XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11892 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11901 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11903 Global Environment Facility To strengthen the ecosystem for microfinance in selected countries and improve global knowledge and implementation of microfinance in locally led climate and biodiversity action Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.As an accredited GEF Agency, the World Bank is fully compliant with the GEF Policies on Environmental and Social Safeguards, Gender Equality, and Stakeholder Engagement and their minimum standards.[1] The World Bank has demonstrated that it has in place the necessary policies, procedures, systems, and capabilities to meet these standards. The World Bank has demonstrated that it has in place the necessary policies, procedures, systems, and capabilities to meet these standards. In December 2019, the GEF Council reviewed document GEF/C.57/05, Report on the Assessment of GEF Agencies’ Compliance with Minimum Standards in the Policies on Environmental and Social Safeguards, Gender Equality, and Stakeholder Engagement. The assessment was conducted by experts engaged by the GEF Secretariat and reviewed the alignment between the World Bank’s Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) and other relevant World Bank policies, procedures, guidelines, and systems and the various requirements and the GEF three policies mentioned above. The expert assessment found that the World Bank met all requirements and is compliant with the minimum standards of the three policies. While the team has interpreted this compliance as covering much of the global program’s potential exposure to environmental and social risks, the team has also completed an additional high-level assessment of potential risks based on the official ESRS conducted for the country projects involved in this global program. The compiled view of these risks and proposed mitigation measures has been provided for transparency in Annex D of this Data Sheet. [1] GEF/C.55/07/Rev.01 (http://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/councilmeetingdocuments/EN_GEF.C.55.07.Rev_.01_ES_Safeguards.pdf) Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Endorsement Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 8174312 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11925 Global Environment Facility To address a gap in well-understood and harmonised definitions, criteria, available guidance and associated capacities for private financial institutions, from both the Global North and Global South, supporting their financing and investment in both real economy players and countries with potential to contribute to the nature positive goal Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.While beyond the scope of the project which will help to strengthen the enabling environment for financing nature-positive, over the medium- to long-terms, the outcomes and outputs of the Finance for Nature Positive project will deliver substantial socioeconomic benefits at both international and national levels by mobilizing financing and investment towards the nature-positive goal. The project has a primarily international focus, bringing together stakeholders from a diverse range of sectors and regions to design its outputs. The framework and implementation materials will be universally applicable, while also accounting for regional contexts. Future impacts of the project include increased investment in real economy players and countries (through sovereign debt) whose operations yield tangible positive outcomes for nature, redirecting finance away from nature-damaging activities and toward activities improving the state of nature?. This is expected to contribute to an improved state of nature and significant progress toward Goal D and Target 19 of the KM-GBF. While the project has an international focus, the project will also develop country-level resources to promote the mobilization of finance in select countries. The project will identify and prioritize countries based on their biodiversity policies and state of nature. By developing country-specific profiles, datasets, and further resources, the project could support national priorities. Country-level project outputs will be complemented by the global framework developed by the project. The project will have at least 230 beneficiaries, of whom at least 40% will be women and 40% will be men. Direct beneficiaries are people benefiting from GEF investments (Core Indicator 11). Under this project, direct beneficiaries are counted as FfB Foundation members —individuals belonging to a financial institution that has signed the Finance for Biodiversity Pledge and participates in working groups— who have reported increased knowledge of and likelihood of investing in or financing the nature-positive goal. Direct beneficiaries will be counted as survey respondents indicating increased appetite for strategies and opportunities that contribute to the nature-positive goal. The projected number of beneficiaries reflects the baseline number and project growth of individuals from financial institutions that are members of the FfB Foundation and active in the FfB community platform.Global Environment Facility WWF-US Finance for Biodiversity Foundation CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 775688 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11933 Global Environment Facility To strengthen the sustainable use, management and conservation of Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs) by enhancing gender-responsive ocean governance, empowering women frontliners in coastal and marine ecosystems and implementing community-led solutions. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility CI Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 3519725 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11935 Global Environment Facility To strengthen the capacity of UNCCD Country Parties on LDN through inclusive decision support Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern CEO Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11941 Global Environment Facility Support countries with advisory and analytical services to identify tangible measures, activities, and investments for enhancing drought resilience Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project will lead to institutional strengthening within government ministries/agencies through improved drought risk management and improved communication with fellow government stakeholders and non-government stakeholders involved in the DRRA process. The process will allow governments to understand the strength of their current drought preparedness and response and prioritize actions to improve this management. This process will strengthen the cross-ministry collaboration to improve this management. The project, especially component 2, will aim to create a community of drought practitioners which will build capacity among political and technical stakeholders and enrich cross-country partnership and collaboration.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 2283105 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11960 Global Environment Facility Accelerate the adoption, scale-up, and investment in Nature-based Solutions (NbS) for cooling and addressing extreme heat. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Implementation of NbS for cooling in the challenge winning cities will reduce extreme heat in identified hot spots of cities and provide natural cooling to the urban poor, who otherwise lack access to mechanical space cooling. Thus, NbS provide several socioeconomic benefits like providing cooling needs equitably and sustainably, reduced health related illness due to exposure to extreme heat, reduced mortality rates, improved health and productivity rates. Areas in a city experiencing UHIE are more vulnerable during heat waves in summer months. Cooling provided by NbS reduces the disaster risk, brings back the lost biodiversity in cities and contributes towards making heat resilient cities. Implementation of NbS also helps in reducing the risk of floods in cities. Benefits of reduced cooling energy demand and hence GHG savings in challenge winning cities shall contribute directly towards global environmental benefits. These have been quantified in the core indicators section.It is estimated that the project will generate savings of USD 1.5 million per country per year due to reduced cooling demand. This calculation is based on today’s simple value of money (USD per kWh).Global Environment Facility UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) - Cool Coalition CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Phnom Penh 11.569583333333 104.92102777778 Yamoussoukro 6.82055 -5.27674 Brasilia -15.77972 -47.92972 3000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11968 Global Environment Facility Foster cooperative management of shared freshwater ecosystems and promote the global transboundary water (TBW) agenda for improved water security and resilience to climate change in shared basins. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.This Project will benefit riparian governments as well as river basin and transboundary aquifer organizations in various ways. Just-in-time support delivered under Pillar 1 is designed to prepare investments that will contribute to the achievement of global environmental benefits as well as transboundary water cooperation. Furthermore, training and development of tools under Pillar 2 will enhance institutional capacity of riparian governments and river basin and aquifer organizations on issues such as flood forecasting, decision support, water accounting, aimed at enhancing climate resilience and sustainable management of shared resources. Knowledge exchange and outreach supported under Pillar 3 are intended to foster new partnerships that facilitate achievement of GEBs and adaptation benefits (e.g. through new partnerships between riparian governments or organizations with development partners).-----------------Stakeholder consultation - brief summary and list of names and dates of consultationsThe 2nd Global Forum on Transboundary Waters held on June 19-20, 2025, in Geneva, co-hosted by the World Bank, Switzerland and the UNECE Secretariat of the Water Convention, provided opportunity to engage with around 90 delegates representing river basin organizations, governments and financing partners from all over the world. The Forum resulted among other in a request for support on innovative financing from the Senegal River Basin Commission (OMVS) as well as support from bilateral partners to collaborate on their initiative related to the Gambia Basin on the same topic. During the 3rd Pan-African Implementation and Partnership Conference on Water (PANAFCON-3) held May 27-29, 2025 in Lusaka, the stakeholder engagement for the Pan-African Study was launched during a session including high-level speakers such as Dr Rashid Mbaziira, Executive Secretary of AMCOW, Harsen Nyambe, Blue Economy and Sustainable Environment Director of the African Union, and Dr Florence Adongo, President of the African Network of Basin Organisations (ANBO) as well as representation of EU and Germany/GIZ in the panel.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 4566210 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11977 Global Environment Facility To design and develop strategies and tools for mercury emission reduction through reduction of coal fired industrial boilers with renewable energy alternatives through Air Quality Management and industrial decarbonization operations. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The proposed MSP is aligned with the Minamata Convention on Mercury and supports the control and reduction of mercury and mercury compound emissions from certain point sources. The project activities thus will contribute to reducing health and environmental impacts to the communities and to GEBs. The MSP is also aligned with the climate change agenda as it, by combining with AQM interventions will contribute to climate mitigation and adaptation efforts.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 1826484 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-12006 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development (MEDD) (Madagascar) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-12112 Global Environment Facility Acceleration of financial investments in maritime decarbonization in developing countries (with a focus on SIDS and LDCs), which is expected to lead to future reductions in GHG emissions, a healthier and more sustainable marine environment, and socio-economic benefits such as job creation and improved access to clean energy. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project will deliver a range of socioeconomic benefits at both national and local levels, particularly in developing countries, including SIDS and LDCs. These benefits are closely linked to the project's overarching goal of accelerating financial investments in maritime decarbonization in developing countries and contribute directly to the achievement of global environmental benefits under the GEF Trust Fund. At the national and local levels, the project will: · Create quality jobs in emerging sectors such as renewable energy, port infrastructure development, and alternative fuel supply chains. The maritime energy transition is expected to generate approximately four million jobs globally, with a significant share in developing countries. · Strengthen institutional capacity by equipping national authorities, port operators, and financial institutions with the tools and knowledge needed to develop and implement bankable decarbonization projects. · Improve access to clean energy by catalyzing investments in renewable energy generation and infrastructure, which are essential for producing alternative marine fuels. · Promote gender equity by addressing persistent gender imbalances in the maritime and energy sectors, ensuring inclusive participation in training, decision-making, and employment opportunities. · Enhance regional cooperation and South-South learning, enabling countries to share best practices and adapt successful financing models to their own contexts. These socioeconomic benefits translate into global environmental benefits by: · Enabling deep reductions in GHG emissions from the maritime sector, which currently accounts for nearly 3% of global emissions. · Supporting the transition to alternative fuels and technologies, which are essential for meeting the IMO’s climate targets. · Strengthening the resilience of supply chains and port operations, contributing to healthier marine ecosystems and reduced pollution. · Unlocking private and domestic capital for climate mitigation, thereby addressing market failures and accelerating the global energy transition. Direct beneficiaries of the project include: · National governments and maritime authorities in developing countries. · Port operators and infrastructure developers. · Local and regional financial institutions. · Technical partners and private sector actors engaged in clean energy and maritime transport. · Women and underrepresented groups in the maritime and energy sectors. By addressing systemic barriers and enabling inclusive, sustainable investment, the project ensures that developing countries can actively participate in and benefit from the global maritime energy transition, while contributing meaningfully to climate mitigation and sustainable development goals.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility EBRD IMO CEO Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 5000000 GEF 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-12173 Global Environment Facility Reduce mercury use in ASGM by advancing formalization and scaling effective solutions through coordinated technical support, stakeholder collaboration, knowledge exchange, and impact assessments Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP NRDC CEO Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-14 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP Chemicals, SPREP, AMAP, SCAR, NAFTA, CEC, RECETOX-TOCOEN, Czech Rep., Ass. per el Desenvolupament de la Ciencia i la Tec., Spain, Uni. of Ibadan, Nigeria, (See NGO info for others) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 532400.00 532400.00 532400.00 532400.00 532400.00 0 UNEP UNEP Chemicals, SPREP, AMAP, SCAR, NAFTA, CEC, RECETOX-TOCOEN, Czech Rep., Ass. per el Desenvolupament de la Ciencia i la Tec., Spain, Uni. of Ibadan, Nigeria, (See NGO info for others) 0 UNEP UNEP Chemicals, SPREP, AMAP, SCAR, NAFTA, CEC, RECETOX-TOCOEN, Czech Rep., Ass. per el Desenvolupament de la Ciencia i la Tec., Spain, Uni. of Ibadan, Nigeria, (See NGO info for others) 0 UNEP UNEP Chemicals, SPREP, AMAP, SCAR, NAFTA, CEC, RECETOX-TOCOEN, Czech Rep., Ass. per el Desenvolupament de la Ciencia i la Tec., Spain, Uni. of Ibadan, Nigeria, (See NGO info for others) 2662000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-23 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 250000.00 250000.00 250000.00 0 UNEP Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 0 UNEP Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 0 UNEP Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 0 UNEP Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 0 UNEP Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 750000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-91 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC IFC-selected intermediaries CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 860000.00 860000.00 860000.00 860000.00 860000.00 0 World Bank IFC-selected intermediaries 0 IFC IFC-selected intermediaries 0 World Bank IFC-selected intermediaries 0 IFC IFC-selected intermediaries 0 World Bank IFC-selected intermediaries 0 IFC IFC-selected intermediaries 4300000 GEF 4300000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-112 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC IFC CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 30000000 GEF 30000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-135 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC IFC-selected intermediaries and IFC co-financed projects CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 3300000.00 3300000.00 3300000.00 3300000.00 3300000.00 0 World Bank IFC-selected intermediaries and IFC co-financed projects 0 IFC IFC-selected intermediaries and IFC co-financed projects 16500000 GEF 16500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-142 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP United Nations University (UNU) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1235260.00 1235260.00 1235260.00 1235260.00 1235260.00 0 UNEP United Nations University (UNU) 0 UNEP United Nations University (UNU) 0 UNEP United Nations University (UNU) 0 UNEP United Nations University (UNU) 6176300 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-173 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 660000.00 660000.00 660000.00 660000.00 660000.00 0 UNEP UNEP 3300000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-186 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 388000.00 388000.00 388000.00 388000.00 388000.00 1940000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-187 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 4800000.00 4800000.00 4800000.00 4800000.00 4800000.00 24000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-277 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS with ICRAF CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 588200.00 588200.00 588200.00 588200.00 588200.00 0 UNDP UNOPS with ICRAF 2941000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-345 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 2600000.00 2600000.00 2600000.00 2600000.00 2600000.00 13000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-378 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 818744.00 818744.00 818744.00 818744.00 818744.00 4093720 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-382 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-384 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP World Meteorlogical Organization CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 960000.00 960000.00 960000.00 960000.00 960000.00 0 UNDP World Meteorlogical Organization 0 UNDP World Meteorlogical Organization 4800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-390 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 3000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-392 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 516600.00 516600.00 516600.00 516600.00 516600.00 0 UNDP UNOPS 2583000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-401 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP IPCC-Secretarait CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 560000.00 560000.00 560000.00 560000.00 560000.00 2800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-413 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP IUCN CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 248333.33 248333.33 248333.33 0 UNEP IUCN 0 UNEP IUCN 0 UNEP IUCN 745000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-465 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Scientific Committee for the Protection of the Environment (SCOPE) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 250000.00 250000.00 250000.00 0 UNEP Scientific Committee for the Protection of the Environment (SCOPE) 0 UNEP Scientific Committee for the Protection of the Environment (SCOPE) 0 UNEP Scientific Committee for the Protection of the Environment (SCOPE) 750000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-501 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS and National Execution (NEX) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 6323800.00 6323800.00 6323800.00 6323800.00 6323800.00 31619000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-502 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank Nationally Executed/UN Office of Project Services CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 702000.00 702000.00 702000.00 702000.00 702000.00 0 UNDP Nationally Executed/UN Office of Project Services 0 UNEP Nationally Executed/UN Office of Project Services 0 World Bank Nationally Executed/UN Office of Project Services 0 UNDP Nationally Executed/UN Office of Project Services 0 UNEP Nationally Executed/UN Office of Project Services 0 World Bank Nationally Executed/UN Office of Project Services 3510000 GEF 3510000 GEF 3510000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-514 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 240000.00 240000.00 240000.00 0 UNEP Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ) 0 UNEP Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ) 0 UNEP Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ) 0 UNEP Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ) 0 UNEP Land-Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ) 720000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-519 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC IFC CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1870000.00 1870000.00 1870000.00 1870000.00 1870000.00 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 9350000 GEF 9350000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-532 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 1012060.00 1012060.00 1012060.00 1012060.00 1012060.00 0 UNDP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNEP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 World Bank UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNDP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNEP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 World Bank UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNDP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNEP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 World Bank UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNDP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNEP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 World Bank UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNDP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNEP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 World Bank UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNDP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNEP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 World Bank UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNDP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNEP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 World Bank UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNDP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 UNEP UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 0 World Bank UNOPS in collaboration with UN-DOALOS 5060300 GEF 5060300 GEF 5060300 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-584 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP in collaboration with GESAMP, SCOPE, ACOPS, WWC, ICSU, Regional Intergovernmental Bodies and National Institutions. CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 1299000.00 1299000.00 1299000.00 1299000.00 1299000.00 0 UNEP UNEP in collaboration with GESAMP, SCOPE, ACOPS, WWC, ICSU, Regional Intergovernmental Bodies and National Institutions. 0 UNEP UNEP in collaboration with GESAMP, SCOPE, ACOPS, WWC, ICSU, Regional Intergovernmental Bodies and National Institutions. 0 UNEP UNEP in collaboration with GESAMP, SCOPE, ACOPS, WWC, ICSU, Regional Intergovernmental Bodies and National Institutions. 0 UNEP UNEP in collaboration with GESAMP, SCOPE, ACOPS, WWC, ICSU, Regional Intergovernmental Bodies and National Institutions. 0 UNEP UNEP in collaboration with GESAMP, SCOPE, ACOPS, WWC, ICSU, Regional Intergovernmental Bodies and National Institutions. 0 UNEP UNEP in collaboration with GESAMP, SCOPE, ACOPS, WWC, ICSU, Regional Intergovernmental Bodies and National Institutions. 6495000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-595 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC IFC CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 2000000.00 2000000.00 2000000.00 2000000.00 2000000.00 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 0 World Bank IFC 0 IFC IFC 10000000 GEF 10000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-610 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 1478400.00 1478400.00 1478400.00 1478400.00 1478400.00 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 7392000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-611 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 250000.00 250000.00 250000.00 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 750000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-612 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank The World Conservation Union CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 233333.33 233333.33 233333.33 0 World Bank The World Conservation Union 700000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-616 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Earth Council CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 241666.67 241666.67 241666.67 725000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-667 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 World Bank Special Fund Management Company; IFC 0 IFC Special Fund Management Company; IFC 30000000 GEF 30000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-770 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Resources Institute in collobration with UNEP,UNDP, WB, WRI, IUCN, FAO, UNESCO, ICSU CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1392000.00 1392000.00 1392000.00 1392000.00 1392000.00 0 UNEP World Resources Institute in collobration with UNEP,UNDP, WB, WRI, IUCN, FAO, UNESCO, ICSU 0 UNEP World Resources Institute in collobration with UNEP,UNDP, WB, WRI, IUCN, FAO, UNESCO, ICSU 0 UNEP World Resources Institute in collobration with UNEP,UNDP, WB, WRI, IUCN, FAO, UNESCO, ICSU 0 UNEP World Resources Institute in collobration with UNEP,UNDP, WB, WRI, IUCN, FAO, UNESCO, ICSU 0 UNEP World Resources Institute in collobration with UNEP,UNDP, WB, WRI, IUCN, FAO, UNESCO, ICSU 0 UNEP World Resources Institute in collobration with UNEP,UNDP, WB, WRI, IUCN, FAO, UNESCO, ICSU 6960000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-792 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 4564600.00 4564600.00 4564600.00 4564600.00 4564600.00 22823000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-819 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNDP/IFC CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 230333.33 230333.33 230333.33 0 UNEP UNDP/IFC 0 UNEP UNDP/IFC 0 UNEP UNDP/IFC 691000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-836 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Conservation International CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 5000000.00 5000000.00 5000000.00 5000000.00 5000000.00 0 World Bank Conservation International 0 World Bank Conservation International 0 World Bank Conservation International 0 World Bank Conservation International 25000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-874 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP START, Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1500000.00 1500000.00 1500000.00 1500000.00 1500000.00 0 UNEP START, Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 0 UNEP START, Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 0 UNEP START, Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 0 UNEP START, Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 0 UNEP START, Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 0 UNEP START, Third World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) 7500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-884 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO FAO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 890000.00 890000.00 890000.00 890000.00 890000.00 0 UNEP FAO 0 FAO FAO 0 UNEP FAO 0 FAO FAO 0 UNEP FAO 0 FAO FAO 0 UNEP FAO 0 FAO FAO 0 UNEP FAO 0 FAO FAO 0 UNEP FAO 0 FAO FAO 0 UNEP FAO 0 FAO FAO 4450000 GEF 4450000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-920 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Multiple operating partners, including World Bank, UN DESA, IMF, WTO, IEA, ISO, CESES and UNOPS as management partner CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 255000.00 255000.00 255000.00 255000.00 255000.00 0 UNEP Multiple operating partners, including World Bank, UN DESA, IMF, WTO, IEA, ISO, CESES and UNOPS as management partner 0 UNEP Multiple operating partners, including World Bank, UN DESA, IMF, WTO, IEA, ISO, CESES and UNOPS as management partner 1275000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1016 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (Chemicals Unit) National Executing Agencies of participating countries CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1167000.00 1167000.00 1167000.00 1167000.00 1167000.00 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (Chemicals Unit) National Executing Agencies of participating countries 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (Chemicals Unit) National Executing Agencies of participating countries 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (Chemicals Unit) National Executing Agencies of participating countries 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (Chemicals Unit) National Executing Agencies of participating countries 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (Chemicals Unit) National Executing Agencies of participating countries 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (Chemicals Unit) National Executing Agencies of participating countries 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (Chemicals Unit) National Executing Agencies of participating countries 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (Chemicals Unit) National Executing Agencies of participating countries 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (Chemicals Unit) National Executing Agencies of participating countries 5835000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1019 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP World Meteorlogical Organization CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 244252.80 244252.80 244252.80 244252.80 244252.80 0 UNDP World Meteorlogical Organization 0 UNDP World Meteorlogical Organization 0 UNDP World Meteorlogical Organization 1221264 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1024 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 325000.00 325000.00 325000.00 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 975000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1223 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNIDO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 1361360.00 1361360.00 1361360.00 1361360.00 1361360.00 0 UNDP UNIDO 0 UNDP UNIDO 0 UNDP UNIDO 0 UNDP UNIDO 0 UNDP UNIDO 0 UNDP UNIDO 6806800 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1224 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Brazil: Universidade Federal de Lavras, Cote d'Ivore: Universite de Cocody (Abidjan), India: Jawaharlal Nehru University, Indonesia: Universitas Lampung, Kenya: National Museums of Kenya, Mexico: Instituto de Ecologia, Xalapa, Uganda: Makere Univer CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1004529.20 1004529.20 1004529.20 1004529.20 1004529.20 0 UNEP Brazil: Universidade Federal de Lavras, Cote d'Ivore: Universite de Cocody (Abidjan), India: Jawaharlal Nehru University, Indonesia: Universitas Lampung, Kenya: National Museums of Kenya, Mexico: Instituto de Ecologia, Xalapa, Uganda: Makere Univer 0 UNEP Brazil: Universidade Federal de Lavras, Cote d'Ivore: Universite de Cocody (Abidjan), India: Jawaharlal Nehru University, Indonesia: Universitas Lampung, Kenya: National Museums of Kenya, Mexico: Instituto de Ecologia, Xalapa, Uganda: Makere Univer 0 UNEP Brazil: Universidade Federal de Lavras, Cote d'Ivore: Universite de Cocody (Abidjan), India: Jawaharlal Nehru University, Indonesia: Universitas Lampung, Kenya: National Museums of Kenya, Mexico: Instituto de Ecologia, Xalapa, Uganda: Makere Univer 0 UNEP Brazil: Universidade Federal de Lavras, Cote d'Ivore: Universite de Cocody (Abidjan), India: Jawaharlal Nehru University, Indonesia: Universitas Lampung, Kenya: National Museums of Kenya, Mexico: Instituto de Ecologia, Xalapa, Uganda: Makere Univer 0 UNEP Brazil: Universidade Federal de Lavras, Cote d'Ivore: Universite de Cocody (Abidjan), India: Jawaharlal Nehru University, Indonesia: Universitas Lampung, Kenya: National Museums of Kenya, Mexico: Instituto de Ecologia, Xalapa, Uganda: Makere Univer 5022646 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1281 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP/DTIE CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1302400.00 1302400.00 1302400.00 1302400.00 1302400.00 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 6512000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1315 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Education Development Center (EDC) 55 Chapel Street, Newton, MA 02458, USA CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 266666.67 266666.67 266666.67 0 World Bank Education Development Center (EDC) 55 Chapel Street, Newton, MA 02458, USA 0 World Bank Education Development Center (EDC) 55 Chapel Street, Newton, MA 02458, USA 800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1328 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP-WCMC CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 300000.00 300000.00 300000.00 0 UNEP UNEP-WCMC 900000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1329 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ 1400000.00 1400000.00 1400000.00 1400000.00 1400000.00 0 UNEP Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 0 UNEP Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 0 UNEP Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 0 UNEP Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 0 UNEP Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 0 UNEP Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 7000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1340 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 316666.67 316666.67 316666.67 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1378 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP International Development Centre of the University of Reading, UK, CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 326000.00 326000.00 326000.00 0 UNEP International Development Centre of the University of Reading, UK, 0 UNEP International Development Centre of the University of Reading, UK, 0 UNEP International Development Centre of the University of Reading, UK, 0 UNEP International Development Centre of the University of Reading, UK, 978000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1430 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP Chemicals CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 193333.33 193333.33 193333.33 0 UNEP UNEP Chemicals 0 UNEP UNEP Chemicals 580000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1439 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC International Finance Corporation CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1418000.00 1418000.00 1418000.00 1418000.00 1418000.00 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 7090000 GEF 7090000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1455 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP SIDSNet. CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNDP SIDSNet. 0 UNDP SIDSNet. 0 UNDP SIDSNet. 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1484 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 4142400.00 4142400.00 4142400.00 4142400.00 4142400.00 20712000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1486 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP IUCN CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 332166.67 332166.67 332166.67 0 UNEP IUCN 0 UNEP IUCN 0 UNEP IUCN 0 UNEP IUCN 0 UNEP IUCN 0 UNEP IUCN 996500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1531 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank University of Queensland, UNESCO/IOC CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 2200000.00 2200000.00 2200000.00 2200000.00 2200000.00 0 World Bank University of Queensland, UNESCO/IOC 0 World Bank University of Queensland, UNESCO/IOC 0 World Bank University of Queensland, UNESCO/IOC 0 World Bank University of Queensland, UNESCO/IOC 0 World Bank University of Queensland, UNESCO/IOC 0 World Bank University of Queensland, UNESCO/IOC 11000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1588 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Legislators Oragnization for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE) International CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 83333.33 83333.33 83333.33 0 UNEP Global Legislators Oragnization for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE) International 0 UNEP Global Legislators Oragnization for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE) International 250000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1599 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP and KfW CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 325000.00 325000.00 325000.00 0 UNEP UNEP and KfW 0 UNEP UNEP and KfW 0 UNEP UNEP and KfW 0 UNEP UNEP and KfW 0 UNEP UNEP and KfW 0 UNEP UNEP and KfW 0 UNEP UNEP and KfW 975000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1605 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 66666.67 66666.67 66666.67 200000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1609 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Energy generation, renewable sources - multiple technologies]]+ 1680000.00 1680000.00 1680000.00 1680000.00 1680000.00 0 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 3953184 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 3953184 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 UNEP United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 0 ADB United Nations Evironment Programme/Division of Technology Industry and Economics 8400000 GEF 8400000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1665 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank International Lake Environment Committee Foundation (ILEC) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 321914.67 321914.67 321914.67 0 World Bank International Lake Environment Committee Foundation (ILEC) 0 World Bank International Lake Environment Committee Foundation (ILEC) 965744 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1685 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC International Finance Corporation PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation 0 IFC International Finance Corporation XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1769 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Lead Agencies - Wetland Internationals and The Global Environment Centre working with a range of national and international partner organizations and institutions CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 324235.00 324235.00 324235.00 0 UNEP Lead Agencies - Wetland Internationals and The Global Environment Centre working with a range of national and international partner organizations and institutions 0 UNEP Lead Agencies - Wetland Internationals and The Global Environment Centre working with a range of national and international partner organizations and institutions 0 UNEP Lead Agencies - Wetland Internationals and The Global Environment Centre working with a range of national and international partner organizations and institutions 0 UNEP Lead Agencies - Wetland Internationals and The Global Environment Centre working with a range of national and international partner organizations and institutions 0 UNEP Lead Agencies - Wetland Internationals and The Global Environment Centre working with a range of national and international partner organizations and institutions 972705 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1802 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Health or Environment Ministry in each participating country in cooperation with HCWH and WHO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 2065291.00 2065291.00 2065291.00 2065291.00 2065291.00 0 UNDP Health or Environment Ministry in each participating country in cooperation with HCWH and WHO 0 UNDP Health or Environment Ministry in each participating country in cooperation with HCWH and WHO 0 UNDP Health or Environment Ministry in each participating country in cooperation with HCWH and WHO 0 UNDP Health or Environment Ministry in each participating country in cooperation with HCWH and WHO 0 UNDP Health or Environment Ministry in each participating country in cooperation with HCWH and WHO 0 UNDP Health or Environment Ministry in each participating country in cooperation with HCWH and WHO 10326455 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1807 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility GEFSEC CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 520000.00 520000.00 520000.00 520000.00 520000.00 2600000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1818 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 5399400.00 5399400.00 5399400.00 5399400.00 5399400.00 26997000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1842 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP International Alliance of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Tropical Forests (IAITPTF) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 304614.67 304614.67 304614.67 0 UNEP International Alliance of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Tropical Forests (IAITPTF) 0 UNEP International Alliance of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Tropical Forests (IAITPTF) 0 UNEP International Alliance of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Tropical Forests (IAITPTF) 0 UNEP International Alliance of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Tropical Forests (IAITPTF) 0 UNEP International Alliance of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Tropical Forests (IAITPTF) 913844 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1856 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP Chemicals Unit CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 101333.33 101333.33 101333.33 304000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1893 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 1256921.40 1256921.40 1256921.40 1256921.40 1256921.40 0 UNDP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNEP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 World Bank United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNDP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNEP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 World Bank United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNDP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNEP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 World Bank United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNDP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNEP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 World Bank United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNDP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNEP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 World Bank United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNDP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNEP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 World Bank United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNDP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNEP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 World Bank United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNDP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNEP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 World Bank United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNDP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 UNEP United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 0 World Bank United Nations Office of Project Services (UNOPS) 6284607 GEF 6284607 GEF 6284607 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1895 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP CIFOR, FSC INT, PROFOREST, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative of Brazil, Forest Stewardship Council Regional Office in Cameroon, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative in Mexico CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 320666.67 320666.67 320666.67 0 UNEP CIFOR, FSC INT, PROFOREST, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative of Brazil, Forest Stewardship Council Regional Office in Cameroon, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative in Mexico 0 UNEP CIFOR, FSC INT, PROFOREST, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative of Brazil, Forest Stewardship Council Regional Office in Cameroon, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative in Mexico 0 UNEP CIFOR, FSC INT, PROFOREST, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative of Brazil, Forest Stewardship Council Regional Office in Cameroon, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative in Mexico 0 UNEP CIFOR, FSC INT, PROFOREST, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative of Brazil, Forest Stewardship Council Regional Office in Cameroon, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative in Mexico 0 UNEP CIFOR, FSC INT, PROFOREST, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative of Brazil, Forest Stewardship Council Regional Office in Cameroon, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative in Mexico 0 UNEP CIFOR, FSC INT, PROFOREST, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative of Brazil, Forest Stewardship Council Regional Office in Cameroon, Forest Stewardship Council National Initiative in Mexico 962000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1917 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Institute for Transportation Development Policy (ITDP) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 241531.67 241531.67 241531.67 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 0 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 724242 UNEP Institute for Transportation & Development Policy (ITDP) 724595 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1952 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP IUCN CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNEP IUCN 0 UNEP IUCN 0 UNEP IUCN 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2000 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 20000000 GEF 20000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2043 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP, GRID-Arendal with national agencies CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 402800.00 402800.00 402800.00 402800.00 402800.00 0 UNEP UNEP, GRID-Arendal with national agencies 0 UNEP UNEP, GRID-Arendal with national agencies 0 UNEP UNEP, GRID-Arendal with national agencies 0 UNEP UNEP, GRID-Arendal with national agencies 0 UNEP UNEP, GRID-Arendal with national agencies 0 UNEP UNEP, GRID-Arendal with national agencies 2014000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2045 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility GEFSEC UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1154980.00 1154980.00 1154980.00 1154980.00 1154980.00 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 World Bank UNOPS 0 GEFSEC UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 World Bank UNOPS 0 GEFSEC UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 World Bank UNOPS 0 GEFSEC UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 World Bank UNOPS 0 GEFSEC UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 World Bank UNOPS 0 GEFSEC UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 World Bank UNOPS 0 GEFSEC UNOPS 5774900 GEF 5774900 GEF 5774900 GEF 5774900 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2067 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Environmental Health Fund with support from UNIDO to oversee project execution and quality at the global level. Numerous NGOs to undertake project activities at national levels. CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNEP Environmental Health Fund with support from UNIDO to oversee project execution and quality at the global level. Numerous NGOs to undertake project activities at national levels. 0 UNIDO Environmental Health Fund with support from UNIDO to oversee project execution and quality at the global level. Numerous NGOs to undertake project activities at national levels. 0 UNEP Environmental Health Fund with support from UNIDO to oversee project execution and quality at the global level. Numerous NGOs to undertake project activities at national levels. 0 UNIDO Environmental Health Fund with support from UNIDO to oversee project execution and quality at the global level. Numerous NGOs to undertake project activities at national levels. 0 UNEP Environmental Health Fund with support from UNIDO to oversee project execution and quality at the global level. Numerous NGOs to undertake project activities at national levels. 0 UNIDO Environmental Health Fund with support from UNIDO to oversee project execution and quality at the global level. Numerous NGOs to undertake project activities at national levels. 1000000 GEF 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2092 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Wildlife Fund-US CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 325000.00 325000.00 325000.00 0 UNEP World Wildlife Fund-US 0 UNEP World Wildlife Fund-US 0 UNEP World Wildlife Fund-US 0 UNEP World Wildlife Fund-US 0 UNEP World Wildlife Fund-US 0 UNEP World Wildlife Fund-US 975000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2123 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP FAO (other EA listed under remarks) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Ghana India Kenya Nepal Pakistan South Africa Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1562136.40 1562136.40 1562136.40 1562136.40 1562136.40 0 UNEP FAO (other EA listed under remarks) 0 UNEP FAO (other EA listed under remarks) 0 UNEP FAO (other EA listed under remarks) 0 UNEP FAO (other EA listed under remarks) 0 UNEP FAO (other EA listed under remarks) 0 UNEP FAO (other EA listed under remarks) 7663832 UNEP FAO (other EA listed under remarks) 7810682 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2127 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Algeria: Ministère de l’aménagement du territoire et de l’environnement ; Chile: Centro de Tecnología y Educación /CET ; China: Ministry of Agriculture/MOA ; Peru: National Environmental Council /CONAMA. (see Remarks for other executing agencies) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile China Algeria Peru Philippines Tunisia Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 700000.00 700000.00 700000.00 700000.00 700000.00 0 FAO Algeria: Ministère de l’aménagement du territoire et de l’environnement ; Chile: Centro de Tecnología y Educación /CET ; China: Ministry of Agriculture/MOA ; Peru: National Environmental Council /CONAMA. (see Remarks for other executing agencies) 0 FAO Algeria: Ministère de l’aménagement du territoire et de l’environnement ; Chile: Centro de Tecnología y Educación /CET ; China: Ministry of Agriculture/MOA ; Peru: National Environmental Council /CONAMA. (see Remarks for other executing agencies) 0 FAO Algeria: Ministère de l’aménagement du territoire et de l’environnement ; Chile: Centro de Tecnología y Educación /CET ; China: Ministry of Agriculture/MOA ; Peru: National Environmental Council /CONAMA. (see Remarks for other executing agencies) 0 FAO Algeria: Ministère de l’aménagement du territoire et de l’environnement ; Chile: Centro de Tecnología y Educación /CET ; China: Ministry of Agriculture/MOA ; Peru: National Environmental Council /CONAMA. (see Remarks for other executing agencies) 0 FAO Algeria: Ministère de l’aménagement du territoire et de l’environnement ; Chile: Centro de Tecnología y Educación /CET ; China: Ministry of Agriculture/MOA ; Peru: National Environmental Council /CONAMA. (see Remarks for other executing agencies) 0 FAO Algeria: Ministère de l’aménagement du territoire et de l’environnement ; Chile: Centro de Tecnología y Educación /CET ; China: Ministry of Agriculture/MOA ; Peru: National Environmental Council /CONAMA. (see Remarks for other executing agencies) 3500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2128 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP United Nations Environment Programme in co-operation with the Secretariat of the CBD CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 923000.00 923000.00 923000.00 923000.00 923000.00 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme in co-operation with the Secretariat of the CBD 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme in co-operation with the Secretariat of the CBD 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme in co-operation with the Secretariat of the CBD 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme in co-operation with the Secretariat of the CBD 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme in co-operation with the Secretariat of the CBD 4615000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2167 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP in collaboration with the GEF IAs and Eas and the GEF Secretariat CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ 240500.00 240500.00 240500.00 0 UNEP UNEP in collaboration with the GEF IAs and Eas and the GEF Secretariat 0 UNEP UNEP in collaboration with the GEF IAs and Eas and the GEF Secretariat 0 UNEP UNEP in collaboration with the GEF IAs and Eas and the GEF Secretariat 0 UNEP UNEP in collaboration with the GEF IAs and Eas and the GEF Secretariat 721500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2193 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Dryland Development Center of UNDP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ 316666.67 316666.67 316666.67 0 UNDP Dryland Development Center of UNDP 0 UNDP Dryland Development Center of UNDP 0 UNDP Dryland Development Center of UNDP 0 UNDP Dryland Development Center of UNDP 950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2261 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 1137600.00 1137600.00 1137600.00 1137600.00 1137600.00 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 0 UNDP International Maritime Organization (IMO) 5688000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2328 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNDP United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) 0 UNDP United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) 0 UNDP United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) 0 UNDP United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2341 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1043684.00 1043684.00 1043684.00 1043684.00 1043684.00 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 5218420 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2342 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT (TSBF) PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 0 UNEP Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT (TSBF) 0 UNEP Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT (TSBF) 0 UNEP Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT (TSBF) 0 UNEP Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT (TSBF) 0 UNEP Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT (TSBF) 0 UNEP Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT (TSBF) 0 UNEP Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of CIAT (TSBF) 4007124 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2367 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 6240000.00 6240000.00 6240000.00 6240000.00 6240000.00 31200000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2407 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2423 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP Chemicals Unit CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 131666.67 131666.67 131666.67 0 UNEP UNEP Chemicals Unit 0 UNEP UNEP Chemicals Unit 0 UNEP UNEP Chemicals Unit 0 UNEP UNEP Chemicals Unit 0 UNEP UNEP Chemicals Unit 395000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2441 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNDP in cooperation with others PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 0 UNDP UNDP in cooperation with others 0 UNDP UNDP in cooperation with others 0 UNDP UNDP in cooperation with others 0 UNDP UNDP in cooperation with others 0 UNDP UNDP in cooperation with others 0 UNDP UNDP in cooperation with others 0 UNDP UNDP in cooperation with others 0 UNDP UNDP in cooperation with others 0 UNDP UNDP in cooperation with others 26858618 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2474 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Council of Fisheries Societies and IOC-UNESCO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 331666.67 331666.67 331666.67 0 UNEP World Council of Fisheries Societies and IOC-UNESCO 0 UNEP World Council of Fisheries Societies and IOC-UNESCO 0 UNEP World Council of Fisheries Societies and IOC-UNESCO 0 UNEP World Council of Fisheries Societies and IOC-UNESCO 0 UNEP World Council of Fisheries Societies and IOC-UNESCO 995000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2495 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 376770.40 376770.40 376770.40 376770.40 376770.40 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNEP UNOPS 1883852 GEF 1883852 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2503 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank UNEP, UNDP, FAO, World Bank and UNESCO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 0 UNEP UNEP, UNDP, FAO, World Bank and UNESCO 0 World Bank UNEP, UNDP, FAO, World Bank and UNESCO 0 UNEP UNEP, UNDP, FAO, World Bank and UNESCO 0 World Bank UNEP, UNDP, FAO, World Bank and UNESCO 0 UNEP UNEP, UNDP, FAO, World Bank and UNESCO 0 World Bank UNEP, UNDP, FAO, World Bank and UNESCO 3000000 GEF 3000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2538 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Energy generation, renewable sources - multiple technologies]]+ 323000.00 323000.00 323000.00 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 969000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2557 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 241200.00 241200.00 241200.00 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 723600 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2580 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 9400000.00 9400000.00 9400000.00 9400000.00 9400000.00 47000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2581 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1781140.00 1781140.00 1781140.00 1781140.00 1781140.00 0 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 8905700 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2582 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 521841.60 521841.60 521841.60 521841.60 521841.60 0 UNEP UNEP 2609208 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2589 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1063495.40 1063495.40 1063495.40 1063495.40 1063495.40 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 5317477 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2592 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 25000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2593 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 3000000.00 3000000.00 3000000.00 3000000.00 3000000.00 15000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2613 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1880000.00 1880000.00 1880000.00 1880000.00 1880000.00 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 9400000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2618 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) 0 IFC International Finance Corporation (IFC) 7000000 GEF 7000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-12258 Global Environment Facility Develop and operationalize an AI-enabled Global environmental benefits calculator (GEBs Calculator) that improves the accuracy, consistency, comparability, and transparency of reporting under GEF Core Indicator 9 across the GEF partnership, by harmonizing methodologies, reducing double-counting, strengthening causal attribution, and enhancing capacity for standardized data collection, validation, and analysis in alignment with the GEF Results Management Framework Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO UNIDO CEO Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 3500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-12259 Global Environment Facility Global Green and Sustainable Chemistry capacity building across countries, and establishment of regional networks Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Center for Green Chemistry and Green Engineering at Yale CEO Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 3711000 GEF 3711000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-12307 Global Environment Facility To enhance access to, and use of, data, analytics, and knowledge to support the improved design, implementation and outcomes of GEF’s Pollution (Chemicals Waste) operations Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Approval Date ' 5000000 GEF 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-12309 Global Environment Facility To catalyze durable global action on sustainable rangeland management and Land Degradation Neutrality by generating knowledge, facilitating investment and strengthening South-South cooperation, anchored in Mongolia’s UNCCD COP17 Presidency (2026-2028). Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Mongolia (MECC) CEO Approval Date ' Mongolia Developing countries, unspecified 2972375 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2713 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP-DGEF and National Agencies CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2714 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 1996246 UNDP NA 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2718 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 World Bank NA 0 World Bank NA 0 World Bank NA 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2722 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP IOC/UNESCO in cooperation with INTERNATIONAL COAST AND OCEAN ORGANIZATION, NEPAD/COSMAR, IOCARIBE, PEMSEA, SOPAC, EPOMEX/SEMARNAT/CCA, WON CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 331533.33 331533.33 331533.33 0 UNEP IOC/UNESCO in cooperation with INTERNATIONAL COAST AND OCEAN ORGANIZATION, NEPAD/COSMAR, IOCARIBE, PEMSEA, SOPAC, EPOMEX/SEMARNAT/CCA, WON 0 UNEP IOC/UNESCO in cooperation with INTERNATIONAL COAST AND OCEAN ORGANIZATION, NEPAD/COSMAR, IOCARIBE, PEMSEA, SOPAC, EPOMEX/SEMARNAT/CCA, WON 0 UNEP IOC/UNESCO in cooperation with INTERNATIONAL COAST AND OCEAN ORGANIZATION, NEPAD/COSMAR, IOCARIBE, PEMSEA, SOPAC, EPOMEX/SEMARNAT/CCA, WON 0 UNEP IOC/UNESCO in cooperation with INTERNATIONAL COAST AND OCEAN ORGANIZATION, NEPAD/COSMAR, IOCARIBE, PEMSEA, SOPAC, EPOMEX/SEMARNAT/CCA, WON 994600 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2774 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 905028.00 905028.00 905028.00 905028.00 905028.00 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 4525140 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2796 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP-WCMC CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 727800.00 727800.00 727800.00 727800.00 727800.00 0 UNEP UNEP-WCMC 0 UNEP UNEP-WCMC 0 UNEP UNEP-WCMC 0 UNEP UNEP-WCMC 0 UNEP UNEP-WCMC 3639000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2815 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNITAR CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 233333.33 233333.33 233333.33 0 UNDP UNITAR 0 UNDP UNITAR 0 UNDP UNITAR 700000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2856 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Fish Center CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 313333.33 313333.33 313333.33 0 UNEP World Fish Center 0 UNEP World Fish Center 0 UNEP World Fish Center 0 UNEP World Fish Center 0 UNEP World Fish Center 940000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2863 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNU-INWEH CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ 317516.67 317516.67 317516.67 0 UNDP UNU-INWEH 0 UNDP UNU-INWEH 0 UNDP UNU-INWEH 0 UNDP UNU-INWEH 0 UNDP UNU-INWEH 952550 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2871 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP)/ SENER CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2880 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP PIF Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2899 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP GEF Agencies CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 2372980.40 2372980.40 2372980.40 2372980.40 2372980.40 0 UNDP GEF Agencies 0 UNEP GEF Agencies 0 UNDP GEF Agencies 0 UNEP GEF Agencies 0 UNDP GEF Agencies 0 UNEP GEF Agencies 0 UNDP GEF Agencies 0 UNEP GEF Agencies 11864902 GEF 11864902 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2900 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank The World Bank CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2939 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Solar energy for centralised grids]]+ 2400000.00 2400000.00 2400000.00 2400000.00 2400000.00 0 UNDP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNDP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNDP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNDP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNDP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNDP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNDP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNDP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE, UNDP National Execution (NEX), Agencies of the Participating Countries 12000000 GEF 12000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2949 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Conservation International CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 0 World Bank Conservation International 0 World Bank Conservation International 0 World Bank Conservation International 0 World Bank Conservation International 0 World Bank Conservation International 0 World Bank Conservation International 0 World Bank Conservation International 20000000 World Bank Conservation International 0 World Bank Conservation International 20000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3036 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ 171000.00 171000.00 171000.00 0 UNDP UNOPS 513000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3037 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Yunan Agricultural University, Kumming, Yunnan, China PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 0 UNEP Yunan Agricultural University, Kumming, Yunnan, China 0 UNEP Yunan Agricultural University, Kumming, Yunnan, China 0 UNEP Yunan Agricultural University, Kumming, Yunnan, China 0 UNEP Yunan Agricultural University, Kumming, Yunnan, China 0 UNEP Yunan Agricultural University, Kumming, Yunnan, China 3411148 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3060 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IFAD IFAD CEO Approval Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ 212400.00 212400.00 212400.00 0 IFAD IFAD 637200 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3138 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP IUCN-World Conservation Union CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 316666.67 316666.67 316666.67 0 UNDP IUCN-World Conservation Union 0 UNDP IUCN-World Conservation Union 0 UNDP IUCN-World Conservation Union 0 UNDP IUCN-World Conservation Union 0 UNDP IUCN-World Conservation Union 950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3145 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 20000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3181 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNEP/GPA CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNDP UNEP/GPA 0 UNDP UNEP/GPA 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3224 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP/DTIE CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 323333.33 323333.33 323333.33 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP/DTIE 970000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3228 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UN Office of Project Services PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 106000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3340 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNDP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 316666.67 316666.67 316666.67 0 UNDP UNDP 0 UNDP UNDP 0 UNDP UNDP 0 UNDP UNDP 950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3342 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP/DEWA CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 316666.67 316666.67 316666.67 0 UNEP UNEP/DEWA 0 UNEP UNEP/DEWA 950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3343 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNU-INWEH CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental research]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNEP UNU-INWEH 0 UNEP UNU-INWEH 0 UNEP UNU-INWEH 0 UNEP UNU-INWEH 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3348 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP and UNITAR CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 316666.67 316666.67 316666.67 0 UNEP UNEP and UNITAR 0 UNEP UNEP and UNITAR 0 UNEP UNEP and UNITAR 400962 UNEP UNEP and UNITAR 935200 UNEP UNEP and UNITAR 950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3349 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Health Organization CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 253800.00 253800.00 253800.00 0 UNEP World Health Organization 0 UNEP World Health Organization 0 UNEP World Health Organization 0 UNEP World Health Organization 0 UNEP World Health Organization 761400 UNEP World Health Organization 761400 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3357 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC Private sector participants TBD PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 0 World Bank Private sector participants TBD 0 IFC Private sector participants TBD 0 World Bank Private sector participants TBD 0 IFC Private sector participants TBD 0 World Bank Private sector participants TBD 0 IFC Private sector participants TBD 0 World Bank Private sector participants TBD 0 IFC Private sector participants TBD 0 World Bank Private sector participants TBD 0 IFC Private sector participants TBD 0 World Bank Private sector participants TBD 0 IFC Private sector participants TBD XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3361 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank First Peoples Worldwide CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 83333.33 83333.33 83333.33 0 World Bank First Peoples Worldwide 0 World Bank First Peoples Worldwide 250000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3414 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP National Ministries/Departments of Environment in the countries CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNDP National Ministries/Departments of Environment in the countries 0 UNEP National Ministries/Departments of Environment in the countries 1000000 GEF 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3415 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Environment; Forest and Water Administration CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 325000.00 325000.00 325000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment; Forest and Water Administration 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment; Forest and Water Administration 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment; Forest and Water Administration 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment; Forest and Water Administration 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment; Forest and Water Administration 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment; Forest and Water Administration 975000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3417 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Nature Protection CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 300000.00 300000.00 300000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Nature Protection 0 UNDP Ministry of Nature Protection 0 UNDP Ministry of Nature Protection 0 UNDP Ministry of Nature Protection 0 UNDP Ministry of Nature Protection 900000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3449 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank UNEP Division of Early Warning Assessment, DEWA (in collaboration with Colorado State University and World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1105252.80 1105252.80 1105252.80 1105252.80 1105252.80 0 UNEP UNEP Division of Early Warning & Assessment, DEWA (in collaboration with Colorado State University and World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF) 0 World Bank UNEP Division of Early Warning & Assessment, DEWA (in collaboration with Colorado State University and World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF) 0 UNEP UNEP Division of Early Warning & Assessment, DEWA (in collaboration with Colorado State University and World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF) 0 World Bank UNEP Division of Early Warning & Assessment, DEWA (in collaboration with Colorado State University and World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF) 0 UNEP UNEP Division of Early Warning & Assessment, DEWA (in collaboration with Colorado State University and World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF) 0 World Bank UNEP Division of Early Warning & Assessment, DEWA (in collaboration with Colorado State University and World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF) 0 UNEP UNEP Division of Early Warning & Assessment, DEWA (in collaboration with Colorado State University and World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF) 0 World Bank UNEP Division of Early Warning & Assessment, DEWA (in collaboration with Colorado State University and World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF) 5526264 GEF 5526264 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3514 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Argentina Bulgaria Bolivia Brazil Belarus Cote d'Ivoire Chile Costa Rica Cuba Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Fiji Honduras Haiti Indonesia Jamaica Kenya Cambodia Kazakhstan Sri Lanka Morocco Madagascar Mauritius Malaysia Mozambique Namibia Panama Peru Pakistan Romania Syria Thailand Türkiye Tanzania Uganda Viet Nam +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 2729499.60 2729499.60 2729499.60 2729499.60 2729499.60 0 UNDP NA 13647498 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3515 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Cameroon India Iran Mexico Philippines South Africa +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 799818.60 799818.60 799818.60 799818.60 799818.60 3999093 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3541 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO UNIDO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Russian Federation Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Energy policy and administrative management]]+ 3600000.00 3600000.00 3600000.00 3600000.00 3600000.00 0 UNIDO UNIDO 0 UNIDO UNIDO 0 UNIDO UNIDO 0 UNIDO UNIDO 0 UNIDO UNIDO 0 UNIDO UNIDO 17895477 UNIDO UNIDO 0 UNIDO UNIDO 18000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3639 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility ADB UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 540000.00 540000.00 540000.00 540000.00 540000.00 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 ADB UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 ADB UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 ADB UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 ADB UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 ADB UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 ADB UNOPS 2700000 GEF 2700000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3648 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP WHO PIF Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3654 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3660 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Dryland Development Center of UNDP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ 100000.00 100000.00 100000.00 0 UNDP Dryland Development Center of UNDP 0 UNDP Dryland Development Center of UNDP 0 UNDP Dryland Development Center of UNDP 0 UNDP Dryland Development Center of UNDP 300000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3681 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3691 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Wildlife Conservation Society CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 316666.67 316666.67 316666.67 0 World Bank Wildlife Conservation Society 0 World Bank Wildlife Conservation Society 950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3707 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Center CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental education/training]]+ 280000.00 280000.00 280000.00 0 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Center 0 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Center 0 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Center 0 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Center 0 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Center 840000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3726 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO UNESCO, International Association of Hydrogeological (IAH) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 350000.00 350000.00 350000.00 350000.00 350000.00 0 FAO UNESCO, International Association of Hydrogeological (IAH) 0 FAO UNESCO, International Association of Hydrogeological (IAH) 0 FAO UNESCO, International Association of Hydrogeological (IAH) 0 FAO UNESCO, International Association of Hydrogeological (IAH) 0 FAO UNESCO, International Association of Hydrogeological (IAH) 0 FAO UNESCO, International Association of Hydrogeological (IAH) 0 FAO UNESCO, International Association of Hydrogeological (IAH) 1750000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3746 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP National Ministries/Departments of Environment in the countries CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1000000 GEF 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3778 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Stockholm Convention Centre Uruguay, UNEP Chemicals CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 281666.67 281666.67 281666.67 0 UNEP Stockholm Convention Centre Uruguay, UNEP Chemicals 0 UNEP Stockholm Convention Centre Uruguay, UNEP Chemicals 0 UNEP Stockholm Convention Centre Uruguay, UNEP Chemicals 845000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3787 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP PIF Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3790 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP RARE; Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE), Conservation International, CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 355000.00 355000.00 355000.00 355000.00 355000.00 0 UNEP RARE; Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE), Conservation International, 0 UNEP RARE; Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE), Conservation International, 0 UNEP RARE; Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE), Conservation International, 0 UNEP RARE; Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE), Conservation International, 0 UNEP RARE; Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE), Conservation International, 1775000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3807 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP CEAZA, Chile; CSIR, South Africa; UWI, Trinidad and Tobago, ISPONRE, Viet Nam CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1259327.40 1259327.40 1259327.40 1259327.40 1259327.40 0 UNEP CEAZA, Chile; CSIR, South Africa; UWI, Trinidad and Tobago, ISPONRE, Viet Nam 0 UNEP CEAZA, Chile; CSIR, South Africa; UWI, Trinidad and Tobago, ISPONRE, Viet Nam 0 UNEP CEAZA, Chile; CSIR, South Africa; UWI, Trinidad and Tobago, ISPONRE, Viet Nam 0 UNEP CEAZA, Chile; CSIR, South Africa; UWI, Trinidad and Tobago, ISPONRE, Viet Nam 0 UNEP CEAZA, Chile; CSIR, South Africa; UWI, Trinidad and Tobago, ISPONRE, Viet Nam 0 UNEP CEAZA, Chile; CSIR, South Africa; UWI, Trinidad and Tobago, ISPONRE, Viet Nam 6296637 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3808 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Kenya Sri Lanka Türkiye +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1103523.60 1103523.60 1103523.60 1103523.60 1103523.60 0 UNEP Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 0 FAO Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 0 UNEP Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 0 FAO Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 0 UNEP Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 0 FAO Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 0 UNEP Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 0 FAO Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 0 UNEP Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 0 FAO Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 4995000 UNEP Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 4995000 FAO Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) -2339893 UNEP Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) -2339893 FAO Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 2865118 UNEP Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 2865118 FAO Bioversity International (Italy), Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (Brazil), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Environment/Department of Agriculture (Sri Lanka) 5517618 GEF 5517618 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3811 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Legislators Organization for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNEP Global Legislators Organization for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE) 0 UNEP Global Legislators Organization for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE) 0 UNEP Global Legislators Organization for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE) 0 UNEP Global Legislators Organization for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE) 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3818 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Coalition for Rainforest Nations, GTZ, InWent, INPE, Indian Forest Service, FAO, UNDP, UNEP, GOFC-GOLD, IIASA CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 World Bank Coalition for Rainforest Nations, GTZ, InWent, INPE, Indian Forest Service, FAO, UNDP, UNEP, GOFC-GOLD, IIASA 0 World Bank Coalition for Rainforest Nations, GTZ, InWent, INPE, Indian Forest Service, FAO, UNDP, UNEP, GOFC-GOLD, IIASA 0 World Bank Coalition for Rainforest Nations, GTZ, InWent, INPE, Indian Forest Service, FAO, UNDP, UNEP, GOFC-GOLD, IIASA 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3856 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP -DELC AND National Executing Agencies in countries CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 500000.00 500000.00 500000.00 500000.00 500000.00 0 UNEP UNEP -DELC AND National Executing Agencies in countries 0 UNEP UNEP -DELC AND National Executing Agencies in countries 2500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3860 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank IUCN CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 980000.00 980000.00 980000.00 980000.00 980000.00 0 World Bank IUCN 0 World Bank IUCN 0 World Bank IUCN 0 World Bank IUCN 0 World Bank IUCN 4900000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3871 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Afghanistan Argentina Bulgaria Bolivia Brazil Belarus Congo DR Cote d'Ivoire Chile Cameroon China Costa Rica Cuba Cabo Verde Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Fiji Guatemala Honduras Haiti Indonesia India Iran Jamaica Kenya Kazakhstan Lao PDR Sri Lanka Morocco Madagascar Mongolia Mauritius Mexico Malaysia Mozambique Namibia Nigeria Nicaragua Panama Peru Papua New Guinea Philippines Pakistan Romania Seychelles Slovak Republic Suriname Syria Thailand Türkiye Tanzania Ukraine Uganda Uzbekistan Venezuela Viet Nam South Africa +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 9042392.60 9042392.60 9042392.60 9042392.60 9042392.60 45211963 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3882 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Bharati Integrated Rural Development Society (BIRDS) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 303030.33 303030.33 303030.33 0 FAO Bharati Integrated Rural Development Society (BIRDS) 0 FAO Bharati Integrated Rural Development Society (BIRDS) 0 FAO Bharati Integrated Rural Development Society (BIRDS) 0 FAO Bharati Integrated Rural Development Society (BIRDS) 909091 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3888 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP DTIE CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Energy policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 326666.67 326666.67 326666.67 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 980000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3900 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP UNOPS, UNEP-DEWA, UNESCO, GWP-Med, UNU-INWEH CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 819000.00 819000.00 819000.00 819000.00 819000.00 0 UNDP UNOPS, UNEP-DEWA, UNESCO, GWP-Med, UNU-INWEH 0 UNEP UNOPS, UNEP-DEWA, UNESCO, GWP-Med, UNU-INWEH 0 UNDP UNOPS, UNEP-DEWA, UNESCO, GWP-Med, UNU-INWEH 0 UNEP UNOPS, UNEP-DEWA, UNESCO, GWP-Med, UNU-INWEH 0 UNDP UNOPS, UNEP-DEWA, UNESCO, GWP-Med, UNU-INWEH 0 UNEP UNOPS, UNEP-DEWA, UNESCO, GWP-Med, UNU-INWEH 0 UNDP UNOPS, UNEP-DEWA, UNESCO, GWP-Med, UNU-INWEH 0 UNEP UNOPS, UNEP-DEWA, UNESCO, GWP-Med, UNU-INWEH 4095000 GEF 4095000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3911 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 320000.00 320000.00 320000.00 320000.00 320000.00 1600000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3920 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP National Environment Ministries/ Departments of Countries CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNEP National Environment Ministries/ Departments of Countries 0 UNEP National Environment Ministries/ Departments of Countries 761738 UNEP National Environment Ministries/ Departments of Countries 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3924 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 400000.00 400000.00 400000.00 400000.00 400000.00 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3928 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNIDO International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) 0 UNIDO International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) 0 UNIDO International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) 0 UNIDO International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3951 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP lead: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC International Center, Germany); CIFOR, RECOFTC, LEI, Pustanling-MOF ,WARSI, Tropical Forest Trust – in Indonesia; ANSAB – in Nepal; FSC National Initiative – in Chile; MARD – in Vietnam. CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile Indonesia Nepal Viet Nam Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 576000.00 576000.00 576000.00 576000.00 576000.00 0 UNEP lead: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC International Center, Germany); CIFOR, RECOFTC, LEI, Pustanling-MOF ,WARSI, Tropical Forest Trust – in Indonesia; ANSAB – in Nepal; FSC National Initiative – in Chile; MARD – in Vietnam. 0 UNEP lead: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC International Center, Germany); CIFOR, RECOFTC, LEI, Pustanling-MOF ,WARSI, Tropical Forest Trust – in Indonesia; ANSAB – in Nepal; FSC National Initiative – in Chile; MARD – in Vietnam. 0 UNEP lead: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC International Center, Germany); CIFOR, RECOFTC, LEI, Pustanling-MOF ,WARSI, Tropical Forest Trust – in Indonesia; ANSAB – in Nepal; FSC National Initiative – in Chile; MARD – in Vietnam. 0 UNEP lead: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC International Center, Germany); CIFOR, RECOFTC, LEI, Pustanling-MOF ,WARSI, Tropical Forest Trust – in Indonesia; ANSAB – in Nepal; FSC National Initiative – in Chile; MARD – in Vietnam. 0 UNEP lead: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC International Center, Germany); CIFOR, RECOFTC, LEI, Pustanling-MOF ,WARSI, Tropical Forest Trust – in Indonesia; ANSAB – in Nepal; FSC National Initiative – in Chile; MARD – in Vietnam. 0 UNEP lead: Forest Stewardship Council (FSC International Center, Germany); CIFOR, RECOFTC, LEI, Pustanling-MOF ,WARSI, Tropical Forest Trust – in Indonesia; ANSAB – in Nepal; FSC National Initiative – in Chile; MARD – in Vietnam. 2880000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4001 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank UNEP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 0 World Bank UNEP 0 World Bank UNEP 0 World Bank UNEP 0 World Bank UNEP 3000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4017 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP sub-regional and regional institutions ; UNCCD National Coordination Bodies and/or Focal Points Institutions (eg: Greece National Committee for Combating Desertification). CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 509090.80 509090.80 509090.80 509090.80 509090.80 0 UNEP sub-regional and regional institutions ; UNCCD National Coordination Bodies and/or Focal Points Institutions (eg: Greece National Committee for Combating Desertification). 0 UNEP sub-regional and regional institutions ; UNCCD National Coordination Bodies and/or Focal Points Institutions (eg: Greece National Committee for Combating Desertification). 0 UNEP sub-regional and regional institutions ; UNCCD National Coordination Bodies and/or Focal Points Institutions (eg: Greece National Committee for Combating Desertification). 2545454 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4027 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank ICFA FAO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Fishing policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 World Bank ICFA FAO 0 World Bank ICFA FAO 0 World Bank ICFA FAO 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4031 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility GEFSEC PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4070 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Rainforest Alliance, Inc. CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4071 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility AfDB GROUPE EOULEE CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Bonoua 5.27247 -3.59625 +![cdata[Waste management/disposal]]+ 525000.00 525000.00 525000.00 525000.00 525000.00 0 AfDB GROUPE EOULEE 1320000 AfDB GROUPE EOULEE -1205985 AfDB GROUPE EOULEE -7580 AfDB GROUPE EOULEE 0 AfDB GROUPE EOULEE 1893565 AfDB GROUPE EOULEE 200000 AfDB GROUPE EOULEE 2625000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4110 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP NATIONAL PARTNERS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Gabonese Republic -1 11.75 +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 5000000.00 5000000.00 5000000.00 5000000.00 5000000.00 0 UNDP NATIONAL PARTNERS 0 UNEP NATIONAL PARTNERS 25000000 GEF 25000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4129 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Guangdong Provincial Government CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' China Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 840000.00 840000.00 840000.00 840000.00 840000.00 0 World Bank Guangdong Provincial Government 0 World Bank Guangdong Provincial Government 0 World Bank Guangdong Provincial Government 4200000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4132 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IADB Electrical Research Institute CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Mexico Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Wind energy]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 0 IADB Electrical Research Institute 0 IADB Electrical Research Institute 0 IADB Electrical Research Institute 0 IADB Electrical Research Institute 0 IADB Electrical Research Institute 1080707 IADB Electrical Research Institute 1358950 IADB Electrical Research Institute 1053671 IADB Electrical Research Institute 1499158 IADB Electrical Research Institute 0 IADB Electrical Research Institute 4982911 IADB Electrical Research Institute 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4212 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 343636.40 343636.40 343636.40 343636.40 343636.40 0 UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO 0 UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO 0 UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO 0 UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO 0 UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO 1275400 UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO 338808 UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO -16376 UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO 0 UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO 1597832 UNEP UNEP/GPA, UNESCO 1718182 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4235 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNDESA United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat UNFFS CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 316666.67 316666.67 316666.67 0 UNEP UNDESA United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat UNFFS 0 UNEP UNDESA United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat UNFFS 0 UNEP UNDESA United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat UNFFS 0 UNEP UNDESA United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat UNFFS 950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4256 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Galatee CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 216666.67 216666.67 216666.67 0 UNEP Galatee 0 UNEP Galatee 650000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4257 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility IFC IFC - Executing Agency CEO Endorsement Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 0 World Bank IFC - Executing Agency 0 IFC IFC - Executing Agency 0 World Bank IFC - Executing Agency 0 IFC IFC - Executing Agency 30000000 GEF 30000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4259 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Conservation International Foundation (CI) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 0 UNEP Conservation International Foundation (CI) 0 UNEP Conservation International Foundation (CI) 0 UNEP Conservation International Foundation (CI) 3582050 UNEP Conservation International Foundation (CI) 1047950 UNEP Conservation International Foundation (CI) 0 UNEP Conservation International Foundation (CI) 4880118 UNEP Conservation International Foundation (CI) 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4260 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IADB The Nature Conservancy CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 0 IADB The Nature Conservancy 0 IADB The Nature Conservancy 0 IADB The Nature Conservancy 0 IADB The Nature Conservancy 0 IADB The Nature Conservancy 0 IADB The Nature Conservancy 0 IADB The Nature Conservancy 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4329 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 26923077.00 26923077.00 26923077.00 26923077.00 26923077.00 0 UNDP UNOPS 134615385 UNDP UNOPS 134615385 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4402 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility GEFSEC PIF Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4410 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention, UNITAR CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 239666.67 239666.67 239666.67 0 UNIDO Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention, UNITAR 0 UNIDO Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention, UNITAR 0 UNIDO Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention, UNITAR 0 UNIDO Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention, UNITAR 0 UNIDO Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention, UNITAR 719000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4412 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 233333.33 233333.33 233333.33 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals 700000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4415 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP CBD Secretariat, Regional and Subregional Organizations and UNEP Division of Environmental Law and Conventions (DELC) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 314916.67 314916.67 314916.67 0 UNEP CBD Secretariat, Regional and Subregional Organizations and UNEP Division of Environmental Law and Conventions (DELC) 0 UNEP CBD Secretariat, Regional and Subregional Organizations and UNEP Division of Environmental Law and Conventions (DELC) 944750 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4421 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP DTIE CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4452 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP GRID-Arendal, WCMC CI WWF IOC UNESCO Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries IUCN Blue Ventures University of Cape Town CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Angoche, Mozambique -16.236931 39.867692 Assassins Bay, Madagascar -22.208758 43.272088 Ayeyarwady Delta, Myanmar 16.78935 94.72804 Montecristi Province, Dominican Republic 19.85 -71.65 Gulf of Guayaquil, Ecuador -2.514641 -79.958960 Gazi Bay, Kenya -4.420331 39.519646 Qassabi, UAE 24.173672 54.134813 Tampa Bay, USA 27.717466 -82.502594 Vanga Bay -4.654031 39.226181 Nusa Lembongan, Indonesia -8.668718 115.468055 +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 900000.00 900000.00 900000.00 900000.00 900000.00 0 UNEP GRID-Arendal, WCMC CI WWF IOC UNESCO Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries IUCN Blue Ventures University of Cape Town 0 UNEP GRID-Arendal, WCMC CI WWF IOC UNESCO Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries IUCN Blue Ventures University of Cape Town 0 UNEP GRID-Arendal, WCMC CI WWF IOC UNESCO Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries IUCN Blue Ventures University of Cape Town 2943517 UNEP GRID-Arendal, WCMC CI WWF IOC UNESCO Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries IUCN Blue Ventures University of Cape Town 358325 UNEP GRID-Arendal, WCMC CI WWF IOC UNESCO Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries IUCN Blue Ventures University of Cape Town 973158 UNEP GRID-Arendal, WCMC CI WWF IOC UNESCO Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries IUCN Blue Ventures University of Cape Town 0 UNEP GRID-Arendal, WCMC CI WWF IOC UNESCO Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries IUCN Blue Ventures University of Cape Town 0 UNEP GRID-Arendal, WCMC CI WWF IOC UNESCO Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries IUCN Blue Ventures University of Cape Town 4500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4489 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP-DEWA, UNEP-DEPI, UNEP-DHI Centre, UNESCO IOC, UNESCO-IHP, ILEC – see Annex 3 for more details CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 0 UNEP UNEP-DEWA, UNEP-DEPI, UNEP-DHI Centre, UNESCO IOC, UNESCO-IHP, ILEC – see Annex 3 for more details 0 UNEP UNEP-DEWA, UNEP-DEPI, UNEP-DHI Centre, UNESCO IOC, UNESCO-IHP, ILEC – see Annex 3 for more details 0 UNEP UNEP-DEWA, UNEP-DEPI, UNEP-DHI Centre, UNESCO IOC, UNESCO-IHP, ILEC – see Annex 3 for more details 0 UNEP UNEP-DEWA, UNEP-DEPI, UNEP-DHI Centre, UNESCO IOC, UNESCO-IHP, ILEC – see Annex 3 for more details 0 UNEP UNEP-DEWA, UNEP-DEPI, UNEP-DHI Centre, UNESCO IOC, UNESCO-IHP, ILEC – see Annex 3 for more details 0 UNEP UNEP-DEWA, UNEP-DEPI, UNEP-DHI Centre, UNESCO IOC, UNESCO-IHP, ILEC – see Annex 3 for more details 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4498 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP National Government Partners CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 2266000.00 2266000.00 2266000.00 2266000.00 2266000.00 0 UNEP National Government Partners 5891131 UNEP National Government Partners 944424 UNEP National Government Partners 1285336 UNEP National Government Partners 341025 UNEP National Government Partners 218123 UNEP National Government Partners 215109 UNEP National Government Partners 153125 UNEP National Government Partners 11330000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4513 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP National Government Ministries CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1359600.00 1359600.00 1359600.00 1359600.00 1359600.00 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 5858643 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 122940 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 6021604 UNEP National Government Ministries 6798000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4524 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Country National Executinig Agencies CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 323591.67 323591.67 323591.67 602055 UNEP Country National Executinig Agencies 970775 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4525 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Country National Executing Agencies CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 308141.67 308141.67 308141.67 440101 UNEP Country National Executing Agencies 924425 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4527 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP International Conservation Caucus Foundation (ICCF) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 303023.67 303023.67 303023.67 0 UNEP International Conservation Caucus Foundation (ICCF) 0 UNEP International Conservation Caucus Foundation (ICCF) 0 UNEP International Conservation Caucus Foundation (ICCF) 909071 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4533 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP-DHI, IWA CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ 818000.00 818000.00 818000.00 818000.00 818000.00 0 UNEP UNEP-DHI, IWA 0 UNEP UNEP-DHI, IWA 0 UNEP UNEP-DHI, IWA 3427978 UNEP UNEP-DHI, IWA 0 UNEP UNEP-DHI, IWA 278523 UNEP UNEP-DHI, IWA 4090000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4541 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Argentina Cuba Egypt Ethiopia Indonesia Iran Kazakhstan Morocco Madagascar Malaysia Peru Papua New Guinea Thailand Türkiye Tanzania South Africa +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 8165673.00 8165673.00 8165673.00 8165673.00 8165673.00 40828365 UNDP UNOPS 40828365 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4543 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP GLOBE International CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNEP GLOBE International 0 UNEP GLOBE International 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4580 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Conservation International, Global Oceans Forum, IUCN, WWF PIF Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4581 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO T-RFMOs (Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)) and member countries, Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Organization of the Central American Isthmus (OSPESCA), Parties of the Nauru Agreement (PNA), Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), Governments of Fiji and Ghana, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), BirdLife International (BLI), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF),World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Industry CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Fishing policy and administrative management]]+ 5434587.20 5434587.20 5434587.20 5434587.20 5434587.20 0 FAO T-RFMOs (Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)) and member countries, Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Organization of the Central American Isthmus (OSPESCA), Parties of the Nauru Agreement (PNA), Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), Governments of Fiji and Ghana, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), BirdLife International (BLI), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF),World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Industry 0 FAO T-RFMOs (Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)) and member countries, Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Organization of the Central American Isthmus (OSPESCA), Parties of the Nauru Agreement (PNA), Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), Governments of Fiji and Ghana, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), BirdLife International (BLI), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF),World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Industry 0 FAO T-RFMOs (Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)) and member countries, Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Organization of the Central American Isthmus (OSPESCA), Parties of the Nauru Agreement (PNA), Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), Governments of Fiji and Ghana, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), BirdLife International (BLI), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF),World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Industry 20190469 FAO T-RFMOs (Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)) and member countries, Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Organization of the Central American Isthmus (OSPESCA), Parties of the Nauru Agreement (PNA), Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), Governments of Fiji and Ghana, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), BirdLife International (BLI), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF),World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Industry 3421669 FAO T-RFMOs (Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)) and member countries, Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Organization of the Central American Isthmus (OSPESCA), Parties of the Nauru Agreement (PNA), Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), Governments of Fiji and Ghana, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), BirdLife International (BLI), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF),World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Industry 1480911 FAO T-RFMOs (Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)) and member countries, Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Organization of the Central American Isthmus (OSPESCA), Parties of the Nauru Agreement (PNA), Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), Governments of Fiji and Ghana, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), BirdLife International (BLI), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF),World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Industry 25093049 FAO T-RFMOs (Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC)) and member countries, Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Organization of the Central American Isthmus (OSPESCA), Parties of the Nauru Agreement (PNA), Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC), Governments of Fiji and Ghana, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), BirdLife International (BLI), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF),World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and Industry 27172936 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4582 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Global Ocean Forum CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 FAO Global Ocean Forum 0 FAO Global Ocean Forum 0 FAO Global Ocean Forum 891425 FAO Global Ocean Forum -5130 FAO Global Ocean Forum 88035 FAO Global Ocean Forum 974330 FAO Global Ocean Forum 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4623 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP National Government Ministries CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1223640.00 1223640.00 1223640.00 1223640.00 1223640.00 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 5350670 UNEP National Government Ministries 260361 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 0 UNEP National Government Ministries 5212573 UNEP National Government Ministries 6118200 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4660 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Fishing policy and administrative management]]+ 1463119.40 1463119.40 1463119.40 1463119.40 1463119.40 0 UNEP IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 0 FAO IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 0 UNEP IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 0 FAO IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 1397483 UNEP IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 1397483 FAO IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 1367067 UNEP IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 1367067 FAO IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 834561 UNEP IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 834561 FAO IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 6005217 UNEP IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 6005217 FAO IUCN, CPPS, East African Seas Regional Coordiating Unit 7315597 GEF 7315597 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4678 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Albania Armenia Barbados Burkina Faso Burundi Bhutan Botswana Belarus Congo DR Cote d'Ivoire Cameroon China Colombia Cabo Verde Dominican Republic Fiji Micronesia Grenada Ghana Gambia Guinea Honduras Jamaica Jordan Kiribati Lao PDR Lebanon St. Lucia Sri Lanka Liberia Moldova Marshall Islands North Macedonia Mali Mongolia Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Nicaragua Nepal Naoero Panama Palau Paraguay Solomon Islands Seychelles Sierra Leone Senegal Suriname El Salvador Syria Togo Timor Leste Tunisia Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Ukraine Uganda Uruguay Uzbekistan St. Vincent and Grenadines Venezuela Viet Nam Vanuatu Yemen Zimbabwe +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 14570253.46 14570253.46 14570253.46 14570253.46 14570253.46 67788408 UNDP UNOPS 72851267 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4682 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNICEF, Programs for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Greenpeace International, Danish Technological Institute (DTI), Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Nairobi, Kenya -1.28333 36.81667 Bogota, Colombia 4.60971 -74.08175 Mbabane, Eswatini -26.31667 31.13333 +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 542430.00 542430.00 542430.00 542430.00 542430.00 0 UNEP UNICEF, Programs for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Greenpeace International, Danish Technological Institute (DTI), Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) 1310026 UNEP UNICEF, Programs for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Greenpeace International, Danish Technological Institute (DTI), Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) 766774 UNEP UNICEF, Programs for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Greenpeace International, Danish Technological Institute (DTI), Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) 361289 UNEP UNICEF, Programs for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Greenpeace International, Danish Technological Institute (DTI), Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) 151133 UNEP UNICEF, Programs for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Greenpeace International, Danish Technological Institute (DTI), Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) 0 UNEP UNICEF, Programs for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Greenpeace International, Danish Technological Institute (DTI), Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) 2589222 UNEP UNICEF, Programs for Appropriate Technologies in Health (PATH), Greenpeace International, Danish Technological Institute (DTI), Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) 2712150 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4794 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP National Governments and UNEP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1442000.00 1442000.00 1442000.00 1442000.00 1442000.00 2335798 UNEP National Governments and UNEP 296417 UNEP National Governments and UNEP 263869 UNEP National Governments and UNEP 1490287 UNEP National Governments and UNEP 868699 UNEP National Governments and UNEP 0 UNEP National Governments and UNEP 247623 UNEP National Governments and UNEP 7210000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4806 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP EcoAgriculture Partners CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNEP EcoAgriculture Partners 0 UNEP EcoAgriculture Partners 0 UNEP EcoAgriculture Partners 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4829 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP National Government Ministries UNEP-WCMC, CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Rural land policy and management]]+ 566000.00 566000.00 566000.00 566000.00 566000.00 0 UNEP National Government Ministries UNEP-WCMC, 0 UNEP National Government Ministries UNEP-WCMC, 0 UNEP National Government Ministries UNEP-WCMC, 0 UNEP National Government Ministries UNEP-WCMC, 2195000 UNEP National Government Ministries UNEP-WCMC, 255000 UNEP National Government Ministries UNEP-WCMC, 0 UNEP National Government Ministries UNEP-WCMC, 1918505 UNEP National Government Ministries UNEP-WCMC, 2830000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4856 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Conservation International, Government/regional organizations in pilot sites CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Fishing policy and administrative management]]+ 1834862.20 1834862.20 1834862.20 1834862.20 1834862.20 0 World Bank Conservation International, Government/regional organizations in pilot sites 0 World Bank Conservation International, Government/regional organizations in pilot sites 0 World Bank Conservation International, Government/regional organizations in pilot sites 5068272 World Bank Conservation International, Government/regional organizations in pilot sites 7980208 World Bank Conservation International, Government/regional organizations in pilot sites 2911936 World Bank Conservation International, Government/regional organizations in pilot sites 9174311 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4909 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP FIA Foundation (GFEI Secretariat) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Cote d'Ivoire Jamaica Montenegro North Macedonia Mauritius Peru Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 452363.80 452363.80 452363.80 452363.80 452363.80 0 UNEP FIA Foundation (GFEI Secretariat) 0 UNEP FIA Foundation (GFEI Secretariat) 0 UNEP FIA Foundation (GFEI Secretariat) 2504566 UNEP FIA Foundation (GFEI Secretariat) -269112 UNEP FIA Foundation (GFEI Secretariat) -1094 UNEP FIA Foundation (GFEI Secretariat) 0 UNEP FIA Foundation (GFEI Secretariat) 2261819 UNEP FIA Foundation (GFEI Secretariat) 2261819 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4922 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO CDE / World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT) and 15 country lead agencies CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Argentina Bosnia-Herzegovina Bangladesh China Colombia Ecuador Lesotho Morocco Nigeria Panama Philippines Thailand Tunisia Türkiye Uzbekistan Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Rural land policy and management]]+ 1223346.00 1223346.00 1223346.00 1223346.00 1223346.00 0 FAO CDE / World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT) and 15 country lead agencies 0 FAO CDE / World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT) and 15 country lead agencies 3823274 FAO CDE / World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT) and 15 country lead agencies 6111757 FAO CDE / World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT) and 15 country lead agencies 2116106 FAO CDE / World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT) and 15 country lead agencies 6116730 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4930 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP The overall Executing Agency will be the Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund because of its close proximity and relationship with the UNEP/CMS Dugong MoU Secretariat who will provide technical oversight of the project. Technical Partners include: the UNEP/CMS Dugong MoU Secretariat and its Technical Advisory Team, UNEP-DEPI, Blue Ventures, GRID-arendal Forest Trends. The key National Partners1 are: Indonesia: Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Ministry of Environment. Madagascar: Ministry of Environment and Forests Malaysia: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Mozambique: Ministry for Coordination of Environmental Affairs (MICOA), Natural History Museum / Eduardo Mondlane University. Sri Lanka: Department of Wildlife Conservation, Ministry of the Environment Timor Leste: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. Vanuatu: Department of Environment and Conservation CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Indonesia Sri Lanka Madagascar Malaysia Mozambique Solomon Islands Timor Leste Vanuatu Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1176803.60 1176803.60 1176803.60 1176803.60 1176803.60 0 UNEP The overall Executing Agency will be the Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund because of its close proximity and relationship with the UNEP/CMS Dugong MoU Secretariat who will provide technical oversight of the project. Technical Partners include: the UNEP/CMS Dugong MoU Secretariat and its Technical Advisory Team, UNEP-DEPI, Blue Ventures, GRID-arendal & Forest Trends. The key National Partners1 are: Indonesia: Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Ministry of Environment. Madagascar: Ministry of Environment and Forests Malaysia: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Mozambique: Ministry for Coordination of Environmental Affairs (MICOA), Natural History Museum / Eduardo Mondlane University. Sri Lanka: Department of Wildlife Conservation, Ministry of the Environment Timor Leste: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. Vanuatu: Department of Environment and Conservation 4492275 UNEP The overall Executing Agency will be the Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund because of its close proximity and relationship with the UNEP/CMS Dugong MoU Secretariat who will provide technical oversight of the project. Technical Partners include: the UNEP/CMS Dugong MoU Secretariat and its Technical Advisory Team, UNEP-DEPI, Blue Ventures, GRID-arendal & Forest Trends. The key National Partners1 are: Indonesia: Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Ministry of Environment. Madagascar: Ministry of Environment and Forests Malaysia: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Mozambique: Ministry for Coordination of Environmental Affairs (MICOA), Natural History Museum / Eduardo Mondlane University. Sri Lanka: Department of Wildlife Conservation, Ministry of the Environment Timor Leste: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. Vanuatu: Department of Environment and Conservation 5523317 UNEP The overall Executing Agency will be the Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund because of its close proximity and relationship with the UNEP/CMS Dugong MoU Secretariat who will provide technical oversight of the project. Technical Partners include: the UNEP/CMS Dugong MoU Secretariat and its Technical Advisory Team, UNEP-DEPI, Blue Ventures, GRID-arendal & Forest Trends. The key National Partners1 are: Indonesia: Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Ministry of Environment. Madagascar: Ministry of Environment and Forests Malaysia: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Mozambique: Ministry for Coordination of Environmental Affairs (MICOA), Natural History Museum / Eduardo Mondlane University. Sri Lanka: Department of Wildlife Conservation, Ministry of the Environment Timor Leste: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. Vanuatu: Department of Environment and Conservation 1031042 UNEP The overall Executing Agency will be the Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund because of its close proximity and relationship with the UNEP/CMS Dugong MoU Secretariat who will provide technical oversight of the project. Technical Partners include: the UNEP/CMS Dugong MoU Secretariat and its Technical Advisory Team, UNEP-DEPI, Blue Ventures, GRID-arendal & Forest Trends. The key National Partners1 are: Indonesia: Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Ministry of Environment. Madagascar: Ministry of Environment and Forests Malaysia: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Mozambique: Ministry for Coordination of Environmental Affairs (MICOA), Natural History Museum / Eduardo Mondlane University. Sri Lanka: Department of Wildlife Conservation, Ministry of the Environment Timor Leste: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. Vanuatu: Department of Environment and Conservation 5884018 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4948 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP Risoe Center (URC), Regional Centers, National Partners CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1221167.00 1221167.00 1221167.00 1221167.00 1221167.00 0 UNEP UNEP Risoe Center (URC), Regional Centers, National Partners 0 UNEP UNEP Risoe Center (URC), Regional Centers, National Partners 4600000 UNEP UNEP Risoe Center (URC), Regional Centers, National Partners 5168058 UNEP UNEP Risoe Center (URC), Regional Centers, National Partners 0 UNEP UNEP Risoe Center (URC), Regional Centers, National Partners 6105835 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5119 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP 12 National Governments CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1236000.00 1236000.00 1236000.00 1236000.00 1236000.00 2689782 UNEP 12 National Governments 848929 UNEP 12 National Governments 800288 UNEP 12 National Governments 186944 UNEP 12 National Governments 385677 UNEP 12 National Governments 376571 UNEP 12 National Governments 265484 UNEP 12 National Governments 6180000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5136 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP National Government Ministries, UNEP-WCMC CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNEP National Government Ministries, UNEP-WCMC 0 UNEP National Government Ministries, UNEP-WCMC 0 UNEP National Government Ministries, UNEP-WCMC 0 UNEP National Government Ministries, UNEP-WCMC 735000 UNEP National Government Ministries, UNEP-WCMC 115000 UNEP National Government Ministries, UNEP-WCMC 0 UNEP National Government Ministries, UNEP-WCMC 649068 UNEP National Government Ministries, UNEP-WCMC 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5141 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Non Annex I Parties CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1430000.00 1430000.00 1430000.00 1430000.00 1430000.00 0 UNDP Non Annex I Parties 0 UNEP Non Annex I Parties 0 UNDP Non Annex I Parties 0 UNEP Non Annex I Parties 2211546 UNDP Non Annex I Parties 2211546 UNEP Non Annex I Parties -524153 UNDP Non Annex I Parties -524153 UNEP Non Annex I Parties 360861 UNDP Non Annex I Parties 360861 UNEP Non Annex I Parties 1459239 UNDP Non Annex I Parties 1459239 UNEP Non Annex I Parties 7116047 UNDP Non Annex I Parties 7116047 UNEP Non Annex I Parties 7150000 GEF 7150000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5201 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Birdlife Interational and AZE Partnership CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Chile Madagascar Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 640937.67 640937.67 640937.67 0 UNEP Birdlife Interational and AZE Partnership 1493702 UNEP Birdlife Interational and AZE Partnership 198936 UNEP Birdlife Interational and AZE Partnership 0 UNEP Birdlife Interational and AZE Partnership 1916673 UNEP Birdlife Interational and AZE Partnership 1922813 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5271 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP National Government Agencies in four countries; Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation (SFP) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Pamekasan -7.1568 113.4746 Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta -6.2182 106.8584 Republic of Indonesia -5 120 Denpasar -8.65 115.21667 Bitung 1.44059 125.12824 Republic of the Philippines 13.40882 122.56155 Republic of Costa Rica 10 -84 Provincia de Manabí -0.66667 -80.08333 Republic of Ecuador -1.25 -78.25 +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1100000.00 1100000.00 1100000.00 1100000.00 1100000.00 1487187 UNDP National Government Agencies in four countries; Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation (SFP) 668908 UNDP National Government Agencies in four countries; Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation (SFP) 1543628 UNDP National Government Agencies in four countries; Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation (SFP) 1134689 UNDP National Government Agencies in four countries; Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation (SFP) 5438942 UNDP National Government Agencies in four countries; Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation (SFP) 5500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5278 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP IOC/UNESCO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 500000.00 500000.00 500000.00 500000.00 500000.00 0 UNDP IOC/UNESCO 1109666 UNDP IOC/UNESCO 968333 UNDP IOC/UNESCO 2679657 UNDP IOC/UNESCO 2500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5307 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP and National Governments participating in the project CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 993150.60 993150.60 993150.60 993150.60 993150.60 4490734 UNEP UNEP and National Governments participating in the project 0 UNEP UNEP and National Governments participating in the project 4500158 UNEP UNEP and National Governments participating in the project -9424 UNEP UNEP and National Governments participating in the project 4965753 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5356 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Resources Institute (Leading all GFW2.0 partners), Ministry of Environment Protection of Georgia, Ministry of Environment and Forests of Madagascar CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Georgia Madagascar Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 1068493.00 1068493.00 1068493.00 1068493.00 1068493.00 0 UNEP World Resources Institute (Leading all GFW2.0 partners), Ministry of Environment Protection of Georgia, Ministry of Environment and Forests of Madagascar 1707009 UNEP World Resources Institute (Leading all GFW2.0 partners), Ministry of Environment Protection of Georgia, Ministry of Environment and Forests of Madagascar 3288333 UNEP World Resources Institute (Leading all GFW2.0 partners), Ministry of Environment Protection of Georgia, Ministry of Environment and Forests of Madagascar 22653 UNEP World Resources Institute (Leading all GFW2.0 partners), Ministry of Environment Protection of Georgia, Ministry of Environment and Forests of Madagascar 5342465 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5400 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP International Nitrogen Initiative INI CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified South Asia Demo Boundary 28.6303 77.2064 South Asia Demo Boundary 41.51 6.5 South Asia Demo Boundary 6.981 80.0244 China 35 105 South Korea 36.5 127.75 Japan 35.685278 139.753056 Lake Victoria Catchment 0.317969 30.589743 Lake Victoria Catchment 1.350555 34.960706 Lake Victoria Catchment -3.483474 32.870345 Lake Victoria Catchment -4.030665 29.759855 Portugal 39.694444 -8.130556 Spain 40 -4 Orgeval watershed (France) 48.810045 2 La Plata Basin -15.801968 -47.910741 La Plata Basin -37.331458 -59.146155 La Plata Basin -19.037179 -65.258561 Nooksack Fraser Transboundary 48.6682 -121.9388 Nooksack Fraser Transboundary 48.7449 -121.8593 Nooksack Fraser Transboundary 48.7914 -122.5904 Nooksack Fraser Transboundary 48.8402 -121.5567 Eastern Europe Demo Boundary 46.303602 30.273256 Eastern Europe Demo Boundary 49.521938 22.675781 Eastern Europe Demo Boundary 49.521938 24.312744 Eastern Europe Demo Boundary 45.469165 28.206968 +![cdata[Environmental research]]+ 1200000.00 1200000.00 1200000.00 1200000.00 1200000.00 533037 UNEP International Nitrogen Initiative INI 738058 UNEP International Nitrogen Initiative INI 150148 UNEP International Nitrogen Initiative INI 1922258 UNEP International Nitrogen Initiative INI 846304 UNEP International Nitrogen Initiative INI 719967 UNEP International Nitrogen Initiative INI 641973 UNEP International Nitrogen Initiative INI 418255 UNEP International Nitrogen Initiative INI 6000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5409 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 283333.33 283333.33 283333.33 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch 0 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch 543633 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch 303410 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch -17043 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch 849318 UNEP UNEP DTIE Chemicals Branch 850000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5439 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 0 World Bank World Bank 0 World Bank World Bank 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5450 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 650000.00 650000.00 650000.00 0 UNDP International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) 0 UNDP International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) 1871099 UNDP International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) 1871099 UNDP International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) 1950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5508 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP IMO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 633333.33 633333.33 633333.33 0 UNDP IMO 0 UNDP IMO 1049503 UNDP IMO 1527667 UNDP IMO 478164 UNDP IMO 1900000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5525 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP and National governments participating in the project CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 440517.33 440517.33 440517.33 900478 UNEP UNEP and National governments participating in the project 239162 UNEP UNEP and National governments participating in the project 0 UNEP UNEP and National governments participating in the project 1139640 UNEP UNEP and National governments participating in the project 0 UNEP UNEP and National governments participating in the project 1321552 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5541 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Mechanism CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Rural land policy and management]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 0 UNEP Global Mechanism 0 UNEP Global Mechanism 0 UNEP Global Mechanism 1770000 UNEP Global Mechanism 1952866 UNEP Global Mechanism 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5601 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 566666.67 566666.67 566666.67 0 UNDP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC 0 UNEP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC 0 UNDP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC 0 UNEP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC 0 UNDP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC 0 UNEP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC 850000 UNDP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC 850000 UNEP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC 1051166 UNDP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC 1051166 UNEP UNDP GEF UNEP DEPI GEF and UNEP WCMC 1700000 GEF 1700000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5648 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNITAR CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 0 UNEP UNITAR 0 UNEP UNITAR 1704608 UNEP UNITAR 125392 UNEP UNITAR 130000 UNEP UNITAR 31260 UNEP UNITAR 2000000 UNEP UNITAR 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5656 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 608828.00 608828.00 608828.00 0 UNDP The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) 0 UNDP The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) 0 UNDP The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) 1826484 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5688 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP-DELC and National Executing Agencies CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 939936.80 939936.80 939936.80 939936.80 939936.80 2524537 UNEP UNEP-DELC and National Executing Agencies 0 UNEP UNEP-DELC and National Executing Agencies 1000000 UNEP UNEP-DELC and National Executing Agencies 0 UNEP UNEP-DELC and National Executing Agencies 0 UNEP UNEP-DELC and National Executing Agencies 579241 UNEP UNEP-DELC and National Executing Agencies 300000 UNEP UNEP-DELC and National Executing Agencies 215745 UNEP UNEP-DELC and National Executing Agencies 4516310 UNEP UNEP-DELC and National Executing Agencies 4699684 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5698 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP DEWA Colorado State University World Bank CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Rural land policy and management]]+ 601600.00 601600.00 601600.00 0 UNEP UNEP DEWA Colorado State University World Bank 1754800 UNEP UNEP DEWA Colorado State University World Bank -179728 UNEP UNEP DEWA Colorado State University World Bank 0 UNEP UNEP DEWA Colorado State University World Bank 179728 UNEP UNEP DEWA Colorado State University World Bank 1754220 UNEP UNEP DEWA Colorado State University World Bank 1804800 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5721 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Zoological Society of London ZSL CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 573833.33 573833.33 573833.33 0 UNDP Zoological Society of London ZSL 1154643 UNDP Zoological Society of London ZSL 384830 UNDP Zoological Society of London ZSL 1680301 UNDP Zoological Society of London ZSL 1721500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5724 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO International Union for Conservation of Nature IUCN CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 527945.20 527945.20 527945.20 527945.20 527945.20 932444 FAO International Union for Conservation of Nature IUCN 279426 FAO International Union for Conservation of Nature IUCN 1110042 FAO International Union for Conservation of Nature IUCN 261705 FAO International Union for Conservation of Nature IUCN 2583617 FAO International Union for Conservation of Nature IUCN 2639726 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5729 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP CI, GWP, ICPDR, IRF, IUCN, TNC, UNECE, UNESCO-IHP, UNIDO, UNU-INWEH, WWF CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 997500.00 997500.00 997500.00 997500.00 997500.00 0 UNDP CI, GWP, ICPDR, IRF, IUCN, TNC, UNECE, UNESCO-IHP, UNIDO, UNU-INWEH, WWF 0 UNEP CI, GWP, ICPDR, IRF, IUCN, TNC, UNECE, UNESCO-IHP, UNIDO, UNU-INWEH, WWF 1474964 UNDP CI, GWP, ICPDR, IRF, IUCN, TNC, UNECE, UNESCO-IHP, UNIDO, UNU-INWEH, WWF 1474964 UNEP CI, GWP, ICPDR, IRF, IUCN, TNC, UNECE, UNESCO-IHP, UNIDO, UNU-INWEH, WWF 1622449 UNDP CI, GWP, ICPDR, IRF, IUCN, TNC, UNECE, UNESCO-IHP, UNIDO, UNU-INWEH, WWF 1622449 UNEP CI, GWP, ICPDR, IRF, IUCN, TNC, UNECE, UNESCO-IHP, UNIDO, UNU-INWEH, WWF 3766528 UNDP CI, GWP, ICPDR, IRF, IUCN, TNC, UNECE, UNESCO-IHP, UNIDO, UNU-INWEH, WWF 3766528 UNEP CI, GWP, ICPDR, IRF, IUCN, TNC, UNECE, UNESCO-IHP, UNIDO, UNU-INWEH, WWF 4987500 GEF 4987500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5730 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP WCMC 3 Ministries of Environment CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 2531598 UNEP WCMC 3 Ministries of Environment 963886 UNEP WCMC 3 Ministries of Environment 123833 UNEP WCMC 3 Ministries of Environment 686613 UNEP WCMC 3 Ministries of Environment 4960000 UNEP WCMC 3 Ministries of Environment 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5731 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP National Competent Authorities, ABS focal points CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Dushanbe 38.53575 68.77905 New Delhi 28.63576 77.22445 Nur-Sultan 51.1801 71.44598 Nairobi -1.28333 36.81667 Kigali -1.94995 30.05885 Ulan Bator 47.90771 106.88324 Victoria -4.62001 55.45501 Amman 31.95522 35.94503 Tirana 41.3275 19.81889 Montevideo -34.90328 -56.18816 Addis Ababa 9.02497 38.74689 Santo Domingo 18.47186 -69.89232 Tegucigalpa 14.0818 -87.20681 Cairo 30.06263 31.24967 Quito -0.22985 -78.52495 Bogotá 4.60971 -74.08175 Panamá 8.9936 -79.51973 Khartoum 15.55177 32.53241 Apia -13.83333 -171.76666 Minsk 53.9 27.56667 Nay Pyi Taw 19.745 96.12972 Istanbul 41.01384 28.94966 Moroni -11.70216 43.25506 Gaborone -24.65451 25.90859 Pretoria -25.74486 28.18783 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 2400000.00 2400000.00 2400000.00 2400000.00 2400000.00 2830314 UNDP National Competent Authorities, ABS focal points 4076300 UNDP National Competent Authorities, ABS focal points 3303123 UNDP National Competent Authorities, ABS focal points 11953866 UNDP National Competent Authorities, ABS focal points 12000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5735 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility CI Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Maputo  -25.9655 32.5832 Hanoi  21.0245 105.8412 Dar es Salaam  -6.8234 39.2695 Bangkok  13.754 100.5014 Vientiane  17.9667 102.6 Beijing  39.9075 116.3972 Phnom Penh  11.5625 104.916 Nairobi  -1.2833 36.8167 Kigali  -1.95 30.0589 Kinshasa  -4.3276 15.3136 Kampala  0.3163 32.5822 Addis Ababa  9.025 38.7469 Brasília  -15.7797 -47.9297 Juba  4.8517 31.5825 Nay Pyi Taw  19.745 96.1297 Sanaa  15.3547 44.2067 Harare  -17.8277 31.0534 Lilongwe  -13.9669 33.7873 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1960000.00 1960000.00 1960000.00 1960000.00 1960000.00 0 CI Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) 6737642 CI Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) 2556246 CI Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) 187420 CI Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) 290954 CI Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) 9772262 CI Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) 9800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5736 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Armenia Burundi Congo DR Cameroon Ghana Kyrgyz Republic Mongolia Maldives Thailand Ukraine Viet Nam +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1393030.20 1393030.20 1393030.20 1393030.20 1393030.20 5840118 UNDP UNOPS 6965151 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5750 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Rainforest Alliance CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Rural land policy and management]]+ 666533.67 666533.67 666533.67 0 UNEP Rainforest Alliance 0 UNEP Rainforest Alliance 1912188 UNEP Rainforest Alliance 1912188 UNEP Rainforest Alliance 0 UNEP Rainforest Alliance 1999601 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5775 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Resources Institute CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Rural land policy and management]]+ 633333.33 633333.33 633333.33 0 UNEP World Resources Institute 1075324 UNEP World Resources Institute 30150 UNEP World Resources Institute -30150 UNEP World Resources Institute 1866538 UNEP World Resources Institute 1900000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5776 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Forest Trends CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 633333.33 633333.33 633333.33 0 UNEP Forest Trends 0 UNEP Forest Trends 11670248 UNEP Forest Trends 1869367 UNEP Forest Trends -10503223 UNEP Forest Trends 1900000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5784 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility CI United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU IAS), Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), and Conservation International Japan. CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 636333.33 636333.33 636333.33 0 CI United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU IAS), Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), and Conservation International Japan. 1514431 CI United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU IAS), Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), and Conservation International Japan. 1908661 CI United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU IAS), Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), and Conservation International Japan. 394230 CI United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU IAS), Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), and Conservation International Japan. 1909000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5797 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO CIFOR CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Rural land policy and management]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 0 FAO CIFOR 1647721 FAO CIFOR 1996688 FAO CIFOR 291482 FAO CIFOR 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5810 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility CI Conservation International, Luc Hoffmann Institute, WCMC, University of Washington CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 601620.67 601620.67 601620.67 0 CI Conservation International, Luc Hoffmann Institute, WCMC, University of Washington 1073355 CI Conservation International, Luc Hoffmann Institute, WCMC, University of Washington 1804862 CI Conservation International, Luc Hoffmann Institute, WCMC, University of Washington 600087 CI Conservation International, Luc Hoffmann Institute, WCMC, University of Washington 1804862 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5824 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Starfish Initiatives CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Rural land policy and management]]+ 608828.00 608828.00 608828.00 0 UNEP Starfish Initiatives 0 UNEP Starfish Initiatives 1682661 UNEP Starfish Initiatives 0 UNEP Starfish Initiatives 0 UNEP Starfish Initiatives 1826484 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5827 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 152905.33 152905.33 152905.33 371784 FAO NA 458716 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5831 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 456666.67 456666.67 456666.67 0 UNEP NA 0 UNEP NA 885918 UNEP NA 1357282 UNEP NA 1370000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5832 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 0 UNIDO NA 884270 UNIDO NA 850874 UNIDO NA 3558 UNIDO NA 0 UNIDO NA 42059 UNIDO NA 1800000 UNIDO NA 1800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5833 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility EBRD CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 633333.33 633333.33 633333.33 0 EBRD NA 0 EBRD NA 0 EBRD NA 18800 EBRD NA 317484 EBRD NA 727294 EBRD NA 489879 EBRD NA 264545 EBRD NA 1900000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5835 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank European Space Agency CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 411571 World Bank European Space Agency 881089 World Bank European Space Agency 486931 World Bank European Space Agency 1779591 World Bank European Space Agency 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5880 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP RedLAC and CAFE networks CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 304413.33 304413.33 304413.33 0 UNEP RedLAC and CAFE networks 879103 UNEP RedLAC and CAFE networks 913240 UNEP RedLAC and CAFE networks 0 UNEP RedLAC and CAFE networks 34137 UNEP RedLAC and CAFE networks 913240 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5886 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNDP, World Bank, WWF, SLT, Interpol,etc CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 311557 UNDP UNDP, World Bank, WWF, SLT, Interpol,etc 931134 UNDP UNDP, World Bank, WWF, SLT, Interpol,etc 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5898 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP PISLM SPREP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Rural land policy and management]]+ 348333.33 348333.33 348333.33 0 UNEP PISLM SPREP 330000 UNEP PISLM SPREP 0 UNEP PISLM SPREP 160000 UNEP PISLM SPREP 1045000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-6920 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP PEMSEA Resource Facility CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Indonesia Timor Leste Developing countries, unspecified Developing countries, unspecified Viqueque -8.78722 126.36 Kabupaten Merauke -7.66667 139.66667 Manufahi -8.99861 125.77778 Manatuto -8.71667 125.95 Provinsi Maluku -3.23846 130.14527 Kovalima -9.26667 125.25 Denpasar -8.65 115.21667 Provinsi Bali -8.5 115 Merauke -8.49958 140.40613 Aru -3.21205 128.27484 Rote -10.6186 123.3804 Lospalos -8.51821 126.9956 1949132.40 1949132.40 1949132.40 1949132.40 1949132.40 605265 UNDP PEMSEA Resource Facility 1590152 UNDP PEMSEA Resource Facility 1995264 UNDP PEMSEA Resource Facility 2488738 UNDP PEMSEA Resource Facility 1795981 UNDP PEMSEA Resource Facility 9363014 UNDP PEMSEA Resource Facility 9745662 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-6925 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP 39 National Governments CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 2882880.00 2882880.00 2882880.00 2882880.00 2882880.00 4004820 UNEP 39 National Governments 2024138 UNEP 39 National Governments 1053961 UNEP 39 National Governments 1082324 UNEP 39 National Governments 999357 UNEP 39 National Governments 671157 UNEP 39 National Governments 919829 UNEP 39 National Governments 14414400 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-6931 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNDP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 13461538.40 13461538.40 13461538.40 13461538.40 13461538.40 67307692 UNDP UNDP 67307692 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-6980 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 400000.00 400000.00 400000.00 0 World Bank NA 1200000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-6993 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO IIASA CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 633333.33 633333.33 633333.33 1018300 UNIDO IIASA 826770 UNIDO IIASA 30427 UNIDO IIASA 0 UNIDO IIASA 24314 UNIDO IIASA 1899811 UNIDO IIASA 1900000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-8004 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP 9 National Governments CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Congo DR Dominica Eritrea Kyrgyz Republic Moldova Mongolia Eswatini South Africa Zimbabwe +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 1645742 UNEP 9 National Governments 1800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-8024 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP 9 National Governments CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Antigua and Barbuda Fiji Lesotho Myanmar Mauritania Mozambique Seychelles Turkmenistan Zambia +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 1364629 UNEP 9 National Governments 1800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9060 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility CI Global Environment Facility WWF-US CI UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF CI UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Cote d'Ivoire Indonesia Peru Developing countries, unspecified 2572294 UNDP CI UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF 2572294 UNEP CI UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF 2572294 FAO CI UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF 2572294 World Bank CI UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF 2572294 CI CI UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF 2572294 WWF-US CI UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9071 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility WWF-US Govs of participating countries, Regional Centers of Excellence Govs of participating countries, Regional Centers of Excellence PIF Approval Date ' Afghanistan Botswana Congo Cameroon Ethiopia Gabon Indonesia India Kenya Mali Malawi Mozambique Philippines Thailand Tanzania Viet Nam South Africa Zambia Zimbabwe Developing countries, unspecified XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9072 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility CI Global Environment Facility WWF-US Global Environment Facility IADB PIF Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9077 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility AfDB Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility DBSA Global Environment Facility IADB UNEP, UNDP, IDB, AfDB ADB, DBSA, UNIDO UNEP, UNDP, IDB, AfDB ADB, DBSA, UNIDO PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Cote d'Ivoire China India Mexico Malaysia Peru Paraguay Senegal Viet Nam South Africa Developing countries, unspecified XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9083 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility DBSA Ministry of Environment (MINEA), Costa Rica Ministry of Investment and Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan Ministry of Water Resources, Irrigation and Electricity – The Electricity Regulatory Authority (Sudan) Ministry of Environment (MINEA), Costa Rica Ministry of Investment and Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan Ministry of Water Resources, Irrigation and Electricity – The Electricity Regulatory Authority (Sudan) PIF Approval Date ' Chile Costa Rica Indonesia Kazakhstan Myanmar Sudan Tunisia South Africa Developing countries, unspecified XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9087 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP 9 National Governments CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Afghanistan Burundi Congo Sri Lanka Maldives Niger Naoero Senegal Chad +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 533333.33 533333.33 533333.33 1377154 UNEP 9 National Governments 1600000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9105 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP 9 National Governments CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Benin Gabon Guinea-Bissau Cambodia Namibia Papua New Guinea Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Uzbekistan Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 1564067 UNEP 9 National Governments 1800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9125 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Indonesia -5 120 Senegal 14.5 -14.25 Cote D'Iviore 8 -5.5 Cabo Verde 14.9315 -23.5125 Ecuador -1.25 -78.25 Peru -10 -75.25 +![cdata[Fishing policy and administrative management]]+ 1574678.80 1574678.80 1574678.80 1574678.80 1574678.80 164667 World Bank NA 1526771 World Bank NA 137939 World Bank NA 1925796 World Bank NA 6507377 World Bank NA 2358145 World Bank NA 7873394 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9126 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Cote d'Ivoire Developing countries, unspecified Sine-Saloum Delta 13.83528 -16.49861 Sassandra 4.95384 -6.08531 Locodjro 5.32327 -4.03696 São Vicente 16.84414 -24.97398 Ilha do Maio 15.21429 -23.16021 +![cdata[Fishing policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1286605.40 1286605.40 1286605.40 1286605.40 1286605.40 756033 UNEP Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 756033 FAO Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 755536 UNEP Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 755536 FAO Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 1054182 UNEP Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 1054182 FAO Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 1576532 UNEP Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 1576532 FAO Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 1394128 UNEP Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 1394128 FAO Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 6122056 UNEP Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 6122056 FAO Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 591555 UNEP Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 591555 FAO Government of CPV, CIV, SEN, and the Abidjan Convention Secretariat 6433027 GEF 6433027 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9128 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO CI, UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF and University of Washington CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Sine-Saloum Delta 13.83528 -16.49861 Maluku -3.23846 130.14527 Sassandra 4.95384 -6.08531 Locodjro 5.32327 -4.03696 São Vicente 16.84414 -24.97398 Ilha do Maio 15.21429 -23.16021 Península de Santa Elena -2.2451 -80.91225 Provincia de Manabí -0.66667 -80.08333 Bahía de Sechura -5.63891 -80.95645 Golfo de Guayaquil -3 -80.5 Santuario Nacional Manglares de Tumbes -3.5 -80.48333 Kabupaten Teluk Wondama -2.7 134.5 East Seram -3.39851 130.39167 +![cdata[Fishing policy and administrative management]]+ 530458.80 530458.80 530458.80 530458.80 530458.80 588204 FAO CI, UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF and University of Washington 134797 FAO CI, UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF and University of Washington 428970 FAO CI, UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF and University of Washington 336327 FAO CI, UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF and University of Washington 851713 FAO CI, UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF and University of Washington 287080 FAO CI, UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF and University of Washington 2640712 FAO CI, UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF and University of Washington 20013 FAO CI, UNDP, UNEP, WB, WWF and University of Washington 2652294 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9162 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Abidjan 5.3629 -3.9992 Vijayawada 16.5075 80.6466 Mysore 12.23 76.42 Jaipur 27 76 Guntur 16.3145 80.4294 Bhopal 23.2547 77.4029 Vinh Yen 21.3089 105.6049 Hue 16.4619 107.5955 Hagiang 15.8 107.7167 Melaka 2.25 102.25 Tianjin 39.3333 11.3333 Shijiazhuang 38.0414 114.4876 Shenzhen 22.5455 114.0683 Ningbo 29.8782 121.5495 Nanchang 28.684 115.8531 Guiyang 26.6504 106.6302 Beijing 39.9075 116.3972 Saint Louis 16.0179 -16.4896 Dakar 14.6937 -17.4441 Recife -8.0539 -314.8811 Asuncion -25.2865 -57.647 Brasilia -15.7797 -47.9297 Xalapa 19.5312 -96.9159 Campeche 18.8333 -90.25 Lima -12.0432 -77.0282 La Paz 24.1444 -110.3005 Johannesburg -26.2023 28.0436 +![cdata[Urban development and management]]+ 1804862.40 1804862.40 1804862.40 1804862.40 1804862.40 1318693 World Bank World Bank 4036394 World Bank World Bank 991102 World Bank World Bank 547708 World Bank World Bank 738896 World Bank World Bank 839474 World Bank World Bank 8472267 World Bank World Bank 9024312 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9163 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility CI CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 609405.67 609405.67 609405.67 0 CI NA 1806925 CI NA 0 CI NA 1828217 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9179 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility WWF-US ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Republic of Indonesia -5 120 Republic of Liberia 6.5 -9.5 Republic of Paraguay -23.33333 -58 Federative Republic of Brazil -10 -55 +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ 795688.20 795688.20 795688.20 795688.20 795688.20 712978 UNDP ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends 712978 WWF-US ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends 439378 UNDP ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends 439378 WWF-US ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends 423730 UNDP ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends 423730 WWF-US ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends 293142 UNDP ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends 293142 WWF-US ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends 2744183 UNDP ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends 2744183 WWF-US ISEAL Alliance, Forest Trends 3978441 GEF 3978441 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9180 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP CI,WWF, Government of Indonesia, Paraguay and Liberia CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ 2916880.60 2916880.60 2916880.60 2916880.60 2916880.60 4086148 UNDP CI,WWF, Government of Indonesia, Paraguay and Liberia 1795137 UNDP CI,WWF, Government of Indonesia, Paraguay and Liberia 3337615 UNDP CI,WWF, Government of Indonesia, Paraguay and Liberia 2605684 UNDP CI,WWF, Government of Indonesia, Paraguay and Liberia 14322265 UNDP CI,WWF, Government of Indonesia, Paraguay and Liberia 14584403 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9182 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility WWF-US Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Departamento de Presidente Hayes -23.5 -58.83333 Departamento de Alto Paraguay -20.5 -59.16667 Departamento de Boquerón -22.64105 -61.07381 +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ 1749612.00 1749612.00 1749612.00 1749612.00 1749612.00 0 UNDP Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia 0 WWF-US Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia 6597460 UNDP Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia 6597460 WWF-US Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia 1083897 UNDP Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia 1083897 WWF-US Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia 977797 UNDP Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia 977797 WWF-US Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia 8659154 UNDP Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia 8659154 WWF-US Proforest, Stockholm Environment Institute, WWF Singapore, WWF Indonesia 8748060 GEF 8748060 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9209 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 13461538.40 13461538.40 13461538.40 13461538.40 13461538.40 67307692 UNDP UNOPS 67307692 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9211 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility World Bank UNODC, World Customs Organization, Interpol, Wildlife Conservation Society, TRAFFIC, WWF, Royal Foundation, CITES Secretariat CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Mozambique -18.25 35 Afghanistan 33 66 India 22 79 Tanzania -6 35 Vietnam 16.1667 107.8333 Dodoma -6.17221 35.73947 Thailand 15.5 101 Bangkok 13.75398 100.50144 Jakarta -6.21462 106.84513 Indonesia -5 120 Philippines 13.4088 122.5616 Nairobi -1.28333 36.81667 Kenya 1 38 Republic of Congo -2.5 23.5 Cameroon 6 12.5 Gabon -1 11.75 Mali 18 -2 Ethiopia 9 39.5 Zimbabwe -19 29.75 Zambia -14.3333 28.5 Malawi -13.5 34 Botswana -22 24 South Africa -29 24 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1400000.00 1400000.00 1400000.00 1400000.00 1400000.00 1406622 UNDP UNODC, World Customs Organization, Interpol, Wildlife Conservation Society, TRAFFIC, WWF, Royal Foundation, CITES Secretariat 1406622 World Bank UNODC, World Customs Organization, Interpol, Wildlife Conservation Society, TRAFFIC, WWF, Royal Foundation, CITES Secretariat 2674428 UNDP UNODC, World Customs Organization, Interpol, Wildlife Conservation Society, TRAFFIC, WWF, Royal Foundation, CITES Secretariat 2674428 World Bank UNODC, World Customs Organization, Interpol, Wildlife Conservation Society, TRAFFIC, WWF, Royal Foundation, CITES Secretariat 897516 UNDP UNODC, World Customs Organization, Interpol, Wildlife Conservation Society, TRAFFIC, WWF, Royal Foundation, CITES Secretariat 897516 World Bank UNODC, World Customs Organization, Interpol, Wildlife Conservation Society, TRAFFIC, WWF, Royal Foundation, CITES Secretariat 5021086 UNDP UNODC, World Customs Organization, Interpol, Wildlife Conservation Society, TRAFFIC, WWF, Royal Foundation, CITES Secretariat 5021086 World Bank UNODC, World Customs Organization, Interpol, Wildlife Conservation Society, TRAFFIC, WWF, Royal Foundation, CITES Secretariat 7000000 GEF 7000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9264 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO PIF Approval Date ' Congo DR Central African Republic Cameroon China Guinea-Bissau Kenya Myanmar Pakistan Sao Tome and Principe Tanzania Developing countries, unspecified XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9309 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Climate Bonds Initiative CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 650000.00 650000.00 650000.00 586883 UNDP Climate Bonds Initiative 54172 UNDP Climate Bonds Initiative 317783 UNDP Climate Bonds Initiative 1496552 UNDP Climate Bonds Initiative 1950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9320 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Energy generation, renewable sources - multiple technologies]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 985060 UNEP UNEP 884963 UNEP UNEP -75239 UNEP UNEP 155216 UNEP UNEP 1942371 UNEP UNEP 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9329 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Resource Institute CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 0 UNEP World Resource Institute 1886489 UNEP World Resource Institute 1984068 UNEP World Resource Institute 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9337 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Myanmar 17.17505 95.999965 Kazakhstan 47.228609 65.20932 Indonesia -2.483383 117.890285 Tunisia 33.843941 9.400138 Costa Rica 10.273563 -84.07391 Sudan 12.862807 30.217636 Chile -35.675147 -71.542969 South Africa -28.816624 24.991639 +![cdata[Energy conservation and demand-side efficiency]]+ 620000.00 620000.00 620000.00 620000.00 620000.00 0 UNEP NA 2331170 UNEP NA 0 UNEP NA 0 UNEP NA 687289 UNEP NA 3100000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9347 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified  Nairobi/Global Project -1.27467 36.81178 +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 322666.67 322666.67 322666.67 364340 UNEP NA 0 UNEP NA 603660 UNEP NA -603660 UNEP NA 0 UNEP NA 0 UNEP NA 232563 UNEP NA 0 UNEP NA 469143 UNEP NA 968000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9373 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO Yale University, National Cleaner Production Center in Brazil CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 590000.00 590000.00 590000.00 0 UNIDO Yale University, National Cleaner Production Center in Brazil 1555227 UNIDO Yale University, National Cleaner Production Center in Brazil 92185 UNIDO Yale University, National Cleaner Production Center in Brazil 0 UNIDO Yale University, National Cleaner Production Center in Brazil 121355 UNIDO Yale University, National Cleaner Production Center in Brazil 1770000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9391 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN IUCN CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 0 IUCN IUCN 1946875 IUCN IUCN -23130 IUCN IUCN 2000000 IUCN IUCN 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9452 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Technical University of Denmark - UNEP DTU Partnership (UDP), National Agencies CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Ukraine Developing countries, unspecified Kabul, Afghanistan 34.53 69.18 Suva, Fiji -18.13683 178.42531 Djibouti, Djibouti 11.58901 43.14503 Monrovia, Liberia 6.30054 -10.7969 Kampala, Uganda 0.32 32.58 Bangui, Central African Republic 4.39 18.55 Sao Tome, Sao Tome y Principe 0.33 6.73 Conakry, Guinea 9.53795 -13.67729 N'Djamena, Chad 12.39 14.91 Niamey, Niger 13.52 2.11 Paramaribo, Suriname 5.86638 -55.16682 Kingston, Jamaica 17.99702 -76.79358 Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago 10.66668 -61.51889 Roseau, Dominica 15.30174 -61.38808 Saint John’s, Antigua and Barbuda 17.12096 -61.84329 Port-au-Prince, Haiti 18.54349 -72.33881 Naypyidaw, Myanmar 19.75 96.13 Kyiv, Ukraine 50.45 30.52 Yaren, Nauru -0.55085 166.9252 Lilongwe, Malawi -13.96692 33.78725 +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1242000.00 1242000.00 1242000.00 1242000.00 1242000.00 700000 UNEP Technical University of Denmark - UNEP DTU Partnership (UDP), National Agencies 1877287 UNEP Technical University of Denmark - UNEP DTU Partnership (UDP), National Agencies 1751824 UNEP Technical University of Denmark - UNEP DTU Partnership (UDP), National Agencies 398265 UNEP Technical University of Denmark - UNEP DTU Partnership (UDP), National Agencies 1422625 UNEP Technical University of Denmark - UNEP DTU Partnership (UDP), National Agencies 6210000 UNEP Technical University of Denmark - UNEP DTU Partnership (UDP), National Agencies 6210000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9522 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry development]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 703945.00 703945.00 703945.00 703945.00 703945.00 -2666232 IUCN IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative -2666232 UNEP IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative -2666232 FAO IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 183756 IUCN IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 183756 UNEP IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 183756 FAO IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative -13683 IUCN IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative -13683 UNEP IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative -13683 FAO IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 1115534 IUCN IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 1115534 UNEP IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 1115534 FAO IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 746833 IUCN IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 746833 UNEP IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 746833 FAO IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 3032715 IUCN IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 3032715 UNEP IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 3032715 FAO IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 1040655 IUCN IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 1040655 UNEP IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 1040655 FAO IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 1650948 IUCN IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 1650948 UNEP IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 1650948 FAO IUCN, FAO, UN Environment Finance Initiative 3519725 GEF 3519725 GEF 3519725 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9602 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility CI National Governments, AGC, NRDC National Governments, AGC, NRDC PIF Approval Date ' Burkina Faso Colombia Guyana Indonesia Kenya Mongolia Peru Philippines Developing countries, unspecified XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9605 Global Environment Facility Build capacity in developing countries for implementing the IMO and other relevant guidelines for biofouling management and to catalyse overall reductions in the transboundary introduction of biofouling-mediated invasive aquatic species with additional benefits in the reduction of GHG emissions from global shipping. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP IMO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1396000.00 1396000.00 1396000.00 1396000.00 1396000.00 829402 UNDP IMO 705049 UNDP IMO 838692 UNDP IMO 1173866 UNDP IMO 1301852 UNDP IMO 6980000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9666 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank WRI, C40, and ICLEI CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 828506 World Bank WRI, C40, and ICLEI 981796 World Bank WRI, C40, and ICLEI 2164080 World Bank WRI, C40, and ICLEI 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9681 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) Ocean Conservancy (OC), UN Environment through its Global Partnership on Marine Litter (GPML) and its Responsible Industry and Value Chain (RIVU) Unit within its Sustainable Lifestyles, Cities and Industry (SLCI) Branch. CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 670811 UNEP Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) Ocean Conservancy (OC), UN Environment through its Global Partnership on Marine Litter (GPML) and its Responsible Industry and Value Chain (RIVU) Unit within its Sustainable Lifestyles, Cities and Industry (SLCI) Branch. 238742 UNEP Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) Ocean Conservancy (OC), UN Environment through its Global Partnership on Marine Litter (GPML) and its Responsible Industry and Value Chain (RIVU) Unit within its Sustainable Lifestyles, Cities and Industry (SLCI) Branch. 869116 UNEP Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) Ocean Conservancy (OC), UN Environment through its Global Partnership on Marine Litter (GPML) and its Responsible Industry and Value Chain (RIVU) Unit within its Sustainable Lifestyles, Cities and Industry (SLCI) Branch. 1778669 UNEP Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) Ocean Conservancy (OC), UN Environment through its Global Partnership on Marine Litter (GPML) and its Responsible Industry and Value Chain (RIVU) Unit within its Sustainable Lifestyles, Cities and Industry (SLCI) Branch. 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9696 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ 1281020.20 1281020.20 1281020.20 1281020.20 1281020.20 422500 UNEP IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US 422500 World Bank IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US 1046262 UNEP IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US 1046262 World Bank IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US 1316485 UNEP IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US 1316485 World Bank IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US 587899 UNEP IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US 587899 World Bank IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US 3148492 UNEP IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US 3148492 World Bank IFC, UNEP FI, WWF-US 6405101 GEF 6405101 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9697 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UN Environment Global Mercury Partnership ASGM area (co-leads: NRDC, UN Environment and UNIDO) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Indonesia -5 120 Philippines 13.40882 122.56155 Kenya 1 38 Mongolia 46 105 Burkina Faso 12.5 -1.66667 Guyana 5 -59 Colombia 4 -73.25 Peru -10 -75.25 +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1600000.00 1600000.00 1600000.00 1600000.00 1600000.00 1836566 UNEP UN Environment Global Mercury Partnership ASGM area (co-leads: NRDC, UN Environment and UNIDO) 976068 UNEP UN Environment Global Mercury Partnership ASGM area (co-leads: NRDC, UN Environment and UNIDO) 1780592 UNEP UN Environment Global Mercury Partnership ASGM area (co-leads: NRDC, UN Environment and UNIDO) 1858646 UNEP UN Environment Global Mercury Partnership ASGM area (co-leads: NRDC, UN Environment and UNIDO) 821568 UNEP UN Environment Global Mercury Partnership ASGM area (co-leads: NRDC, UN Environment and UNIDO) 628086 UNEP UN Environment Global Mercury Partnership ASGM area (co-leads: NRDC, UN Environment and UNIDO) 8000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9719 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP The Sustainable Trade Initiative (IDH), and Green Fund CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Rural development]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 1925000 UNEP The Sustainable Trade Initiative (IDH), and Green Fund 0 UNEP The Sustainable Trade Initiative (IDH), and Green Fund 0 UNEP The Sustainable Trade Initiative (IDH), and Green Fund 1950000 UNEP The Sustainable Trade Initiative (IDH), and Green Fund 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9771 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP SAICM Secretariat CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1638000.00 1638000.00 1638000.00 1638000.00 1638000.00 8070000 UNEP SAICM Secretariat 0 UNEP SAICM Secretariat 0 UNEP SAICM Secretariat 23230 UNEP SAICM Secretariat 0 UNEP SAICM Secretariat 0 UNEP SAICM Secretariat 8190000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9774 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Argentina Burkina Faso Bhutan Belarus Congo DR Colombia Cabo Verde Dominican Republic Eritrea Gambia Jamaica Madagascar Mali Malaysia Nepal Panama Holiday Inn Suva -18.14194 178.42265 Weston Suites Hotel 18.46447 -69.93185 Mogiliov 53.89999 30.33334 Madiro -13.31502 48.25926 Boulevard Arjaan By Rotana 31.96433 35.90915 Michelo Suites 16.52128 -88.37047 Okapi Hotel -1.94095 30.05844 Tolongoina -21.55 47.51667 Soamazava -24.06667 47.23333 Ikongo -21.76667 43.55 Nosy Hara -12.23333 49.01667 Anivorano -24.2 45.88333 Hell-Ville -13.39718 48.26663 Mmaraka -24.66167 25.90583 Buena Vista 19.47599 -70.68968 Urbanización El Tejar 19.29165 -70.26189 Villa Providencia 18.46 -69.30733 Kinunga -1.96336 30.07914 Ban Phouôy 15.15008 106.24963 La Clery 14.01846 -60.98422 Londonderry 13.77623 -61.01362 Laiqizhaicun 34.3212 108.56143 Dzamandzar -13.32912 48.20382 Ambohimiarina I -21.20113 48.17883 Andranokobaka -18.07302 48.28516 Ampaisokely -18.94012 46.90465 Saint Mary’s College 14.02451 -60.99848 Grenada Free Port 12.04444 -61.74957 Residencial Marbella 8.08843 -80.97715 Santa Fe 8.61047 -78.21537 Burayu 9.03528 38.66083 Malé 4.17521 73.50916 Uzbekistan 41.66667 63.83333 Passe Onzaine -19.725 63.49167 Động Bạch Mã 16.16667 107.83333 Suai -9.31286 125.25648 Ainaro -8.99241 125.50816 Lao People’s Democratic Republic 18 105 Cambodia 13 105 Muang Sanamxai 14.73807 106.41328 Welaluhu -9.03004 125.99599 Ban Phoulan 20.51628 101.4924 Timor-Leste -8.83333 125.75 Ruhangali -1.6821 29.7922 Teaoraereke Village 1.33309 173.01162 Tabiteuea Village 1.42301 173.09988 Tuvalu -8.51719 179.14478 Vanuatu -16.3333 167.5 Port Vila -17.73648 168.31366 Luganville -15.51989 167.16235 Suva -18.13683 178.42531 Nabuna -17.2497 179.38374 Obock 12.25007 43.08369 Obock 11.96693 43.28835 Holhol 11.31028 42.92944 Djibouti 11.83333 42.5 Thies 14.8 -16.93333 Mongu Arna 9.48855 9.13985 Jam 6.8539 9.50232 Effurun 5.55629 5.78459 Calabar 4.97602 8.3472 Balogun 7.53291 3.90822 Abuja 9.05785 7.49508 Gourcy 13.20776 -2.35893 Togo 8.66667 1.08333 Victoria -4.62001 55.45501 Seychelles -4.58333 55.66667 Tunis 36.81897 10.16579 Soliman 36.73575 10.52751 Ghardimaou 36.44788 8.4413 Bou Arada 36.3162 9.61157 Beirut 33.89332 35.50157 Baalbek 34.00583 36.21806 Aaramoun 33.75972 35.51972 El Maqâssed 34.00806 36.21222 Stadiumi Kombëtar Qemal Stafa 41.31667 19.81667 Paskuqan 41.35389 19.80667 Anatolia 39 35 Keren 15.77792 38.45107 New Amsterdam 6.24793 -57.5171 Guyana 5 -59 Eritrea 15 39 Sipaliwini District 4 -56 Awasa 7.06205 38.47635 Asmara 15.33805 38.93184 Assab 13.00917 42.73944 Mendefera 14.88722 38.81528 Addis Ababa 9.02497 38.74689 Kingston 17.99702 -76.79358 Cassia Park 18.01964 -76.80732 Santo Domingo 18.47186 -69.89232 Cañada de Lilo 19.22317 -70.88349 Azua 18.45319 -70.7349 El Valle 22.28695 -79.95831 Santo Domingo 22.58677 -80.24261 Reparto Mirama 23.03333 -81.53333 Playa de Florida 21.40796 -78.5687 Playa Nazabal 22.76864 -79.73816 Morón 22.10774 -78.62667 Horquitas 22.2021 -80.77189 Guantánamo 20.14444 -75.20917 El Serverancia 23.03333 -81.53333 El Cafetal 22.8 -82.51667 Cuba 22 -79.5 Cocodrilo 21.50081 -83.09839 Camagüey 21.38083 -77.91694 Bayamo 20.37417 -76.64361 Abreus 22.27797 -80.56931 Oakes Field 25.0405 -77.3515 Trinidad and Tobago 11 -61 Chaguanas 10.51667 -61.41667 West Farm Gut 17.29444 -62.76798 Brown Hill 17.12142 -62.60203 Soufrière 13.84541 -61.02493 Savannes Bay Nature Reserve 13.76317 -60.92373 Sauteurs 12.21833 -61.63917 Saint George 12.05 -61.73333 Hillsborough 12.48292 -61.45597 Curlew Cay 17.38333 -88.03333 Barranco 16 -88.91667 Provincia del Darién 8.08333 -77.88333 El Crucero 22.50274 -79.48201 Jabal al Atil 15.4 28.95 Maimará -23.62454 -65.40913 Mount Mata’aga -13.62092 -172.44735 Arta Region 11.5 42.75 Rwanda -2 30 K'eda 41.60093 41.94008 Comrat 46.29456 28.6565 Chisinau 47.00556 28.8575 Viva Wyndham Fortuna Beach All Inclusive 26.5404 -78.5935 Chao’an 22.27043 112.57365 Permanent Freshwater Lake 4.67968 -160.37207 Aramari Gilberts Village 3.81773 -159.32555 Tereitannano Village 3.83401 -159.34753 Government Station 2.05143 173.26316 Ambo Village 1.35317 173.04259 Bikenibeu Town 1.36273 173.12689 Betio Sport Complex 1.35575 172.92783 Nanumanga -6.2897 176.31958 Rukoki -2.2345 30.1224 Rwanira -2.313 30.0587 Bugesera District -2.23456 30.14825 Nigvziani 42.07499 41.90821 Suojia 33.89159 93.67153 Akpabuyo 4.90092 8.48111 Maiduguri 11.83537 13.15166 +![cdata[Agricultural development]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Rural development]]+ 3467500.00 3467500.00 3467500.00 3467500.00 3467500.00 15058254 UNDP UNOPS 1300868 UNDP UNOPS 978378 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 0 UNDP UNOPS 17337500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9775 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UN Environment Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System UN Environment Economic Fiscal Policy Unit CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified New Delhi, India 28.614179 77.202266 Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan 51.12822 71.430668 Beijing, China 39.906217 116.391276 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 47.949809 106.966724  Abuja, Nigeria 9.064331 7.489297 Mexico City, Mexico 19.432601 -99.133342 +![cdata[Financial policy and administrative management]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 1287975 UNEP UN Environment Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System UN Environment Economic & Fiscal Policy Unit 247500 UNEP UN Environment Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System UN Environment Economic & Fiscal Policy Unit 419525 UNEP UN Environment Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System UN Environment Economic & Fiscal Policy Unit 0 UNEP UN Environment Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System UN Environment Economic & Fiscal Policy Unit 1778035 UNEP UN Environment Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System UN Environment Economic & Fiscal Policy Unit 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9807 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO Carbon Trust UK CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Energy conservation and demand-side efficiency]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 536212 UNIDO Carbon Trust UK 1388427 UNIDO Carbon Trust UK 73786 UNIDO Carbon Trust UK 1 UNIDO Carbon Trust UK 1998426 UNIDO Carbon Trust UK 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9826 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Environmental Ministries in the 17 participating countries CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 654500.00 654500.00 654500.00 1508249 UNDP Environmental Ministries in the 17 participating countries 1921472 UNDP Environmental Ministries in the 17 participating countries 1963500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9829 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Environmental Ministries in the 17 participating countries CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 654500.00 654500.00 654500.00 1350371 UNDP Environmental Ministries in the 17 participating countries 1930427 UNDP Environmental Ministries in the 17 participating countries 1963500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9832 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 654500.00 654500.00 654500.00 490000 UNEP UNEP 0 UNEP UNEP 1158378 UNEP UNEP 315122 UNEP UNEP 1628351 UNEP UNEP 1963500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9840 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Environmental Ministries in the 13 participating countries CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 500500.00 500500.00 500500.00 1061481 UNDP Environmental Ministries in the 13 participating countries 1476042 UNDP Environmental Ministries in the 13 participating countries 1501500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9857 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Afghanistan Albania Armenia Bahamas China Cuba Ethiopia Georgia Jordan St. Kitts and Nevis Lao PDR St. Lucia Marshall Islands Mali Niger Nigeria Papua New Guinea Palau Sierra Leone Türkiye Tuvalu Tanzania Ukraine Uganda Holiday Inn Suva -18.14194 178.42265 Bodufolhudhoo 4.1855 72.77335 Toamasina -18.1492 49.40234 Fianarantsoa -21.45267 47.08569 Antananarivo -18.91368 47.53613 Rand Nature Centre 26.53863 -78.67397 Laḥğ 13.05667 44.88194 Ligaulevu Bay -16.33976 179.34986 Jisr Ros el Maten 33.86636 35.62233 Saint Michael’s Cathedral 13.09783 -59.61242 Harrison’s College 13.09991 -59.61062 Fontabelle 13.10226 -59.62349 Alexandra School 13.24712 -59.64224 Clifton Hall 13.18873 -59.5066 University of the West Indies 13.13376 -59.63006 Moramanga Ville -18.94728 48.22771 Paro Chhu 27.31667 89.53333 Ha Chhu 27.23333 89.5 Uzbekistan 41.66667 63.83333 Động Bạch Mã 16.16667 107.83333 Suai -9.31286 125.25648 Vunuku -18.12169 178.55758 Rewa Province -18.08333 178.33333 Raviravi -18.37593 178.1073 Maka Bay -12.49601 177.03893 Cameroon 6 12.5 Dikhil 11.10454 42.36971 Thala 35.59234 8.68258 Sbikha 35.92038 10.03087 El Fahs 36.37419 9.90651 Djebel Abiod 36.97616 9.07845 Nefza 36.9868 9.07576 La Pépinière 36.86331 6.91096 Bou Yaya 29.25969 0.21744 Beirut 33.89332 35.50157 Anatolia 39 35 Harris 13.3106 -59.61763 Green Hill 13.13892 -59.60659 Flatfield 13.32795 -59.61162 Mackenzie 6.00535 -58.30457 Uruguay -33 -56 Trelawny 18.38333 -77.63333 Arthur’s Town 24.6224 -75.67151 Trinidad and Tobago 11 -61 Seahaven Estate 17.20311 -62.60047 Vernon's Island 17.11431 -61.76925 Old Road 17.01682 -61.83579 Blake Island 17.01456 -61.78266 Soufrière 13.85616 -61.0566 Saint George's 12.05288 -61.75226 Venezuela 8 -66 Puerres 0.82122 -77.31978 Bogotá 4.60971 -74.08175 Vaisala -13.51439 -172.67522 Tafitoala -14.00703 -171.81238 Mulivai -14.00385 -171.80234 Mount Mata’aga -13.62092 -172.44735 Lata -14.04579 -171.44635 Fausaga -14.0006 -171.82444 Faleasi‘u -13.80742 -171.92864 Apia -13.83333 -171.76666 Vakano -18.17842 -178.79216 Teleneşti 47.58333 28.5 Chisinau 47.00556 28.8575 Tabarka–Ain Draham International Airport 36.98 8.87694 Coconut Court Beach Hotel 13.0902 -59.6033 Vaivase-uta -13.85642 -171.74491 Nu’ualofa -13.75652 -172.30587 Sologa Stream -13.61487 -172.20003 Samtse 26.91309 89.08361 Chigorodó Airport 7.68038 -76.6865 Kunahandhoo 1.78276 73.36739 Khada 28.28041 83.57943 Staţia de Cale Ferată Chişinău 47.01139 28.86111 Balibo -8.97145 125.043 Réduit -20.23436 57.49386 Curepipe -20.31628 57.52594 Lion 27.72165 85.3224 +![cdata[Agricultural development]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Rural development]]+ 3833435.40 3833435.40 3833435.40 3833435.40 3833435.40 7468540 UNDP UNOPS 2818354 UNDP UNOPS 6301498 UNDP UNOPS 19167177 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9858 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Forest Trends CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 823388 UNEP Forest Trends 921500 UNEP Forest Trends 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9861 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN CBD, CIFOR, FAO, ICRAF, ITTO, IUFRO, UNDP, UN Environment, UNCCD, World Bank, UNFF CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ 208333.33 208333.33 208333.33 0 IUCN CBD, CIFOR, FAO, ICRAF, ITTO, IUFRO, UNDP, UN Environment, UNCCD, World Bank, UNFF 625000 IUCN CBD, CIFOR, FAO, ICRAF, ITTO, IUFRO, UNDP, UN Environment, UNCCD, World Bank, UNFF -315182 IUCN CBD, CIFOR, FAO, ICRAF, ITTO, IUFRO, UNDP, UN Environment, UNCCD, World Bank, UNFF 281087 IUCN CBD, CIFOR, FAO, ICRAF, ITTO, IUFRO, UNDP, UN Environment, UNCCD, World Bank, UNFF 12559 IUCN CBD, CIFOR, FAO, ICRAF, ITTO, IUFRO, UNDP, UN Environment, UNCCD, World Bank, UNFF 625000 IUCN CBD, CIFOR, FAO, ICRAF, ITTO, IUFRO, UNDP, UN Environment, UNCCD, World Bank, UNFF 625000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9866 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP National Executing Agencies CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 476666.67 476666.67 476666.67 815000 UNEP National Executing Agencies 434444 UNEP National Executing Agencies 180556 UNEP National Executing Agencies 1287751 UNEP National Executing Agencies 1430000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9884 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UN Environment Chemicals and Health, the Basel and Stockholm Conventions Regional Centre for English speaking countries in Africa; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre in Uruguay; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre for the Asia and the Pacific Region in China. CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 1645531 UNEP UN Environment Chemicals and Health, the Basel and Stockholm Conventions Regional Centre for English speaking countries in Africa; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre in Uruguay; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre for the Asia and the Pacific Region in China. 0 UNEP UN Environment Chemicals and Health, the Basel and Stockholm Conventions Regional Centre for English speaking countries in Africa; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre in Uruguay; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre for the Asia and the Pacific Region in China. 0 UNEP UN Environment Chemicals and Health, the Basel and Stockholm Conventions Regional Centre for English speaking countries in Africa; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre in Uruguay; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre for the Asia and the Pacific Region in China. 319619 UNEP UN Environment Chemicals and Health, the Basel and Stockholm Conventions Regional Centre for English speaking countries in Africa; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre in Uruguay; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre for the Asia and the Pacific Region in China. 2000000 UNEP UN Environment Chemicals and Health, the Basel and Stockholm Conventions Regional Centre for English speaking countries in Africa; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre in Uruguay; Basel and Stockholm Convention Regional Centre for the Asia and the Pacific Region in China. 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9900 Global Environment Facility To provide project preparation and technical assistance services to project developers to build a balanced portfolio of effective projects for the LDN Fund. It also aims to increase knowledge and awareness of models for LDN investment across the investor and project developer community. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility WWF-US Mirova, GM (UNCCD Global Mechanism) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 312555 WWF-US Mirova, GM (UNCCD Global Mechanism) 209132 WWF-US Mirova, GM (UNCCD Global Mechanism) 199456 WWF-US Mirova, GM (UNCCD Global Mechanism) 421168 WWF-US Mirova, GM (UNCCD Global Mechanism) 700689 WWF-US Mirova, GM (UNCCD Global Mechanism) 1843000 WWF-US Mirova, GM (UNCCD Global Mechanism) 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9914 Global Environment Facility To improve the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity by demonstrating innovative finance blending models to increase return-seeking private investment in conservation. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN TNC CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1650000.00 1650000.00 1650000.00 1650000.00 1650000.00 8250000 IUCN TNC -25742 IUCN TNC 0 IUCN TNC 0 IUCN TNC 8250000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9935 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank, Finance and Markets Global Practice (FMGP) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Disaster Risk Reduction]]+ 493333.33 493333.33 493333.33 0 World Bank World Bank, Finance and Markets Global Practice (FMGP) 462773 World Bank World Bank, Finance and Markets Global Practice (FMGP) 161018 World Bank World Bank, Finance and Markets Global Practice (FMGP) 101001 World Bank World Bank, Finance and Markets Global Practice (FMGP) 249378 World Bank World Bank, Finance and Markets Global Practice (FMGP) 477859 World Bank World Bank, Finance and Markets Global Practice (FMGP) 1452029 World Bank World Bank, Finance and Markets Global Practice (FMGP) 1480000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9947 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP WRI (World Resource Insitute) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Energy generation, renewable sources - multiple technologies]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 1698162 UNEP WRI (World Resource Insitute) 229838 UNEP WRI (World Resource Insitute) 2000000 UNEP WRI (World Resource Insitute) 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9993 Global Environment Facility Policy-makers and stakeholders are able to prioritise and implement agroecological systems in drylands as a means to sustain productivity of agro-ecosystems in support of food security, agricultural livelihoods, and reduce environmental degradation and GHG emissions. Indicators: i) Number of project proposals and draft policy documents (strategies, laws, financial plans) integrating agroecology and its principles ii) Number of countries who have agroecology in their government agenda for discussions on agricultural development planning Targets: i) At least three countries out of seven have developed a project proposal or a draft updated policy document promoting agroecology ii) Seven countries have agroecology in their agenda for discussions on agricultural development planning Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO CARI CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Bryanston, Sandton, South Africa -26.05211 28.02805 Gorantla, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India 16.5039 80.16753 Magadi, Karnataka, India 12.97681 75.80802 Pennagaram, Tamil Nadu, India 12.71801 79.40125 Wardha, Maharashtra, India 20.73933 78.59784 Kolār, Karnataka, India 13.13768 78.12999 Dungarpur, Rajasthan, India 23.84306 73.71466 Dharwad, Karnataka, India 15.46005 75.00778 Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu, India 12.1277 78.15794 Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India 13.21055 79.0956 Banswara, Rajasthan, India 23.54109 74.4425 Tataguine, Senegal 14.45 -16.63333 Sangalkam, Senegal 14.78023 -17.22761 Katob, Senegal 13.81667 -14.08333 Pissila, Sanmatenga, Burkina Faso 13.16417 -0.8225 Ouagadougou, Burkina faso 12.36566 -1.53388 Guiè, Dapelogo, Burkina 12.79567 -1.60792 Fada N'gourma, Burkina Faso 12.06157 0.35843 Barga, Yatenga, Burkina Faso 13.79332 -2.25502 Baoudoumboin, Burkina Faso 13.05354 -2.63336 Tiflet, Morocco 33.89469 -6.30649 Palmeraie de Skoura, Morocco 31.07808 -6.57311 Mzouda, Marocco 31.22083 -8.59257 Asni, Morocco 31.24653 -7.9789 Province du Zondoma, Burkina Faso 13.18333 -2.36667 Tehuledere, ethiopia 11.31667 39.75 Mēlē, Ethiopia 5.88333 37.43333 Nieuwoudtville, South Africa -31.37656 19.1122 Juazeiro, Bahia, Brazil -9.41167 -40.49861 Jenipapo, Ceará, Brazil -3.55171 -39.18565 Borborema, Paraíba, Brazil -6.80333 -35.58 Araripe, Ceará, Brazil -7.21337 -40.137 Enjeitado, Piauí, Brazil -3.71861 -42.46583 Shoul, Morocco 33.9196 -6.61588 Ghassate, marocco 31.16992 -6.86179 Zululand District, South Africa -27.81139 31.29426 Umkhanyakude, South Africa -27.62236 32.32945 Overstrand Municipality, South Africa -34.47129 19.37165 Port Elizabeth, South Africa -33.89909 25.60341 +![cdata[Agricultural development]]+ 379071.67 379071.67 379071.67 975242 FAO CARI 106477 FAO CARI 50354 FAO CARI 1086357 FAO CARI 1137215 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10084 Global Environment Facility To promote and support innovative and scalable initiatives, and foster multistakeholder partnerships at the local level to tackle global environmental issues in priority landscapes and seascapes Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.During the project period, the SGP will deliver the following important socio-economic results:· SGP interventions will directly impact 200,000 beneficiaries out of which 50% are female through enhanced capacities and improved livelihoods and lives;· SGP will support CSO-Government-Private Sector dialogues in at least 15 countries to have scaled up policy impact· Under social inclusion, the SGP will ensure that 30% of its projects are led by women, that at least 50% of all SGP beneficiaries are women;· At least 20 percent of relevant SGP country programs integrate appropriate models to engage youth and 15 percent of countries have targeted support for indigenous peoples; · At least 15 countries will undertake South-South exchanges such that cross-fertilization and learnings between communities, CSOs and other partners are promoted; The interventions from the SGP contributes to global environmental benefits at multiple levels, starting from the global level, prioritized at the national level through the CPS, and translated into small grant actions in the field. Firstly, SGP priorities will be fully aligned to that of the GEF-7 Programming Directions Paper and its outcomes to meet the GEF-7 targets. Secondly, greater attention will be focused to creating synergy among individual projects using landscape or seascape approaches, as well as taking all opportunities for complementation with larger projects of the GEF and other donor agencies. Thirdly, SGP local initiatives will link to global initiatives and platforms as well as fostering joint efforts with global networks. Finally, the implementation of “Grantmaker+” set of roles has been designed to support scaling up, mainstreaming and replication that will provide higher level capacity development (i.e. IP Fellowships), networking and institutional support, knowledge sharing (e.g. through South-South exchanges), and advocacy mechanisms at national levels (i.e. CSO-Government-Private Sector Dialogue Platforms), and where relevant, all of these to extend to regional and global levels. Insofar as the SGP interventions promote local socio-economic benefits such as improvement of local livelihoods, strengthening capacities of local communities, these will take into consideration the underlying aim to reduce threats from the local level to globally important environmental assets, raising awareness and mobilizing civil society and wider public towards supporting environmentally friendly practices and approaches. In this way, the delivery of the socio-economic and other local benefits contribute towards the delivery of global environmental benefits.Global Environment Facility UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Weston Suites Hotel 18.46447 -69.93185 Mont Choisy Coral Azur Beach Resort -20.03205 57.55045 Jixiang 26.8575 100.23 Finca Sesenta y Dos 9.44805 -82.48632 Black Lion Hospital 9.02028 38.74958 BICIAB // Tampouy 12.38963 -1.57645 Didy -18.11667 48.53333 Les Salines -20.37306 57.36667 Neiba (Zona Urbana) 18.48686 -71.41471 La Yagua O La Caya 17.98685 -71.16792 30 De Mayo O La Policía 18.21258 -71.1017 Villa Providencia 18.46 -69.30733 Nuevo 18.06516 -71.10764 Universitario 19.37263 -69.85267 Etsha -19.13099 22.29254 Houay Poungtôm 18.35249 103.18711 Parque Nacional Darien 7.73611 -77.54722 Vank’ 40.88611 45.38348 Ts’its’sar 40.63348 45.01392 Carellie 14.01889 -60.96851 Anbre 13.82686 -60.92775 Namatiu District School -19.07841 178.10128 Plaza Ycua Francia -25.26586 -57.57469 Korogasau Peak -16.76648 -179.76552 Tavai -26.18824 -55.52995 Titikaveka -21.26857 -159.75719 Zone Industrielle de Gounghin 12.36631 -1.54137 Panbang 26.87479 91.0799 Imorona -21.45367 47.329 Khar 27 91.35 Vuwani -23.13524 30.42136 Las Piedritas -26.82357 -61.56734 Curva de Novoa -27.17081 -60.96252 Meedhoo 5.45791 72.95486 Guraidhoo 3.90061 73.46745 Faridhoo 6.78499 73.05399 Kokand 40.52861 70.9425 Ban Xamtai 19.99 104.6347 Pakse 15.12022 105.79898 Ban Kôngphat 18.08333 104.55 Yinsheng 36.65 102.36667 Xining 36.62554 101.75739 Baoji 34.36944 107.13635 Phnom Penh 11.56245 104.91601 Cambodia 13 105 Ulaanbaatar 47.90771 106.88324 Badrah 49.61833 101.98972 Auki -8.76778 160.69778 Tabomatang Village -1.39711 176.48118 Suva -18.13683 178.42531 Mount Paho -12.50028 177.07284 Tadjourah 12 42.5 Mabla 11.945 43.04306 Inḏa‘i ‘Alé 11.98694 43.14306 Holhol 11.31028 42.92944 Cameroon 6 12.5 Dikhil 11.10454 42.36971 Forêt de Day 11.76667 42.65806 Ḏagad 12.17816 43.39168 Ali Sabih 11.15583 42.7125 Masaka -0.33379 31.73409 Lugazi 0.36788 32.9376 Lira 2.2499 32.89985 Jacksons Summit 1.10278 34.52583 Entebbe 0.05621 32.47949 Yako 11.6 -1.35 Koudougou 12.25263 -2.36272 Kokologo 12.19392 -1.87687 Togo 8.66667 1.08333 Cacheu 12.27444 -16.16528 Lopo 3.58003 16.10224 Victoria -4.62001 55.45501 Mbarra Kunku 13.40583 -16.73333 Kiang West District 13.33333 -16 Kerewan 13.4898 -16.08879 Jigimar 13.56667 -15.6 Brikama 13.27136 -16.64944 Basse Santa Su 13.30995 -14.21373 Barra 13.48278 -16.54556 Kaboukaria 10.81667 -10.6 Gogota 7.77 -8.50778 Zouq et Tahta 34.57306 36.28111 Beirut 33.89332 35.50157 Amchît 34.14777 35.64435 El Mejdel 34.10611 35.90222 Anatolia 39 35 Negēlē 5.31667 39.58333 Wildey 13.09385 -59.5834 Sheraton Park 13.08333 -59.56215 Malagueta 15.18333 -23.68333 Morro Fundo de Casa Velha 16.98333 -25.23333 Bishoftu 8.75225 38.97846 Awasa 7.06205 38.47635 Formosa -26.18489 -58.17313 Arsi Zone 7.5 39.5 Paraguay -23.33333 -58 Estancia Caracol -22.3 -57.01667 Uruguay -33 -56 Paso del Centurión -32.16667 -53.75 Santo Domingo 18.47186 -69.89232 Dajabón 19.54878 -71.70829 Azua 18.45319 -70.7349 Trinidad and Tobago 11 -61 Tower Hill 17.18333 -62.58333 Roseau 15.30174 -61.38808 Morne Prosper 15.29698 -61.36002 Dominica 15.5 -61.33333 Soufrière River 13.85596 -61.06063 Biabou 13.1943 -61.13904 Hillsborough 12.48292 -61.45597 Turneffe Islands 17.33333 -87.86667 Savannah Forest Station 16.51762 -88.48882 Sarteneja 18.35334 -88.14541 La Democracia 17.34076 -88.54472 Panama City 8.9936 -79.51973 Metetí 8.49909 -77.97897 Santiago del Estero -27.79511 -64.26149 Puesto Pozo de las Yeguas -22.5 -62.48333 Paso Grande -28.32336 -63.18405 Estación Morillo -23.46667 -62.88333 Los Blancos -23.60988 -62.59542 Huachana -26.40736 -63.49877 Estación Gobernador Vera -29.46206 -60.2124 Apeadero Enrique Berduc -31.73333 -60.31667 Árraga -28.05129 -64.22379 Vaini -21.19292 -175.17678 Tongatapu -21.13333 -175.2 Tonga -20 -175 Pangai -19.81468 -174.35423 Auala -13.5167 -172.65245 Apia -13.83333 -171.76666 Avarua -21.2075 -159.77546 Kumi District 1.5 33.95 Nakapiripirit District 1.90718 34.59601 Arta Regiion 11.5 42.75 Tsalka 41.5946 44.0891 Marelisi 41.96113 43.27927 Chiat'ura 42.29806 43.29889 Lusaghbyur 40.86137 44.03489 Slawharad 53.44312 31.00025 Savusavu Hot Springs Hotel -16.779 179.3398 Hotel Centro -27.7833 -64.2666 Çankaya 39.9179 32.86268 hotel castillo capiovi -26.92971 -55.05989 Ibanda District -0.081 30.556 Mityana District 0.43213 32.06697 Manono-uta -13.89091 -172.06409 Maiana Airport 1.00419 173.03057 Main Camp GB H-Bomb Tests 2.0046 -157.39408 Cachaco 16.62057 -24.3354 Bayanga 2.78864 16.22608 Seronga -18.8129 22.4164 Gora Dalidag 41.27722 45.86833 Kiryandongo District 2.01568 32.07034 Stantsiya Kutaisi Vtoraya 42.26653 42.72139 Hedong 23.01247 113.09286 Yangliu 29.48617 106.23678 Mutare -18.9707 32.67086 Harare -17.82772 31.05337 Gweru -19.45 29.81667 Dihira 26.79579 91.4 Shakawe -18.36536 21.84219 Trou d’Eau Douce -20.23405 57.79448 Eswatini -26.5 31.5 Thohoyandou -22.94564 30.48497 Milkovo Brdo 41.97352 22.78242 Grand (Louangphabang) 19.88615 102.12991 +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 12307692.40 12307692.40 12307692.40 12307692.40 12307692.40 19684460 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services 27850740 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services 14003262 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services -318930 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services 0 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services 61538462 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10088 Global Environment Facility To provide streamlined support and capacity building at the country, regional, and global level to enable Non Annex I countries under the UNFCCC and developing countries under the Paris Agreement to better respond to reporting requirements and to catalyze increased ambition within country NDCs to contribute to the stated temperature goal of well below 2 degrees and if possible 1.5 degrees. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.This project will ultimately contribute to enhanced ambitions in reducing GHG emissions. Improved coordination will generate synergies and avoid duplication across support initiatives and efforts, freeing resources for additional efforts in the global aim to keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius. Similarly, the enhanced availability of knowledge through a centralized coordination platform will help countries increase their transparency capacity and, as a result, their capacity to report progress on their NDCs and long-term policy planning, providing for increased ambition. In the area of climate change, the project will increase climate-related knowledge through improved GHG inventories and transparency frameworks and will disseminate good practice to developing countries, which will in turn allow them to undertake more robust mitigation activities. Furthermore, capacity improvements related to climate change adaptation and guidance on including robust adaptation goals in NDCs will generate adaptation-related benefits, but they may also generate benefits in other global environmental areas, such as biodiversity and land degradation through improved REDD+ capacity.Global Environment Facility UNEP Technical University of Denmark/UNEP DTU Partnership (DTU/UDP) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified UN City, Copenhagen, Denmark 55.70 12.60 +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1313509.40 1313509.40 1313509.40 1313509.40 1313509.40 1468015 UNEP Technical University of Denmark/UNEP DTU Partnership (DTU/UDP) 1556000 UNEP Technical University of Denmark/UNEP DTU Partnership (DTU/UDP) 1500000 UNEP Technical University of Denmark/UNEP DTU Partnership (DTU/UDP) 6567547 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10114 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility DBSA Global Environment Facility EBRD International Energy Agency (IEA) International Energy Agency (IEA) PIF Approval Date ' Antigua and Barbuda Albania Armenia Bangladesh Burundi Cote d'Ivoire Chile Costa Rica Ecuador Grenada Indonesia India Jamaica Jordan St. Lucia Sri Lanka Madagascar Maldives Peru Philippines Seychelles Sierra Leone Togo Tunisia Ukraine Uzbekistan South Africa Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Electric mobility infrastructures]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10119 Global Environment Facility Measures to regulate SAICM Emerging Policy Issues (EPIs) accelerated and contribute to the attainment of the 2030 Agenda Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. Humans and ecosystems are simultaneously exposed to multiple combinations of chemicals, multiplying uncertainty around impacts of exposure to individual chemicals. Many chemicals may feature in one or more categories. In this context, the chemical-by-chemical regulatory approach is increasingly unable to address the global environmental and health risks posed by these chemicals. Activities under this project therefore aim to contribute to an integrated, collaborative and multistakeholder approach needed, being executed under SAICM. Through activities on the emerging pollutants, EPPPs and EDCs, this project is expected to produce data points and increase scientific capacity in LMICs. This evidence is expected to drive adoption of policies, for example on disposal of medicines, on handling and treatment of pharmaceutical wastes from healthcare facilities, and on controlling hazardous discharges in effluent from manufacturing facilities. Such policies will lead to socio-economic benefits through reduced contamination of water and soil resources. Improved and demonstrable environmental management of manufacturing facilities is essential for the long-term development of such production in LMICs, and the project will help to ensure that the shift in production of pharmaceuticals from developed to developing countries is not accompanied by unacceptable environmental problems. Normal 0 false false false EN-US ZH-CN AR-SA /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN;} Global Environment Facility UNEP WHO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 333016.67 333016.67 333016.67 531740 UNEP WHO 410183 UNEP WHO 999050 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10185 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility IADB BCRC - Pacific Regional Environment Programme PIF Approval Date ' Latin America and Caribbean Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Bahamas Belize Cook Islands Cuba Cabo Verde Dominica Dominican Republic Fiji Micronesia Guinea-Bissau Guyana Kiribati Comoros St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia Marshall Islands Mauritius Maldives Naoero Niue Papua New Guinea Palau Solomon Islands Seychelles Suriname Sao Tome and Principe Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tuvalu Vanuatu Samoa Developing countries, unspecified Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10201 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IFAD Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility CI Global Environment Facility WWF-US Governments of Participating countries Governments of Participating countries PIF Approval Date ' Burundi Brazil Cote d'Ivoire China Ethiopia Ghana Guinea Guatemala Indonesia India Kenya Kazakhstan Liberia Madagascar Mexico Malaysia Nigeria Nicaragua Peru Papua New Guinea Paraguay Thailand Tanzania Ukraine Uganda Uzbekistan Viet Nam Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ +![cdata[Food crop production]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Food security policy and administrative management]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10206 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility WWF-US Public and Private institutions, research institutes, CSO Organizations Public and Private institutions, research institutes, CSO Organizations PIF Approval Date ' Angola Burkina Faso Botswana Kenya Kazakhstan Mongolia Malawi Mozambique Namibia Tanzania Zimbabwe Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry development]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10253 Global Environment Facility To maximize the effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of GEF-7 investments in sustainable drylands management to achieve Land Degradation Neutrality Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.1. As is the case with global environmental benefits and gender, the GCP will serve to amplify the delivery of socioeconomic benefits by the child projects that constitute the programme through: - The coordination of efforts among projects and partipating countries in order to realize the potential for synergies, and avoid duplication, conflicts or impact leakages. - Facilitate participating countries’ access to knowledge and technical assistance, and the exchange of knowledge among countries (IP and non-IP) on options for reconciling the delivery of global environmental benefits with socioeconomic benefits (including win-win options where the socioeconomic benefits actively support the achievement of GEBs, and vice versa). - Facilitating access to policy support through COFO WG on Dryland and UNCCD. 11. Livelihoods, Employment, and responding to the global health challenges. 1. The GCP will facilitate efforts by child projects, through technical assistance and knowledge resources, to improve their effectiveness in contributing to improved livelihoods, employment, and responding to health challenges such as COVID-19, HIV/AIDS and malaria. Issues of particular relevance in relation to the DSL IP include the following: - Most poor people in drylands depend on agriculture, which is typically characterized by precarious and poorly-remunerated jobs. - Degradation, desertification, and deforestation of land and ecosystems in drylands lead to increasing difficulties to produce and secure a dignified income from agricultural work. - Youth in particular (especially young women) face additional disadvantages in accessing productive and gainful jobs, due to their limited access to productive resources, including land and credit, as well as markets and organizations. The impacts of climate and environmental change may affect access to decent jobs for youth, especially in the agriculture sectors where the great majority of jobs are water-dependent. - Lack of jobs and deteriorating environmental conditions often result in youth migration. This is particularly true in drylands, where migration is closely linked to environmental stresses and is often used as a way to adapt to environmental and climate changes. - Early removal from school to put children into child labour responds to a functional and economic dependency of farmers facing desertification and the loss of their resources. This situation can trap children and youth in a vicious cycle of hunger and poverty.- At the time of submission, the response to the COVID-19 emergency in IP countries was in the process of being developed and implemented. The GCP will facilitate efforts of country projects to work with national government counterparts to ensure wherever possible that IP investments are supporting the resilience of food systems, value chains, and the employment associated with this. 2. Interventions under the IP, which will be supported by the GCP, recognise that revitalising rural economies and actively promoting productive employment and decent work in rural areas is crucial to improve food security and reduce inequalities and poverty while also promoting safe, regular and orderly migration for the development of rural areas. Decent jobs are opportunities for work that are productive, respect core labour standards, provide a fair income (whether through self-employment or wage labour) and ensure equal treatment for all: workers should be able to perform their tasks under safe and healthy conditions and have a voice in the workplace. Through the IP, the sustainable management and restoration of landscapes, and the improvement of natural resource management and rural livelihoods, could address some of the adverse drivers of migration by improving the well-being and resilience of local populations, especially youth. As noted above, this will also include facilitating the efforts of national government counterparts to respond to the COVID-19 crisis in their countries in ways which support collaboration between IP participants and outreach to neighboring countries.3. The GCP will allow child projects to tap into the particular contributions that FAO is able to make in relation to decent rural employment. In order to provide specific guidance to help improve outcomes for livelihoods and employment through country project and GCP interventions, the Decent Rural Employment Toolbox has been designed to provide assistance to policy makers and planners, rural development practitioners and FAO staff at country level on how to systemize and scale up ongoing efforts to promote decent employment in rural areas[1]. [1] Specific guidance on how FAO can promote the Four Pillars of Decent Work in rural areas is provided in the Quick reference for addressing decent rural employment (as well as in the full corresponding Guidance document). For more information on FAO’s work on decent rural employment and related guidance materials please consult the FAO thematic website at: http://www.fao.org/rural-employment/en/. Global Environment Facility FAO IUCN CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Republic of Mozambique -18.25 35 Republic of Kazakhstan 48 68 United Republic of Tanzania -6 35 Republic of Kenya 1 38 Mongolia 46 105 Burkina Faso 12.5 -1.66667 Angola -12.5 18.5 Namibia -22 17 Republic of Zimbabwe -19 29.75 Republic of Malawi -13.5 34 Republic of Botswana -22 24 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Site preservation]]+ 1611376.20 1611376.20 1611376.20 1611376.20 1611376.20 2404925 FAO IUCN 1241461 FAO IUCN 773300 FAO IUCN 8056881 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10266 Global Environment Facility To coordinate, communicate, and manage knowledge from ISLANDS Programme to amplify the results of ISLANDS child projects throughout each region resulting in the Programme being more than the sum of the parts of the individual projects Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Under Component 1, the CCKM project will work with project partners to achieve on consensus on programmatic visibility and branding, and conduct training with executing partners responsible for the execution of GEF ISLANDS child projects. GEF ISLANDS, through regional child projects, will provide support to 27 SIDS in the Caribbean, Indian Ocean and Pacific regions, as well as an additional three Caribbean SIDS through the additional Caribbean child project. Consistent, recognisable branding, and a harmonised approach to stakeholder engagement will help to ensure visibility of Programmatic activities, and the engagement of stakeholders at the national and local levels. A high level of ISLANDS visibility is in turn is expected to support a growing awareness of chemicals and wastes issues and to prompt behavioural change in SIDS stakeholders. Behavioural change in this context means increased consciousness and understanding on waste management, and increased recycling in SIDS. Increased levels of recycling are expected due to both increased awareness (through the project) and increased economic activity around recycling (facilitated by the shipping partnership and activities in individual child projects). This is expected to lead to more job opportunities in the recycling sector. Unemployed youth will be targeted for these jobs, contributing significant socioeconomic benefits.Under Component 2, the CCKM project will synthesize information and create educational materials and tools. This will include: basic tutorials and accessible webinars on key topics including developing planning tools such as baseline inventory methods, legal authorities checklists, and institutional mapping guides; radio programmes or podcasts, accessible online, shareable on social media and on local radio; and video, shareable on local television networks and on social media, and also accessibility online. These materials are intended to reach a broad range of stakeholders and increase the total number of project beneficiaries through inspiring widespread behaviour change. Less waste in SIDS environments will result in secondary health benefits to SIDS communities, as well as direct benefits through improved healthcare waste management, relating to initiatives to address COVID-19.Global Environment Facility UNEP Green Growth Knowledge Partnership CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Praia. Cabo Verde 14.93152 -23.51254 Port of Spain. Trinidad and Tobago 10.66668 -61.51889 Apia. Samoa -13.83333 -171.76666 Morioni. Comoros -11.70216 43.25506 +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 644582 UNEP Green Growth Knowledge Partnership 1022892 UNEP Green Growth Knowledge Partnership 0 UNEP Green Growth Knowledge Partnership 0 UNEP Green Growth Knowledge Partnership 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10270 Global Environment Facility To support low and middle-income countries around the world with the shift to electric mobility Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The Global Child Project under the Global Programme will support countries with the introduction of electric mobility which: 1.) Will reduce dependency of imported fossil fuels in the participating countries. The reduced import of petroleum fuels will decrease the countries’ exposure to price volatility of international market prices of these fuels and hence increase energy security and resilience of public budgets. 2,) Will reduce air pollution and subsequent impacts on public health. Decreased levels of urban and rural air pollution will contribute to reduced numbers of patients with respiratory diseases and will therefore contribute to reduced public health related expenditures. 3.) Will increase road safety due to renewed public transportation fleets. New vehicles with better safety standards which are part of captive fleets will contribute to a generally improved road safety and improved transport services. 4.) Will contribute to the improvement of gender related aspects such as comfort and safety. New vehicles which are designed in a way to cater for gender specific security and comfort measures will improve the general perception of safety and comfort for women. The Global Programme, with the support of the materials developed, the events hold, the networking facilitated as part of the Global Child Project will therefore lead to a whole suite of benefits other than the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility EBRD United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Antananarivo, Madagascar -18.91 47.54 Dhaka, Bangladesh 23.71 90.41 Colombo, Sri Lanka 6.94 79.85 New Delhi, India 28.65 77.23 Male, Maldives 4.17521 73.50916 Tashkent, Uzbekistan 41.26 69.22 Bangkok, Thailand 13.75 100.50 Jakarta, Indonesia -6.21462 106.84513 Manila, Philippines 14.60 120.98 Cote d’Ivoire (Standalone) 8 -5.5 Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire 5.35 -4.00 Freetown, Sierra Leone 8.48714 -13.2356 Victoria, Seychelles -4.62001 55.45501 Tunis, Tunisia 36.82 10.17 Amman, Jordan 31.95522 35.94503 Lomé, Togo 6.13 1.22 Beirut, Lebanon (Standalone) 33.89332 35.50157 Cabo Verde (Standalone) 16 -24 Saint John’s, Antigua & Barbuda 17.12 -61.84 Tirana, Albania 41.33 19.82 Kingston, Jamaica 17.99702 -76.79358 Castries, Saint Lucia 13.9957 -61.00614 Saint George’s, Grenada 12.04788 -61.75188 San Jose, Costa Rica 9.93333 -84.08333 Quito, Ecuador -0.22985 -78.52495 Santiago, Chile -33.46 -70.65 Lima, Peru -12.04318 -77.02824 Bujumbura, Burundi -3.38 29.36 Yerevan, Armenia 40.18 44.51 Kyiv, Ukraine 50.45 30.52 Mauritius (Standalone) -20.3 57.58333 Pretoria, South Africa -25.74486 28.18783 +![cdata[Electric mobility infrastructures]]+ 820020.00 820020.00 820020.00 820020.00 820020.00 900000 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 900000 ADB United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 900000 EBRD United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 431470 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 431470 ADB United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 431470 EBRD United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 534750 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 534750 ADB United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 534750 EBRD United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 884565 UNEP United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 884565 ADB United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 884565 EBRD United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), International Energy Agency (IEA), Asian Development Bank (ADB), European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Centro de Movilidad Sostenible (CMS) 4100100 GEF 4100100 GEF 4100100 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10306 Global Environment Facility To support transformational shifts in the use of environmentally sustainable practices and policies for priority global value chains. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified India 22 79 Tanzania -6 35 Uzbekistan 41.6667 63.8333 Kazakhstan 41.5 75 Vietnam 16.1667 107.8333 Thailand 15.5 101 Indonesia -5 120 Malaysia 2.5 112.5 China 35 105 Kenya 1 38 Papua New Guinea -6 147 Uganda 1.25 32.5 Liberia 6.5 -9.5 Côte d'Ivoire 8 -5.5 Ghana 8.1 -1.2 Nigeria 10 8 Guinea 10.8333 -10.6667 Ethiopia 9 39.5 Paraguay -23.3333 -58 Brazil -10 -55 Guatemala 15.5 -90.25 Nicaragua 13 -85 Colombia 4 -73.25 Peru -10 -75.25 Mexico 23 -102 Burundi -3.5 30 Ukraine 49 32 +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ +![cdata[Food crop production]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Food security policy and administrative management]]+ 5825688.00 5825688.00 5825688.00 5825688.00 5825688.00 377739 World Bank World Bank 3656970 World Bank World Bank 4420080 World Bank World Bank 6558604 World Bank World Bank 5047955 World Bank World Bank 29128440 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10309 Global Environment Facility To demonstrate a path for companies and cities to adopt robust science-based targets to sustain Earth’s biodiversity and land systems, and influence all of society to safeguard our global commons. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Together, the Earth Commission, the Science-Based Targets Network and its associated issue hubs and Earth HQ, the communications and mobilization efforts will conform a Global Commons Alliance. The Alliance brings together powerful leadership, technology, science, innovation, and communication to positively transform the world’s economic systems and protect the global commons. This Alliance will be branded with its makeup and targets marketed within planetary science circles as well as among corporations and cities. The Global Commons Alliance is an unprecedented international network that aims to ensure our planet remains habitable. The Alliance will become the recognized scientifically based source for measurable targets that corporations, cities, and even countries can adopt and publicly announce. By developing these entity specific targets, the number of globally recognized companies and large (500K+ inhabitant) cities adopting targets for land and biodiversity will increase. The adoption of these targets will spur others to take similar action with the combined effort slowing habitat loss and ecosystem degradation while protecting biodiversity and mitigating climate change. The uptake of biodiversity and land targets developed within the timeframe of this project will contribute to the development and spur the adoption of entity-specific targets for oceans and freshwater and further targets for climate. These leadership actions undertaken by companies and cities within the timeframe of this two-year project influence supply chains globally, and private sector support, national governments will be encouraged to raise their level of ambition for making and delivering on these conservation commitments. The development of these targets will provide a much-needed tool for helping companies, cities, and nations understand what needs to be done to ensure that critical Earth systems are maintained, and the measures that they must undertake to do so. In summary, this project is harnessing the world’s greatest leadership, technology, science, innovation, and communication to positively transform our global economic systems and protect the global commons. According to the latest science, the drain on the global commons, largely due to the structure and pace of the global economy, is overwhelming critical planetary life-support systems. The system is out of balance. Science can show us how much and how quickly we need to reduce our impact on our climate, freshwater, biodiversity, land and oceans. Scientists can define a “north star” that we must reach in order to rebalance planetary systems. Government and business leaders need to use this as a guide to ensure the required transformation of global economic systems. We need to mobilize everyone at every level - so they can play their part in reaching this north star.Global Environment Facility CI IUCN, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry development]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 879660 CI IUCN, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors 524532 CI IUCN, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors 237827 CI IUCN, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors 2000000 CI IUCN, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors 343505 CI IUCN, Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10321 Global Environment Facility Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by supporting market transformations that will facilitate decarbonization of the building sector by linking global market experience, national policy, local action and capacity building. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The Project aims to achieve the following socioeconomic benefits: 1) Market transformation through: Catalyzing public-private collaborations and encouraging private investment. The project will support market transformation efforts around the world to demonstrate the power of public-private and national-subnational engagement to develop and implement strategies to decarbonize building operations. Providing countries and cities with information on energy consumption and GHG intensity of their building sector enabling them to improve energy efficiency and increase the share of clean energy in buildings. This information will begin to allow for comparison of energy consumption and emissions patterns between buildings and thereby allow government and the private sector to understand where there is room for improvement in the energy use and supply of their buildings. 2) Cost savings to businesses, households and the public sector resulting from avoided energy bill costs, affordable procurement of clean energy, and reduced energy supply and infrastructure needs. 3) Economic development through job creation related to building construction and clean energy and improved resilience and energy security from increased energy productivity and diversified energy supply. 4) Environmental and health improvements through improving using of local and national clean and renewable resources and energy efficiency, improving outdoor and indoor air quality, and improving comfort, productivity and quality of life within buildings. 5) Social development through more sustainable and equitable urbanization patterns, improving urban livelihoods, more knowledgeable city governance, and improved delivery, access, quality and affordability of urban energy services. The Project has included gender considerations and the perspective of women in the project design, which will help to mitigate risks to the project and generate building decarbonization actions that are more locally appropriate and effective. The Project includes consideration of gender-related impacts, gender-related education and gender inclusion as strategies. In collecting data, the project will disaggregate information by sex, as previously noted. The project will track gender of participants in stakeholder groups, workshops, project staff and working groups. Gender as a topic will be addressed in the project team and stakeholder meetings, to help identify other areas where gender goals could be established. The project team will be supported by WRI’s gender advisor (as in-kind co-finance), a staff person who will help with development and implementation of the gender-related project elements. Global Environment Facility UNEP World Resources Institute CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Energy conservation and demand-side efficiency]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 1039342 UNEP World Resources Institute 525956 UNEP World Resources Institute 306202 UNEP World Resources Institute 1970000 UNEP World Resources Institute 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10322 Global Environment Facility The Food Securities Fund will improve rural livelihoods and achieve positive environmental outcomes by supporting sustainable agriculture production systems in emerging and developing markets with a complementary source of credit, provided in partnership with companies committed to sustainable development in their sourcing areas. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The critical link between rural economies, environmental degradation, and empowerment of local people (particularly marginalized groups, such as rural women) must be addressed in any sustainable financing structure. The Food Securities Fund will provide loans to borrowers and promote the uptake of responsible, climate smart agriculture practices, thereby achieving a positive social and environmental impact and contributing to improved food security. By giving borrowers access to more credit, the Fund will enable them to expand their operations and hire and train more staff – including women. This borrower growth will result in an improved and more reliable demand for produce from farmers, including smallholder farmers including women. Better access to capital will also mean that borrowers will be able to provide pre-harvest inputs to farmers including credit, agricultural inputs, and/or training. This input of cash and employment in rural areas will have a domino effect, generating additional economic activity and enterprises in these rural areas that may or may not be directly related to the agricultural sector. The Food Securities Fund will generate socio-economic benefits for at least 700,000 local people in emerging and developing country landscapes, 50% of them women. The Fund will closely monitor borrower contributions to the Fund’s social and environmental KPIs and their performance on these issues will be used as criteria for loan renewal.Global Environment Facility CI Clarmondial AG CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry development]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Food security policy and administrative management]]+ 2692293.60 2692293.60 2692293.60 2692293.60 2692293.60 6415100 CI Clarmondial AG 45000 CI Clarmondial AG 103073 CI Clarmondial AG 13461468 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10353 Global Environment Facility To scale up green chemistry for POPs and mercury replacement through capacity building and innovation, and creation of a global unifying green chemistry network for implementation and uptake. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.299 The GGNIP programme is expected to yield the following socioeconomic benefits at the national and local levels: 300. Knowledge management and capacity building for local beneficiaries which has a snowballing effect on impacting public support towards Global Greenchem project and usage of green chemicals allowed by international environmental standards. The Programme also provides immense benefits in terms of educating industries, enterprises, factory owners, workers, and primary users of toxic chemicals on greenchem alternatives. As well as promoting the production of less toxic waste streams even in traditional manufacturing processes. 301. The Greenchem program is designed to promote clean manufacturing and production in industrial processes such as textiles, metallurgy, foam production, paper, and packaging. With the project’s global primary focus on reducing emissions of POPs, it will therefore have co-benefits of reducing mercury which has been acknowledged by all targeted countries of the program. 302. Addressing the environmental and health hazards associated with POPs PFOS, HBCDDs, SCCP, and mercury is crucial to ensure that highly desired development gains in thematic sectors are not compromised. The GEF-funded GreenChem project will define at-risk populations across participating countries, together with the development of national priority actions to address such risks. Project activities in specific project components will involve consultation with at-risk communities with the aim of increasing their understanding about the dangers of POPs and mercury exposure, providing vulnerable communities with clear, practical information to protect themselves. This will likely involve, but not limited to, communities living in close proximity to paper, pulp, garment, insulation, and textile manufacturing industries including waste management plants in participating countries. 303. The productive sectors in participating countries, including employees working within these processing industries will also be key project beneficiaries as the project will work closely with industry partners to improve understanding of risks arising from POPs and mercury usage, management, and release, as well as implementing green chemistry technologies available that can replace traditional technologies which use POPs. It is envisaged that the elimination of hazardous chemicals by this the project will also lead to improved working conditions for employees currently at occupational risk of POPs and/or mercury exposure. 304. Access to training on Occupational health and safety, Resource Efficient and Cleaner Production and Green Chemistry concepts, including BAT/BEP, information on new technologies, skills and knowledge sharing are benefits which the participating entriprises, industries and countries will attain from the project. 305. Most importantly, the socio-economic benefits of the proposed project will be the reduced amount of POPs and mercury releases in the environment and consequently the reduction of human exposure. The sound management of chemicals such as POPs and Hg at the national level will contribute towards the mitigation of global environmental problems associated with heavy metals and POPs environmental pollution. In concrete terms, these benefits translate to the achievement of global environmental commitments made in the Stockholm Convention on POPs (articles 3, 5, 6 and correlating articles). Some Global GreenChem programmatic aspects proliferate and directly support the Minamata Convention on mercury. Effects of unsound chemical and waste management in participating countries 306. The need and urgency for programs such as the GreenChem is especially essential in countries like Ukraine, where there has been unsound disposal of PCBs and outdated prohibited pesticides. Issues regarding POPs are the unintentional generation of dioxins and furans that widely take place during the burning of chlorine-containing materials. In Ukrainian industries like pesticides, metalworking, textile, leather, plastics, paint production POP-containing compounds is still utilized for running industrial processes in an outdated manner. 307. The Ugandan textile industry relies on POPs (Perfluorohexanesulphonic acid (PFHxS) and C6-perfluorinated compounds). C6-perfluorinated compounds are commonly used as liquid repellants in textiles and in electrical cables insulation. 308. Indonesia’s POP release is accounted for in the pulp and paper industries as well as the paint industry emitting PCDD/PDCF and (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)). As an alternative to the status quo, the GreenChem pilot proposes the usage of fluorine-free green chemicals addressing PFOS in paper, textiles, and paint industries in Ukraine, Uganda, and Indonesia. 309. Insulation in Jordan, is challenging in the construction, chemical & manufacturing industries with the unsound use of HBCDD in EPS/XPS. After the survey, companies leading the insulation sector confirm that Flame retardant (FR) Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Foam production is frequently used in the local Construction/building insulation sector due to its commercial viability, and ease of production. EPS however is associated with the HBCDD flame retardant additives. Industrial POPs such as HBCDD is of major concern due to its bioaccumulation and detrimental effects that extend through food chains. HBCDD is also used in the production of FR/EPS. 310. For the case of Serbia, PBDEs, PCBs POPs are especially utilized and released from electrical equipment, automotive, and production of energy for heating. Significant unintended sources of POP industrial chemicals–polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) are emitted in Serbia through open burning processes. PBDEs in vehicles in Serbia were around 13 tons, while cathode ray tube casings in electrical and electronic equipment were approx. 136.9 tons. Similarly, HBCDD on the Serbian market was around 37.3 tons in 2019. The GreenChem program intends to support these countries to drastically reduce the usage of these POPs and transition to cleaner alternatives. 311. In Peru, the plastics sector and its manufactures have been becoming a good option for the Peruvian consumer. The purchase of materials and inputs to produce different kinds of plastics has led to a skyrocket in demand for manufactured goods from other sectors. Among the sectors that demand it are the automotive industry, construction and building, medicine, electrical and electronics, food, and agriculture, among other sectors. It should be remembered that Peru is a net importer of plastic in its primary forms, 99% of the inputs are of foreign origin, according to figures from the Plastics Committee of the National Society of Industrialists (SNI). Among the types of raw materials demanded by this market are polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polystyrene (PS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and others such as epoxy and allide resins. The plastics industry represents 4% of the industrial GDP and generates approximately 200 000 jobs in Peru. In 2013 and 2014, the plastics industry grew 17.3% and 7.9% respectively, influenced by an increase in demand for PVC pipes and fittings and the greater dynamism of other industries such as those that manufacture soft drinks (bottled water, soft drinks, rehydrating beverages) which required a greater number of containers and labels. In the first four months of 2019, the industrial production of plastics products grew 4.2% compared to the same period of the previous year. This higher production activity was mainly explained by mainly due to the increase in demand for plastic pipes (PVC) and the higher production of plastic plates, sheets, and tapes. 312. As part of the Green chem program, shifting to the use of clean chemicals is associated with numerous benefits which have been categorized into environmental, social, regulatory, and economic. Envisaged risks or potential drawbacks stemming from enterprises and industries are also being considered. 313. Social Benefits Below mentioned are direct social benefits of the Green chem program: - Less release of hazardous chemicals to land, air, and water will have an immediate positive impact on the health of local communities, at-risk populations (community in close proximity to factories), workers, and end consumers - Reduce risks associated with handling, storage and transportation of hazardous chemicals - Positive effect on woman’s and children‘s health, for example, the Ukrainian textile industry accounts for more than 2300 plants wherein approximately 90% women are employed. - Increasing safety for workers: less use of toxic materials, less personal protective equipment required, less severe consequences in case of accidents arising from occupational hazards. - Safer products will become available for customers. - Enhance safe and responsible management of hazardous chemicals, will ensure employees protection, safer and healthier job environments - Reducing/eliminating POPs will simultaneously reduce accidents and near misses leading fewer downtimes due to investigations and less insurance liability. 314. Environmental Benefits - Highlighted below are the environmental benefits of the Green chem program: - Reduction in hazardous waste to be treated or disposed of, reducing the application of landfills and their adverse impacts (leachate & LFG) on the environment (water resources & climate change) - Reduction of airborne pollutants from building insulations containing in case of fire incidents and its negative impacts on water sources, land, human and wildlife - Emissions reduction in PFHxS: Example, in Ugandan textile industry alone, approximately 375 tons/year of PFHxS containing material is produced and 1.41 tons/year emitted to the environment. - Eliminating the use of PFHxS containing substances and their salts which have been identified as candidate POPs and proposed to be listed under the Stockholm Convention. -Reducing POP in wastewater: In textile industry, water consumption constitutes 200-300 dm3/kg of fabric, the application POPs eminently makes it a component of waste water. It significantly complicates wastewater treatment process as these substances are nonbiodegradable in the environment and hardly removed by other treatment methods. 316. Standards and Regulatory Benefits The GreenChem program is expected to positively trigger new environmental policies and standard in countries and sectors, it‘s implemented. -Creation of a stronger community of practices in the implementation of green chemicals - Development of guidelines to operationalize the chemicals management regulations and facilitate the promotion of BAT/BEP for chemicals management in targeted sectors - Dissemination of results of the successfully the implemented pilot, and capacity building for institutions involved in managing POPs, which is required for upscaling and replication of piloted project initiatives 317. Economic Benefits 318. The accelerator programme will support start-ups and SMEs, local businesses equipped with better knowledge, technology, and funding. Greenchem project intends to develop a green chemistry innovation network, with keen focus on innovation accelerators and start-up incubators. The elimination of POPs involves various set of activities such as import control, rigorous lab analysis (e.g. XRF/LCMS analysis for EPS beads), national monitoring plan, annual tests etc. All this translate to resources and workforce thereby flourishing the national economy of participating countries 319.A huge network of beneficiaries such as new suppliers (equipment, raw material), importers, and other green startups will focus on safe green materials.Companies implementing Green Chemistry alternatives (Green FR EPS foam) will have a competitive edge which opens export lines to USA & Europe where stringent environmental importations restrictions are applied. By deploying GreenChem solutions, enterprises become resilient against state environmental regulations whilst at the same time attracting more customers that prefer doing business with eco-responsible enterprises. 320. The GreenChem project solutions supports sustainable production & purchasing, which motivates suppliers to activate the green raw-material production lines thereby encouraging competitiveness towards a green economy. Energy reductions are direct benefits from the use of green-based raw materials as the extraction, operation will be less costly. Ideally, this should be less expensive for the implementing companies, whilst reducing CO2 emissions and contributing to a green economy. 321. The integration of Green Chemistry solutions and its associated capacity building, nurturing of green researchers & entrepreneurs create job opportunities which in turn promote economic development. 322. For the case of Serbia, the benefit-cost the ratio of eliminating and subsequently phasing out PBDE-a POP chemical its estimated that more than € 68million over 5years could be saved from medical treatment on carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic diseases arising from occupational hazards. And about 24.5 million is estimated as the cost of disposal and de-contamination scenario for a 5-year phase-out. 323. Elimination of toxic substances in raw materials and waste means no special requirements for storage, handling and waste of chemicals. This translate in costs reduction for waste management and disposal of POPs. 324. Envisaged Challenges/ Drawbacks 325. In different sectorial markets (textiles, paper, pulp, paints, insulation, etc.) where GreenChem alternatives will be demonstrated, some drawbacks from participating enterprises are envisaged: 326. Replacement of POPs by GreenChem alternatives may affect the final product quality: - Safer end products could however be more expensive which is offset by the lower cost of treating health problems, additionally meet the high international standards and reaching more health-concerning markets like EU who pays more for better products implementation of a GreenChem alternative most likely may result in an increased production cost which may offset prices for consumers; - High price tag set for the GreenChem alternatives hinder the purchase and supply process especially for SMEs; - GreenChem alternative non-compliance with performance and product specifications; - Delayed formalization of Orders and import process due to detailed internal procedures and delayed delivery of raw materials from the supplier - Consider trials for all available fluorine free alternatives so as to ensure that customer needs for repellence in the final product is not lost as a result of eliminating the use of PFHxS containing substances. Global Environment Facility UNIDO Yale University CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Indonesia -6.2088 106.8456 Uganda 0.3476 32.5825 Jordan 31.9539 35.9106 Peru -12.0464 -77.0428 Yale University 1.25 32.5 Yale University 44.80401 20.46513 Ukraine 50.4501 30.5234 Serbia 44.7866 20.4489 +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ 5450 UNIDO Yale University 3936973 UNIDO Yale University 2267017 UNIDO Yale University 2589249 UNIDO Yale University 12600000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10374 Global Environment Facility Towards a more impactful GEF portfolio: facilitating replication of good practice across GEF International Waters projects, including projects across all focal areas in Small Island Developing States, working in collaboration with development partners, supporting the delivery of training information management, providing programmatic guidance and facilitating partnership building. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The socioeconomic benefits of the project contribute to freshwater security and better utilisation of marine resources, in particular through expansion of the blue economy opportunities. The Blue Economy identifies the oceans as areas for potential sustainable development of both existing and new sectors, ensuring environmentally and socially sustainable commercial activities such as tourism, extractive industries, renewable energy production, fisheries and aquaculture, coastal development and marine transport, as well as local communities and stakeholders relying on healthy and productive oceans and coasts for their sustainable livelihoods and resilience. The project will develop capacities to foster cooperation with the economic sectors, private or public, in particular through implementation of tools such as Marine Spatial Planning. The project envisages support to partnerships with the private sector, which may result in significant socio economic benefits in a long term. With regard to both freshwater and marine ecosystems, the project will also seek to identify the investment opportunities, in particular those that could be integrated in the Strategic Action programmes. This identification of opportunities forms a critical part of the project’s private sector engagement activity, which envisions leveraging such partnerships to deliver socioeconomic benefits by attracting private sector investments in SAP delineated priorities. The ultimate result of these partnerships, leveragd by this project, will be socioeconomic benefits and the national and local levels. The project also includes a unique component addressing knowledge management across all GEF focal area investments in Small Island Developing States. SIDS are a recognized classification of countries based on shared socio-economic development constraints, including small population, limited resources, remoteness, susceptibility to natural disasters, vulnerability to external shocks, and excessive dependence on international trade. The growth and development of SIDS is also often hindered by high transportation and communication costs, disproportionately expensive public administration, and infrastructure due to their small size, and little to no opportunity to create economies of scale. The knowledge generated from past and current GEF SIDS investments are an important resource to inform achievement of national sustainable development goals, including the priorities of the Small Island Developing States Accelerated Modalities of Action (SAMOA Pathway). Awareness, knowledge and capacities of civil society, government institutions and the private sector will also increase as a consequence of the different communication, knowledge generation and management instruments of the project. The project’s overall knowledge management approaches, tested over many years, will help leverage socioeconomic benefits at national/local levels as the sharing of lessons-learned helps other GEF IW investments in facilitating recovery to the COVID-19 pandemic.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[River basins development]]+ 1195740.00 1195740.00 1195740.00 1195740.00 1195740.00 185709 UNDP Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 185709 UNEP Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 826278 UNDP Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 826278 UNEP Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1368686 UNDP Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1368686 UNEP Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 5978700 GEF 5978700 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10375 Global Environment Facility To catalyze the conservation of 1.25 billion hectares of ocean ecosystems, to safeguard biodiversity, help build resilience to climate change, promote human well-being and enhance ecosystem connectivity and function. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The ocean provides food and economic opportunities for billions of people around the world. Fish is one of the most important sources of protein and nutrition, accounting for roughly 17% of protein at the global level while in island nations and some least-developed countries, consumption of fish protein exceeds 50% of daily protein.[1] Global fisheries and aquaculture are key to meeting global goals to end hunger and malnutrition and provides livelihoods for nearly 60 million people across the world.[2] Furthermore, the ocean is an important carbon sink and is responsible for absorbing approximately 30% of global carbon emissions.[3]The effective place-based conservation and management of prime ocean ecosystems safeguards biodiversity, replenishes fisheries, provides for the safety and security of people, and enables ecosystems to function as they should providing a range of other benefits that include nutrient cycling, climate regulation, cultural values, and recreation. A longitudinal study conducted by Conservation International directly links marine managed areas with increased local incomes, food stability, and quality of life.[4] Areas with adequate capacity and funding are found to deliver almost three times the ecological benefits.[5] Furthermore, building ocean resilience is a critical hedge against climate change. Well-managed marine reserves may help marine ecosystems and people adapt to five prominent impacts of climate change: acidification, sea-level rise, intensification of storms, shifts in species distribution, and decreased productivity and oxygen availability, as well as their cumulative effects. As such, effectively managed ocean conservation areas reduce stress from unsustainable human activities making the ocean systems more resilient and better able to cope with climate impacts.[6] With a more resilient ocean, people are less susceptible to impacts on coastal infrastructure, decreases in the health, abundance and size of key marine food and economic resources, and extreme weather events.Unlike traditional marine management approaches, the Alliance seeks to work in concert and partnership with prominent sectors of the blue economy to build resilient and thriving ocean economies. For example, in sites with significant exposure to commercial fishing and aquaculture industries, the Alliance seeks opportunities for direct engagement with the seafood sector. When possible, the Alliance intends to identify market interventions that seek to achieve dual marine protection and economic development objectives, thereby increasing economic benefits for people engaged in those sectors.Similarly, tourism in the marine space represents a significant source of economic activity in a number of existing and potential MPA sites under consideration by the Alliance. In areas with high coastal and marine tourism activity (or the potential for tourism), direct linkages between biodiversity and environmental quality and industry economic performance provide strong incentives for aligning industry and marine protection and management objectives. With these strategic and innovative partnerships, the Alliance will bring diverse economic benefits to populations in coastal areas within and adjacent to MPA sites.With its ambitious and unprecedented goal of catalyzing the conservation of 1.25 billion hectares of ocean ecosystems, the Alliance will have a huge and positive impact on oceans around the world and will catapult the achievement of related Aichi and SDG targets while bolstering and providing sustainable livelihoods for millions of coastal people around the world. The Blue Nature Alliance will directly benefit an estimated 2,467,000 people globally (50% women; 50% men)[7], including people that receive socio-economic, recreational or cultural benefits as a result of investments made by the Alliance, including both monetary (e.g., jobs, grants, increased income) and non-monetary benefits (e.g., training, increased knowledge, enhanced experiences). These beneficiaries include the following stakeholders, each of which will be measured individually for each ocean conservation area that the Alliance will invest in, or for broader science, policy and capacity-building activities that the Alliance may invest in to grow the field of large-scale marine conservation: Personnel of all MPAs that the Alliance invests in. This includes all personnel that are directly employed by the government agency responsible for managing the MPA, including staff responsible for management, finance, program evaluation, science, research, communications, outreach, education, and enforcement. MPA partner personnel that is directly involved in enforcement, research, education and outreach activities funded by the Alliance. This includes all personnel that are not employed by the government agency managing the MPA, but that are directly involved with activities related to implementing the MPA that are funded by the Alliance. Small scale or artisanal fishers that operate within or in close proximity of Alliance engagement sites. People employed in post-harvest jobs of small-scale fisheries that operate within or in close proximity of Alliance engagement sites. Tourist service providers that operate within Alliance engagement sites. MPA visitors. People living within or within 1 km of the MPA, and therefore will reap the many ecosystem service benefits of the area. Other MPA users (e.g. scientists, educators, historians, etc.) that conduct activities within ocean conservation areas. Staff of all implementing partners that are directly involved with activities funded by the Alliance. People that participate in workshops and trainings funded by the Alliance. The project will, further, support a scope of work relevant to GEF’s International Waters Global Environmental Benefits (GEBs) through its prioritization and exploration of transboundary opportunities. Opportunities identified thus far include transboundary cooperation in the Southern Cone of Argentina and Chile, the Pacific Central-American Coastal LME, Canadian Eastern Arctic – West Greenland LME, and Antarctica. All interventions in these regions will be aligned with priorities identified in the relevant Strategic Action Programmes (SAPs) and lessons learned will be captured and shared through IW:LEARN. [1] In, FAO, “The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture,” (2018): 978-92-5-130562-1.[2] In, FAO, “The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture,” (2018): 978-92-5-130562-1. [3] Nicolas Gruber, Dominic Clement, Brendan R. Carter, Richard A. Feely, Steven Van Heuven, Mario Hoppema, Masao Ishii et al, "The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2 from 1994 to 2007," Science 363, no. 6432 (2019): 1193-1199.[4] Orbach, “Marine Managed Area Science Project Synthesis”.[5] Gill, “Capacity shortfalls”, 665-669. [6] Roberts, “Marine reserves can mitigate”, 6167-6175.[7] The Blue Nature Alliance will collect data on this indicator in a sex-disaggregated manner.Global Environment Facility CI Blue Nature Alliance CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Republic of Palau 7.503 134.621 Republic of Indonesia -5.0000 120.0000 Benham Plateau 16.284083 124.055205 Macquarie Island Marine Park -55.8824 161.3308 Mariana Trench 15.18739414 145.753067 Emperor Seamount Chain 42.00024405 169.999938 New Caledonia -21.5000 165.6000 Gulf of Guinea 2.0000 2.5000 Ireland 53.0000 -8.0000 Republic of Seychelles -4.5833 55.6667 Norway 62.0000 10.0000 Benguela -12.5763 13.4055 Tristan da Cunha -37.1128 -12.2834 Azores 37.80847 -25.47466 North Atlantic Ocean 40.0000 -40.0000 Oriental Republic of Uruguay -33.0000 -56.0000 Brazil -20.48483 -28.84714 Ilhas Martin Vaz -20.48483 -28.84714 South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands -56.0000 -33.0000 Isla del Coco 5.5280 -87.0628 Isla Malpelo 4.0033 -81.6072 Isla de Coiba 7.4661 -81.7884 Volcan Bank 9.5667 -80.3833 Archipiélago Juan Fernández -33.6706 -78.8770 Islas Diego Ramirez -56.48297 -68.7226 Nazca Ridge -26 -92 Revillagigedo Islands 18.5784 -112.5075 Gulf of California 26.7750 -110.5664 Clipperton Island 10.304077 -109.21686 French Polynesia -15 -140 Kingdom of Tonga -19.313798 -174.732471 Samoa -12.513586 -172.603252 Lau Province -18.2049 -178.7925 Niue -19.03333 -169.86667 Weddell Sea -73.0000 -45.0000 Ross Sea -75.0000 -175.0000 Hudson Bay 60.00042 -85.99978 Queen Charlotte Sound 51.4996 -128.5033 Europe 48.6910 9.1406 Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument 25.41667 -170.5833 Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument 16.72 -169.503 Caribbean 12.178583 -69.056663 Caribbean 20.3858 -72.3340 Mozambique Channel -19.0000 41.0000 +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[River basins development]]+ 4527156.00 4527156.00 4527156.00 4527156.00 4527156.00 2471083 CI Blue Nature Alliance 2909515 CI Blue Nature Alliance 2976537 CI Blue Nature Alliance 22635780 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10391 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility ADB World Resources Institute (WRI) PIF Approval Date ' Argentina Brazil China Costa Rica Indonesia India Morocco Rwanda Sierra Leone Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Urban development and management]]+ +![cdata[Urban development]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10397 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Government of Participating countries PIF Approval Date ' Brazil India Nigeria Paraguay Uganda XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10404 Global Environment Facility Enhance Indigenous Peoples’ and Local Communities’ (IPLCs) efforts to steward land, waters and natural resources to deliver global environmental benefits. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Improved management of forest, grasslands and marine ecosystems will generate a range of socio-economic benefits including contributions to enhanced food security and livelihoods across the set of ICI subprojects. Habitat conservation will also contribute to maintenance of key environmental provisioning services for a range of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) and other nature-based products. ICI grants will support activities that unlock or generate the financial resources IPLCs need to sustain their livelihoods and roles as environmental stewards. Depending on the particular subproject, this may include income-generating sustainable production activities (e.g. niche natural food products, improved livestock management, ecotourism) or innovative and culturally appropriate financing mechanisms such as IPLC trust funds and payments for ecosystem services. Several suproject EOIs indicated interest in developing community funds and other benefit-sharing mechanisms, as well as savings and credit groups. Other illustrative measures include targeted assistance to small and medium IPLC enterprises for enterprise development and to connect owners to mainstream financing. Activities will include a focus on women’s economic empowerment, and be oriented to benefit IPLC women and men through long-term approaches that enable self-determined land and resource governance and help reduce dependence on external donor support. A crucial aspect of socioeconomic benefits under the ICI will be cultural benefits. Several subproject EOIs indicated interest in recording and disseminating traditional knowledge, ranging from resource management practices to food production to customary rites. Documenting customary land use and land rights, as well as efforts focused on language preservation also reflect important cultural benefits. Some subprojects may consider mapping sites of current and archaeological cultural significance, as an input into designing suitable management arrangements. Finally, intergenerational cultural benefits are anticipated from efforts to disseminate traditional skills and knowledge (e.g. medicines, handicrafts, rites and language) to youth. Detailed plans, metrics, targets and M&E provisions with respect to cultural benefits will be elaborated in each subproject Impact Strategy. Specific on-the-ground activities to generate socioeconomic benefits will be determined during the first phase of implementation, through the preparation of Impact Strategies for each subproject (Output 1.1.2). Although the final sets of activities and their details cannot be determined before inclusive participatory planning processes are complete (including feasibility assessment, value chain analysis, etc.), the EOIs submitted by the selected subprojects anticipate the following indicative types of activities and benefits (see ProDoc Appendix X for a complete listing): Annapurna Conservation Area · Develop IPLC-based green enterprises · Promote Payments for Ecosystem Services · Identify diversified financial mechanisms, benefit-sharing mechanism on ACA revenues established and economic measures implemented to enhance economic resilience of IPLCs. DR Congo · Mapping of traditional areas of IPLCs · Reinforce legal status of IPLC claims to traditional territories · Develop strategies to strengthen socioeconomic resilience · Income generating activities based on sustainable management of biodiversity (e.g. NTFPs, artisanal products, agriculture, local tourism) Ewaso Ng’iro River Basin · Support legal recognition for community land and registering community conservancies · Develop management plan for pastoralist community governance of land and resources, including community benefits. · Create a Knowledge Centre to ensure intergenerational flow of knowledge and share knowledge with other stakeholders Futa Mawiza Biocultural Territory · Elaborate community plans and projects to protect territory · Investment in projects prioritized by each community (e.g. tourism, ecological production, food sovereignty, inventory and safeguarding of seeds) · Implement projects to strengthen conservation of the Futa Mawiza territory (e.g. tourism network, exchange networks) Lau Seascape and Cook Islands · Document cultural knowledge and heritage of IPLC · Develop toolkit to support islanders in applying traditional food production practices · Strengthen financial and project management capacity of IPLCs Northern Tanzania · Train and coach village councils and CBO’s in management and use of community funds generated by carbon offset sales · Train and coach savings and credit groups targeting women and youth · Develop sustainable natural resource-based income generating activities (e.g., beekeeping, traditional medicine, livestock fattening) Ru K'ux Abya Yala · Develop indigenous territorial management plans · Market added value products from indigenous enterprises · Strengthen technical and administrative capacity in community enterprises Southern Amazon · Documentation, mapping and demarcation of ancestral lands · Document and promote traditional knowledge and practices to ensure food sovereignty, climate change mitigation, and biodiversity loss · Invest in sustainable community livelihoods Thailand · Prepare land-use maps based on traditional customs/knowledge, and support sound practices for resource, water, forest and fire management, as well as food security · Promote sustainable nature-based livelihoods (e.g. bee keeping, eco-tourism, handicrafts and animal raising)Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility CI CI Center for Communities and Conservation, IUCN Global Programme on Governance and Rights, Sotz’il, FENAMAD, Observatorio Ciudadano, FARN, ANAPAC, Ujamaa Community Resource Team, IMPACT, Indigenous Peoples’ Foundation for Education and Environment, Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities, House of Ariki-House of Lau-CI-Fiji CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Port Elma Villa La Angostura -40.7473751 -71.6729436 Amarakaeri Communal Reserve Area -12.7833 -70.9538 Makame -4.71192 36.57169 Ndedo -4.98877 36.75921 Ruvu Remit  -4.76803 37.73371 Pukapuka -10.85371 -165.8474 Ban Mae Sa 18.815304 98.334818 Ban Mae O 18.820787 98.402535 Ban Mae Kho 18.8254 98.3622 Ban Huai Khanun1 18.360659 98.542246 Ban Huai Khanun2 18.357893 98.546832 Ban Huai Khanun3 18.358233 98.555939 Ban Pa Pong Sung 18.127319 98.148574 Ban Om Ting 18.316537 98.50463 Ban Mae Hat 17.701603 98.112812 Ban Khayan 18.30026 98.49204 Ban Huai Duea 19.136605 98.540996 Ban Mae Yod 18.846203 98.158166 Ban Huai Pong 18.130163 98.162152 Ban Huai Hok 19.166547 98.640382 Atiu -19.9957 -158.1095 Mangaia -21.9261 -157.9186 Rarotonga -21.23274 -159.77245 Lof Raquithue -39.7447 -71.47997 Kaski 28.3455 83.9708 Myagdi 28.546 83.4633 Mustang 29.1833 83.9563 Manang 28.6641 84.0222 Lamjung 28.2100 84.3638 Ban La-up 18.4024635 98.1086168 Ban Mae Lae 18.36871 98.06251 Ban Pha khao 18.329001 98.470242 Ban Khun Pae 18.320538 98.475239 Ban Huai Manao 18.35638 98.511571 Ban Huai Yao 18.768679 98.61352 Ban Mae Lan Kham 18.746331 98.714359 Ban Mai Lan Kham 18.77802 98.70003 Ban Mae Lai Nuea 18.159974 98.099293 Lake Natron and west Longido cluster 2.4166 36 Makame – Simanjiro cluster -4.6333 36.7333 Lake Eyasi and Yaeda Valley cluster 3.6666 35.0833 Ban Mai 18.30129 98.49704 Ban Pang Sa 20.107062 99.703248 Ban Huai Rai 19.115479 98.56835 Samburu Isiolo 1.3333 37.1166 Marsabit 2.3347 37.9908 Laikipia -0.3333 36.7666 Walikale 1.4305 28.0752 Sankuru -4.9666 23.45 Mweka -4.8519 21.5594 Mai-Ndombe 2.5911 19.3350 AK Tenamit Izabal Guatemala, 15.5 -89 FUNDALACHUA 15.4708 -90.3708 Sotzil Chimaltenango Guatemala, 14.6611 -90.8194 Tikonel Chimaltenango Guatemala, 14.6611 -90.8194 Alta Verapaz Guatemala 15.6666 -90 FPCI Guna Yala Panama 9.25 -78.25 Patagonia -44 -68 Neuquén -38.9516 -68.0591 Panguipulli -39.6436 -72.3327 Curarrehue -39.3602 -71.5875 Scope of the Madre de Dios Territorial Reserve -12 -70.25 Takutea -19.8127 -158.2883 Ban Huai Ya Sai 18.78133 98.69056 Ban Cha Da 20.085687 99.718083 Ban Cha Yi 20.104728 99.625397 Ban Lao Fu 20.11082 99.68715 Ban Pong Khom 20.10605 99.645 Ban Huai Ma Nam 17.662208 98.086822 Ban Pong Pa Khaem 20.10601 99.657529 Ban Um Lo Nuea 17.693513 98.070528 Ban Um Lo 17.676917 98.045223 Ban Sop Khong 17.637551 98.090962 Ban Mae Haet 17.664782 98.105652 Ban Huai Kung 18.14837 98.13119 Ban Mae Lai Bon 18.150842 98.113898 Ban Pang Tong 19.054998 98.602857 Ban Khun Sa Nok 19.126424 98.57753 Ban Khun Sa Nai 19.12639 98.57744 Ban Pong Thak 19.072765 98.578622 Ban Pong Sa 19.09224 98.570844 Ban Mae To 18.826978 98.62141 Ban Khun To 18.76017 98.63009 Ban Pa Kha Nok 18.76871 98.66251 Ban Sop Mae Ruam 18.896213 98.323501 Ban Bon Na 18.307279 98.495052 Ban Mae Chok 19.280842 98.647489 Ban Khun Win 18.743923 98.692624 Ban Kong Phae 18.301023 98.510373 Ban Huai Sompoi Mai 18.371444 98.52852 Ban Pa Kia Nai 18.38035 98.54559 Ban Kong Son 18.313124 98.493293 Ban Sam Lang 18.346534 98.499721 Ban La-ang Nuea 18.3435967 98.0563043 Ban Khun Tae 18.394527 98.502344 Ban Huai Sompoi 18.371444 98.52852 Bahuaja Sonene National Park -13.5091 -69.5738 Ban Pa Kloi 18.30821 98.47198 Ban Pa Kloi 18.860051 98.168364 Ban Hua Lao 19.190184 98.648922 Alto Purus National Park -10.4125 -71.6611 Scope of Manu National Park -12.0419 -71.7875 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 714202 IUCN CI Center for Communities and Conservation, IUCN Global Programme on Governance and Rights, Sotz’il, FENAMAD, Observatorio Ciudadano, FARN, ANAPAC, Ujamaa Community Resource Team, IMPACT, Indigenous Peoples’ Foundation for Education and Environment, Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities, House of Ariki-House of Lau-CI-Fiji 714202 CI CI Center for Communities and Conservation, IUCN Global Programme on Governance and Rights, Sotz’il, FENAMAD, Observatorio Ciudadano, FARN, ANAPAC, Ujamaa Community Resource Team, IMPACT, Indigenous Peoples’ Foundation for Education and Environment, Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities, House of Ariki-House of Lau-CI-Fiji 1182278 IUCN CI Center for Communities and Conservation, IUCN Global Programme on Governance and Rights, Sotz’il, FENAMAD, Observatorio Ciudadano, FARN, ANAPAC, Ujamaa Community Resource Team, IMPACT, Indigenous Peoples’ Foundation for Education and Environment, Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities, House of Ariki-House of Lau-CI-Fiji 1182278 CI CI Center for Communities and Conservation, IUCN Global Programme on Governance and Rights, Sotz’il, FENAMAD, Observatorio Ciudadano, FARN, ANAPAC, Ujamaa Community Resource Team, IMPACT, Indigenous Peoples’ Foundation for Education and Environment, Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities, House of Ariki-House of Lau-CI-Fiji 6188254 IUCN CI Center for Communities and Conservation, IUCN Global Programme on Governance and Rights, Sotz’il, FENAMAD, Observatorio Ciudadano, FARN, ANAPAC, Ujamaa Community Resource Team, IMPACT, Indigenous Peoples’ Foundation for Education and Environment, Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities, House of Ariki-House of Lau-CI-Fiji 6188254 CI CI Center for Communities and Conservation, IUCN Global Programme on Governance and Rights, Sotz’il, FENAMAD, Observatorio Ciudadano, FARN, ANAPAC, Ujamaa Community Resource Team, IMPACT, Indigenous Peoples’ Foundation for Education and Environment, Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities, House of Ariki-House of Lau-CI-Fiji 22535780 GEF 22535780 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10408 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO Under discussion. An expression of interest (EoI) will be issued to select the Executing Partner through an open and competitive procurement process by February 2020. PIF Approval Date ' Indonesia Cambodia Kazakhstan Morocco Moldova Nigeria Türkiye Ukraine Uruguay South Africa Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Energy generation, renewable sources - multiple technologies]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10414 Global Environment Facility To promote and support innovative and scalable initiatives, and foster multistakeholder partnerships at the local level to tackle global environmental issues in priority landscapes and seascapes Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.During the project period, the SGP will deliver the following important socio-economic results: · SGP interventions will directly impact 200,000 beneficiaries out of which 50% are female through enhanced capacities and improved livelihoods and lives; · SGP will support CSO-Government-Private Sector dialogues in at least 15 countries to have scaled up policy impact · Under social inclusion, the SGP will ensure that 30% of its projects are led by women, that at least 50% of all SGP beneficiaries are women; · At least 20 percent of relevant SGP country programs integrate appropriate models to engage youth and 15 percent of countries have targeted support for indigenous peoples; · At least 15 countries will undertake South-South exchanges such that cross-fertilization and learnings between communities, CSOs and other partners are promoted; The interventions from the SGP contributes to global environmental benefits at multiple levels, starting from the global level, prioritized at the national level through the CPS, and translated into small grant actions in the field. Firstly, SGP priorities will be fully aligned to that of the GEF-7 Programming Directions Paper and its outcomes to meet the GEF-7 targets. Secondly, greater attention will be focused to creating synergy among individual projects using landscape or seascape approaches, as well as taking all opportunities for complementation with larger projects of the GEF and other donor agencies. Thirdly, SGP local initiatives will link to global initiatives and platforms as well as fostering joint efforts with global networks. Finally, the implementation of “Grantmaker+” set of roles has been designed to support scaling up, mainstreaming and replication that will provide higher level capacity development (i.e. IP Fellowships), networking and institutional support, knowledge sharing (e.g. through South-South exchanges), and advocacy mechanisms at national levels (i.e. CSO-Government-Private Sector Dialogue Platforms), and where relevant, all of these to extend to regional and global levels. Insofar as the SGP interventions promote local socio-economic benefits such as improvement of local livelihoods, strengthening capacities of local communities, these will take into consideration the underlying aim to reduce threats from the local level to globally important environmental assets, raising awareness and mobilizing civil society and wider public towards supporting environmentally friendly practices and approaches. In this way, the delivery of the socio-economic and other local benefits contribute towards the delivery of global environmental benefits.Global Environment Facility UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Dzarani -22.88333 30.16667 Duvet Center Hotel 41.9986 21.42441 Boulevard Arjaan By Rotana 31.96433 35.90915 Hotel Nedjma Tlemcen 34.88292 -1.31669 D Lux Kiev Hostel 50.45443 30.50216 Mar Lodj 14.05 -16.66667 Maputo -25.96553 32.58322 Simunye -26.20889 31.91889 Mets K’arakhach’ 39.7973 45.84448 Anse Ger 13.79567 -60.91567 Marisule/East Winds 14.05407 -60.96849 May Pen Proper 17.97034 -77.23911 Hospital Nacional Simao Mendes 11.86337 -15.58379 National Museum of History 41.32944 19.8174 Atiu -19.99569 -158.10948 Lotificación Panorama 14.84945 -91.52906 Zona Uno 14.63522 -90.51202 Boquerón -26.66982 -57.13853 Động Bạch Mã 16.16667 107.83333 Đầm An Khê 14.71667 109.06667 Manufahi -8.99861 125.77778 Maliana -8.99167 125.21972 Dili -8.55861 125.57361 Lospalos -8.52167 126.99833 Welaluhu -9.03004 125.99599 Tigoa -11.5521 160.06514 Holhol 11.31028 42.92944 Doûda 11.53361 43.18417 Tadjourah 12 42.5 Dikhil 11.10454 42.36971 Yokoul 15.13333 -16.23333 Tioukougne Peul 15.44168 -16.72729 Bônta 10.994 42.06609 Arta 11.52639 42.85194 Kayar 14.91893 -17.11978 Faraba 12.88333 -14.91667 Djilor 14.06667 -16.33333 Diokoul 13.95 -15.28333 Dindéféllo 12.3816 -12.3248 Dialakoto 13.31667 -13.3 Ondame 11.76667 -15.93333 Mata de Ucó 12.15167 -16.31528 Rosso 16.51378 -15.80503 Lac Rkîz 16.84806 -15.39 Aleg 17.05314 -13.91312 Victoria -4.62001 55.45501 Louhoulé 7.79472 -8.77972 Damakania 10.01667 -12.9 Tessaoua 13.6 7.9 Kantché 13.4 8.6 Keïta 14.7551 5.7749 Gouré 13.9835 10.27035 Bouza 14.43333 6 Ajékoria 14.33979 6.78927 Koulikoro 12.86273 -7.55985 Bamako 12.65 -8 Jerash 32.28082 35.89929 Irbid 32.55556 35.85 Amman 31.95522 35.94503 Peza e Madhe 41.2175 19.69611 Liqeni i Nartës 40.53929 19.4229 Anatolia 39 35 Maja e Dajtit 41.3675 19.92306 Kuru-Kururu Creek 6.56646 -58.17171 Uruguay -33 -56 Spanish Town 17.99107 -76.95742 Saint Mary 18.31667 -76.9 Mercers Creek 17.10323 -61.72978 Soufrière River 13.85596 -61.06063 Pointe La Ville 13.93395 -61.0582 San Francisco Menéndez 13.84306 -90.01583 Finca Venecia 14.64048 -91.14375 Valle Department 13.58333 -87.58333 Ciudad Choluteca 13.30028 -87.19083 Venezuela 8 -66 Quebraba Suruguapo 9.17741 -69.71575 Estado Portuguesa 9.16667 -69.25 Caracas 10.48801 -66.87919 Barrancas 8.6989 -62.19656 Matapalo 9.13222 -72.28252 San José de la Montaña 9.3384 -69.8981 Savaia -13.95514 -171.95711 Salelavalu-uta -13.7202 -172.20427 Sa’asa’ai -13.63714 -172.1942 Moata‘a -13.83745 -171.74828 Faleasi‘u -13.80742 -171.92864 Apia -13.83333 -171.76666 Avarua -21.2075 -159.77546 Gitega -3.42708 29.92463 Gikora -3.1123 30.5593 Yerevan 40.18111 44.51361 Zel'va 53.14931 24.81201 Manzini - Matsapha Airport -26.52902 31.30752 Princess D Annam Resort And Spa 10.9333 108.1 Hrebinka Raion 50.11395 32.4384 Pesega -13.83735 -171.78407 Bohuns'kyi Rayon 50.25 28.66667 Commune of Rohero -3.3835 29.37194 Polje 40.97417 20.64 Elbasan 41.1125 20.08222 Sao Domingos 12.40194 -16.20056 Bogdanci 41.20306 22.57556 Musina -22.34881 30.04074 Shpach'ye 53.32806 31.2175 Mauretania 36.60588 2.19182 Mykhailivka-Rubezhivka 50.52008 30.14399 Madarounfa 13.28253 7.15495 Dniprovskyi District 50.46756 30.63194 Thị Trấn Phú phong 13.91414 108.92317 Phường Trần Phú 13.76957 109.22437 South Africa -29 24 Soqatra 12.50228 53.82065 Masisi -22.42164 30.86163 Kutama’s Location -23.06667 29.66667 +![cdata[Forestry development]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 22324173 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services 19301171 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services 10794531 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services 61538462 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10424 Global Environment Facility Governments and businesses commit to and begin implementing policies, programs, and investments that advance the transition to the Blue Economy (sustainable ocean economy). Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project will build political, business, and civil society support for policies, business models, and actions that will generate a number of socioeconomic benefits at national and local levels. These include but are not limited to: * Enhanced marine-based, sustainable tourism industry resulting from greater support for marine protected areas. This in turn will support more and better jobs. * Enhanced fisheries industry resulting from greater political support for clamping down on illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing and governance/market models that support sustainable fisheries. * Growth in ocean-based renewable energy generation (e.g., offshore wind, wave). The above will result in more and better jobs, economic growth, and social development (especially where the fruits of economic development are fairly shared). Underpinning all of the above is greater investment in and protection of the natural capital of ocean ecosystems (e.g., coral reefs, mangroves, seagrass beds, open ocean). This investment in marine natural capital, in turn, will generate a number of global environmental benefits, including biodiversity conservation, climate change mitigation (e.g., increasing the biomass carbon sink in the ocean), and climate change adaptation (e.g., strengthening the resilience of community marine fisheries).Global Environment Facility UNEP World Resources Institute CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[River basins development]]+ 660000.00 660000.00 660000.00 1412421 UNEP World Resources Institute 269358 UNEP World Resources Institute 1980000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10426 Global Environment Facility Leverage and build upon existing parliamentary caucus architecture to raise awareness about blue economy opportunities and Large Marine Ecosystems Strategic Action Programs and elevate marine issues amongst legislators in order to facilitate regional cooperation. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. In the absence of comprehensive, transboundary marine conservation approaches and of adequate governance frameworks, marine resources will continue to decline. This would result in many socio-economic repercussions, including negative effects on national economies, livelihoods, and food security for vulnerable populations. This project will contribute to the development of improved marine governance at the national and regional levels, which will improve economies, livelihoods, and food security. Policymakers will benefit from educational briefings about marine biodiversity conservation and its impacts on local people and will develop improved policies and legislation, which will translate to improved socio-economic status for many vulnerable people who rely on the marine environment and its resources as a source of food and income. This increased knowledge will also lead policymakers to effectively connect local issues with global issues; to mainstream marine biodiversity conservation into other policies/legislation; to employ synergies and avoid tradeoffs between water, energy, and food; and to ensure that improved human well-being, health, livelihoods, and social equity are co-benefits of marine biodiversity conservation. Additional benefits will include: larger areas of seascapes under improved management for biodiversity conservation; globally over-exploited fisheries moved to more sustainable levels; and marine pollution/debris reduced.Global Environment Facility UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[River basins development]]+ +![cdata[Fishery development]]+ +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 666471.67 666471.67 666471.67 599825 UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) 373777 UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) 0 UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) 877683 UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) 0 UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) 1999415 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10452 Global Environment Facility cities pursue integrated urban planning and implementation and increase their ambitions, to deliver impactful sustainable development outcomes with global environmental benefits (GEBs) Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The Project aims strengthen integrated urban planning approaches through learning material and opportunities for city officials to improve sustainable, inclusive, and integrated planning approaches. Integrated planning relates to the transformation of existing practices and processes to enable multi-sector collaboration to allow cities to take advantage of the co-benefits to operate as systems (transportation, land use, housing, conservation, business, etc.) influencing one another, and increase efficiencies both in terms of land and resource use, ultimately benefitting biodiversity and ecosystems and the services they provide, climate mitigation and adaptation as well as pollution and health. Integrated planning for sustainable urban development aims to facilitate and articulate political decisions and actions to transform cities and neighborhoods. Integrated planning efforts also emphasize participatory approaches, in which women, minorities and vulnerable groups are part of the dialogues and influence decisions. Cities are natural places for integrated solutions and offer fertile ground to integrate interdependent operations. Traditionally, urban systems have been integrated with varying degrees of effectiveness through urban governance and land use planning. The integration of human systems and natural systems provides strong environmental, social and economic benefits. For instance, the development of and management of watershed ecosystems, forests as urban and peri-urban agriculture as elements of green infrastructure in and around cities, offer compounding benefits for global climate change mitigation and local urban adaptation, resilience, diminishing air and water pollution, and increasing quality of life. Moreover, in this century, problem solving is co-created, powered by multi-level governments, multi-sector networks and individuals and entities with knowledge and capacity that cut across disciplines (New localism, 2019). Cities must prioritize work across multiple sectors (e.g. land use, housing, transport, economic development water, waste, sanitation, public safety, education, and energy) and must align multiple strategies (e.g. planning, budget, staff skills, regulatory frameworks, civic engagement) to be able to have an enduring impact on the ground. Evidence-based and integrated urban planning provide this opportunity. When cities utilize integrated approaches for planning, the impact of the sectoral actions is higher than the sum of the parts. A study by the International Resource Panel (IRP) shows how parallel actions in urban spatial restructuring, human-scale sustainable design, resource-efficient urban components, urban infrastructure planning for cross-sector efficiency and the promotion of sustainable behaviors, leads to improvements in well-being for all, while reducing resource consumption and GHG emissions. According to the “Weight of cities” by the IRP, cities can achieve some 30-55% reduction of GHG emissions, water and metal consumption and land use compared to baseline projections, by leveraging connections and resource sharing across urban systems such as green buildings, district energy systems, bus rapid transport, and transition to renewables combined with strategic densification (IRP, 2018). Utilizing integrated urban planning approaches provides multiple benefits to cities. It allows cities to formulate cross-sectoral goals and to develop monitoring systems for cross-cutting policy fields. They enable cities to develop strategies and projects that involve the knowledge and perspectives of different disciplines and actors from civil and private sector. They help cities with limited budgets and capacities to implement their goals more efficiently by joining capacities and funds, and by reducing trade-offs between sectors and neighboring municipalities (Eisenbeiß, 2016). Integrated sectoral approaches include multiple benefits generated by looking at the connections between sectors. Examples include low-carbon transit-oriented development; circular economy and resource flow driven planning. The same thinking, area-based investments (integrated approaches at the neighborhood level) should use approaches to capture multiple environmental and livability benefits, such as combining green spaces with low emission zones to regulate temperature, air quality and noise for healthier living and a more sustainable environment. Not only does inclusive, integrated urban planning incorporate gender and vulnerable processes into decision making and participatory processes, the GP aims to mainstream gender in all its activities to ensure gender is considered robustly in project design and implementation. For instance, the Project will collect sex-disaggregated data for all events. The Project Team will staff a Gender Lead and will have the support of WRI’s Gender Specialist (as co-finance) through the duration of the project to advise on the design and implementation of the gender action plan. Global Environment Facility UNEP World Resources Institute (lead); C40; ICLEI; UNEP cities unit CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Samarkand, Uzbekistan 39.65456 66.96445 India, Surat 21.1702 72.8311 India, Pune 18.5204 73.8567 Puducherry, India 11.93381 79.82979 India, Chennai 13.0827 80.2707 India, Delhi 28.6139 77.2090 India, Mumbai 19.07283 72.88261 Ahmedabad, India 23.02579 72.58727 Indonesia, Semarang -6.99306 110.4381 Indonesia, Palembang -2.9761 104.7754 Indonesia, Jakarta -6.2088 106.8456 Indonesia, Bitung 1.4404 125.1217 Indonesia, Balikpapan -1.2379 116.8529 Shenzhen, China 22.54554 114.0683 China, Ningbo 29.8683 121.544 China, Chongqing 29.4316 106.9123 China, Chengdu 30.5728 104.0668 Ghana, Kumasi 6.6931 -1.6186 Ghana, Accra 5.6037 -0.1870 Sierra Leone, Freetown 8.48714 -13.2356 Rabat, Morocco 34.01325 -6.83255 Morocco, Marrakech 31.6295 -7.9811 Rwanda, Kigali -1.9706 30.1044 Madrid, Spain 40.4165 -3.70256 South Africa, Cape Town -33.92584 18.42322 Brazil, Teresina -5.092 -42.8038 Brazil, Belem -1.4557 -48.4902 Argentina, Mar del Plata -38.0055 -57.5426 Argentina, Buenos Aires -34.61315 -58.37723 Brazil, Florianopolis -27.5949 -48.5482 Costa Rica, San Jose 9.9281 -84.0907 Colombia, Medellín 6.25184 -75.56359 Colombia Barranquilla 10.96854 -74.78132 Argentina, Ushuaia -54.8019 -68.303 Argentina, Salta -24.7821 -65.4232 Argentina, Mendoza -32.8895 -68.8458 Chile, Santiago -33.45694 -70.64827 Baku, Azerbaijan 40.37767 49.89201 Canada, Vancouver 49.2827 -123.1207 Kenya, Nairobi -1.286389 36.817223 +![cdata[Urban development and management]]+ +![cdata[Urban land policy and management]]+ +![cdata[Urban development]]+ 3242752.20 3242752.20 3242752.20 3242752.20 3242752.20 1786775 UNEP World Resources Institute (lead); C40; ICLEI; UNEP cities unit 4068237 UNEP World Resources Institute (lead); C40; ICLEI; UNEP cities unit 1936348 UNEP World Resources Institute (lead); C40; ICLEI; UNEP cities unit 5852793 UNEP World Resources Institute (lead); C40; ICLEI; UNEP cities unit 16213761 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10461 Global Environment Facility To promote coordination, ecosystems connectivity and accelerate the uptake of, and investment in, innovative cleantech solutions under the Global Cleantech Innovation Programme Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.251. The project will act as a catalyst for SME development and clean technology investment globally. The creation of dedicated national platforms for promoting clean technology innovation in SMEs will result in an enhancement of human capital with the acceleration and scale-up of fast-growing cleantech innovation SMEs creating new green jobs and contributing to national and global poverty alleviation efforts. It supports the formation of new sectors supporting low-carbon and low-emission economic development and further catalyzes greater private sector cleantech investment.252. Local development and production of these new technologies will very likely result in lower costs benefiting both the technology developer and end-user and with local development there will be accelerated local and national economic development. Finally, the increased use of clean technology innovations supported by the project will result in significant GHG emission reductions. 253. The project will forge linkages between clean technology innovators and the international private sector that can invest in the subsequent commercialization of the technologies. It will also provide SMEs with attractive incentives to invest in innovation in clean technology in a relatively risk-free environment that will benefit all economies. At the same time, the growing number of participants encourages cross-country networking and creates opportunities for cooperation to further enrich the innovation ecosystem in participating countries.Global Environment Facility UNIDO The Cleantech Group (CTG), The Network of Global Innovation (NGIN), REEEP on behalf of The Private Financing Advisory Network (PFAN), UNIDO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Vienna, Austria 48.20849 16.37208 +![cdata[Energy generation, renewable sources - multiple technologies]]+ 594954.00 594954.00 594954.00 684817 UNIDO The Cleantech Group (CTG), The Network of Global Innovation (NGIN), REEEP on behalf of The Private Financing Advisory Network (PFAN), UNIDO 177638 UNIDO The Cleantech Group (CTG), The Network of Global Innovation (NGIN), REEEP on behalf of The Private Financing Advisory Network (PFAN), UNIDO 283356 UNIDO The Cleantech Group (CTG), The Network of Global Innovation (NGIN), REEEP on behalf of The Private Financing Advisory Network (PFAN), UNIDO 0 UNIDO The Cleantech Group (CTG), The Network of Global Innovation (NGIN), REEEP on behalf of The Private Financing Advisory Network (PFAN), UNIDO 1784862 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10497 Global Environment Facility AGRI3 will de-risk USD 1 billion of private sector financing and provide USD 15 million in technical assistance for forest conservation, restoration and sustainable agriculture in developing countries and emerging markets to address climate change and land degradation. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Sustainable agriculture and forestry can help farmers to realize short-term and long-term economic benefits. According to the FAO, there is a direct positive correlation between growth in agriculture and the eradication of hunger and poverty. Agriculture is on average twice as effective in reducing poverty as non-agriculture sectors, and five times more effective than other sectors in resource poor low-income countries. However, the current trajectory of growth in agriculture is unsustainable and the negative environmental impacts from agriculture could increase 50-90% by 2050. To reverse this trajectory, there is a need for more investment into sustainable agriculture. This investment is crucial to increasing food production to meet growing demand, improving the access of vulnerable people to food, and by stabilizing markets so that prices are affordable for consumers and remunerative for producers. Investments in agriculture can improve the resilience of rural incomes and livelihoods by addressing climate change, conserving natural resources and facilitating the transition to sustainable agriculture. A key component of the Fund is improving rural livelihoods and farmers are the ultimate beneficiaries of all transactions related to the Fund. Each transaction should have a strong focus on improving rural livelihoods and the project’s Result Framework specifies that at least 300,000 farmers and farm workers will be trained in sustainable forest management and sustainable agricultural practices. The Fund will help transition farmers to climate-smart agricultural practices which helps to address the interconnected challenges of climate change and food security. Climate-smart agriculture can help increase productivity (e.g., from improved water and soil conservation), it can help enhance farmer resilience (e.g., via agricultural practices to reduce vulnerability to drought, pests, diseases and other climate-related shocks) and reduce emissions (e.g., increasing carbon sequestration through improved soil health and avoiding deforestation).Through this model the Fund is aiming to achieve the following key outcome targets over twenty years. These targets are all based on average figures from six selected case studies, and multiplying this average by AGRI3’s targeted number of transactions (see Appendix XVIII for more details): 87,000 hectares of degraded land restored (contributing to GEF Core Indicator 3.1)41,000 hectares of forest under improved management (contributing to GEF Core Indicator 4.1) 700,000 hectares of agricultural lands under sustainable management (contributing to GEF Core Indicator 4.3) 18,400,000 tCO2eq of carbon emissions avoided/ sequestered (Over 20 years - contributing to GEF Core Indicator 6.1) 300,000 farmers and farm workers trained, 30% of whom are female (contributing to GEF Core Indicator 11).Global Environment Facility CI Cardano Development CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Formal sector financial intermediaries]]+ +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ +![cdata[Agricultural inputs]]+ +![cdata[Agricultural financial services]]+ 13461468 CI Cardano Development 0 CI Cardano Development 13461468 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10500 Global Environment Facility The Livelihoods Carbon Fund 3 (LCF3) is an innovative and replicable investment-model that invests in community-based solutions to restore natural ecosystems, and establish agroforestry and regenerative agriculture systems in developing countries that will generate certified carbon offsets to climate-responsible corporates and contribute towards SDGs while delivering a steady and positive financial return to financial investors. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Throughout the investment horizon of 10 to 20 years for each LCF project, local communities can tap into carbon projects’ co-benefits as well as an upside sharing mechanism for the distribution of carbon offsets generated beyond targets. Co-benefits of LCF carbon projects can be categorized as either social or economic benefits. The projects are undertaken on smallholder farmers’ land, to which LCF holds no title, and the trees financed by LCF are the property of these same smallholder farming households. Similarly, when LCF projects finance mangrove planting, both the trees and the areas where restoration projects are undertaken typically are communal property such that planting and restoration directly benefits local communities. The specific social, economic and environmental impacts generated by LCF3 varies, depending on the type of carbon project and the local context. However, based on outcomes from LCF1 and LCF2, several types of socio-economic benefits can be anticipated.LCF1 and LCF2 projects provide numerous examples of co-benefits associated with restoration of degraded ecosystems and positive impact for livelihoods. One such example is launching of a social enterprise in India to home-deliver organic produce in Calcutta from restored mangroves of the Sundarbans. Another is doubling the milk productivity of farmers in Kenya organized in dairy cooperatives to secure more favorable bulk contracts for sale to a national major milk distributor. These types of benefits are entirely captured by the project’s communities and local stakeholders and are not part of the return to LCF investors.In addition to significant direct benefits from ecosystem restoration, communities and Project Developers are entitled to share the potential upside, on a 50-50% basis, carbon credit generation. Performance-based upside-sharing arrangements have been defined in the fund’s legal documentation.Proceeds from the performance-based mechanism will be distributed to the Project Developers to fund further development actions to the benefit of the communities. As stated in the LCF3 Prospectus: The Project Developers shall be entitled to an incentive, based on their real over-performance in the project, as defined by the Board. Any incentive allocated to the Project Developer shall be fairly shared by the Project Developer with the local communities, upon rules to be determined by the Board, taking account of the input of the Advisory Committee. The relevant excess VERs may therefore be directly allocated to the local communities by the Fund as agreed with the Project Developer.In addition to benefits from investment in ecosystem restoration, enhanced livelihoods, and upside-sharing from carbon credits, LCF3 anticipates the following types of socio-economic benefits to accrue to communities:Increased access to knowledge and training: One of the key levers to keeping offset generation cost under control is to optimize direct project costs by maximizing penetration rate within the project area. Therefore, within the project boundary, the expected participation rate of project beneficiaries to training/knowledge/resources made available under the project is expected to be at least 60%, incidentally creating favorable conditions for positive spillovers.Strengthening of local institutions and governance: LCF3 carbon projects can be sustainable in the long-term only if community restoration efforts during the 3-5 years implementation phase of a project are coupled with conservation activities spanning across at least 15 years. For such conservation activities to take place, communities require mobilization in formal or informal organizational structures to collectively steer the management of their natural resources. For example, some communities may take the collective decision to refrain from wild grazing which poses a direct threat to newly planted fruit and timber saplings, and also indirectly impacts water availability for agriculture through hill-top deforestation. To safeguard restored natural ecosystems, Project Developers may institutionalize protection at the local level by entering into agreements with village governments and community groups specifying their commitments towards ecosystem protection and community development.Participation of women in governance bodies: Across these various project governance bodies (village committees, cooperatives, etc.), the share of female participation fostered by LCF3 projects will be at least 50%, as female participation across these bodies is a key success factor in the long-term sustainability of LCF3 projects. In fact, a recently scientific study published in the Nature Climate Change journal has highlighted the benefits of equal gender participation in decisions pertaining to the management and conservation of natural resources.Increased resilience to climate change: With a project portfolio expected to include at least 16,500Ha of mangrove and coastal habitat restoration and conservation, LCF3 is expected to enhance the resilience and adaptation of coastal communities when faced with extreme weather events as exacerbated by climate change (empirical and field-based studies have shown that 30 trees per 100 square meters may reduce the maximum flow of a tsunami by more than 90 percent).Decreased exposure to health hazards and injuries: Health hazards from open, three-stone fires, or rudimentary stoves that burn wood and/or charcoal include chronic and acute illnesses such as early childhood acute lower-respiratory infections (including pneumonia) and obstructive pulmonary disease. Carbon avoidance activities in LCF3 through rural energy/improved cookstove initiatives are expected to benefit 217,500 people through lower exposure to health hazards and injuries over a period of at least 7 years.Improved food security: By promoting the transformation of degraded agricultural lands and landscapes into sustainable production systems for food and commodities through investments in smallholder agriculture, LCF3 helps to bridge the financial gap for smallholder farmers, while effectively contributing to food security, food sovereignty, and nutrition of rural households and communities. Increased financial benefits for community members: Through LCF3's investments, 70,000 people are expected to enter into a sourcing agreement with one or several commercial entities, enabling them to capture more value across the value of chain of agricultural produce or services promoted under LCF3 projects. These commercial linkages may be directly facilitated through LCF3 creating and/or providing support to 650 collective organizations such as farmers cooperatives, collective storage spaces, natural resource management committees, business incubators, remunerated planting groups, etc. During its community outreach activities, LCF3 projects highlight the potential benefits associated with joining collective organizations supported by LCF3 to secure the membership of at least 100,000 beneficiaries. Overall, as carbon financing is not expected to provide sufficient funding capacity for all value chain required investments across the portfolio of LCF3 projects, the fund expects to finance, on a project-by-project basis, some value chain-related project activities through third party co-financing (e.g., with the support of development agencies, philanthropic organizations, etc.). Overall, LCF3 initiatives help to build resilient and productive ecosystems, delivering enhanced services and restoring the socioeconomic benefits of ecosystems to local populations, while increasing their resilience to adverse climate change events, promoting fair/equitable development, and reconciling biodiversity use with economic growth.Global Environment Facility CI Livelihoods Ventures CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Informal/semi-formal financial intermediaries]]+ +![cdata[Agricultural inputs]]+ +![cdata[Agricultural financial services]]+ 13461468 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10544 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility DBSA Global Environment Facility EBRD IEA IEA PIF Approval Date ' Albania Bangladesh Ecuador Grenada Indonesia Jordan Sri Lanka Philippines Tunisia South Africa Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Electric mobility infrastructures]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10545 Global Environment Facility To develop the capacity for enhancing ecosystem services of peatlands (specifically reduction of GHG emissions from degraded peatlands) in Mongolia and the capacity of indigenous reindeer herders to reduce land degradation and improve the provision of ecosystem services and increase community resilience. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. The following section is a reproduction of the ProDoc Section on benefits (ProDoc pp. 62) This Project will support Mongolia’s LDN target of ‘Promoting sustainable grassland management and halting further grassland degradation’ and ‘Ensuring no net loss of wetlands by 2030 compared to 2015’ by putting 20,000 ha of landscapes under improved practices. The Project will reduce 30,000 t of CO2e per annum with sustainable peatland management interventions. Demonstration of successful introduction of peatlands related land use change in the NDCs of Mongolia will be a positive example for other countries and will encourage countries to include peatlands in their NDCs. The project implementation will have a significant positive impact on Mongolian part of the watershed of Lake Baikal. The sources of the main tributaries of the Lake Baikal, Orkhon and Selenga, are part of the project area. Safeguarding these sources will contribute to alleviating the current problems of the decline of the water level of Lake Baikal, the world´s largest freshwater resource. The project will develop and apply existing methods of ecosystem restoration and test them in pilots to inspire local, national and international stakeholders. Restoration of peatlands in arid and semiarid biomes, as well as restoration of permafrost is a significant challenge. By demonstration of pilots, the Project will help in meeting the targets of the UN decade of ecosystem restoration (2021-2030). Furthermore, the project will directly contribute to increasing the capacity of disadvantaged nomadic herder communities to engage in and benefit from sustainable land management efforts and adapt to environmental and human-induced changes to the rangeland habitats they depend upon. The tools and partnerships developed through the project will increase their knowledge and understanding of policy and national decision-making processes that affect the habitats they depend upon, and their livelihoods. With these capacities, herder communities will be in a better position to advocate for their sustainable model of land use in sensitive tundra and taiga landscapes and mitigate pressures to convert land to more degrading uses. Nomadic herders will enhance their resilience to changing social, environmental and climatic conditions at the global scale. An additional expected benefit of the project is community empowerment, enabling nomadic herders’ community members to participate more fully as equal partners in information sharing, education and training, technology transfer, organizational development, and policy development, thereby gaining more access to commercial, social and political opportunities. The project will also facilitate interaction between state, local authorities, industry and nomadic herders, assisting in creating dialogue, building confidence and sharing information. Further the project will: · Enhance capacity of countries to implement MEAs (multilateral environmental agreements); · provide ways and means for reducing and mitigating the effects of anthropogenic transformation, land fragmentation and degradation; · provide global support for achieving UNESCO World Heritage status for reindeer husbandry; · preserve and develop reindeer husbandry and its cultural base in the circumpolar north; and · increase the competence of the next generation concerning the central importance of indigenous pastoral systems. In addition to these benefits, the contribution of the project to the GEF Core Indicators is discussed and presented earlier. Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET) of Mongolia and International Centre for Reindeer Husbandry (ICR) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Mongolia Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry development]]+ 200000 UNEP Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET) of Mongolia and International Centre for Reindeer Husbandry (ICR) 200000 UNEP Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MET) of Mongolia and International Centre for Reindeer Husbandry (ICR) 3757991 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10548 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO WWF-US, ISSF and others PIF Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10561 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank Governments of participating countries and other institutions Governments of participating countries and other institutions PIF Approval Date ' Bhutan Malaysia Nigeria Pakistan South Africa +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10569 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility CI PIF Approval Date ' Bolivia Congo Cote d'Ivoire Ecuador Ghana Guinea Honduras Madagascar Mali Nigeria Nicaragua Sierra Leone Suriname Uganda Zambia Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ +![cdata[Precious metals/materials]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10575 Global Environment Facility Project Objective: To build capacity and solutions that ensure the long-term survival of climate refuge coral reef ecosystems, thereby conserving their biodiversity and supporting the blue economies and communities dependent on them. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.As mentioned earlier, the design of the project is based on the premise that successful use, management, and conservation of coastal and marine resources requires that both women and men have equal access to opportunities and the ability to participate in, and benefit from, the project initiatives. The project seeks to strengthen social equity in the conservation and management of climate refuge coral reefs – ensuring that women and men from local communities have a strong voice in the planning and decision-making processes that will take place through the Hub (under Component 2). This includes activities dedicated to supporting local communities to define and articulate their aspirations and priorities and ensure that these are integrated into the national vision and action plan for climate refuge reefs (developed under Outcome 2.2). This will involve strengthening skills, knowledge, and motivation of both local communities as well as other stakeholders involved in the Hub to ensure inclusive and equitable involvement of local communities (Output 2.1.2). Under Outcome 4.1.1, local communities will be supported to share their realities and narratives around climate refuge reefs nationally as well as globally, ensuring that they have a strong voice in the communications and awareness raising activities. Component 3 is primarily focused around identifying investment opportunities for reef-friendly businesses with a particular focus on SMEs that will generate new sustainable livelihood opportunities for local communities (with a particular focus on women). Under Component 3, the project will analyze needs and opportunities for SMEs to manage risks and needs to maximize their potential to strengthen livelihood security in a manner that is inclusive and equitable (with a particular focus on women and vulnerable groups). This may include strengthening women-led enterprises and economic empowerment through enabling access to financial services and strengthening financial literacy. Global Environment Facility WWF-US University of Queensland CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[River basins development]]+ +![cdata[Fishery development]]+ +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 927009 WWF-US University of Queensland 772587 WWF-US University of Queensland 7000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10576 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Government of Participating countries and Other Institutions PIF Approval Date ' Guinea Kenya Nicaragua Uzbekistan +![cdata[Agricultural development]]+ +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ +![cdata[Food crop production]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Food security policy and administrative management]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10581 Global Environment Facility To improve the conservation of Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) sites. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project will directly benefit 5,000 women and 5,000 men in the communities of the project intervention area. The nature-based livelihood options to be developed and piloted in communities adjacent to AZE sites will provide numerous opportunities for both women and men to participate in nature-based livelihood practices, directly strengthening the economic position and the livelihoods of the affected communities. Additionally, the project’s gender mainstreaming approach will ensure that women receive their fair share of project benefits with a direct positive impact on their economic independence. Training materials will be gender sensitive and gender balance will be sought through the implementation of the Gender Action Plan developed specifically for the project. The participation and access by Indigenous communities will be secured and guided by the implementation of the Indigenous Peoples Framework developed for the project. The project will deliver global environmental benefits through the direct conservation of 25 AZE trigger species and through its contribution to GEF Core Indicators 1, 4 and 11: Core Indicator 1: Terrestrial protected areas created or under improved management for conservation and sustainable use (Hectares): 935,770. Core Indicator 4: Area of landscapes under improved practices (excluding protected areas) (Hectares) 400,000; and total area under improved management (Hectares) of 1,463,286. Core Indicator 11: Number of direct beneficiaries disaggregated by gender as co-benefit of GEF investment: 5,000 females; 5,000 males. Global Environment Facility UNEP AZE Partnership and Secretariat (American Bird Conservancy - ABC), Birdlife International CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Chile Colombia Dominican Republic Madagascar Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Site preservation]]+ 653746.33 653746.33 653746.33 200000 UNEP AZE Partnership and Secretariat (American Bird Conservancy - ABC), Birdlife International 0 UNEP AZE Partnership and Secretariat (American Bird Conservancy - ABC), Birdlife International 477068 UNEP AZE Partnership and Secretariat (American Bird Conservancy - ABC), Birdlife International 1961239 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10606 Global Environment Facility The project aims to support the deepening of mercury reduction in artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM), holistic formalization of the sector and scaling up of successful interventions through sharing of technical information, outreach to relevant stakeholders, knowledge exchange and communication strategies. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The Global Child project will generate socio-economic benefits through increased knowledge which will lead to improved outcomes in: ? Income and livelihood security of ASGM communities: This project supports ASGM formalization that will result in more efficient gold processing, improved productivity and higher incomes for miners which will produce cascading benefits for mining communities. This will include opportunities for improved food security for miners and local host communities. Through formalization and the associated increased knowledge, it can be expected that miners’ capacity to invest in more sustainable livelihoods will be increased. In the country child projects increased formalization will result in higher revenues for governments to invest in social services for the broader populace. In Bolivia, for example, where it is estimated that formalization covers only 40% of ASGM activities, incorporating the remaining 60% would contribute to a significant increase in government revenue. In Congo, the proposed introduction of a mobile application which will facilitate access to market prices and information, as a means to ensure a fairer distribution of benefits in the supply chain, would have an immediate impact of increased incomes for miners which could then in turn produce better livelihood outcomes. ? Health of local populations including women and vulnerable peoples: The formalization of the ASGM sector and the increased application of mercury free gold production methods will lead to a reduction in mercury emissions and releases. The use of better practices and better handling of mercury means that less people will be exposed to mercury and its negative impacts, resulting in less mercury contamination of the environment and lower and less harmful levels of mercury entering our food chains. Improved mining practices will also improve the quality and in certain instances quantity of water, therefore host communities will have access to cleaner water. It is also expected that there will be a reduction in waterborne diseases, as miners will backfill mined out pits due to formalization efforts and better practices. Efforts to reduce mercury are specifically important for countries like Ghana and Uganda where the high levels of methylmercury threaten food security, the fish analysed as part of Uganda’s NAP showed that mercury levels far exceeded the FAO’s guidelines, other staple foods such as cassava and yams also presented elevated mercury levels. The impact of mercury can transcend borders and can adversely impact the food and water security of an entire region therefore reducing mercury releases that might cause exposure or poisoning can improve the health of communities. The proposed Bolivia child project aims to derive systemic change from the multi-stakeholder approach that is inherent in the JA, and the inclusivity of the approach which will result in better protection of women and other vulnerable groups from the negative impacts ? Biodiversity and climate security: The Global Child Project employs a holistic integrated approach to formalization, by supporting JA/LA approaches there will be concomitant benefits to the whole ecosystem. Responsible ASGM will reduce mercury use, and its corresponding emissions and releases, generating better outcomes for the natural environment. Formalization will create better resourced mining communities, making them more resilient to the impacts of climate change. ? Gender awareness: The global project will implement a gender mainstreaming plan ensuring knowledge products and communication materials are gender sensitive and do not exacerbate existing gender in-equalities amongst project beneficiaries. Table 9: Socio-economic benefits by country project Socio-economic benefits – Highlights by Country ProjectBoliviaThe baseline data indicates that the extraction of gold using mercury is highly inefficient, particularly the high mercury to gold ratios imply that money is being lost in mercury overuse. Application of innovative approaches to gold extraction, supported and promoted through the Global Child Project, will lead to more efficient extraction processes, leading to better profits and higher incomes. Less money spent on mercury by miners will also mean that more of the economic value of ASGM accrues to local communities.CongoThrough knowledge promoted by this Global Child Project it can be expected that there will be improved practices and a move towards cleaner gold production. The reduction of mercury emissions and releases will result in reduced contamination of Congo forests and less mercury entering the food chain. This can be expected to lead to reduced negative impacts of mercury on the artisanal mining communities in the Congo, in particular, better health outcomes. The reduction of releases into the environment will also better protect the forest-based livelihoods in the Congo. In addition, more efficient gold extraction that will be promoted by the Global Child Project will lead to increased incomes for ASGM communities in the Congo.GhanaIt can be expected that the Ghanaian ASGM communities will benefit from the project through the improved incomes that will be made possible from applying the more efficient mercury gold processing technologies that will be promoted by the project. Since the Volta River Basin is transnational, communities in other countries that ate downstream of the ASGM activities can be expected to benefit from improved health outcomes that will result from the application of these innovative mercury-free technologies.HondurasThe formalization that will be promoted and supported by the Global Child Project as a core driver of reduction in mercury emissions and releases by the ASGM community in Honduras can be expected to lead better protection of biodiversity. This can be expected to lead to positive socioeconomic impacts on the people of Honduras, particularly the communities who live near these hotspots. As a nation, Honduras can be expected benefit from improved resilience to climate change impacts by improving the protection of mangroves from environmentally destructive ASGM activities as mangroves help to reduce the impacts of high-water inundations. The protection of these mangroves may also have livelihood impacts as they are known to be breeding areas for some of the marine life that is a food source for nearby communities.MadagascarIt can be expected that the Global Child project will benefit Madagascar through the improved environmental management that will result from the formalization that will be promoted alongside mercury-free innovations. The reduction in wetland destruction that will result from better knowledge disseminated by this Global Child Project will mean a better environment for the communities near these wetlands. Livelihood opportunities associated with these protected areas including tourism will be one of the socioeconomic benefits for the communities.NigeriaSome of the states where ASGM takes place in Nigeria are water scarce. As such, the proved operating practices that will result from the innovative mercury-free processes disseminated by this Global Child Project, may lead to improved conservation of water through practices like water recycling. Another benefit of the improved mining practices promoted by the Global Child Project will be a reduction in the fatalities of artisanal miners, which is a significant problem in Nigeria. SurinameThe large number of people employed in the ASGM sector in Suriname can be expected to benefit economically from the efficient operations resulting from the better processing practices promoted by this Global Child Project. This can also be expected to lead to better quality jobs for these workers and a reduction in one of the worst forms of child labour (child labour in mining). Keeping children out of mining sites will result in better life outcomes for them with respect to health and education. The dissemination of good gender equality practices will also lead to better outcomes for the many women known to work in the ASGM sector in Suriname.UgandaThis Global Child Project can be expected to support a reduction in mercury emissions releases from the ASGM sector in Uganda which is known to be the largest contributor of mercury contamination. This project will disseminate knowledge on mercury-free gold extraction methods, leading to mercury pollution reductions, not only in the specific sites covered by this country child project, but also through replication in other areas not directly targeted under this programme. The reduction in releases resulting from the work of this Global Child Project will mean that freshwater systems and large water bodies like the Lake Victoria will have less contamination, and hence reduction in mercury entering the food chain through fish.Cote d’IvoireThe rapid expansion of the ASGM sector in Cote d’Ivoire has been accompanied by an increase in the use of mercury for gold extraction. This Global Child Project will therefore benefit Cote d’Ivoire by disseminating knowledge that supports cleaner production in this expanding sector. It may be expected that the use of mercury in ASGM may not be as entrenched as the countries where it has been prevalent for longer, hence the knowledge on good practices disseminated through this project may have an easier path to adoption.EcuadorThis Global Child Project can be expected to result in socioeconomic benefits for Ecuador, through better environmental management promoted through dissemination of appropriate knowledge. Downstream livelihoods can be expected to improve as a result. The reduction in transboundary pollution may also lead to a reduction in disputes over the issue with neighbouring Peru, as well benefiting the environment and health of the populace in that country.GuineaThe ASGM sector in Guinea employs more than 240,000 miners. The improved practices that will result from the knowledge disseminated by this project will lead to improvement in the lives of these miners. The formalization which will be promoted together with improved gold extraction processes will result in better jobs for these miners, dissemination of this knowledge may lead to replication in Guinea and also in neighbouring countries of the Mano River Union (Liberia and Sierra Leone). This may also lead to reduction in the cross border illicit trade of gold which can also lead to improved economic benefits for the countries.Another aspect that may benefit from the formalization that will be supported by the dissemination of knowledge is the relations between large-scale miners and the ASGM sector. The improved practices may be fertile ground for better relations between the two subsectors, and even collaboration.MaliThis Global Child Project can be expected to benefit Mali through promoting improved practices that will result in better socioeconomic impacts for all artisanal miners including the large number of women involved. The dissemination of knowledge on the mercury-free gold extraction innovative approaches guided by a gender mainstreaming plan can be expected to lead to improved equality on how both women and men benefit. This gender equality approach will also be reflected in the coordination and monitoring efforts of this Global Child Project leading to better socioeconomic development outcomes for women. These will include women not being disproportionately exposed to mercury, and as consequence of this, a reduction in the number of children exposed to mercury and other mine site hazards.NicaraguaThis Global Child Project will be disseminating knowledge on improved ASGM practices that will support transformation of the ASGM sector in Nicaragua. With a gold mining sector that relies on ASGM to contribute more than 50% of national production, the positive impacts of a transformed ASM sector will have far reaching positive economic benefits for Nicaragua. The nationwide change in ASGM practices from the country child project, will be possible through replication supported and promoted by the dissemination of knowledge on improved ASGM operating practices. The coordination and monitoring efforts driven by this Global Child Project can be expected to support the Nicaragua country child projects reach its targets of mercury reduction through transformation of its ASGM sector. Sierra LeoneThis Global Child Project will result in socioeconomic benefits for Sierra Leone through positive impacts of knowledge that will be disseminated. The improved ASM practices that will be implemented as a result, will demonstrate the importance of the gold sector which has been overshadowed by the diamond sector. The positive image that will be promoted via the communication efforts of this Global Child Project will support some of the responsible supply chain initiatives being considered for the ASGM sector in Liberia (e.g., the replication and adoption of the De Beers GEMFAIR concept originally implemented in the artisanal diamond sector).This Global Child Project can also be expected to support the transboundary socioeconomic impacts of the Sierra Leone country child project. This is particularly important from the Mano River Union perspective, where transboundary illicit trade in gold (and diamonds) has presented many developmental challenges.ZambiaThe emerging ASGM sector in Zambia (after decades of a mining sector dominated by copper) will be supported by the Global Child Project to prevent it from following the bad example of mercury pollution disasters seen the ASGM sectors in countries where it has existed for a long time. The knowledge shared on good ASGM practices and mercury free gold extraction, will help the country child project support clean production of gold as the formal ASGM sector grows. This will reduce the entrenchment of bad ASGM practices, leading to socioeconomic benefits for the actors in the sector, e.g., better incomes, improved health outcomes and gender equality. Dissemination of knowledge on ASGM formalization models by the Global Child Project will support the Zambian country project to develop its ASGM sector for better mineral linkages, contributing to economic transformation of rural communities. It will also lead to improved revenue capture for the government for social programs. Global Environment Facility UNEP NRDC and Global Mercury Partnership CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ +![cdata[Precious metals/materials]]+ 941000 UNEP NRDC and Global Mercury Partnership 1260893 UNEP NRDC and Global Mercury Partnership 7936276 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10620 Global Environment Facility Facilitation of a collaborative, cross-sectoral ecosystem-based sustainable stewardship approach for the Sargasso Sea, as an ABNJ of significant importance, through improvements in the knowledge base and strengthened frameworks for collaboration Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. The Section above on Global Benefits captures what is most relevant and appropriate to this ABNJ project. At national levels this ABNJ project will deliver socioeconomic benefits as follows: the Sargasso Sea is the only known spawning area for the critically endangered European eel (Anguilla anguilla) and the endangered American eel (A. rostrata), both of which are at the centre of what has recently become a global multi-million dollar industry as a result of the rise in their popularity as a food item. The goods and services associated with the Sargasso Sea have a direct as well as indirect inherent value to many countries outside of its borders as is clearly defined in the Project Document under the section on ‘Development Challenge’. As noted above in the section on Global Benefits, the Sargasso Child Project focuses on socioeconomic benefits by identifying the intrinsic value of the goods and services provided by such an ABNJ. This is why the Ecosystem Diagnostic Analysis and the Strategic Action Programme have such specific activities related to the capturing the baseline on socioeconomics (Fisheries, tourism, dependent livelihoods, shipping, etc.) and the monitoring and review of findings from the Project that include a publication “Sargasso - The State of the Marine Environment and Socioeconomics'. Furthermore, both the European Eel and the American Eel are known to be heavily over-fished. The European Eel is assessed as critically endangered by the IUCN red list. Since the early 1980s, a steady and almost continent-wide decline of ~90% has been observed, particularly in the recruitment of European glass eels. Less is known about the state of American eel stocks, but they are also assessed as endangered and the number of eels reaching the rivers of Europe and North America has already fallen dramatically over the last 4-5 decades. In the absence of this Sargasso project and its objective to develop a Strategic Action Programme for conservation and stewardship of this important nursey area, this could have dramatic socioeconomic impacts on communities on both sides of the Atlantic as well as on the food-chain within the ecosystem itself and beyond even at a global level. Clearly, these benefits translate in supporting the achievement of global environment benefits as has already been articulated in that section on Global BenefitsGlobal Environment Facility UNDP UNESCO-IOC CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 583628 UNDP UNESCO-IOC 590952 UNDP UNESCO-IOC 2652294 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10622 Global Environment Facility To achieve responsible, efficient and sustainable tuna harvests and biodiversity conservation in the ABNJ in face of a changing environment Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The thrust of the Project is to ensure that the tuna industry continues to shift to more sustainable fishing practices and safeguards against the occurrence of any major disruptions in the sector and thus continue to provide employment opportunities and related socio-economic benefits. Direct socio-economic benefits and contributions to supporting full and productive employment opportunities at the national and local levels within the scope of a global project where much of the effort is directed to and promoting of policy formulation and adoption, institutional strengthening and capacity development, developing and testing new technologies and information generation and dissemination will be relative few within the 5 year Tuna II project timeframe. However over the medium to long-term if progress towards project outcomes proves sustainable the benefits are likely to be significant. As noted in section 1.a. above, the tuna industry is a multi-billion industry that provides sources of income and employment to a large, global community of workers. Moreover, given the size of the industry and continued and growing demand for sustainably harvested tuna there would be significant socio-economic benefits particularly in the harvesting and processing sub-sectors of the main commercial tuna species that provide both direct and indirect benefits to a large number of people and their families, provided that human rights and labour abuses, lack of equitable return to small island and large coastal developing states, gender inequality, and lack of attention to small scale tuna fishing and value chain activities are given due attention as part of the sustainable management of the overall industry. A number of studies are increasing demonstrating the importance of the industry as a source of employment although globally, estimates have yet to be calculated. In addition to the above, the Project will support a number of pilot activities in t-RFMO MS at the national/local level designed to develop and promote more sustainable fishing practices (e.g., improved use of cold chain technology, fish handling and traceability technology and the introduction of more sustainable fish harvesting practices that can result in higher product value) that will likely bring direct benefits to participating fishers. The countries and project sites have yet to be finalized constraining socio-economic cost-benefit analysis. However, one of products of these pilot projects will be the development of business case studies to quantify benefits. These case studies, supported by the Project, will be used to leverage additional investments within the life of the project designed to scale up the results in additional number of beneficiaries and benefits. Providing secure employment to existing workers in the sector that will also benefit from the added value of sustainably harvested tuna species will contribute to the Project’s GEBs primarily by increasing support at the local and national levels for promoting sustainable harvesting and processing practices pursued by their respective companies. Where these benefits are actually achieved on the ground they may provide evidence to motivate other employees and firms to follow suit and support: (i) the adopting lessons learned and applying it to other regions through south-south and north-south cooperation strategies, (ii) harnessing the power of industry groups / associations and civil society organizations and the (iii) 724,000 metric tons of globally over-exploited marine fisheries moved to more sustainable levels (GEF indicator 8).Global Environment Facility FAO Regional Fishery Commissions (RFMOs): Regional Fishery Commissions: Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) (leading execution agency), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC). Other executing partners: Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), International Whaling Commission (IWC), Centre for Marketing Information and Advisory Services for Fishery Products in Latin America and the Caribbean (INFOPESCA), International Monitoring, Control and Surveillance Network (IMCSN), International Pole Line Foundation (IPNLF), BirdLife International (BLI), Conservation International (CI), Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), Pew Charitable Trust/The Ocean Foundation (TOF), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF), and World Wildlife Fund US (WWF-US) and World Wildlife Fund- Pakistan (WWF-Pakistan). CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 6084620 FAO Regional Fishery Commissions (RFMOs): Regional Fishery Commissions: Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) (leading execution agency), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC). Other executing partners: Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), International Whaling Commission (IWC), Centre for Marketing Information and Advisory Services for Fishery Products in Latin America and the Caribbean (INFOPESCA), International Monitoring, Control and Surveillance Network (IMCSN), International Pole & Line Foundation (IPNLF), BirdLife International (BLI), Conservation International (CI), Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), Pew Charitable Trust/The Ocean Foundation (TOF), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF), and World Wildlife Fund US (WWF-US) and World Wildlife Fund- Pakistan (WWF-Pakistan). 4524410 FAO Regional Fishery Commissions (RFMOs): Regional Fishery Commissions: Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) (leading execution agency), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC). Other executing partners: Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), International Whaling Commission (IWC), Centre for Marketing Information and Advisory Services for Fishery Products in Latin America and the Caribbean (INFOPESCA), International Monitoring, Control and Surveillance Network (IMCSN), International Pole & Line Foundation (IPNLF), BirdLife International (BLI), Conservation International (CI), Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), Pew Charitable Trust/The Ocean Foundation (TOF), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF), and World Wildlife Fund US (WWF-US) and World Wildlife Fund- Pakistan (WWF-Pakistan). 1254089 FAO Regional Fishery Commissions (RFMOs): Regional Fishery Commissions: Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) (leading execution agency), and Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC). Other executing partners: Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA), International Whaling Commission (IWC), Centre for Marketing Information and Advisory Services for Fishery Products in Latin America and the Caribbean (INFOPESCA), International Monitoring, Control and Surveillance Network (IMCSN), International Pole & Line Foundation (IPNLF), BirdLife International (BLI), Conservation International (CI), Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), Pew Charitable Trust/The Ocean Foundation (TOF), International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF), and World Wildlife Fund US (WWF-US) and World Wildlife Fund- Pakistan (WWF-Pakistan). 14378000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10623 Global Environment Facility To ensure that DSF in the ABNJ are managed under an ecosystem approach that maintains demersal fish stocks at levels capable of maximizing their sustainable yields and minimizing impacts on biodiversity, with a focus on data-limited stocks, deepwater sharks and vulnerable marine ecosystems. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The thrust of the Project is to ensure that the DSF industry operating in the ABNJ continues to shift to more sustainable fishing practices including the long-term management of fish stocks and the reduction in impacts on associated and dependent species. The project also acts to promote more stable fisheries free from major disruptions in the sector and thus continue to provide employment opportunities and related socio-economic benefits. This will be promoted by improved stock assessments and returning stocks to biomass levels able to produce maximum sustainable yields. Direct socio-economic benefits and contributions to supporting full and productive employment opportunities at the national levels within the scope of a global project where much of the effort is directed to and promoting of policy formulation and adoption, institutional strengthening and capacity development, developing and testing new technologies and information generation and dissemination will be relative few within the 5 year DSF Project (10623) timeframe.Deep sea fisheries in the ABNJ do provide a small number of employment opportunities during fishing operations and socio-economic benefits along the value chain, but neither significantly contributes to any form of nutritional benefit or productive employment in rural areas. The value chain quickly becomes consumed by the larger fisheries that operate within EEZs, and these would be best served by national projects and not a global ABNJ project.The DSF Project (10623) provides an important contribution to supporting the management organisations and the fishing industry to operate sustainably in the ABNJ whilst reducing impacts. This produces direct and global benefits to ensuring the health of the high seas, but there is a potentially more important secondary benefit that is often over-looked. Deep sea and other fisheries in the ABNJ are, in spite of what is often portrayed, managed better now that they have ever been. IUU fishing is likely at its lowest ever point. The result is that most stocks support economically viable fisheries and impacts on other components of the ecosystems are continuously being reduced. The DSF Project (10623) will support this and support improvements in this, to ensure that DSF continue in the ABNJ and continue to be monitored.Some regions are already seeing reductions in the levels of fishing due to low stocks and poor economic returns. And conservations organisations are in general campaigning for formal bans in fishing and increases in closed areas for MPAs. If this were to be successful, and the results are a formal cessation of many legal deep sea fisheries, then a situation similar to the 1960-1970s would quickly return and there would be massive and uncontrolled catches without any regard for environmental protection. IUU fishing would be the norm and likely would be difficult to ever bring under control. This DSF Project (10623) will serve to improve fisheries management and avoid the possibility of an uncontrolled rise in IUU fishing. Global Environment Facility FAO Global Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 430203 FAO Global Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) 685028 FAO Global Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) 1115069 FAO Global Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) 4437156 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10626 Global Environment Facility Maximize the effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of GEF-7 investments in the Common Oceans ABNJ program. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.As noted in the TE, the GEF-5 Common Oceans ABNJ Program (GEF ID 4580) showed the challenges in achieving an effective coordination among projects under a Program implemented by different agencies and with start of the implementation at points widely separated in time. The presence of a dedicated Global Coordination Project in the GEF-7 version of the Program is a realization that only through active coordination between the various and diverse projects it will be possible to achieve the programmatic outcomes.Therefore, the main benefit of this project will be to enable the formulation of a cohesive approach to the challenges and threats that combines the vision of four very different projects, amplifying their individual impact.In terms of socio-economic benefits, the emphasis of the Component 3 of the GCP, on the engagement of the private sector, will attract fresh ineterst and resources to creating sustainable utilization approaches consistent with the Blue Economy tenets of many of the member States of multi-lateral management organizations. Some of these initiatives will open the door of major markets to fishery products that can be certified, as proposed in the Component 3. Sustainable products that have facilitated access to major markets create a source of income supporting stability of the labor markets in the originating markets and throughout the value chain in general.From the point of view of the programmatic goals that the GCP will contribute to deliver by all child projects, these aree consistent with the long-term vision for the new program is an ABNJ with a healthy ecosystem structure and function, with coordinated multi-sectoral processes providing support to address cumulative impacts and ensure a sustainable supply of ecosystem goods and services including long-term socio-economic benefits (both use and non-use values) to human populations. The Program’s objective to which the new GEF-7 Common Oceans ABNJ Program (GEF ID 10548) seeks to contribute is ‘the sustainable use of ABNJ natural living resources and strengthened biodiversity conservation in the face of a changing environment’. The steps to achieve this goal and how the GEF-7 Common Oceans ABNJ Program expects to contribute to these, are set out in a simplified Theory of Change (ToC) graphic (see Figure 1). The GEF-7 Common Oceans ABNJ Program (GEF ID 10548) aims to: (i) Strengthen frameworks, processes and incentives for more effective governance and adaptive management, particularly of fisheries, in ABNJ; (ii) Improve the capacity for participating States to more effectively implement integrated management, based on the ecosystem approach in the ABNJ (and considering their connectivity to coastal waters), including addressing science-based decision-making, compliance and enforcement issues, and mitigation of environmental impacts; (iii) Support better coordination, collaboration and partnerships between the fisheries sector and other stakeholders and relevant initiatives with interests in ABNJ to promote more coherent integrated multi-sectoral action on ABNJ issues; (iv) Improve awareness and understanding of the challenges and solutions to sustainable use of ABNJ, and encourage wider support and increased investment to address threats to, and sustainable management of, the ABNJ. The Program recognizes that threats to marine life and natural systems in ABNJ come from multiple sectors, but the focus is on addressing fisheries management challenges, taking into account, as necessary, cumulative multi-sector impacts, connections with neighboring EEZ regions (including LMEs), and the need for better understanding of ABNJ issues and for cross-sectoral coordination. This acknowledges that the distribution and impacts of fisheries activities are more widespread and extensive than those of other sectors operating in ABNJ (e.g. seabed mining, which tends to be more localized), and there is a higher chance of fisheries interacting with users from other sectors (e.g, cabling, shipping, seabed mining), directly or via cumulative effects. This warrants a Program focus on fisheries but also the need for an integrated cross-sectoral approach. Tackling these issues requires a combination of program components addressing fisheries management issues, as well as others with a multi-sector focus.The GEF-7 Common Oceans ABNJ Program will also contribute to the achievement of several of the goals (SDGs) of the United Nations 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development. The Agenda recognizes that ending poverty must go hand-in-hand with strategies that build economic growth and address a range of social needs including education, health, social protection, and job opportunities, while tackling climate change and environmental protection. The Program particularly contributes to SDG 14 (Life Below Water) - Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development, and specifically its targets 14.4, 14.5, 14.6, 14.7, 14.A and 14.C (contributions to relevant SDG targets are given in Annex D). There are a number of other SDGs that are also relevant to the sector including on climate change (SDG 13 - Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts, notably targets 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, and 13.B) and SDG 17 (Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development, notably target 17.6).Global Environment Facility FAO FAO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 940089 FAO FAO 848053 FAO FAO 386790 FAO FAO 2752294 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10633 Global Environment Facility Boosting investor interest to increase capital flows towards forest restoration and deforestation-free agriculture. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. 1. The benefits of this projects can be framed as follows: · First of all, through this project, a number of finance institutions are expected to make commitments to shift the way they finance clients in the forestry / agricultural sectors by not only focusing on ‘avoiding harm’ but by building in conditions that lead to positive social and environmental impacts by committing to finance deforestation-free and nature-positive soft commodity production and other forms of sustainable land use. · Secondly, the project strives to converge on a way to frame, measure and monitor impact related to the above by standardizing Key Performance Indicators, and by monitoring frameworks that are applied by impact investors, banks and institutional investors committed to shift capital towards sustainable land use. 2. By de-risking and availing more investment opportunities for SFM, SLM and sustainable agriculture, the GF4SL also aims at influencing national regulatory frameworks to facilitate a paradigm shift to internalizing environmental risks into longer-term agricultural and/or forestry strategies. The project will also impact local smallholders, as additional investment prospects also mean more chances to graduate from subsistence farming to more commercially oriented practices. By priming necessary loans to require SLM and sustainable agriculture methodologies, a ‘top-down’ paradigm shift can be accompanied by a ‘bottom-up’ approach. This will provide for additional livelihood and socio-economic opportunities and in turn positively influence the rural labor-market and reduce urban migration. 3. Additionally, nature-dependent households located near forest areas will benefit as they are usually relying on the collection of non-timber forest products to meet daily needs. As forests are degraded and these ecosystem services are negatively affected, household livelihoods are further reduced. Thus, the preservation and regeneration of sustainable landscapes has significant potential to also protect the most vulnerable and especially indigenous peoples who are even more dependent on natural resources on an everyday basis. 4. In addition to the above global strategies to yield substantive investment opportunities for deforestation-free commodities production under components 1 and 2 of the GF4SL, the project also will engage directly with producer associations, initiatives and smallholders at the local level though the global and regional learning hubs in component 3. Community-based forestry and agribusiness producer groups and enterprises are engaged/trained/empowered to better leverage their rights to forest resources and other natural resources to secure private investment in socially and environmentally sustainable projects. The project will thus increase the awareness of smallholders on the impacts of forest conversion and the often ensuing land degradation on the health of the communities living around the forest, e.g. through smoke and haze from clearing forest lands. This is aimed at supporting lasting change of behavior and decisions through improved risk assessment opportunities at local level when engaging in agricultural activities at the expense of the environment. Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP as leading EA with CIFOR as co-EA CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry development]]+ 303294.33 303294.33 303294.33 244422 UNEP UNEP as leading EA with CIFOR as co-EA 0 UNEP UNEP as leading EA with CIFOR as co-EA 620461 UNEP UNEP as leading EA with CIFOR as co-EA 0 UNEP UNEP as leading EA with CIFOR as co-EA 909883 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10647 Global Environment Facility To enhance knowledge and coordination services to promote wildlife-based economic development and combat illegal wildlife trade. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Mozambique -18.25 35 Madagascar -20 47 Afghanistan 33 66 Pakistan 30 70 Bhutan 27.5 90.5 India 22 79 Tanzania -6 35 Vietnam 16.1667 107.8333 Thailand 15.5 101 Indonesia -5 120 Philippines 13.4088 122.5616 Malaysia 2.5 112.5 Cambodia 13 105 Kenya 1 38 DRC -2.5 23.5 Cameroon 6 12.5 Congo (Republic) -1 15.5 Nigeria 10 8 Gabon -1 11.75 Chad 15 19 Mali 18 -2 Angola -12.5 18.5 Namibia -22 17 Ethiopia 9 39.5 Zimbabwe -19 29.75 Zambia -14.3333 28.5 Malawi -13.5 34 Botswana -22 24 South Africa -29 24 1834862.60 1834862.60 1834862.60 1834862.60 1834862.60 0 World Bank World Bank 1035680 World Bank World Bank 1447147 World Bank World Bank 1614377 World Bank World Bank 2288592 World Bank World Bank 9174313 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10655 Global Environment Facility To promote and support innovative and scalable initiatives, and foster multistakeholder partnerships at the local level to tackle global environmental issues in priority landscapes and seascapes Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.During the project period, the SGP will deliver the following important socio-economic results: · SGP interventions will directly impact 120,000 beneficiaries/community partners, of which 50% are female through enhanced capacities and improved livelihoods and lives; · SGP will support CSO-Government-Private Sector dialogues in at least 10 countries to have scaled up policy impact · Under social inclusion, the SGP will ensure that 30% of its projects are led by women and that at least 50% of all SGP beneficiaries are women; · At least 20% of relevant SGP country programs integrate appropriate models to engage youth and 15% of countries have targeted support for indigenous peoples; · At least 15 countries will undertake South-South exchanges such that cross-fertilization and learnings between communities, CSOs and other partners are promoted; The interventions from the SGP contribute to global environmental benefits at multiple levels, starting from the global level, prioritized at the national level through the CPS, and translated into small grant actions in the field. Firstly, SGP priorities will be fully aligned to that of the GEF-7 Programming Directions Paper and its outcomes to meet the GEF-7 targets. Secondly, greater attention will be focused on creating synergy among individual projects using landscape or seascape approaches, as well as taking all opportunities for complementation with larger projects of the GEF and other donor agencies. Thirdly, SGP local initiatives will link to global initiatives and platforms, as well as fostering joint efforts with global networks. Finally, the implementation of “Grantmaker+” has been designed to support scaling up, mainstreaming and replication that will provide higher level capacity development (i.e. IP Fellowships), networking and institutional support, knowledge sharing (e.g. through South-South exchanges), and advocacy mechanisms at national levels (i.e. CSO-Government-Private Sector Dialogue Platforms), and where relevant, all of these to extend to regional and global levels. Insofar as the SGP interventions promote local socio-economic benefits such as improvement of local livelihoods and strengthening capacities of local communities, these will take into consideration the underlying aim to reduce threats from the local level to globally important environmental assets, raising awareness and mobilizing civil society and the wider public towards supporting environmentally friendly practices and approaches. In this way, the delivery of the socio-economic and other local benefits contribute towards the delivery of global environmental benefits.Global Environment Facility UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Afghanistan Albania Armenia Argentina Burkina Faso Bahamas Bhutan Botswana Belize Congo DR Central African Republic Cote d'Ivoire Cameroon China Colombia Cuba Cabo Verde Dominican Republic Eritrea Ethiopia Micronesia Gabon Grenada Gambia Guinea-Bissau Jamaica St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia Liberia Lesotho Morocco Madagascar Marshall Islands Mali Mongolia Niger Nigeria Nepal Panama Palau Seychelles Sierra Leone Senegal Somalia Eswatini Togo Tunisia Tonga Türkiye Tanzania Uganda Uzbekistan Venezuela Vanuatu Yemen South Africa Zimbabwe Weston Suites Hotel 18.46447 -69.93185 Finca Sesenta y Dos 9.44805 -82.48632 Black Lion Hospital 9.02028 38.74958 Mermoz-Sacré-Coeur 14.70634 -17.47734 Antsohihy -14.87959 47.98751 Ankazobe -18.31667 47.11667 Ambatondrazaka -17.83333 48.41667 Hospital Nacional Simao Mendes 11.86337 -15.58379 Government Palace 47.92075 106.91731 Changlimithang Stadium 27.4711 89.6393 Barriada Santa Librada 7.52825 -80.02186 Kenge -5.02334 17.0216 Kengkhar 27.114 91.287 Denchukha 27.01667 89.25 Bhangbārai 27.26667 90.3 Sarpang District 27.03333 90.41667 Uzbekistan 41.66667 63.83333 Ulaanbaatar 47.90771 106.88324 Cecerleg 47.475 101.45417 Sühen Hudag 44.06667 107.33333 Mongolia 46 105 Haylaastay 46.77076 113.88248 Arvayheer 46.26389 102.775 Democratic Republic of the Congo -2.5 23.5 DR Congo -2.5 23.5 Kindu -2.94373 25.92237 Cameroon 6 12.5 Wassadougou 13.35 -13.33333 Simal 14.15 -16.65 Senegal 14.5 -14.25 Sandiara 14.43333 -16.8 Saint-Louis 16.01793 -16.48962 Pakirane 13.9 -14.13333 Missira 13.53333 -13.51667 Mboro 15.14051 -16.88682 Périmètre de Reboisement de Mbaw 14.75917 -17.32639 Massadala 13.28914 -12.94135 Mako 12.8555 -12.3506 Loumbi Diaoubé 14.5 -15.66667 Loul Séssène 14.3 -16.6 Keur Sountou 13.7 -15.78333 Keur Massar 14.77977 -17.31131 Kalifourou 12.92593 -13.6391 Guinguinéo 14.26667 -15.95 Gorée 14.667 -17.3983 Gamon 13.34271 -12.9173 Edalé 12.66667 -13.05 Dioulacolon 12.81667 -14.86667 Diogué 12.57444 -16.7525 Didé 13.97055 -12.34431 Diadouri 13.20721 -12.93803 Dakar 14.6937 -17.44406 Bala 14.03333 -13.16667 Moanda -5.92753 12.37148 Mbandaka 0.04865 18.26034 Matadi -5.83861 13.46306 Guinea-Bissau 12 -15 Gabú 12.16667 -14.16667 Fafaje 11.41667 -14.86667 Cupedo 11.83333 -15.9 Catió 11.2825 -15.25472 Salo 3.80403 15.34765 Nola 3.52494 16.04583 Berbérati 4.26116 15.79216 Sierra Leone 8.5 -11.5 Pujehun District 7.31855 -11.5792 Potoru 7.50596 -11.47897 Lalehun 8.42252 -10.65293 Kenema 7.87687 -11.19025 Kailahun 8.2789 -10.573 Freetown 8.48714 -13.2356 Benga 7.37055 -11.75615 Niger 18 9 Niamey 13.51366 2.1098 Karofan 14.31374 6.15265 Ngaparou 14.75677 -17.46868 Castors 14.72639 -17.44861 Pukë 42.04444 19.89972 Mojo 8.58679 39.12111 Tarrafal 15.26667 -23.71667 Santa Cruz 15.13333 -23.56667 Sal Rei 16.17611 -22.91722 Ribeirão Chiqueiro 15.01667 -23.53333 Pico do Fogo 14.95005 -24.34253 Saint George's 12.05288 -61.75226 São Filipe Airport 14.885 -24.48 Shari 27.26173 89.34271 Bayanga 2.78864 16.22608 Sao Domingos 12.40194 -16.20056 Xitole 11.763 -14.693 Hingslo 27.17937 89.15256 Pangsu 27.25723 90.57762 Kori 8.2027 -12.07255 Gaura 7.67677 -11.03049 Nimikoro 8.58036 -11.09537 Peje Bongre 8.15641 -10.76719 Institut National de la Statistique -18.91805 47.52069 Marbella 8.9841 -79.5269 +![cdata[Forestry development]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Site preservation]]+ 0 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services 19960283 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services 6466409 UNDP United Nations Office for Projects and Services 43937623 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10658 Global Environment Facility Develop and implement effective science-based tools to enable companies to drive delivery of the Fashion Pact’s biodiversity, climate, and ocean commitments. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. This project has an exceptional potential to transform the fashion industry and generate benefits that will have long-term and significant environmental benefit while also providing important positive socioeconomic outcomes. The sourcing of sustainably produced raw materials by the fashion industry will spur growth and jobs associated with these industries. Meanwhile, the purchasing of these sustainably produced products will result in improved animal welfare (cashmere) and reduce d deforestation and land conversion. Finally, the switch to gold sourcing that reduces the use of mercury will improve the environment and especially water quality for local mining communities while reducing their exposure to toxic levels of these minerals. As the Fashion Pact grows, the magnitude of its impact will grow and expand into additional commodities that will result in more accessible, viable, and healthy socioeconomic benefits for people around the world. Global Environment Facility CI Fashion Pact Association and Conservation International Center for Sustainable Lands Water CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Republic of Kenya  1 38 Mongolia  46 105 Federative Republic of Brazil  -10 -55 +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 899270 CI Fashion Pact Association and Conservation International Center for Sustainable Lands & Water 856460 CI Fashion Pact Association and Conservation International Center for Sustainable Lands & Water 2000000 CI Fashion Pact Association and Conservation International Center for Sustainable Lands & Water 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10697 Global Environment Facility To enhance awareness of ABNJ governance to support sustainable resource use and biodiversity conservation in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction through strengthened cross-sectoral capacity building. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.This project will lead to conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in ABNJ through increased sectoral and cross-sectoral cooperation and coordination. The global environmental benefits that result from this will lead to the following socio-economic benefits: Increased food security. Fisheries that are managed sustainably provide an increased amount of fish that are able to be caught. An increase in catch whilst not depleting the stock leads to increased food security. This is of particular importance in a world where the population is expected to increase to 10 billion people by the mid-century. Climate change mitigation. Sustainable resource use in ABNJ maintains ecosystem functioning, one function of which is carbon storage. Maintaining the ocean’s ability to store carbon through restoration of key ecosystems will mitigate against further global warming and its associated socio-economic impacts. Ecotourism. By conserving and sustainably using biodiversity in ABNJ, there will be an increase in migratory marine species that, although spend much of their time in ABNJ, also spend time in national waters. This presents opportunities for countries to increase their tourism sectors and benefit from the presence of biodiversity. Opportunities for women. This project, through its capacity building element, will target women to increase the gender balance of ABNJ-sectors and actors. By building the capacity of women for sectoral and cross-sectoral cooperation and coordination, the project is increasing the number of women in decision-making. This will lead to more management decisions that have positive impacts and results for women, making the benefits from ABNJ fairer and more equitable. Conserving traditional and indigenous knowledge. Sustainable resource use in ABNJ will result in a healthier ocean overall, including national waters. In turn, this will allow indigenous and local coastal and island communities to continue their traditional ways of life that depend on a healthy ocean. In turn, by protecting and preserving these communities, the scientific community can benefit from traditional and indigenous knowledge which is highly valuable in addressing global issues.The project will deliver valuable outputs that would allow it to contribute to the achievement of the Project and Program global environment benefits through: - Enhancing capacity and knowledge of 1750 Women and 1750 Men to improve cooperative management of ABNJ in 2 regionally-defined ecosystems (Pacific Islands and South East Pacific) within one ocean basin- Building, sharing, and applying capacity, knowledge and information to develop a regional cross-sectoral cooperation and coordination mechanism in ABNJ in the two pilot regions (level 1.5)- Building and applying national capacity and knowledge to support the development of a cross-sectoral cooperation and coordination mechanism for ABNJ (level 1.5) - Development of an active online ABNJ governance platform that ensures that all actors have access to information on existing governance bodies; facilitating the dissemination of, and uptake of project knowledge and experiences through IW:LEARN; and facilitating the active participation of project staff and national representatives at IW conferences (level 4). Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Oceans Forum, WCMC, Grid-Arendal CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Water resources conservation (including data collection)]]+ +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 750000 UNEP Global Oceans Forum, WCMC, Grid-Arendal 237845 UNEP Global Oceans Forum, WCMC, Grid-Arendal 2500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10701 Global Environment Facility To safeguard key threatened and iconic wildlife in China through cross-sectoral engagement, community participation and innovative management technologies across landscapes. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The durability of integrated landscape management approaches and innovative tools in key endangered wildlife habitats restoration interventions demonstrated in the project and upscaling will largely depend on sustained involvement and generation of livelihood benefits for local communities. The estimated project direct beneficiaries include 2,000 local farmers, of whom 40% are women. These people from the local communities will benefit directly through strengthened and expanded sustainable livelihood initiatives. Engagement and generation of socioeconomic benefits for women and men from the local communities is an important aspect of the integrated landscape approach in the project design. The viability of the wildlife habitats and ecological corridor restoration approaches demonstrated on the project over the long-term will largely depend on sustained involvement of local communities and flow of sustainable livelihood benefits. The project will provide opportunities for local people to be involved in capacity building activities aimed at strengthening their existing or introducing new close-to-nature livelihood models, including joint management of natural resources, organic farming, ecotourism, certification schemes and alternative livelihood cooperatives, etc. Under the current conditions in China, one of the biggest barriers hindering economic prosperity in rural area is that farmers, especially women and ethnic minority farmers often have limited access to green supply chains, lack financial management skills, and are uninformed of real-time market information and of partnership opportunities. By facilitating linkages to local cooperatives and women’s groups and ecologically conscious private enterprises which are closer to the marketplace, the prospects of their income generation capabilities and assets accumulation will be substantially improved. Apart from these monetary gains, i.e., increased financial capital, the local direct beneficiaries will gain non-monetary benefits. Joint management of natural resources and improved nature conservation are expected to restore ecosystem functions and services, resulting in improved land productivity, water quality, climate regulation services, erosion control capabilities, etc. These improvements will generate increased nature capital of the local communities. Significant gains in human capital are also expected through the project interventions. For example, local communities will benefit from knowledge achieved through skills trainings, learning-by-doing, financial management training, etc. The institutional level direct beneficiaries, including 500 people at the national and provincial level and 1,500 conservation workers and natural reserve managers and professionals at the landscape level, will also increase knowledge and hands-on experience. Strengthened institutional capacities will help ensure sustainability of the results achieved during the project and upscaling of the demonstrated interventions in other regions in the country. The cumulative monetary and non-monetary benefits will strengthen the resilience of local communities with respect to the expected impacts of climate change, e.g., restored and protected ecosystem functions and services, and also in regard to socioeconomic disruptions, e.g., diversified income opportunities will allow local households to cope with possible market fluctuations or supply chain interruptions, such as those that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the project strategy emphasizes the need to strengthen social capital in the target landscapes, through establishment of multi-stakeholder, nature reserve and community joint management models to wildlife and nature conservation, which will provide local people, including women and ethnic minorities an opportunity to actively participate in the decision-making processes regarding sustainable management of natural resources in their communities. The project will also facilitate enhanced social networking, e.g., cooperatives, micro-enterprises, in partnership with governmental entities, NGOs, and private sector players, e.g., through insertion of local farmers into green value chains, In addition, the citizen science events planned will also attract tens of thousands of young students and general public to participate in the drive of nature conservation and wildlife protection. The project is relevant to a number of SDGs, most notably SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 13 (Climate Action), SDG 15 (Life on Land), and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals), as outlined below in Table 6 of the Project Document.Global Environment Facility UNDP Foreign Environmental Cooperation Center of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (FECO) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' China Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Site preservation]]+ 120411 UNDP Foreign Environmental Cooperation Center of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (FECO) 1082942 UNDP Foreign Environmental Cooperation Center of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (FECO) 5786073 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10716 Global Environment Facility To eliminate uncontrolled releases of mercury from healthcare settings Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Socioeconomic benefits will be delivered directly to the Indian Hg-added medical device manufacturing base in the form of technical assistance to support the identification and fostering of alternative sources of income. These manufacturers are often artisanal in scale and potentially vulnerable to lost income. The project will engage a socioeconomic expert to carry out an assessment of the industry and possible alternative product lines. These results will be shared with manufacturers and technical assistance will be provided to assist in the transition. Socioeconomic benefits will also be delivered to the waste management sector through capacity building on environmentally sound disposal. Benefits will include increased demand from healthcare facilities for their services and an improved regulatory environment. Socioeconomic benefits will be delivered to actors along the mercury-free medical devices supply chain, including wholesalers, vendors, freight and transportation workers and technicians. The shift away from Hg-added devices to Hg-free equipment represents a significant boon in demand. Finally, socioeconomic benefits will be delivered to multiple beneficiaries through reductions in Hg exposure, including to workers along the value chain. Women of child-bearing age in particular will benefit owing mercury’s ability to migrate transplacentally and deposit in the foetus.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Health Organization (WHO) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Albania Burkina Faso India Montenegro Uganda Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ 1843301 UNEP World Health Organization (WHO) 7980000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10726 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Government of participating country PIF Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Madagascar +![cdata[Agricultural development]]+ +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ +![cdata[Food crop production]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Food security policy and administrative management]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10748 Global Environment Facility Demonstrate mercury and POPs emissions reduction potential from coal-fired power plants and industrial boilers in order to support governments in implementing control and reduction strategies for new and existing sources Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.There are significant social and economic benefits at a national scale from installation of mercury emission controls. These benefits are in the form of prevented/decreased human exposure to mercury and subsequent reduced health risks and reduced environmental risks as a result of reduced emissions. These reduced risks are associated with economic gains. Demonstrating the co-benefit effects of reducing multiple pollutants simultaneously could be the impetus for countries of South East Asia, South America, and Africa to realize that they can afford to set legislation, that they will be able to achieve compliance, and that they can produce beneficial effects for the population. Beneficial effects of multi-pollutant control have been estimated in terms of prevented premature deaths, chronic bronchitis, nonfatal heart attacks, respiratory symptoms, aggravated asthma, and hospital and emergency room visits. All of the above adverse impacts result in economic losses.Global Environment Facility UNEP Macquarie University CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ 198000.00 198000.00 198000.00 337830 UNEP Macquarie University 65790 UNEP Macquarie University 123233 UNEP Macquarie University 594000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10755 Global Environment Facility To support the establishment of a Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) to develop and disseminate a global framework for corporates and financial institutions to assess, manage and report on their dependencies and impacts on nature. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The consequences of the continued degradation of nature is being felt across the global economy, and in light of COVID the evidence of the materiality of nature in the global economy is increasing[1].The TNFD will help shift financial flows from nature-negative to nature-positive investments and helping transition to a nature-positive economy[2]. It will do this by seeking to address economic activities that directly and indirectly deplete natural capital through lending, investment, projects and insurance (as described in Section 1). The World Economic Forum estimated that this transition to a nature-positive economy could generate up to US$10 trillion in annual business value and create 395 million jobs by 2030. This equates to approximately 20% of the total projected increase in the global labor force between now and 2030[3]. In the food and use sector alone, it is estimated that there will be an annual business opportunity of $4.5 trillion by 2030 associated with transitions towards a nature-positive economy[4]. If the TNFD succeeds in supporting this transition this will represent additional jobs and livelihoods opportunities for millions of households globally, and in particular in the global south where much of the world’s most valuable natural capital is located[5]. [1] Global Canopy & Vivid Economics (2020). The Case for a Task Force on Nature-Related Financial Disclosures. Available online: https://www.globalcanopy.org/sites/default/files/documents/resources/Task-Force-on-Nature-related-Financial-Disclosures-Full-Report_1.pdf [2] Ibid. [3] Ibid. [4] WEF (2020): Nature Risk Rising. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/reports/nature-risk-rising-why-the-crisis-engulfing-nature-matters-for-business-and-the-economy [5] UNEP WCMC (2014). Towards a global map of natural capital: key ecosystem assets. Available online: https://www.unep-wcmc.org/system/dataset_file_fields/files/000/000/232/original/NCR-LR_Mixed.pdf?1408446708 Global Environment Facility WWF-US UNEP FI CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Site preservation]]+ 566276.33 566276.33 566276.33 1310291 WWF-US UNEP FI 283355 WWF-US UNEP FI 1651329 WWF-US UNEP FI 1698829 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10802 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility CI PIF Approval Date ' Cote d'Ivoire Ecuador Guinea Mali Nicaragua Sierra Leone Zambia Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ +![cdata[Precious metals/materials]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10810 Global Environment Facility Reduce the risk of exposure to mercury-added skin lightening products Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project does not have direct socioeconomic benefits to the general public in the three target countries as the interventions will not increase jobs, income nor wealth of any sector in society. However, it will increase the knowledge and education on the risks of using mercury SLPs to various levels of stakeholders in the three target countries and globally. In addition, the project will discourage societal preferences for lighter color skin and reduce media/TV advertisements and advice that directly and indirectly encourage SLP usage. Consumers will be exposed to a high level of awareness on the harmful effects of chemicals present in SLPs through clear labels and advocacy campaigns. Healthy individuals without any prejudice or preference toward skin color will contribute toward a more harmonized, fair, and progressive society. The aim of the project is directly aligned with the Minamata Convention. Furthermore, given the potential health risks posed by mercury, there are tremendous health benefits in phasing out mercury SLPs and SLPs in general around the world. Healthy individuals will contribute to well-being of communities and the productivity and prosperity of a country as whole. In addition to the goals of national mercury reduction and global commitment in phasing out mercury SLPs and SLPs in general, the project also addresses Sustainable Development Goals 3 (Good Health and Well-being), 4 (Quality Education), 5 (Gender Equality), 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), 10 (Reducing Inequality), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), 14 (Life Below Water), 15 (Life on Land), 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions), and 17 (Partnerships for the Goals). Global Environment Facility UNEP World Health Organization (WHO), Biodiversity Research Institute (BRI) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Gabon Jamaica Sri Lanka Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 843563 UNEP World Health Organization (WHO), Biodiversity Research Institute (BRI) 1008750 UNEP World Health Organization (WHO), Biodiversity Research Institute (BRI) 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10816 Global Environment Facility To reverse rangeland degradation and improve productivity of rangelands globally, through sustainable livestock value chains, and thereby reduce poverty and secure livelihoods, with inclusive benefits to women and youth. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project works primarily at the global and regional levels, however, it is expected that Component 1 will directly benefit pastoralists and their communities through the development and brokering of at least 5 bankable public-private partnership projects in selected livestock value chains that also benefit rangeland restoration. The choice of the value chain will be based on criteria that maximize socio-economic benefits as these provide the incentives for long term sustainability, such as increased income for SMEs and women-owned enterprises, increased empowerment of women, and increased employment and training for youth. Global Environment Facility IUCN ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Forestry development]]+ 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 400000 IUCN ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute) 0 IUCN ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute) 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10872 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility ADB FAO, Viet Nam Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD), Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers (India), Department of Agriculture and its units/ bureaux/ attached agencies (Philippines), Department of Agriculture (Laos PDR), Ministry of Environment and Water and Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Aquaculture, and Fisheries (Ecuador) PIF Approval Date ' Ecuador India Kenya Lao PDR Philippines Uruguay Viet Nam Developing countries, unspecified +![cdata[Agricultural development]]+ +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ +![cdata[Precious metals/materials]]+ XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10890 Global Environment Facility To establish a truly global partnership to engage and assist developing countries to raise awareness, build capacity, define baselines and promote international policy dialogue on the mitigation of underwater noise from shipping. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.With the emphasis on building capacities in developing countries to assess and mitigate the impacts of underwater noise from shipping, the main socioeconomic benefit is the resulting increased human capital. The increase in human capital regarding marine ecosystem sensitivities to noise will deepen the appreciation and understanding of natural resources under management by developing countries. The project will also better enable stakeholders from developing countries to be more meaningfully involved in regional and global dialogues and to make science-based contributions to decision-making processes on regulatory, technological and other conservation management measures. This involvement also extends to women professionals, as resources under Component 2 are allocated or strengthening capacities of women, advancing gender equality and women’s empowerment objectives. The strengthened capacities, increased awareness and more effective stakeholder collaboration catalysed through the Global Strategic Partnership are expected to contribute to increased attention and mitigation of the impacts of underwater noise from shipping. The resulting socioeconomic benefits would extend both to the fisheries and tourism sectors. Research has indicated that anthropogenic underwater noise has the potential to impact fishery resources directly via displacement of fish from important habitats. But it is also possible that noise has ecosystem impacts affecting lower trophic levels such as invertebrates on which fish prey (see Popper et al. 2020). Reducing pressure from anthropogenic noise including those from ships could alleviate ecosystem impacts and lead to an increase or recovery of fishery resources which would ultimately benefit the fisheries sector. This could be critically important to artisanal fishers in developing countries who have limited ability to adapt to changing fish stock locations. Beyond the fishing industry itself, reduction of low-cost protein access could negatively impact nutrition needs and caloric intake for those living on subsistence wages. In many parts of the world, eco-tourism, including whale-watching, is on the rise (Cisneros-Montemayor et al. 2010). Reducing pressures from shipping and other noise emitters would likely lead to beneficial impacts on whale populations such as increased habitat use of previously heavily noise polluted areas and population growth, which in turn could directly benefit eco-tourism in the form of whale-watching. Reduction of underwater noise could also benefit the recreational diving sector as studies have shown that human divers can be affected by underwater noise too. Effects can range from aversion to injury (Anthony et al. 2009). There is a growing body of knowledge on the impacts of underwater noise from shipping on marine fauna, including sea turtles. For example, it is known that sea turtles are sensitive to noise below the 1000 Hz similar to the range of vessel motors.[1] The type of ecotourism oriented on sighting of species, like sea turtles, provides a sustainable alternative to other, more destructive activities, and the positive externality includes promoting a country’s environmental, economic and social development in areas where these species exist. With respect to climate change adaptation benefits, the project contributes to building the knowledge base on best practices for mitigating the impacts of underwater noise from shipping. Commercial shipping is expected to adjust to changes brought about by the effects of climate change. For instance, further loss of sea ice in the Arctic opens opportunities for year-round shipping and enhanced access to oil and gas and other resources. Facilitating improved multi-stakeholder dialogue and collaboration, including through the establishment of the Global Strategic Partnership, will help steer formulation of science-based regulatory frameworks to reduce impacts on globally significant biodiversity. [1] NOAA Fisheries, Sea Turtles in a Sea of Sound, see https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/sea-turtles-sea-sound. Global Environment Facility UNDP IMO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 650000.00 650000.00 650000.00 584873 UNDP IMO 1950000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10892 Global Environment Facility To support lake ecosystems recovery through phosphorus emissions reductions from land to water to improve the protection and restoration of freshwater and coastal ecosystems, bringing together the global lake management and sustainable phosphorus management communities including developing and testing a sustainable phosphorus management framework in Chile to inform international application. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The global environmental problems and global baseline (see Sections 1 and 2) demonstrate that current phosphorus practices are not sustainable and that following the current trajectory will result in widespread environmental and socio-economic issues. Barriers slowing progress towards sustainable phosphorus management across scales include: - A lack of an internationally relevant phosphorus monitoring and assessment system, - Poor knowledge exchange limits the effectiveness of phosphorus emissions reduction programs, - Low awareness of the public and private sectors on the rewards of improving phosphorus sustainability, and the risks of inaction. - Where they exist, basin-to-national-scale phosphorus emissions reduction policies are fragmented and limited in ambition. It is important to have a holistic and precautionary approach to phosphorus pollution/waste throughout the value chain (e.g. Net Zero P approach). Countries, cities, and companies need to identify and act upon hotspots, detect leakage of phosphorus in their industries and value chains, and activate the most effective interventions systematically. Such efforts will lead to more sustainable phosphorus management and contribute significantly to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and multiple regional and global calls for improvement in nutrient use efficiency. By focusing on lakes as the primary loci of environmental impact, the GEF uP-Cycle project will demonstrate how ecosystem recovery can be achieved through phosphorus emissions reductions from land to water. Sustainable phosphorus management will be essential to improve the protection and restoration of freshwater and coastal ecosystems. To deliver on this aim, the project will bring together the global lake management and sustainable phosphorus management communities, developing and testing a sustainable phosphorus management framework in Chile to inform international application. The project will be delivered through five interlinked components with corresponding activities to deliver the component outputs to reach expected outcomes (see ‘Section 3. The Proposed Alternative Scenario’ for further details). By achieving these outcomes, the uP-Cycle project will deliver environmental and socio-economic benefits. Expected environmental institutional benefits The actions proposed by the project will bring benefits to environmental institutions, including: - Enhanced institutional capacity to strengthen baseline phosphorus emissions data and identify impacts to support the identification of emissions reduction measures. - A better understanding and access to tools that can predict ecosystem impacts in response to phosphorus pollution and its mitigation. This information is critical to argue for more stringent standards on phosphorus pollution and to ensure maximum benefits are equitably realized from planned investments. In addition, it will better inform on the nature and extent of ecological and ecosystem service response following costly emissions reduction investments across sectors. - Improved understanding of nutrient loading from land-based activities to the coasts, to support the objectives of the HC-LME SAP, and a national surveillance and/or nutrient emissions modelling approach is required to inform the need for national-scale nutrient load reduction. - Reduction of phosphorus emissions at source by identifying and accelerating sector-specific opportunities to reduce direct emissions to existing waste streams and/or to optimize practices to increase phosphorus use efficiency to reduce point and diffuse source emissions. - Contributions to Net Zero Ambitions by reducing direct greenhouse gas emissions from standing waters related to a reduction in phosphorus-driven algal biomass and through the selection of Nature-Based Solutions that deliver both reductions in phosphorus emissions from land to water as well as greenhouse gas emissions from land to atmosphere. - Increased regional to global capacity to implement phosphorus recovery and recycling by assessing capacity for Nature-Based Solutions, both in urban and rural settings, to divert, capture and recover phosphorus from points of accumulation in the natural environment, upstream of sensitive ecosystems. - Increased access to knowledge and tools required to implement effective Lake Ecosystem Resilience Enhancing Measures, ensuring that ecological recovery following emissions reductions is effective, including the creation of refuge habitats for threatened species, the control of legacy phosphorus pollution in lakebed sediments, and the control of other important stressors (e.g., climate change, non-native invasive species, other nutrients and pollutants) which may constrain ecosystem recovery in the long term. Expected Socio-economic Benefits The actions proposed by the project will bring socio-economic benefits, including: - Embracing the Circular Economy – the project will identify opportunities that address losses of phosphorus and other nutrients along the full value chain delivering on wider sustainability ambitions including the reduction of food waste and wastewater discharges. - Increasing Resilience in Food and Drinking Water Sectors – the project will provide options to reduce reliance on mined (and imported) inorganic phosphorus fertilizers in agriculture and aquaculture (and other end-uses) (e.g. through improved phosphorus use efficiency, loss reduction and increase in phosphorus recycling), within the carrying capacity of the system, whilst reducing drinking water treatment costs associated with the reduction of harmful algal blooms and their toxins. - Supporting Growth in Eco-Tourism, Business and the Housing Sectors – The project will protect local economic growth by enhancing the value of natural capital to contribute to the creation of vibrant and dynamic water economies working with stakeholders to develop opportunities for businesses or industries for whom clean, safe and biodiverse lakes are a critical resource. - Empowering communities by fostering Inclusive Sustainability Communities to ensure that all members of society play an active role in the development of future emissions reduction plans, including, Youth and Indigenous Peoples Assemblies. - Accelerating Inclusive Sustainable Innovation working across sectors to support the development of innovations, jobs and opportunities through the transition to new emissions reduction practices (e.g., small-holding farmers) for vulnerable groups who are historically socially and/or economically reliant on the status quo. - Enhancing Capacity across the Institutional Framework by connecting knowledge providers (e.g., universities, citizens’ science practitioners, businesses, and regulatory bodies) through shared education and skills development activities to underpin the long-term knowledge base. The following communities/sectors will directly benefit from the uP-Cycle project in the following ways: - For lakeshore communities directly impacted by eutrophication (e.g., risks to human health, supply of food, drinking water, recreation, property values, aesthetic, spiritual and cultural benefits). - The wider community, within the lake catchment and beyond, that are reliant on lake ecosystem services (e.g., drinking water, irrigation water, transportation, recreation, and hydropower). - For coastal communities impacted by nutrient pollution delivered from upstream freshwater catchments. - For aqua culturists, by supporting improved (long-term) and sustainable fisheries and through relief from future risk of hypoxic waters as a result of eutrophication. - For waste managers through access to knowledge, training and technical guidance on the management of phosphorus-rich wastes to optimize phosphorus recycling. - For farmers through better phosphorus management policies and practices, such as access to recycled phosphorus fertilizer, and contributing to food security. - For communities economically dependent on biodiversity and high-quality freshwater ecosystems, through improved revenue from eco-tourism.Global Environment Facility UNEP The UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) in collaboration with the Chilean Ministry of Environment CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 600000 UNEP The UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) in collaboration with the Chilean Ministry of Environment 0 UNEP The UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) in collaboration with the Chilean Ministry of Environment 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10897 Global Environment Facility To strengthen delivery of the global biodiversity species data through the IUCN Red List in the most comprehensive, sustainable, convenient and interoperable way for the many existing and planned platforms and users Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. The Dasgupta Review highlighted that the species extinction crisis is undermining the productivity, resilience and adaptability of nature. This, in turn, puts local and national economies, livelihoods and wellbeing at serious risk. The project will assist countries to make better informed decisions and plans for the safeguarding and recovery of nature. Through the further development of IUCN’s species datasets and derivatives, this project will contribute to the Conservation of Globally Significant Biodiversity, which is a Global Environment Benefit. The IUCN Red List is used to conserve global biodiversity through its use as an indicator, in raising awareness on the nature crisis, informed priority setting, identifying Key Biodiversity Areas, influencing resource allocation and availability, improving legislation and policy, and conservation action leading to positive change (Betts et al. 2020[1]). [1] Betts, J., Young, R. P., Hilton-Taylor, C., Hoffmann, M., Rodríguez, J. P., Stuart, S. N., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2020). A framework for evaluating the impact of the IUCN Red List of threatened species. Conservation Biology, 34(3), 632-643. @font-face {font-family:SimSun; panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1; mso-font-alt:??; mso-font-charset:134; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:3 680460288 22 0 262145 0;}@font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;}@font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536858881 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;}@font-face {font-family:"\@SimSun"; panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1; mso-font-charset:134; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:3 680460288 22 0 262145 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0in; margin-right:0in; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:SimSun; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}p.MsoFootnoteText, li.MsoFootnoteText, div.MsoFootnoteText {mso-style-name:"Footnote Text\,Geneva 9\,Font\: Geneva 9\,Boston 10\,f"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-link:"Footnote Text Char\,Geneva 9 Char\,Font\: Geneva 9 Char\,Boston 10 Char\,f Char"; margin:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:X-NONE; mso-fareast-language:X-NONE;}p.MsoCommentText, li.MsoCommentText, div.MsoCommentText {mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-link:"Comment Text Char"; margin:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:X-NONE; mso-fareast-language:X-NONE;}span.MsoFootnoteReference {mso-style-name:"Footnote Reference\,16 Point\,Superscript 6 Point"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-parent:""; vertical-align:super;}span.FootnoteTextChar {mso-style-name:"Footnote Text Char\,Geneva 9 Char\,Font\: Geneva 9 Char\,Boston 10 Char\,f Char"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-locked:yes; mso-style-link:"Footnote Text\,Geneva 9\,Font\: Geneva 9\,Boston 10\,f"; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:X-NONE; mso-fareast-language:X-NONE;}span.CommentTextChar {mso-style-name:"Comment Text Char"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-locked:yes; mso-style-link:"Comment Text"; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:X-NONE; mso-fareast-language:X-NONE;}.MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-font-family:SimSun; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;}div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;}Global Environment Facility IUCN IUCN CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 611620.67 611620.67 611620.67 559083 IUCN IUCN 580000 IUCN IUCN 1834862 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10902 Global Environment Facility Reduce the use and prevalence of harmful agrochemicals by supporting farmers to access finance, innovative practices, and markets required to incentivize sustainable practices. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.As outlined in the global environmental problem section, pesticide and plastic emissions and residues have a negative impact on soil quality, populations of natural predators etc. This has an impact on seed germination, plant growth and animal health. These negative consequences of pesticides and plastics reduce the productivity and resilience of the farming system to existing pests and the growing impact of climate change. A robust ecosystem is more resilient to climate change due to higher levels of biodiversity.[1] Farmers are already increasing the number of times they spray per cropping cycle and the concentration of active ingredient applied because of growing resistance in the pests and the loss of natural predators. Replacing HHPs with less toxic and more selective pesticides and non-chemical options will allow natural predators to thrive which combined with other integrated pest management practices will reduce the impact of pests on yields. Reducing micro and macro plastic pollution that could contaminate soils before it becomes a problem will allow farmers in Uruguay and Kenya to avoid the problems of reduced germination and plant growth that are starting to be seen in Asia. The project environmental results will also directly benefit health. Reducing the exposure of farmers and their families to HHPs will reduce the incidence of accidental poisoning and the subsequent loss of labor and the cost of treatment for farming families. Reducing residues of HHPs on food produce will reduce the incidence of accidental poisoning amongst consumers, whilst there is no statistic on this problem available in Uruguay or Kenya this is due to lack of data on this issue, as academic studies in both countries have found pesticide residues that exceed accepted residue levels. HHPs have been associated with suicides in rural communities in Asia and banning HHPs has been correlated to reductions in the number of suicides (see baseline). Whilst research in this issue has not been carried out in Kenya and Uruguay, there is a probability that HHPs contribute to the number of suicides in these countries. Finally, alternative pest and crop management approaches can bring economic benefits for farmers. Pesticides and agricultural plastics are expensive inputs for farmers, and the disposal of hazardous waste is another expense that needs to be borne either by manufacturers, importers, or farmers. At the farm level, reducing the number of pesticides and plastics used is potentially a way to improve margins on crops, providing yields can be maintained, whilst removing the possibility of accidental poisoning reduced the associated health care costs. At the national level, reducing the use of HHPs reduced the risk of accidental poisoning for both farmers and consumers and the cost imposed on the public health system. Elimination of HHPs also eliminates the risk that export crops are rejected by importing countries that have strict phytosanitary requirements and robust testing regimes. [1] https://www.fao.org/agroecology/knowledge/10-elements/balance/en/ Global Environment Facility UNEP FAO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Kenya Uruguay Developing countries, unspecified Nakuru, Kenya -0.3031 36.0800 Kirinyaga, Kenya -0.5000 37.3333 Kenya 1.4420 38.4314 Bungoma, Kenya 0.5635 34.5606 Uruguay -32.5228 -55.7658 1552845 UNEP FAO 7486500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10903 Global Environment Facility Project Objective: To generate, coordinate, communicate, and manage knowledge to amplify the results of FARM child projects as a single Programme regionally and globally Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Socio-economic benefits of reducing the use of HHPs, reducing plastic pollution from agriculture and increasing the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices include the following. Improved public health outcomes. The global child project will contribute to mitigating direct and indirect health impacts caused by harmful agrochemicals (refer to Baseline section for a description of health impacts). A higher level of awareness coupled with stronger regulations will contribute to minimising the access to and use of HHPs thereby reducing the risk of pesticide poisoning, for farmers applying pesticides, neighbours affected by pesticide drift and consumers at risk of consuming contaminated food. These problems are more prevalent in low-income and middle-income countries, where there is less understanding of the risks and less use of personal protective equipment. As previously noted, women are more susceptible than men to the toxic effects of agricultural pesticides, and according to research carried out by the Centre for Prevention of Pesticide Poisoning are more likely to use pesticides to attempt to committee suicide. This will have a positive impact on the individuals and families affected, reducing sickness and distress, and will reduce the burden on under resource and over stretched public health systems. Climate change resilience. Maintaining biodiversity has been shown to contribute to climate change resilience combatting the build-up on novel pests and diseases, which have traditionally been controlled by the additional use of pesticides and allowing existing farming practices to continue. Maintaining long term agricultural productivity. Reducing the environmental consequences of unsustainable agricultural practices, such as reducing biodiversity and increasing the contamination of soils with pesticide and plastic residues will contribute to maintaining soil fertility and long-term agricultural productivity and the viability of rural livelihoods. Furthermore, reducing the use of HHPs will give farmers increased access to higher value organic value chains thereby increasing household revenue.Global Environment Facility UNEP Green Growth Knowledge Partnership CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified India 22.3511 78.6677 Vietnam 14.0583 108.2772 Lao Democratic People's 20.0171 103.3783 Philippines 12.7503 122.7312 Kenya 1.4420 38.4314 Uruguay -32.5228 -55.7658 Ecuador -1.3398 -79.3667 3005020 UNEP Green Growth Knowledge Partnership 7455000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10916 Global Environment Facility Support country planning to inclusively and effectively meet or exceed GBF Target 3. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Overall, the project will encourage national-level action towards achieving or exceeding GBF Target 3 in ways that are inclusive and effective. This will lead to a number of direct and indirect benefits. An important part of contributing to Target 3 involves engaging a range of rights holders and stakeholders, particularly Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs). Many IPLC groups have been managing their areas and their biodiversity for generations, but are now facing outside threats to their livelihoods, wellbeing and cultures. Work towards Target 3 includes supporting them to gain stronger rights and tenure for their areas, building their capacity to withstand outside threats and govern their areas effectively, and ensure they gain benefits from their areas. This project will promote approaches that are respectful, just, equitable and inclusive, are led by rights holders and stakeholders, and match their aspirations for their areas.In addition, Target 3 emphasizes nature’s services to people as well as biodiversity. This project will promote a strong focus on ecosystem services in the global guidance and the five country planning processes. In the past, protected area planning often prioritized biodiversity over people’s needs from nature; the project team will work to promote conservation of provisioning, regulating and cultural services at multiple scales, on a coequal basis with biodiversity. This is likely to include areas that have lower value for species conservation, and areas that are less remote than protected areas tend to be. Throughout this process WWF will respect local rights-holders’ and stakeholders’ needs and aspirations. The approach also takes into account likely future conditions as well as current ones, helping build climate resilience of people and nature. Therefore, this project sets the stage for equitable, just and inclusive processes that deliver positive benefits to people’s wellbeing at local and national levels, while enhancing conservation of biodiversity and nature’s services to people from local to global levels. The project will generate benefits in terms of increased access to information and participation of indigenous peoples and local communities in the decision-making process. The project acknowledges the important role played by those communities in stewarding nature and the need to develop specific policies for the development of sustainable economic activities. As a result of the project and the information generated, countries will be able to allocate their resources more effectively toward activities and policies identified as priorities to the implementation of Target 3, as well as to the establishment of adaptation measures for climate change, for example. Additionally, the project will generate socioeconomic benefits by developing a roadmap that will lead to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services, and more sustainable development. The roadmap will help support local economies, while also reducing the risks of climate change, providing numerous ecosystem services, and benefiting human health. Depending on the country, the project might also contribute to making the case for protection of areas of particular importance for biodiversity and its contributions to people. All in all, project will better inform countries’ actions towards achieving or exceeding GBF Target 3, including by identifying data needs, providing a sense of the costs, elaborating benefits of PAs/OECMs, and the enabling conditions to Target 3. Based on this information, the national plans will outline actions and a “how to” guide to governments that will focus either on policy formulation or on the identification of technical studies that should be further prioritized to close the existing gaps and support achieving Target 3. The resulting investment in conservation areas and sustainable activities have the capacity to generate socioeconomic benefits at the local (e.g., income and employment), national (e.g., food and water security), and global level (e.g., climate change adaptation and mitigation). Global Environment Facility WWF-US WWF-US CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 1039806 WWF-US WWF-US 799661 WWF-US WWF-US 2000000 WWF-US WWF-US 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10918 Global Environment Facility Project Objective: to raise awareness of the value of green hydrogen, address barriers to production and use, and support the development of first-of-a-kind projects in developing countries. Project Description Summary: The proposed GEF-funded project (“Green Hydrogen Support in Developing Countries”) will consist of two main components. Component 1 will target Global Knowledge TA work through the establishment of a high-level Green Hydrogen Development Facility (Green Hydrogen Facility) that will serve as a global platform to disseminate best practices and facilitate global knowledge exchange to raise awareness between public and private sector stakeholders on different green hydrogen technology applications and policy solutions. Component 2 will target the development/operationalization of emerging green hydrogen opportunities through first-of-a-kind projects in 4 countries, namely, Chile, Morocco, Tunisia, and Ukraine to fast-track public-private investment mobilization for green hydrogen project development. Overall, the project will aim to promote policy innovations to support green hydrogen technology development and transfer in order to reduce global green house gas (GHG) emissions, which closely aligns with the GEF-7 Climate Change Mitigation (CCM) Focal Area objectives. As such, the project will focus on multiple policy, strategy, and technology application use cases of green hydrogen across sectors starting in the power sector from long-duration storage and the integration of renewables to hard-to-abate heavy industry (cement, chemicals, steele, etc.) solutions. In addition, the proposal will focus on green hydrogen solutions across other key sectors such as transport (long-distance trucking, shipping, and aviation) and agriculture (ammonia production) including the building sector. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Developing countries, unspecified Developing countries, unspecified Developing countries, unspecified 566767.67 566767.67 566767.67 0 World Bank World Bank 556233 World Bank World Bank 544521 World Bank World Bank 1700303 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10920 Global Environment Facility To identify approaches and promote mutually reinforcing legal frameworks and alignment of financial resources for global biodiversity benefits. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.193. The project will work toward increasing Policy Coherence in the three target countries through raising awareness and motivating a strong commitment among policy makers about the benefits of pursuing coherence in making laws that seek to achieve environmental, economic, and social goals. Through increasing understanding of Policy Coherence policy makers will better understand how their policy choices today can affect the future population, and how their choices could impact on wellbeing and sustainable development elsewhere. A better understanding of Policy Coherence would help foster whole-of-government coordination to promote mutually supporting actions across sectors enabling policy makers to identify and address policy divergences and conflicts between measures, thereby increasing integration, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of conservation and development measures. Addressing the interactions among economic, social, and environmental goals in a balanced manner will ultimately support the wellbeing of people. Given the long-term benefits anticipated from this effort, both in protection of biodiversity and the environment and in improvements in resource allocation, the populations involved in the sectors with which the project will work in each country will experience long-term benefits from the intended results.Global Environment Facility UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (1) The Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) was established when ICCF expanded its operations outside the US, where ICCF was originally founded to support Congress. CCN is now doing business as the ICCF Group and both terms are being used interchangeably. CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Ministry of Environment and Climate Change of Mongolia 47.9184676 106.9177016 Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development of Colombia 4.625970 -74.070503 Ministry of Green Economy and Envrionment of Zambia -15.4347 28.3206 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 1027999 UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (1) The Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) was established when ICCF expanded its operations outside the US, where ICCF was originally founded to support Congress. CCN is now doing business as the ICCF Group and both terms are being used interchangeably. 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10921 Global Environment Facility To leverage the conservation caucus model to increase the sustainability of funding for protected areas systems. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. Improving the financial sustainability of National Protected Areas Systems through the interventions of this project provides benefits at the global, national, and local levels. Globally it contributes to GEF-7 Core Indicators by addressing direct drivers to protect habitats and species and improve financial sustainability, effective management, and ecosystem coverage of the global protected area estate. This in turn will significantly increase the area of protected areas under effective and equitable management, including the ecological representativeness of protected area systems, and their coverage of protected areas, and other effective area-based conservation measures of particular importance for biodiversity, especially habitats for threatened species. At the national and local levels, National Protected Areas Systems provide ecosystem goods and services critical for sustaining human well-being, economic and social development, with global environmental and adaptation and mitigation benefits. National Protected Areas Systems provide provisioning services in the form of water, timber, medicine, storm protection, and food; regulating services in the context of climate and rainfall; cultural services for inspiration and recreation; and supporting services such as photosynthesis, soil formation and nutrient cycling. Many industries including fisheries, maritime transport, sun and beach tourism, nautical tourism, diving, sustainable timber, nature-based terrestrial tourism, non-timber forest products, traditional medicine, water, etc. are reliant on the flora, fauna, subsoil resources and the other ecosystems goods and services provided by protected areas. Well planned and managed protected areas help to maintain the evenness of climatic representation under protection that is required to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem connectivity, maintain species range limits, and protect the structure of biotic communities[1]. A well-financed National Protected Areas Systems will help to maintain its capacity to provide essential ecosystem services to increase resistance, resilience and reduce vulnerability of community livelihoods against climate change. [1] Elsen, P.R. (2020). Keeping pace with climate change in global terrestrial protected areas. Science Advances, Vol. 6, No. 25 Global Environment Facility UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Jakarta -6.21462 106.84513 Nairobi -1.28333 36.83333 Mexico City 19.42847 -99.12766 Bogota 4.60971 -74.08175 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 363079 UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) 584237 UNEP Conservation Council of Nations (CCN) 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10923 Global Environment Facility To help enable decision-makers1 to accelerate the systemwide transformations2 needed to safeguard the global commons for all. 1Decision-makers include policymakers across all sectors and at all levels of decision-making; funders and investors channelling climate and nature-related finance through bilateral aid agencies, multilateral institutions, private philanthropies, and impact investing firms; leaders across the private sector; and those at the helm of international non-governmental organizations, civil society movements, and United Nations agencies. 2 Limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C and halting biodiversity loss will require transformations across socio-technical systems (power, industry, transport, the built environment, and sustainable production and consumption) and social-ecological systems (food, terrestrial ecosystem management, freshwater ecosystem management, and marine ecosystem management). Broader transformations across political, economic, and social systems will also be required, such as how we will finance the transition to a net-zero GHG emissions and nature-positive future, measure economic well-being, distribute the costs and benefits of these transformations, improve social equity and inclusion, and govern the global commons. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Due to the global and interdisciplinary nature of this project, it is hard to pinpoint quantifiable or localized socioeconomic benefits—however, the project should bring about socioeconomic co-benefits globally and locally through facilitating systems change via the project outcomes. More specifically, the success of the SCL’s work could help deliver the GEF’s global environmental benefits and adaptation benefits. Rapid, far-reaching transitions across systems can lead to a more prosperous, sustainable, and nature-positive society for all. As an example, transforming how we manage land and forests entails restoring degraded and deforested landscapes. Such a transformation would lead to a positive impact not only on biodiversity, associated ecosystems services, and ecological resilience, but also contribute to GEF’s global environmental benefits in climate change (through sequestering and storing carbon), land degradation (through restoration of native ecosystems), and adaptation (through agroforestry systems that diversify farmers’ livelihoods). Similarly, transforming our food systems involves shifting to sustainable agricultural production, halving food loss and waste, shifting to more plant-based diets, and reducing GHG emissions from agriculture. These shifts could enhance food security (through increasing crop, livestock, and pasture productivity on existing lands) and improve livelihoods (through the introduction of more resilient, low-emissions production methods and technologies), helping hundreds of millions of small-scale agricultural producers to adapt to the impacts of climate change. The SCL also includes a cross-cutting focus on ‘Inclusion, Equity and the Just Transition’ that will underpin the sectoral transformations it seeks to advance (see Annex N for further information). This will include shifts that ensure that the costs and benefits of systems change are equitably distributed, that those historically marginalized from decision-making processes have a seat at the table across all levels of policymaking (i.e., global, national, and local), and that efforts to safeguard the global commons are combined with those to ensure universal access to basic services and opportunities. It also encompasses efforts to ensure just transitions at all levels and for both those disproportionately affected by climate impacts and biodiversity loss, as well as those working in industries that may need to be phased out (e.g., fossil fuel companies). If the Lab is successful in supporting decision-makers to act on these issues, (and potentially strengthening coalitions or helping create a new coalition for transformations not currently addressed), then this should also contribute to substantial socioeconomic benefits in the near future at both local and national levels. Global Environment Facility CI World Resources Institute (WRI) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Guild Hall, London 51.5159 -0.09198 Expo City, Dubai 25.97869 55.14126 Sharm el-Sheikh 27.91582 34.32995 Yale Club, New York, New York 40.75273 -73.97723 University of Exeter, Exeter UK 50.73466 -3.53365 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 546979 CI World Resources Institute (WRI) 1406492 CI World Resources Institute (WRI) 1953471 CI World Resources Institute (WRI) 0 CI World Resources Institute (WRI) 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10930 Global Environment Facility Towards a nature positive world by 2030 through businesses driving policy ambition and reducing negative corporate impact Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.This project will contribute indirectly to socioeconomic co-benefits at national level in the four key geographies South Africa, India, Colombia and Malaysia, including sustainable livelihoods and economic growth through the innovative, circular solutions delivered by partner businesses which support biodiversity conservation and preserves and restores ecosystem services, as they become increasingly aware of their impacts and dependencies on nature and move towards implementing business-related targets of the CBD Post-2020 GBF. The 7,306 people who are expected to benefit directly from project activities and knowledge products will be equipped with much needed skills to transform business practices and models for nature and climate positivity, increasing their chances for sustained employment. Not only will they benefit individually, but the beneficiaries will also spark continued change by applying acquired knowledge disseminated through the project in different corporate environments, stimulating climate and nature positive business change in a variety of regions and sectors. The more knowledgeable a company’s workforce and management about their operations and supply chains impacts on nature and dependencies on ecosystem services, the higher the chances that they take sufficient and timely action to address their contributions to biodiversity loss, land degradation and climate change. In this way, improved knowledge of the corporate workforce is expected to translate into achieving the global environment benefits of biodiversity conservation, reversing land use change and habitat fragmentation, and mitigating GHG emissions to curtail climate change. Next to stimulating change in the four countries, knowledge products are also expected to increase the awareness and understanding of corporate actors globally, who then in turn are better informed to take action on nature and climate. Moreover, the project’s efforts to assist companies and governments to formulate an enabling policy environment that incentivizes sustainable business models, will contribute to sustaining ecosystem services on which human health depends. In other words, economic activities will shift to stay within planetary boundaries (leveraging on the Global Commons Alliance) and thus keeping health and wellbeing at the center of ambitions, in line with the healthy people, healthy planet concept. Finally, the project interventions will also lead to women empowerment at multiple levels, through a focus on women leadership enhancement in the corporate sector.Global Environment Facility CI Business for Nature, hosted at World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Kuala Lumpur 3.1412 101.68653 Cape Town -33.92584 18.42322 Bogota 4.60971 -74.08175 Santiago de Chile 35.6751 -71.542 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 1707096 CI Business for Nature, hosted at World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) 244004 CI Business for Nature, hosted at World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) 1985000 CI Business for Nature, hosted at World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10936 Global Environment Facility To protect human health and the environment from harmful effects of mercury through implementation of policies and improved practices to phase down the use of dental amalgams Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project will have direct socioeconomic benefits to the public in the three target countries as the interventions aim to increase the quality, accessibility, and affordability of oral health care. In addition, the project will increase the knowledge and education of health workforce and to various levels of stakeholders in the three target countries and globally. Consumers will be exposed to high level of awareness on the harmful effects of chemicals present in dental amalgam and its associated wastes through advocacy campaigns. Healthy individuals will contribute toward a more harmonized, fair, and progressive society. Furthermore, this project is framed around Article 4 and Annex A Part II of the Minamata Convention delivering an evidence based transformative framework, which will mobilize and enable the phase down of the use of dental amalgam, recognising that this action is the most effective strategy to achieve the objective of the Convention. The project and its outputs are aligned with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, specific linkages to SDG 3 (Targets 8 and 9). Under SDG 3 (Good health and wellbeing): Target 9 (By 2030, substantially reduce the number of deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and air, water and soil pollution and contamination), as well as supporting and contributing to Target 8 (Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all). In addition, the design of the project is oriented towards SDG 12 (Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns), and SDG 6 (Water and Sanitation) through the environmentally sound management of dental amalgam and all its wastes throughout their life cycle. Priority in the project is given to ensuring that management and disposal of dental waste is conducted in an environmentally sound manner in line with the provisions of the Minamata Convention, the Basel technical guidelines on the environmentally sound management of mercury waste, and the transboundary transport requirements of the Basel Convention. The activities of this proposal reflect and include all nine measures of Annex A Part II of the Minamata Convention and have been designed to enable countries to phase down dental amalgam in a measureable, equitable and sustainable manner. The project will enhance and support intersectoral dialogue and cooperation and provide social and economic information/data that will help guide and support financing and investment, including health system strengthening for phasing down the use of dental amalgam. The shift to integrated people centred health services, which will encourage dialogue and intersectoral planning between ministries of health, environment, education, finance and labour will be an integral part of the project. The principle of integrated people centred services is embedded in the WHO Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases NCDs 2013-2020 and WHO World Health Assembly resolution WHA60.17 Oral health: action plan for promotion and integrated disease prevention . From the health perspective, the 2016 UN High Level Commission report on Health Employment and Economic Growth (HEEG) notes that ’investing in the health workforce’ was a major opportunity to foster political commitments and to make gains across several SDGs, including SDG 1 (poverty elimination), SDG 4 (quality education), SDG 5 (gender equality) and SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth). The 2017 UN High-level Commission on Health Employment and Economic Growth report also called for a fit for purpose health workforce; the right number, with the right competenceis and skills, the right skills mix, in the right place and with right conditions for decent work and lifelong learning. The report’s recommendations to transform the health workforce for the SDGs were based in part on the health workforce; six recommendations relate to what needs to be changed in health employment, health education and health service delivery to maximize future returns on investments, with a further four recommendations on how to enable the necessary changes. There is good evidence indicating that investing in the health workforce to deliver integrated people centred health services with: 1) care that is focused and organized around the health needs and expectations of people and communities, rather than on diseases; and 2) such that people receive a continuum of health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, treatment, disease management, rehabillitation and pallative services, through different levels and sites of care within the health system and according to their needs throughout the life course, will yield co-benefits in terms of improved dental health.Global Environment Facility UNEP World Health Organization (WHO) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Senegal Thailand Uruguay Developing countries, unspecified 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 887644 UNEP World Health Organization (WHO) 917465 UNEP World Health Organization (WHO) 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10993 Global Environment Facility This project is designed to increase the role of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in delivering Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN), and in promoting adherence to LDN principles, including environmental and social safeguards, in public and private investments. The project has a global scope and will strengthen the capacity and the level of engagement of CSOs in the regions. The project objective is: “Increased capacities and recognition of the CSOs to contribute to the adherence of LDN principles in policies, programs and investments”. This will be delivered through capacities and support to CSOs to ensure that LDN is better aligned with established principles and practices and to lead investments in LDN. The project will consist of 2 components: 1) Influencing LDN and 2) Leveraging LDN. Component 1 focuses on increasing the recognition of CSOs at the political level, as well as increasing opportunities to be involved in designing, implementing, and evaluating LDN transformative projects. This is further extended to increasing the visibility of CSOs efforts towards achieving LDN. This will be done through a variety of mechanisms, namely knowledge development and exchange, mentoring, advocacy towards policy makers, awareness raising events and mobilisation of CSO community. Component 2 seeks to answer this demand, by building CSOs capacities and providing technical support to CSOs to leverage funds and convening fund raising meetings with donors and private investors. It is centred around a single outcome: CSOs’ capacities to leverage funds for LDN are increased. This will be achieved through knowledge development and exchange, and increased engagement with donors Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.As a global scale project, the socioeconomic benefits delivered by the project at national and local level will be indirect and context dependent. Overall, the project targets building the capacity of CSOs in both advocacy and fund-raising; these will directly feed into their mandate to bring forth civil societies to government, monitoring policies and encouraging political participation at the community level. Under Component 1, CSOs will be able to gain more knowledge about the UNCCD and LND, which in turn; this will improve their ability to understand how and when they can influence policy, starting at a national level, but for some, at an international level. This is of particular importance for countries where land degradation and LDN may not be prioritized; it will increase their ability to more effectively advocate to their governments, creating the necessary environment to encourage and strengthen sustainable land management and restoration opportunities. In terms of communities, this translates into the recognized socio-economic benefits of such actions (e.g., improved food production, natural resource management, climate resilience). Through component 2 (and some capacity building elements of Component 1 – e.g., communication), CSOs should be better equipped to navigate the funding landscape, which in essence, will provide more opportunities for community-based projects to slow land degradation or increase land restoration efforts. This in turn will provide numerous socioeconomic benefits to the local populations benefitting from the initiatives, including but not limited to, improved food production, improved and sustainable water and other natural resource management, improved health, increased job opportunities, and importantly climate change resilience. It is also important to recognize that this project will also improve the socio-economic opportunities for many of the CSO-based individuals taking part in the project, namely in terms of professional prospects. It provides a way to build capacity (i.e., increase skill sets), as well as expose them to novel situations and people. This, particularly in the global south, are non-negligible impacts, as it helps foster the confidence, capacity and networking that is necessary to increase the influence of such stakeholders on the global policy level, which in turn, should help further the (sustainable) socio-economic development agenda.Global Environment Facility IUCN Both ENDS; IUCN CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 401145 IUCN Both ENDS; IUCN 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11006 Global Environment Facility Project Objective: To build capacity and mobilize the local public and private sector in target countries to unlock blended finance investment in land degradation neutrality. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project aims to benefit 9,500 community members engaged in the businesses supported by the National TA hub. As a result, one of the most direct socio-economic benefits of this project is the creation of either jobs or livelihood opportunities for those engaged in the supply chains of the target businesses. The project will also strengthen the capacity of SMEs, cooperatives, and community enterprises, improving their ability to access funding in the future. It will also leave in place a hub that will be able to support other SMEs after the lifetime of the project. In addition to this the project will have the following broader socio-economic benefits: Climate security & vulnerability The provision of TA hub support will encourage and scale up the adoption of more climate resilient production practices than under a baseline scenario. For example projects supported by the LDNF TAF to date (e.g. Café Selva Norte) are targeted enhanced land productivity, increases in soil organic matter and the adoption of agroforestry, all outcomes that contribute to increasing the climate resilience of farmers and producers. Support from the TA hub will also improve the resilience of the businesses themselves to climate shocks, by helping secure greater investment and profitability in the long term. This will in turn allow them to continue employing workers and using suppliers in their supply chain. This has been evidenced during the GEF 6 TAF project, where TAF-supported companies have improved the technical quality of their investment proposals to the LDNF and received LDNF investment as a result. Only commodities and value chains that don’t face short-medium existential threats from climate change will be selected for support. For example, the TA hub will not focus on commodities in landscapes where in the next 20-30 years climate change is projected to make it an unviable crop in that region. Water security In a similar manner to climate security, the production practices supported by the TA hub will help contribute to enhanced water security. This will be achieved via more water resource efficient practices, conservation agriculture and improved soil structure and water retention capacity. This will mean less water is needed to achieve similar levels of productive output. For example, in conservation agriculture systems in Mexico water requirements have reduced by 17% in comparison to conventional agriculture. Food security & health Support provided by the TA Hub will help SMEs operating in the land use sector to access greater investment. This will help create new jobs, achieve advances in productivity, allowing for greater food crop yields, and for cash crops, enhanced profitability will help the producers and farmers in their supply chain earn more and increase household food security. Increased household incomes will also support improved household health. LDN Fund investments supported by the TAF to date have enabled businesses to create jobs and improve household incomes. For example, the LDN Fund investment in Miro Forestry in Ghana is creating 1,500 additional jobs in its local communities and Mountain Hazelnut Ventures in Bhutan is providing a doubling of income for 15,000 households. For the businesses themselves, the TA provided may contribute to improved labor conditions on farms, also leading to improved health outcomes for farm workers. In some cases (as demonstrated in the LDN TAF’s support to Mountain Hazelnut Ventures in Bhutan) TA Hub support can help the commercialization of sustainably produced non-timber forest products (including foodstuffs) or can enhance sustainable production and commercialization of food that is traded in local and regional markets, such as plantain, grains, cassava and citrus, which can also enhance food security in the local area or the region. This is often the case when working with farmers to transition from monoculture to agroforestry or intercropping schemes. Access to new markets Some of the businesses supported by the TA Hub may gain access to new markets, which will allow them to expand in the future and become more sustainable over the long term. It may also raise awareness amongst customers in these new markets of Colombian products, quality, and pricing, which could provide a broader benefit to producers and companies delivering this product in the region in the question.Global Environment Facility CI IDH - The Sustainable Trade Initiative CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Ecologic 4.3352 -71.3086 Asprotimaná 1.9833 -76.0 Campo Capital S.A.S. — Tamandúa ARR Project 3.6964 -73.6996 Alqueria 7.1347 -73.1315 Synag Sinergias Agroindustriales de Colombia S.A.S. 8.9290 -75.0271 Mesa Baja Agroindustrias S.A.S. 4.5000 -75.6667 Sudus S.A.S. 4.5000 -75.667 Amazon Putumayo River S.A.S. 0.5133 -76.5007 ASOSEYNEKUN 10.4171 -73.5804 Confiamos Colombia S.A.S 1.5000 -78.000 Agropecuaria Tierra Verde Silvia S.A.S. 10.000 -74.5000 Cirkular Agro S.A.S. 2.500 -75.583 Equilibria 6.5573 -75.8276 Ancestral Organics Foods S.A.S. BIC 4.0000 -72.000 Fundación Amanecer 4.000 -72.000 Inversiones Ganadería Santamaría S.A.S. — Moriche Vivo 4.0000 -72.0000 Tropicarbon S.A.S. 4.000 -72.000 EntreSierras 9.3333 -73.5000 ASOCPRAUR 7.8830 -76.6259 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 247267 CI IDH - The Sustainable Trade Initiative 444869 CI IDH - The Sustainable Trade Initiative 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11011 Global Environment Facility To mainstream ecological and social aspects of sustainability to foster sustainable fisheries production and improved wellbeing of coastal communities in support of emerging Blue Economies in the Canary Current and the Pacific Central American Coastal Large Marine Ecosystems. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.448. The main benefits from the project will be:(a) To engage international and domestic buyers into preferring and purchasing sustainable and responsible seafood from the target supply chains.(b) To engage fishers and processors into: (i) supplying sustainable and responsible seafood, (ii) improving the condition of the fishery resources, the management of the fisheries, the articulation among supply chain links, and (iii) collaborative and coordinated public – private action.(c) To support strengthening participatory fisheries governance and policy coherence through a whole-of-government response approach and multilevel dialogue among key stakeholders, particularly on sensitive issues.(d) To contribute to strengthen the capacities of vulnerable groups to be able to actively engage into participatory fisheries governance and improving the functioning of the seafood supply chains.(e) To foster regional public and private collaboration to address issues with shared resources.(f) To promote an enabling environment that facilitate women and youth engagement into fisheries governance. Gender equality and intergenerational equity will be mainstreamed into project actions. (g) To develop practical experience and learning that will be useful worldwide.449. The number of direct and indirect beneficiaries of the pilot intervention is presented in Annex 18 of the PRODOC. The following table summarises the social and economic benefits of the project: Output Direct beneficiaries Indirect beneficiaries Outcome 1.1. Increased market demand for sustainable marine commodities in relevant international and domestic markets. International buyers will better understand the dimensions of sustainable seafood, the long-term benefits of sustainable production, and the business opportunities based on market differentiation. The fishers, processors, and buyers that participate in the buyer engagement initiatives will have direct experience with and training on the promotion of sustainable seafood consumption and buyer engagement. Improved understanding of the dimensions of sustainable and responsible seafood and the market tools (e.g., labels, certifications, value chain audits, FIPs) to develop and promote sustainable and responsible seafood products. Increased interaction and dialogue among the members of the supply chains. New opportunities to channel produce to domestic markets. Fishers will have practical experience with shorter supply chains and direct interaction with domestic retailers (improved negotiation). Stable income based on purchasing agreements. Outcome 1.2. Increased market demand for socially responsible seafood commodities. International and domestic buyers will better understand the dimensions of socially responsible seafood and the opportunities for market-differentiation based on ethical purchasing. Direct experience with and training on the integration of social responsibility in their operations. Access to markets that demand socially responsible seafood commodities. No indirect beneficiaries Outcome 1.3. Increased market demand for seafood commodities from fisheries with reduced bycatch and environmental impact. International and domestic buyers better understand the long-term implications on the sustainability of the resources caused by environmental impacts and the opportunities for market-differentiation based on the application of reduced bycatch and environmental impact. Direct experience with and training on the integration of tools to reduce bycatch and environmental impact in their operations. Access to markets that demand responsible seafood commodities. No indirect beneficiaries Outcome 2.1. Increased supply of seafood products that demonstrate improved fisheries governance and stock health. The participants of the co-management platforms will have practical experience and training on participatory fisheries management (processes and tools), better interaction with other stakeholder of the fishery and supply chain, improved dialogue and negotiation skills, and a better understanding of the multiple dimensions of fisheries management. Artisanal fishers, women processors and youth will have a better representation in the dialogue processes. Th participants of the FIPs (fishers, processors, buyers) will secure market access to their products, will improve collaborative business schemes, will explore ways to capture and retain more value on their value chain links, and will have technical assistance and training on FIP implementation. The participants of the small pelagic fish supply chain improvement project in the Joal CLPA (fishers, middlemen, women processors) will explore new collaborative business schemes in a shorter supply chain, develop new business opportunities based on market-differentiation and increase income by reducing losses and capturing value. The participants of the development of governance and fisheries co-management skills will improve their capacities to engage into fisheries governance processes and FIPs. The fishers, workers of the processing plants and their families will benefit from a more stable flow of fishery resources. Fishers will have a voice in fisheries governance processes. Outcome 2.2. Increased supply of seafood products that demonstrate improved social responsibility. The persons that receive support for integrating social responsibility in fisheries governance and supply chains will better understand the social dimensions of the fisheries and supply chains (e.g., decent work, integration of women and youth, human rights) and will have practical experience in the integration of these matters into their operations. The government officers trained in Regulatory Impact Assessment in fisheries will be able to apply a tool to improve decision making and to develop a whole-of-government response approach. Fisheries authorities will benefit from improved internal collaboration (breaking silos) and intersectoral collaboration with different public entities. The fisheries officers and fisheries stakeholders that participate in learning exchange actions will benefit from opening participants views, accessing new experiences and to identify practical solutions to existing challenges and problems. The stakeholders that participate in the processes to develop or update fisheries management plans and fisheries conservation and management measures will have practical experience and training on participatory fisheries management (processes and tools), better interaction with other stakeholder of the fishery and supply chain, improved dialogue and negotiation skills, and a better understanding of the multiple dimensions of fisheries management. Artisanal fishers, women processors and youth will have a better representation in the dialogue processes. The fishers, workers of the processing plants and their families will benefit from a more stable flow of fishery resources. Outcome 2.3. Increased supply of seafood products that demonstrate reduced bycatch and environmental impact. The persons that participate in the process to prepare and adopt measures to reduce bycatch in longline fisheries will benefit from a better understanding of the implications and impacts of bycatch (in particular with ETP species) and the associated market risks, and practical experience on the application of regulations and tools to reduce bycatch. Producers will also benefit from market differentiation and access to markets that demand sustainable seafood. The fishers, workers of the processing plants and their families will benefit from a better utilization of bycatch resources. Outcome 3.1. Reliable and verifiable information of sustainability performance of target marine commodities is available to supply chain partners and the public to drive their purchasing decisions. All supply chain stakeholders will benefit from access to reliable information to support decision making. No indirect beneficiaries. Outcome 3.2. Lessons about mainstreaming ecological and social sustainability into seafood supply chains are available worldwide. The persons that will access the lessons will benefit from insights about the factors that contributed to successes and failures to be considered into their own interventions and to apply improvements. No indirect beneficiaries. Outcome 4.1 Project-level monitoring and evaluation, in compliance with UNDP and mandatory GEF-specific monitoring and evaluation requirements The project partners, UNDP and GEF will benefit from streamlined project execution. Global Environment Facility UNDP Sustainable Fisheries Partnership (SFP) CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Boca Chica 8.21925 -82.21944 Posorja -2.69213 -80.24949 Puerto Mensabe 7.75611 -80.16749 Coquira 9.12623 -79.0613 Mbour 14.42196 -16.96375 Kayar 14.91893 -17.11978 Kafountine 12.92528 -16.73889 Dakar 14.68417 -17.42833 Buena Vista 13.8225 -90.31056 Vacamonte 8.87022 -79.67113 Malena 7.57641 -80.9627 Juan Díaz 9.04059 -79.44083 Cap-Skirring 12.35011 -16.71707 Nouadhibou 20.89766 -17.05108 Nouakchott 17.98837 -16.0294 10733945 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11012 Global Environment Facility To generate and use knowledge products to stimulate investments to support Parties to the UNCCD to successfully implement the Abidjan Legacy Program. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.1. It is reteirated here that this project is cross-cutting knowledge management and learning pillar and precursor of the Legacy Program of the COP that will focus on transforming production systems of target value chains (cocoa, coffee, palm oil, cashew and cotton, among others) including making them more resilient to climate change , inclusive and mitigate their contribution to land degradation and deforestation. Therefore, it is designed to support the overall implementation of the Legacy Program. In increasing access to knowledge and appropriate tools and innovations, participating coun tries and the private sector will make better informed decisions in the AFOLU business sector. Thus, in this regard, the MSP will contribute to reducing or arresting trends in deforestation and associated land degradation of targeted agricultural value chains, while supporting livelihoods of local communities that directly depend on the integrity of forests and soil fertility to survive. Improved forests and reduced levels of land degradation have positive impacts on biodiversity but also reduce carbon emissions that result from particularly agriculture, but also generally, from land use change. 2. As a principally knowledge-generation and exchange focused project to support the implementation of the Legacy Program, the MSP is conceived to contribute to reducing land degradation, deforestation, loss of biodiversity and GHG emissions associated with agricultural commodity value chains – thereby supporting livelihoods of communities that directly depend on land for their survival. 3. The MSP will generate and disseminate reliable information to support the integration of environmentally-friendly systems, such as those informed agroecology approach into agricultural commodity value chains in production landscapes across different biomes – facilitating the mainstreaming of different innovations, practices and technologies in production landscapes to increase food security, diversify agricultural livelihoods, reduce environmental degradation and biodiversity loss and increase soil carbon sequestration. 4. The MSP is a precursor of the Legacy Program to facilitate its implementation to achieve both environmental benefits as well as contributing to the socioeconomic wellbeing of local livelihoods. In its role as a cross-cutting knowledge management and learning pillar and precursor of the LP, the proposed MSP is poised to: · Support eight (8) events to foster national-level knowledge exchange and scaling up of SLM and LDN best practices; · Establish one community of practice with strengthened capacities targeted on climate resilient and low emission agricultural value chains, forest and land use; · Build capacities of direct beneficiaries of 30,000 individuals, inclusive across the gender divide to ensure 50% representation of both males and femals; · Produce knowledge products (on low emission agricultural value chains, forest and land use and technologies investments, financial models and instrument) and devise dissemination mechanisms to reach out to all relevant stakeholders in Côte d’Ivoire that will participate in the LP and beyond, including peer-reviewed publications. During the dissemination process of knowledge products and learning, the project will also involve GEF National Focal Points and the UNCCD National Focal Points. As noted by STAP, the involvement of the Focal Points will create a ‘knowledge and practice multiplier effect’ as they will be equipped with the right skills and understanding of how to define knowledge exchange needs and help develop, implement, measure, and report knowledge results[1]; and · Create one open access information platform for targeted investments to facilitate knowledge sharing and stimulate interest in investments in SLM and LDN in support of sustainability in priority value chains – this will also seek to learn and contribute to responding to the challenges in value chains e.g recurrent difficulties on the cocoa value chain in Côte d’Ivoire , carbon credit owners etc. 5. In consultation with other key stakeholders who include the GEF and the UNCCD Knowledge Hub, the creation of one open information will be informed by other existing knowledge information systems, user access and platform content – to best synergise through interoperability rather than duplicating efforts. 6. As a cross-cutting knowledge management and learning pillar and precursor, it should be noted that future projects, principally the LP will benefit from the MSP’s knowledge products and built capacities in production landscapes through maintaining or improving the flow of agro-ecosystem services to sustain food production and livelihoods; and reducing pressures on natural resources from competing land uses and increase resilience in the wider landscape. Overall, this will involve the use of SLM practices such as agroforestry, silvo-pastoral systems, agro-ecological intensification, and other practices. Production systems such as agroforestry, for example, support the generation of global environmental benefits through the preservation of biodiversity, carbon emissions avoided and carbon sequestration. Additionally, this helps to maintain important local ecosystem services including the provision of clean water for crops and communities – contributing to food and nutrition security, resilience, and livelihoods of local farmers. The role of the MSP as a cross-cutting knowledge and learning pillar of the LP cannot therefore, be underestimated in catalysizing the generation of socioeconomic and environmental benefits in production landscapes. 7. Consistent with the expectation that a GEF project will not cause any harm to environment or to any stakeholder and, where applicable, it will take measures to prevent and/or mitigate adverse effects, this project is a cross-cutting Knowledge Management and Learning Pillar of the LP. According to IFAD’s Environmental and social categorization and criteria, this is a Category C project – not requiring additional environmental analysis because the activities have positive environmental impacts, or negligible or minimally adverse environmental impacts.[2] [1] STAP (2021). Understanding South-South Cooperation for Knowledge Exchange [2] IFAD (2017) Social, Environmental and Climate Assessment Procedures (SECAP): Managing risks to create opportunities Global Environment Facility IFAD Government of Ivory Coast CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11020 Global Environment Facility Facilitate development, curation and use of free, public-domain biodiversity data and analytics to facilitate investment assessments Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 600000.00 600000.00 600000.00 375510 World Bank World Bank 749339 World Bank World Bank 634816 World Bank World Bank 1800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11036 Global Environment Facility To provide technical support to GEF-eligible Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in their work to review and align components of their NBSAPs with the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF): national targets, policy frameworks, monitoring frameworks, and biodiversity finance Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.N/AGlobal Environment Facility UNDP UNDP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 500000.00 500000.00 500000.00 1175843 UNDP UNDP 261256 UNDP UNDP 1500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11039 Global Environment Facility To provide technical support to GEF-eligible Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in their work to review and align components of their NBSAPs with the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF): national targets, policy frameworks, monitoring frameworks, and biodiversity finance Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.N/AGlobal Environment Facility UNEP UNEP CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 500000.00 500000.00 500000.00 855434 UNEP UNEP 193451 UNEP UNEP 1500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11041 Global Environment Facility The project objective is to contribute to the mainstreaming of natural capital into policy and investment decision-making processes through the development of a standardized framework, customizable tools, and scalable training material for rapid Natural Capital Assessment and Accounting (NCAA). The specific objectives are: (i) contribute to the mainstreaming of natural capital in ten countries through the implementation of rapid approaches for Natural Capital Assessment and Accounting (NCAA) in science-policy processes to inform public policy and investment decisions; and (ii) based on country-specific experiences, provide the Global Environment Facility (GEF) Partnership with a standardized framework, customizable tools, and training curricula for rapid NCAA approaches designed to support the integration of natural capital into policy and investment decision-making processes. In achieving these objectives, the project supports countries enacting the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Rapid NCAA approaches provide socio-economic benefits through several avenues. First, integrated teams of technical and policy experts ensure that the benefits of ecosystems to people are explicitly modeled and mapped, providing spatial information on where, and which communities are benefitting (or have lost benefits from) ecosystem services.Many ecosystem benefits are public goods, some also accrue also to the private sector. Rapid NCAA approaches help highlight how decisions in one sector or community can affect another sector or community, improving opportunities for better outcomes for more people and sectors in cost-effective and efficient ways.Understanding how ecosystems benefit particular groups of people will help countries and communities in targeting policies and investments in ecosystems so that the highest priority social and economic goals can be met, including climate adaptation, climate risk resilience, food and water security, livelihood support through tourism, fisheries, agriculture, etc; disaster risk reduction, etc. Priority ecosystem services and communities are defined in rapid NCAA approaches through engagement of diverse stakeholders, including government, private sector, and civil society members representing the breadth of societal interests.The results of a rapid NCAA in any country will be presented in socioeconomic terms that are defined as most influential for decisions by the science-policy integrated team leading the country pilot. These socioeconomic benefits can be expressed in different value currencies, including in terms of the number and characteristics of people affected, and also in terms of monetary values, livelihoods, income, access to markets, or other socio-economic metrics of interest. The second primary way in which rapid NCAA approaches bring socio-economic benefits is through the engagement of key actors in the NCAA science policy process, thereby building lasting capacity in technical and policy expertise for NCAA approaches within the country. Formal and informal, ‘learning-by-doing’ trainings help ensure that diverse stakeholder voices are heard and heeded, and also that policy or finance decisions are informed and implemented. Such broad and meaningful stakeholder engagement is an essential part of ensuring the sustainability of policy and finance interventions, and to effectively manage socio-economic conflicts so that support for implementation is durable over time.Global Environment Facility IADB Natural Capital Project, Stanford University CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 660000.00 660000.00 660000.00 780984 IADB Natural Capital Project, Stanford University 1980000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11074 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility EBRD UNEP Sustainable Mobility Unit PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11075 Global Environment Facility Support countries with scaling-up investment in integrated e-mobility systems through the provision of global knowledge, technical assistance and a global partnership on Used EVs, Battery End-of-Life and Circularity in low and middle-income countries Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Socio-economic co-benefits [As described in section B2. Theory of Change] The GEF programme and the country projects supported by the global project will see multiple co-benefits including related to health, energy security and green jobs. 1. Electrification of transport and stimulation of renewable energy generation will greatly contribute to reduced air pollution in the global south and subsequent impacts on public health. The switch from often polluting ICE vehicles to electric will reduce the emission of dioxins and furans, particulate matter, critical air pollutants resulting from incomplete combustion of petroleum fuels. Reduced air pollution will result in less premature deaths and lower costs for the health system, along with improving quality of life. Not only air pollution will be reduced, also the pollution from POPs (including untinentionally produced), and thus contamination of soil and water. 2. Shifting from expensive petroleum fuels which need to be imported using expensive foreign exchange to locally generated power, including renewable power, will greatly reduce transport sector costs and improve energy security and mix while reducing dependency on importations. Many countries in the global south suffer disproportionally from high and volatile fuel markets. The use of locally generated power, increasingly based on renewable sources of energy, will keep much value created in the countries and improve economic resilience. 3. Locally assembling, manufacturing and recycling of EVs is a priority in many LMIC to create green jobs and create local value added. In many LMICs, there's a growing emphasis on locally assembling, manufacturing, and recycling EVs to foster economic growth, create green jobs, and generate local added value through new economic activities. The project will engage local technology suppliers, such as manufacturers of charging equipment or vehicle assemblers to foster local development. While the sector is currently male-dominated, a special focus can be given to employ women or vulnerable groups, thus reducing their underemployment and lack of access to economic opportunities. 4. New vehicles with better safety standards which are part of captive fleets will contribute to a generally improved road safety and improved transport services, particularly for women. New vehicles which are designed in a way to cater for gender specific security and comfort measures will improve the general perception of safety and comfort for women.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility EBRD UNEP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Palau 7.503 134.621 Vanuatu -17.7414972 168.3150163 Senegal 14.69376 -17.44406 Fiji -18.1415884 178.4421662 Solomon islands -9.43333 159.95 Zambia -15.4164488 28.2821535 Zimbabwe -17.8317730 31.0456860 Rwanda -2 30 Azerbaijan 40.37767 49.89201 7221101 GEF 7221101 GEF 7221101 GEF 7221101 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11085 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility CAF UNEP's Economic Trade and Policy Unit (Global) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11098 Global Environment Facility Support countries to accelerate efforts to achieve net-zero nature-positive economies through the catalyzing of finance and partnerships, the triggering of investment, the promotion of policy and governance coherence, and the curation, diffusion and transferring of experiences, good practices and lessons learned. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.B1.6. Socio-economic benefitsAs a global platform without direct impact in countries, the project will indirectly lead to important co-benefits. The project will strengthen coordination, build capacity, and strengthen knowledge management to optimize the impact of the child projects, as well as disseminate their experiences globally. Co-benefits include:SocialIncreased institutional capacity and preparedness to natural disasters including extreme weather events: enhancing the ability of organizations and institutions to effectively respond to and mitigate the impact of natural disasters including extreme weather events through improved planning, resource allocation, and coordination of emergency response efforts. This will increase community resilience and reduce the social and economic impact of such events.Comprehensive modelling enhances resilience of value chains: assessing the interconnectedness between climate change, biodiversity loss, and economic activities across various sectors of the production value chains. By integrating climate-nature interactions into modelling efforts, decision-makers can also gain insights into the return on different investments by sector and the environmental footprint of different industries and supply chains. This approach helps identify opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, minimize habitat destruction, and enhance resource efficiency throughout the production process while promoting growth in jobs and income. Moreover, comprehensive modelling allows decision makers to examine trade-offs and make informed decisions in developing of strategies to promote sustainable practices, enhance resilience to environmental risks, and foster the transition towards nature-positive and climate-resilient economies. Inclusion of vulnerable groups, gender and youth considerations into climate and nature initiatives: the transition to a net-zero nature-positive future has winners and losers. The project will promote the integration of diverse perspectives and needs into socio-economic modelling and NZNP planning, to ensure that countries can successfully plan for and navigate to a NZNP which is climate just. Such planning processes promoted through the global platform will focus on prioritizing the inclusion of marginalized and vulnerable communities, addressing gender disparities, and empowering youth to actively participate in decision-making processes. By ensuring the representation and involvement of these groups, NZNP planning, and implementation processes will be more equitable, inclusive, and responsive to the unique challenges and opportunities faced by different segments of society. Moreover, capacity-building interventions will be able to underscore the importance of tools and methodologies such as the Sustainable Budgeting Approach (SBA) in catalyzing efficient, sustainable delivery of government services to vulnerable groups, and holistic modelling can further help in identifying and quantifying gender inequality, female economic empowerment across sectors, labor force participation. Ultimately, through its guidance materials, knowledge products and capacity building efforts, the Global Platform seeks to create a space for discussion around integration of gender-responsiveness in NZNP planning in a variety of country contexts. This would enable country child projects to not only address the needs of women and vulnerable groups in planning efforts, but also to acknowledge their role as agents of change in NZNP economies.EconomicImproved returns on public investment through a detailed and rigorous analysis of investment scenarios across key sectors of the economy: by examining different investment options for key sectors of the economy that have the greatest NZNP potential, policy makers will be positioned to increase the economic efficiency and gains of allocation decisions in key sectors and increase job, growth and sustainability multipliers of both public and private capital flows. Improved energy security planning: mainstreaming net-zero and nature-positive considerations into energy planning and incentivizing investment on low-carbon technologies will contribute to future-proof the investment and reduce the dependency on fossil fuels, which will reduce the vulnerability to energy price shocks and supply disruptions.Job creation and economic growth: the transition to a net-zero and nature-positive economy in participant countries is expected to create new job opportunities (especially green jobs), stimulate innovation, research and development that also promote economic growth, particularly in key identified sectors for downstream intervention such as renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, and industry.Financial savings: by improving the capacity to undertake climate and nature-oriented initiatives, improve resource efficiency and the preparedness for future impacts, the NZNPA IP will help to reduce energy costs for governments and economy-wide, leading to potential cost saving and helping to address inequalities in society.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility CAF UNEP's Economic and Trade Policy Unit CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Hanoi 21.0245 105.84117 Dodoma -6.17221 35.73947 Bangkok 13.75398 100.50144 Jakarta -6.21462 106.84513 Yamoussoukro 6.82055 -5.27674 Abuja 9.05785 7.49508 Rabat 34.01325 -6.83255 Mexico City 19.42847 -99.12766 Port of Spain 10.66668 -61.51889 San Jose 9.93333 -84.08333 Santiago -33.45694 -70.64827 Port Louis -20.16194 57.49889 9800000 GEF 9800000 GEF 9800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11118 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility IFAD Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility CI National Institute for Biodiversity and Conservation (INBC), Office for River Basin Management of Cunene, Cubango and Cuvelai (GABHIC), SOFEDOR, OIPR, ANADER, UNEP, National Agency of the Great Green Wall (ANGMV), Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Mozambique National Sustainable Development Fund (FNDS), Rwanda Environment Management Authority, IUCN, Agricultural Research Council (ARC), Ministry of Environment (or its equivalent) of Angola, Cambodia, Chad, Congo DR, Madagascar, Peru, Nepal, Vietnam, and Sierra Leone Ministry of Agriculture (or its equivalent) of Nepal, South Africa, and São Tomé e Principe Ministry of Natural Resources of Uzbekistan National Institute for Biodiversity and Conservation (INBC), Office for River Basin Management of Cunene, Cubango and Cuvelai (GABHIC), SOFEDOR, OIPR, ANADER, UNEP, National Agency of the Great Green Wall (ANGMV), Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Mozambique National Sustainable Development Fund (FNDS), Rwanda Environment Management Authority, IUCN, Agricultural Research Council (ARC), Ministry of Environment (or its equivalent) of Angola, Cambodia, Chad, Congo DR, Madagascar, Peru, Nepal, Vietnam, and Sierra Leone Ministry of Agriculture (or its equivalent) of Nepal, South Africa, and São Tomé e Principe Ministry of Natural Resources of Uzbekistan PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11122 Global Environment Facility To scale Global Environmental Benefits through coordinated governance of the GEF-8 Ecosystem Restoration Integrated Program and targeted support to 20 innovative country child projects in catalyzing transformational shifts in ecosystem restoration. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.117. The human wellbeing benefits are created by program through its child projects operating in direct response to drivers of ecosystem degradation that reduce ecosystem provisioning services and reduce socioeconomic benefits to populations. The GCP does not itself create socioeconomic benefits. However, by engaging and informing stakeholders (Outcome 2.1.) through the portal, capacity building, the Knowledge Products, and the Communities of Practice the project is accelerating the potential of child projects to enhance and expand socioeconomic benefits. 118. Through the program monitoring and evaluation system (Outcome 2.2), the GCP will collate information from child projects and inform the PSC and the RACs understanding the nature and types of benefits generated by the program by tracking the related program indicators: [25] • PFD Indicator no. 1.2.1. Number and proportion of men and women in targeted ecosystems in 20 countries participate in participatory decision-making, with access to and share benefits from ecosystem restoration. (Target refined during PPG phase).• PFD Indicator no. 2.2.3: People benefiting from the program interventions: (a) Number of IP&LCs, (b) number of men and women, (c) number of youths. TBD during PPG• PFD Indicator no. 2.2.6: The level of satisfaction expressed by indigenous groups, local communities, women and other vulnerable groups with reference to their participation in the planning, FPIC and decision-making processes of targeted restoration projects= S to HS at MTR and TE.• PFD Indicator no. 4.1.3: Diversity of stakeholders included on child project steering committees and program boards (# of ministries, stakeholder groups involved, % women, youth, IPLCs) T=50% women’s involvement, other targets TBD during PPG.• PFD Indicator no. 4.2.2: Number and types of stakeholders benefiting from program induced investments in the restoration continuum through enhanced efficiency improvements, effectiveness, or financing in restoration activities.[25] Conservation International, GEF, 2023 Program Framework Document, Indicative Program Overview, p4. URL: URL: https://www.thegef.org/projects-operations/projects/11118Global Environment Facility CI CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 8595372 CI NA 17810092 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11148 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility CI Global Environment Facility WWF-US Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development (Colombia) Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development (Colombia) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11164 Global Environment Facility To enhance collaboration, knowledge exchange, capacity development and partnerships for wildlife conservation, to facilitate maximum effectiveness in tackling interlinked threats to wildlife populations globally. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The coordination project will itself not directly create socioeconomic benefits. Instead, through the coordination, knowledge exchange and technical support it provides, it will facilitate and enhance the achievement of socioeconomic benefits in the 15 national projects. The achievement of meaningful socioeconomic benefits forms an integral part of the GEF-8 GWP, reflected in program component 3. Technical support needed for this program component is included in Output 2.4. The technical and knowledge support needs of the national projects to generate socioeconomic benefits have been considered in the development of this coordination project and will be adapted as needed during project implementation to reflect the needs of projects. Socioeconomic benefits will be monitored and reported on via the GWP program-level M&E framework (see Annex L). Relevant program indicators include indicator 3.3.1. Number of countries and/or communities with new and/or strengthened arrangements related to ownership, access, or use rights of Indigenous Peoples, and of local communities; and indicator 3.4.1. Number of community members (sex disaggregated) economically benefiting from wildlife economy through i) new jobs created; ii) increased income; iii) new enterprises/business created or supported; and iv) other diversified livelihood opportunities. The coordination project will aggregate and report progress towards these as part of program-level M&E reporting.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 14697248 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11166 Global Environment Facility To reduce sea-based marine plastic litter from the global shipping and fisheries sectors, particularly in target LMEs, leading to the reduction of direct and indirect impacts from plastics in the marine environment. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.We confirmed that the project has considered socio-economic benefits to be delivered during the execution and these have been described in the Project Description and will be monitored and reported on during project implementation (at MTR and TE) The specific socioeconomic benefits of the project at the national and local levels include:Improved resilience of local communities to environmental and economic shocks, due to greater diversification of livelihood opportunities related to the reuse, repurpose/ recycle or safe disposal of SBMPL, derived from shipping and fisheries sectors. (Component 3)Improved capacity (awareness, knowledge and skills) of local communities to co-manage SBMPL, including conceptualization/innovation of small business ideas to reuse, repurpose/ recycle or safely dispose of SBMPL, derived from shipping and fisheries sectors. (Component 3)Empowerment of women entrepreneurs and women-led enterprises to reuse, repurpose/ recycle or safely dispose of SBMPL, derived from shipping and fisheries sectors. (Component 3)Improved employment and income earning opportunities, at national and local levels from the identification of potential markets for reusing, repurposing/ recycling of SBMPL, derived from shipping and fisheries sectors. (Component 3)Mobilization of new finance sources supported to assist with reduction and recycling of SBMPL. (Components 2 and 3)Improved human health resulting from the reduction of SBMPL in marine ecosystems that are important as human food sources (Components 1, 2, 3)Reduced operational costs of small-scale fishers resulting from the frequent replacement of fishing gears due to adoption of practices to reduce and prevent ALDFG. (Component 1)Enhanced social and economic impact of future projects and initiatives through the documentation and dissemination of lessons learned and best practices that can be used for replication and up-scaling in other communities, countries and regions (Component 4).Global Environment Facility FAO International Maritime Organization (IMO) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 7105936 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11169 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of Environment, UNDP country office Cambodia as Responsible Party for the construction supply chain (Cambodia); BCRC Caribbean (Trinidad Tobago); TBC – World Economic Forum/ World Business Council for Sustainable Development (Global); Ministry of Textiles and Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change - Project execution entities, to be competitively selected during PPG, potentially: National Institute of Fashion Textiles; (Network of) Textile Industry Research Associations (India); Pakistan Agriculture Coalition and Small and Medium Enterprise Development Authority (Pakistan); Ministry of Environment and Energy, UNIDO, and other Project Execution Partners to be determined during PPG (Costa Rica); Ministry of Environment (Peru); Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Light industry and Ministry of Environment and Tourism (Mongolia); Ministry of Production, Foreign Trade, Investment and Fisheries and Ministry of Urban Development and Housing (Ecuador) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11177 Global Environment Facility To accelerate multi-stakeholder engagement in eliminating hazardous chemicals from fashion and construction value chains and to replicate the successes of in-country child projects regionally and globally Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.YesGlobal Environment Facility UNEP UNEP Knowledge and Risk Unit CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 8700000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11181 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility WWF-US Brazil - Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation (MSTI) Brazil - Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation (MSTI) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11197 Global Environment Facility The Global Project will optimize the delivery of a cohesive program across 15 countries and address global barriers to reduce plastic pollution in the food and beverage sector. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.YesGlobal Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility WWF-US UNEP UNEP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 7500000 UNEP UNEP 7500000 WWF-US UNEP 15984404 GEF 15984404 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11211 Global Environment Facility Provide a brief summary description of the project, including: (i) what is the problem and issues to be addressed? (ii) what are the project objectives, and if the project is intended to be transformative, how will this be achieved? iii), how will this be achieved (approach to deliver on objectives), and (iv) what are the GEBs and/or adaptation benefits, and other key expected results. The purpose of the summary is to provide a short, coherent summary for readers. (max. 250 words, approximately 1/2 page) The proposed Shifting to Zero Waste Against Pollution (SWAP) Initiative aims to reduce chemical pollution in the value chain, and improve resource efficiency, by supporting pilot cities in emerging economies and Least Developed Countries towards a zero-waste vision in line with green chemistry, circular economy, and waste hierarchy principles for sustainable production and consumption. The comprehensive approach of the Initiative will be implemented in five cities: Freetown (Sierra Leone), Kocaeli (Türkiye), Montevideo (Uruguay), Tunis (Tunisia) and Tianjin (China). The Initiative foresees interventions to: Enable conditions and coherent policies to promote integrated planning and programming at city level towards a long-term vision of zero waste and zero pollution. Explore special and diverse legal, fiscal and financial steering instruments to promote sustainable investment and cost recovery to address the financial challenges for the transition to a zero-waste city. Enhance sustainable production and consumption by encouraging the private sectors adopting BAT/BEP to eliminate harmful chemicals in products, promoting eco-design, sustainable consumption and services, building ecosystem from upstream to downstream for circularity of materials. Make information and knowledge accessible for raising awareness to every key stakeholder in the key value chains including producers, retailers, consumers, citizens, waste workers through a whole-of-society approach. Build global networks and partnerships on zero waste, provide policy and technical advice through its clearing house, facilitate knowledge sharing, and raise awareness across countries and regions. Through its key interventions the Initiative will positively contribute to decouple economic activities from waste generation, increase resource efficiency, prevent pollutions of the solid wastes and harmful chemicals to land, water, and air, and generate significant and sustainable global environment benefits for the reduction of hazardous chemicals, greenhouse gas emissions, and protection of human health and ecosystem. The SWAP Initiative will be very closely related and seeking synergy with the following GEF-8 Integrated Programmes: Sustainable Cities, Supply Chain and Circular Solutions to Plastic Pollution. The SWAP Project will directly benefit 4,902,665 people (2,476,271 women; 2,426,394 men) and will evidence results in the following Global Environmental Benefits: 7,052,000 metric tonnes of direct CO2e emissions avoided and 2,954,262 of indirect CO2e emissions avoided, 95,660 MT of POPs/Hg containing waste reduced and 1,042,000 MT of plastic waste avoided; 457 gTEQ avoided for a 10-year period. Finally, it will influence from a global perspective, by providing useful insights into practical and effective solutions to inspire, replicate and scale-up in different urban contexts, leveraging transformative change in existing structures towards the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals for a healthy planet and healthy people. This in turn will positively impact to combat the Triple Planetary Crisis. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.YesGlobal Environment Facility UNDP UNDP (Global) – Direct Implementation Modality; Foreign Environmental Cooperation Center – FECO (China) – National Implementation Modality (NIM); Environmental Protection Agency – EPA (Sierra Leone) - Country Office Support to National Implementation Modality; Ministry of Environment (Tunisia) - Country Office Support to National Implementation Modality; Ministry of Environment Urbanization and Climate Change – MoUECC (Türkiye) - Country Office Support to National Implementation Modality; Ministry of Environment (Uruguay) - - Country Office Support to National Implementation Modality. CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' China Sierra Leone Tunisia Türkiye Uruguay Developing countries, unspecified Tianjin – China 39.133331 117.183334 Freetown – Sierra Leone 39.14222 117.17667 Tunis – Tunisia 36.806389 10.181667 Montevideo - Uruguay -34.901112 -56.164532 Kocaeli - Türkiye 40.55 29.55 28035000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11214 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility IFAD Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11215 Global Environment Facility To enhance the effectiveness of the Food Systems Integrated Program in catalyzing food systems transformation and generating global environmental benefits, in selected participating countries and globally Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.1. Value chains within agrifood systems (including agricultural production, processing, distribution and storage, and marketing), as well as consumer behaviour are all subject to biophysical, environmental, technological, infrastructural, political, economic, socio-cultural and demographic drivers. The interaction of the various elements of agrifood systems with the drivers and formal and informal structural and individual inequalities influences social welfare outcomes, as well as dietary, economic, livelihood and environment impacts. Women’s engagement in agrifood systems may be on worse terms than that of men if women take on part-time, irregular, informal jobs and entrepreneurship in lower-profit segments of agrifood systems to accommodate their high unpaid domestic and care work burden, and significant gender gaps are evident in wages in agricultural and off-farm activities. Proactively supporting vulnerable segments of society, especially rural and youth women to become active change agents in food production will make rural economies more resilient and can help alleviate local and regional environmental challenges. The project can achieve this through support to inclusive gender-responsive policies and incentives and by encouraging private sector and social enterprise investment in female-led agri-businesses, opening new opportunities for markets and decent employment.Global Environment Facility IFAD Global Environment Facility FAO FAO CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 18232110 GEF 18232110 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11250 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility CI Global Environment Facility WWF-US Organization to be Determined, Belize Organization to be Determined, Belize PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11266 Global Environment Facility To empower collaboration, capacity and multistakeholder partnerships among BGI IP child projects to facilitate nature-positive development and reduce ecosystem degradation linked to the tourism, food and urban sectors in SIDS Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.221. The socio-economic benefits created by the BGI IP through its country child projects will derive from interventions to address drivers of ecosystem degradation that reduce ecosystem services upon which local populations depend for livelihoods, income, food security, cultural services, etc. Although the GCP will not itself create socio-economic benefits, it will enhance the ability of the country child projects to do so through the strategic guidance, technical assistance and access to finance provided through the GCP’s Policy & Practice Facility and Nature Based Solutions Accelerator, as well as the knowledge products, tools and collaborative learning provided through the GCP’s Knowledge Management and Learning Cluster, including through the Regional Nodes and Thematic Working Groups overseen by the Cluster. 222. Through the IP / GCP monitoring and evaluation system (Outcome 3.2), the GCP will collate information from child projects and inform the BGI IP Advisory Board and the GCP Steering Committee on the socio-economic benefits generated by the GCP and the country child projects by tracking related program indicators, including:· Programme Level Indicator 1.1.1 Number of positive (economic) incentives developed, and negative incentives eliminated, to promote biodiversity conservation and sustainable use and NbS (aligned with GBF Target 18)· Programme Level Indicator: 1.3.1 Amount of US$ financing mobilized for NbS in key economic sectors (scaling up, scaling out & scaling deep) (aligned with GBF Target 19)· Programme Level Indicator: 2.1.3 % of the NbS investments that empower women participation (women hold senior management role, enterprise owned by women, women are >50% workforce, or products and services are specifically benefit women).· Programme Level Indicator: 2.2.1 % of beneficiaries and partners surveyed that report increased capacity to execute innovative NbS at seascape and landscape levels, disaggregated by sex, sector, youth, IP, vulnerable people · Programme Level Indicator: 2.4 Number of good practices and gender responsive lessons learned identified, documented and disseminated by the child project & GCPGlobal Environment Facility UNDP UNDP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 14103670 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11285 Global Environment Facility SGP-OP8 builds on 30 years of successful experience in empowering local CSOs and CBOs in community driven initiatives that have enhanced wellbeing, increased awareness and resilience, and generated global environmental benefits. With economic development pressures intensifying in the developing world and the associated rising inequalities, local communities, particularly vulnerable and disadvantaged groups are becoming increasingly marginalized. The objective of Part 1 of SGP OP8 is to engage local CSOs/CBOs in landscape-seascape approaches across the 99 participating countries, providing them access to knowledge and information, capacitating them through learning-by-doing, skills development, and delivering technical and grant assistance for interventions that enhance socioeconomic conditions and generate global environmental benefits. In line with the GEF-8 SGP Implementation Arrangements Paper, core SGP resources are to be allocated equally among all eligible countries. The proposed strategy, elaborated through four complementary outcomes, reflects the key features of GEF Small Grants Programme 2.0, including new approaches to support youth, women and Indigenous Peoples, linking up with complementary partnerships, cooperating with the two additional GEF agencies, and leveraging opportunities with other GEF programs. SGP-OP8 will facilitate opportunities for innovation and scaling up, catalyze multi-stakeholder alliances, and leverage dialogue platforms for greater impact. An important comparative advantage of SGP is the focus on social inclusion and vulnerable groups, including women, Indigenous Peoples, persons with disabilities, the elderly and youth. Expected results under OP8-Part 1 include 225,000 ha of land and ecosystems under restoration, 3,800,000 ha of landscapes under improved practices, 90,000 ha of marine protected areas under improved management, 270,000 ha of marine habitat under improved practices, and 500,000 direct beneficiaries, of whom 250,000 are women. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Yes.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNDP/ Other Executing Partner CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Antigua and Barbuda Albania Armenia Argentina Bangladesh Burkina Faso Burundi Benin Brazil Bahamas Belize Congo DR Central African Republic Congo Cote d'Ivoire Cameroon Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Cabo Verde Djibouti Dominican Republic Algeria Ecuador Egypt Eritrea Ethiopia Fiji Gabon Grenada Georgia Gambia Guinea Guinea-Bissau Honduras Haiti India Jamaica Jordan Kyrgyz Republic Cambodia Comoros Lao PDR Lebanon St. Lucia Liberia Morocco Moldova Mali Mongolia Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Nepal Naoero Panama Philippines Palau Rwanda Solomon Islands Seychelles Sierra Leone Senegal Suriname Togo Timor Leste Tunisia Tonga Türkiye Tanzania Ukraine Uruguay Venezuela Vanuatu Samoa South Africa Zambia Zimbabwe Developing countries, unspecified 126186603 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11287 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IUCN Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility BOAD Global Environment Facility DBSA Global Environment Facility IADB World Resources Institute (WRI) World Resources Institute (WRI) World Resources Institute (WRI) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11300 Global Environment Facility The Global Platform will support cities and local governments by fostering knowledge generation and sharing, and facilitating partnership building to promote integrated urban planning, nature-positive, climate-resilient, and carbon-neutral urban development and investment. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The platform has thoroughly considered the socio-economic benefits to be delivered by the project, and these have been clearly described in the Project Description. The project aims to integrate gender equality into all phases, promote urban spaces that enhance women's health and economic opportunities, and ensure that 50% of project beneficiaries are women. Additionally, the project will support integrated urban planning, nature-positive, climate-resilient, and carbon-neutral urban development. The socio-economic benefits include strengthening local institutional capacity, fostering knowledge generation and sharing, and facilitating partnership building. The project will embed diverse infrastructure types—ecological, hydrological, and engineered—into urban resilience planning to deliver multi-dimensional benefits. This approach will enhance resilience, ensure sustainable outcomes, and drive project implementation through cross-cutting priorities such as financing and inclusion. The project will also focus on building circular economies in cities, emphasizing sustainable financing, job creation, resource efficiency, and increased revenue potential. These socio-economic benefits will be monitored and reported on during project implementation, ensuring that the project's impact on local communities is continuously assessed and optimized.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 17917431 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11308 Global Environment Facility Developing countries have enhanced capacity, knowledge and awareness on forest-related data collection, analysis and dissemination to meet the enhanced transparency requirements of the Paris Agreement. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The new project is a global normative project guided by FAO’s corporate approach to Capacity Development23, which considers the following interlinked dimensions: individuals, organizations, and the enabling environment. Components 1 and 2 of the new project will enhance the knowledge and skills of individuals coming from forest-related organizations (and/or institutions), whose work results rely on the performance of the organizations in which they work. Besides, the project will indirectly influence the enabling environment, which will contribute to the effectiveness of organizations. It is demonstrated that technical and functional capacities are crucial for strengthening capacities. Specifically, functional capacities enable individuals and organizations to lead and manage their change initiatives. For example, functional capacities to generate, manage and exchange information and knowledge or engage in networks, alliances, and partnerships. Component 3 of this project will facilitate knowledge sharing practitioners. In addition, the GAP provide a series of concrete actions to mainstream gender (see Annex K: GAP). The new project will try to curb the uneven access to socio-economic benefits and services of women as opposed to men, by (i) undertaking strategies to increase women’s participation in the project and ii) raise awareness on the role of women in forest monitoring and reporting. The socio-economic benefits of the project are multiple and will be monitored during the project life through the following indicators (see Annex A1: Logical Framework Matrix): a) Improving women’s participation and decision making will be measured as follows: Number of direct beneficiaries disaggregated by sex and age (GEF Core Indicator 11); and b) Investing in women’s skills and capacity will be measured as follows: Number of individuals accessing the virtual capacity-building activities disaggregated by sex and age. Decent rural employment is not directly relevant to this project. Overall, the project will adhere to human rights-based approaches, including the right to food, decent work, and full accountability to affected populations.Global Environment Facility FAO FAO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 666666.67 666666.67 666666.67 1250513 FAO FAO 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11316 Global Environment Facility Countries enhance the capacity to establish the foundation of a systemic tracking and reporting framework to comply with Article 13 and sustainably scale-up ambition for their climate action Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The global environmental benefits of this project revolve around its goal to contribute to the global reduction of GHG emissions and enhancement of removals by supporting countries to identify, track, achieve, and scale up their mitigation and adaptation targets transparently and sustainably. The proposed project can contribute to enhancing the GHG emissions reduction ambitions. Besides, enabling environment and coordination can ensure synergies and avoid duplication. This will ensure efficient utilization of resources by freeing the resources that are supposed to be used under a duplication scenario. Therefore, more resources will be available to contribute towards Paris Agreement. In addition, an enabling environment for transparency will help countries to enhance transparency capacity and, report to the global community in the form of BTR leading to long-term policy planning, and increased ambition. Through the intervention like capacity building for national GHG inventories, and on ETF reporting requirements, the project will also contribute to Global Methane Pledge, REDD+, enhancing ambition towards net-zero, and long-term strategy formulation. Through the project, countries will receive support to enhance their technical and institutional capacities to standardize and strengthen their MRV and M&E systems in line with the ETF, as well as guidance to overcome challenges in submitting the Biennial Update Report (BUR) and bridging the planning of the BTR. The collaborative approach and innovative modalities of this project, such as one-to-one mentoring programs, certified training, and engagement with academia and youth, are designed to increase country ownership and the sustainability of the results obtained. Recognition of the importance of identifying financial, technology development and transfer, and capacity-building to target improvements and facilitate ambition throughout project activities will enhance these global and environmental and adaptation benefits. The direct benefits of the CBIT-AFOLU+ will be further extended through global knowledge-sharing activities, including the development and dissemination of ETF-ready tools, and the strengthening of the network and collaborations created during the previous project. Knowledge products, tools, and opportunities will be available to all countries to maximize the benefits and enhance transparency at a global level. The project aims to have an impact in the area of climate change, specifically through improved GHG inventories and transparency frameworks which will allow countries to develop mitigation and adaptation strategies based on robust evidence and relevant data while attracting necessary support. With dedicated knowledge sharing and guidance, countries will have the tools to adopt transformational shifts towards low-emission and resilient development, ultimately entering emission pathways consistent with holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels.Global Environment Facility FAO FAO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 672527 FAO FAO 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11326 Global Environment Facility Help Brands decarbonize their supply chains and reduce hazardous chemical and waste in their operations. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.We confirm.Global Environment Facility World Bank International Finance Corporation (IFC) CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 14678899 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11349 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility CAF Global Environment Facility CI Global Environment Facility EBRD Global Environment Facility IADB Department of Water Resources Management (VietNam) Department of Water Resources Management (VietNam) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11353 Global Environment Facility To enhance the effectiveness of the CHO IP in addressing nutrient pollution and marine hypoxia by curbing coastal pollution from agriculture, industrial, and municipal sources through gender-responsive policy and regulatory measures, infrastructure investments, nature-based solutions and inclusive awareness-raising initiatives globally, regionally and in participating countries, thereby delivering increased global environmental benefits. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.229. CHO-IP co-benefits include supporting a sustainable blue economy by curbing inflow of land-based-pollution into the coastal environment, thereby advancing the ecological, social, and economic well-being of countries and LMEs. The CHO-IP will help to support livelihoods, better human health, enhance food security and economic well-being and help strengthen resilience to climate change and its impacts, and overall, the CHO-IP will directly contribute to GEF’s “Healthy Planet, Healthy People” framework.230. The GCP supports the CPs in delivering their socio-economic benefits but, like the contribution to GEF Core Indicators, the GCP does not directly contribute major socio-economic benefits itself. The most significant contributions made by the GCP relate to its technical capacity service provision to the CPs, particularly through best management practices (Component 3) and in relation to gender. 231. The GCP will offer support to improve benefits and opportunities to women through a comprehensive Gender Action Plan (GAP, see Annex J) for the CHO-IP, key elements of which will be adopted by all the CPs. The GCP will oversee the implementation of the GAP providing support to CPs to facilitate inclusive gender-responsive policies and incentives to addressing nutrient pollution and marine hypoxia, and by encouraging private sector and social enterprise investment in female-led businesses opportunities (especially through the interventions of the three RMDBs), opening new opportunities for markets and decent employment, particularly in the agricultural sector where women dominate informal employment, and improving participation of women in decision-making in related to activities that cause or mitigate nutrient pollution and marine hypoxia.232. In general terms, the four IA's of the GCP will follow, throughout implementation, the GEF guidance: Key Principles to Strengthen Knowledge Management, Learning, and Interoperability Platforms for GEF Integrated Approach Programs.Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility CAF Global Environment Facility EBRD FAO CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 12452292 GEF 12452292 GEF 12452292 GEF 12452292 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11437 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO Algeria - Ministry of Environment and Renewable Energy (TBC) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11445 Global Environment Facility To strengthen the design and implementation of the nine National Child Projects through: (i) producing and disseminating at least 20 global knowledge products and operating five thematic working groups; (ii) delivering hands on technical assistance to every national project team ; and (iii) maintaining an open access knowledge platform that enables continuous south–south learning—thereby accelerating safe, and inclusive green hydrogen solutions in participating countries. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The Global Child Project of the GCHP aims to establish the foundational elements necessary for developing clean hydrogen technologies in participa?ting countries by focusing on knowledge management, capacity building, and coordination. These activities will catalyse the transition to clean hydrogen while delivering wide-ranging socio-economic benefits across the programme’s target sectors.The socio-economic benefits of the Global Child Project include:Capacity building and job creation: By fostering capacity-building initiatives such as thematic working groups, e-training sessions, and the creation and management of the Global Knowledge Platform, the Global Child Project will equip stakeholders in participating countries with the technical skills and expertise needed for clean hydrogen production and application. This capacity-building effort will directly contribute to the creation of skilled jobs in sectors linked to hydrogen production, infrastructure development, and technology management. Through the dissemination of knowledge and best practices, the project will support local industries in developing the workforce required to sustain long-term growth in the clean hydrogen economy.Innovation and industrial development: The Global Child Project will promote technological innovation by encouraging collaboration among industry stakeholders, international experts, and governments. By sharing best practices and innovation case studies via the Global Knowledge Platform, the project will help spur the development of hydrogen-related technologies and industries. This will open-up new economic opportunities in industrial and transport sectors and position countries as global frontrunners in the green hydrogen economy. These industries will create direct and indirect jobs, contributing to the broader socio-economic development of participating nations.Energy security and economic resilience: Through its focus on clean hydrogen, the Global Child Project will enhance energy security by supporting the development of locally produced hydrogen as a reliable alternative to imported fossil fuels. This shift will not only reduce dependency on external energy sources but will also stabilise energy prices, making economies more resilient to global energy market fluctuations. Increased energy independence will strengthen national energy systems, enabling countries to better meet their energy demands while ensuring a more sustainable and secure energy future.Gender inclusion and social equity: The Global Child Project will actively promote gender inclusion by ensuring that women and youth are integral participants in all project activities. The project aims for 50% female participation in capacity-building initiatives and a 20% youth participation rate, thereby creating opportunities for underrepresented groups in the clean hydrogen sector. Through focused training programmes and the development of gender-responsive knowledge products, the project will support social equity, providing equal access to new employment opportunities and ensuring that the benefits of the green hydrogen transition are widely shared across communities.Health and environmental benefits: By facilitating the adoption of clean hydrogen technologies, the Global Child Project will help reduce air pollution in industrial and urban areas, contributing to improved public health outcomes. Reducing reliance on fossil fuels will decrease harmful emissions, leading to better air quality and reducing health problems associated with pollution. Additionally, the environmental benefits will include the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.Global knowledge exchange and long-term impact: The creation of the Global Knowledge Platform will facilitate continuous learning, enabling countries to access the latest research, best practices, and technological developments in clean hydrogen. This knowledge-sharing ecosystem will enhance the capacity of countries to innovate and implement hydrogen technologies, while also building a global community of practitioners. The socio-economic benefits of this platform will extend beyond the project’s lifespan, as the lessons learned and products developed will continue to be used by future generations of stakeholders, ensuring sustainable and enduring impacts.The Global Child Project, through its knowledge-driven approach, will not only contribute to the global reduction of CO2 emissions but also bring about lasting socio-economic benefits. By focusing on capacity building, innovation, energy security, and gender inclusion, the project will drive sustainable development in the participating countries and create a transformative model for how clean hydrogen can contribute to industrial growth and social equity.Global Environment Facility UNIDO UNIDO CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 2652294 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11467 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility ADB Global Environment Facility WWF-US Ministry of Transport (Malaysia) Ministry of Transport (Malaysia) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11473 Global Environment Facility Advance the transition towards sustainable transportation infrastructure by coordinating the GRID IP, leveraging global partnerships, and supporting national and global knowledge sharing and capacity building. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.For the Global Platform, the estimation of Core Indicator 11 has been derived from the planned engagement activities and targeted audiences. To ensure an inclusive approach, a 50/50 split assumption between women and men has been applied across all activities. This assumption is grounded in the goal of promoting gender equality in the impact of the GEF-financed projects. The table below provides a detailed breakdown of the assumptions used in the estimation process, outlining the various activities and the corresponding expected number of beneficiaries. Table: Core Indicator 11 calculation Activity Number of People Discounting factor for overlap Events/year Years Total People Comments Technical Assistance 7 0.74 3 6 94 This includes individuals who directly receive TA (attending training/workshops). It is expected that there will be 3 TA opportunities per year for the 6 years with approximately 7 attendees from the 5 countries. Webinars 150 0.6 2 6 1080 An estimated 150 people registered/webinar with a 60% attendance. There will be 2 webinars each year during the 6-year program. Targeted Webinars 10 0.6 5 5 150 In addition to the open webinars, targeted webinars will be associated with the TA activities. These webinars are aimed at disseminating the knowledge generated through those TA. Communities of practice 5 0.8 1 4 16 It is estimated that communities of practice will continue discussions and knowledge sharing beyond the events, through the Knowledge Platform. Courses and other training 30 0.8 1 5 120 Several in-person courses will be delivered by subject matter experts around nature-positive transportation infrastructure development, strengthening of policy frameworks, integrated planning, gender mainstreaming, participatory inclusion of Indigenous peoples and local communities, and other related matters. These courses can be delivered once a year based on need. These training sessions can range from 1/2 day to several days (as needed). Conferences and knowledge management events 25 0.6 4 6 360 Numerous engagements with knowledge partners, private industry representatives, local and Indigenous groups will take place throughout the duration of the Integrated Program. Numerous round-table discussions and interviews will be conducted to inform people about the different technical assistance and training opportunities to be offered. 4 round-table discussions with 20 to 30 people each will be conducted every year. Other 253 0.5 4 5 2530 One additional outreach engagement each quarter for 5 years (not counting the first year). An approximate 50% overlap is expected among the attendees of these different engagements. Stakeholders engaged will benefit directly from the project by receiving training, knowledge, and tools to implement sustainable infrastructure practices. Total 4350 Global Environment Facility WWF-US WWF-US CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 8607339 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11495 Global Environment Facility The objective of this project is to prevent the loss of tropical primary forests worldwide by strengthening their protection and conservation, which will in turn contribute to mitigating climate change, preventing biodiversity loss and land degradation, while improving the livelihoods of the communities that depend upon them. Problem and issues to be addressed: Primary forests play a critical role in carbon storage and sequestration, biodiversity conservation and other ecosystem services, as well as livelihoods support. Their conservation is fundamental for achieving multiple global goals, including the UNSPF Global Forest Goals and the objectives of the CBD, UNFCCC, UNCCD and several SDGs. Currently, there is insufficient recognition and conservation of primary forests globally, especially tropical primary forests. The lack of understanding and integration of the values and benefits of primary forests in global policy agendas and forest financing strategies has led to their inadequate prioritization, contributing to ongoing deforestation and loss of these vital ecosystems. Lack of coordination and information-sharing mechanisms has further hindered donor engagement and resulted in a funding gap that hampers effective conservation efforts. The objective of this project will be accomplished through knowledge packaging and dissemination and capacity development that will raise the visibility of tropical primary forests among stakeholders, policymakers, and the public, transforming how they are perceived and ensuring their inclusion in forest financing strategies, conservation initiatives, and the global policy agenda. The project will also facilitate and stimulate financing for tropical primary forest conservation by establishing robust donor-recipient dialogue and coordination mechanisms and providing information on financing opportunities. The project seeks to enhance the work of the GFFFN, supporting countries in developing forest finance strategies that prioritize intact tropical primary forests. This transformative approach will strengthen financing mechanisms, foster innovative approaches, and mobilize resources towards the conservation of tropical primary forests. The project aligns with the Collaborative Partnership on Forests (CPF) in enhancing coordination on global forest issues among relevant international forest-related organizations. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Knowledge management and learning planThe knowledge Management and learning (KM&L) plan intends to be a guidance document for stakeholders and project partners for use as an aid for effective knowledge use, dissemination, and action, not only limited to the archiving of knowledge generated by the project.The KM&L plan has the following main goals –1. To create awareness regarding the need for primary forest conservation.2. To contribute to evidence-based policy, and to build a shared understanding for the need for improved policies and practices for primary forest conservation.3. To mobilise actions and resources from countries, donors, GEF agencies, NGOs, Indigenous Peoples & Local Communities, women, youth, and other relevant stakeholders for primary forest conservation.Overall KM&L will be coordinated by IUCN. The Programme Associate part of the project management team at IUCN will coordinate the knowledge management of this project together with the Global Programme Manager with the support of the Executing Agencies (EAs). IUCN will develop a knowledge repository via a dedicated project website & will continue to maintain it even after project completion as part of IUCN’s work on Primary Forests including Intact Forest Landscapes. All the reports, policy guidance documents and workshop outcomes will be housed under this website. IUCN and EAs will also use innovative methods such as story maps, information videos and blogs to communicate the issues surrounding primary forests and lessons learnt from this project. This coordination has been outlined as IUCN’s role under Component 2 and in the Terms of Reference of the Programme Associate. Each executing agency will also ensure proper communication and dissemination of knowledge generated by this project via their own dissemination channels. Furthermore, the Collaborative Partnership on Forests (CPF) will also be leveraged to support the knowledge management and learning plan, with selected deliverables shared and promoted within the CPF website and networks.A draft KML plan with key deliverables, budget and the responsible executing agency(ies) has been proposed below which will be further refined during the inception phase: Knowledge Management and Learning (KML) Plan deliverables and budgetActivitiesDeliverablesBudgetExecuting agencyTimelineOutcome 1: Profile of primary forests raised globally and financing for their conservation facilitated, promoted and stimulated.Activity 1.1.1: Prepare policy recommendations targeting key policy sessions and conventions. Activity 1.1.2: Compile and disseminate analyses on the values of primary forests. Policy guidance documents100,000 40,000GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY Year 1-2 Year 1-2Activity 1.2.2: Conduct a survey and map the existing climate global and regional financing frameworks to identify their priorities, opportunities, and challenges for financing conservation of primary forests. Report on Donor financing priorities and existing frameworks30,000UNFFSYear 1Activity 1.2.3: Coordinate and exchange lessons learned and experiences with existing and emerging initiatives in the area of conservation finance, such as CPIC and Project Finance for Permanence. Activity 1.3.2: Coordinate and exchange lessons on conservation finance on existing climate financing platforms. Report on lessons learned in the area of conservation management20,000 20,000UNFFS UNFFSYear 1-2 Year1-2Activity 1.4.2: Case studies in 2 HFLDs on financing options. 2 case studies20,000GRIFFITH UNIVERSITYYear 1Activity 1.5.1: Organize donor-investment recipient dialogues and events in conjunction with UNFF or other relevant international meetings to match the interests of donors and the needs of countries with significant coverage of primary forests.Report on current financing pathways for primary forest conservation.20,000UNFFSYear1-2Activity 1.5.2: Convene dialogue with donors and High Forest Cover Low Deforestation (HFLD) countries building on the HFLD Platform, paying particular attention to investment opportunities that support primary forest champions especially among Indigenous Peoples, Women and Youth. Workshop reports on donor dialogues20,000UNFFSYear1-2Component Subtotal 270,000 Outcome 2: Values of primary forests recognized more strongly in global policy arenas and integrated into capacity building and monitoring. Activity 2.1.1: Develop multi-media communication products and a major report on primary forests. Videos, infographics, social media posts on the importance of primary forest conservation100,000 50,00050,000GRIFFITH UNIVERSITYUNFFSIUCN Year 1-2Activity 2.1.2: Organize workshops for key leaders to integrate primary forests into MEAs. Activity 2.1.3: Work with civil society to promote primary forests in MEAs. Proceedings of the regional workshops100,000 100,000GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY GRIFFITH UNIVERSITYYear 1-2 Year 1-2Activity 2.2.2: Develop and test geospatial tools for primary forest area assessment. Activity 2.2.3: Organize regional capacity-building workshops. Activity 2.3.2: Organize regional workshops for updates on primary forest data in reports. Primary forest data incorporated within Forest Resource Assessment by FAO40,000 70,000 70,000FAO FAO FAOYear 1 Year1-2 Year1-2Activity 2.2.1: Develop biome-specific guidance on reporting primary forests status and trends. Activity 2.3.3: Publish a brief on the status and trends of primary forests. Publication of a brief on the current status and trends of primary forests.40,000 40,000FAO FAOYear 1 Year 1Activity 2.5.1: Organize virtual meetings with the 5 Regional Programs of CFB IPs, and the project design teams. Activity 2.5.2: Develop a proposal for enhanced linkages, learning, and visibility across the CFB IPs. Activity 2.6.1: Develop a project event for UNFCCC COP30. A proposal for enhanced linkages, learning and visibility across the GEF8 Critical Forest Biomes IP5,000 5,000 15,000IUCN IUCN IUCNYear 1 Year 1-2 Year 2Activity 2.6.2: Create a knowledge repository web page. Project website5,000IUCNYear 1-2Component Subtotal 690,000 Outcome 3: Increased capacity of stakeholders to develop and implement national forest financing strategies for primary forest conservation. Activity 3.1.1: Organize regional and national workshops on forest financing strategies. Activity 3.1.3: Provide guidance on integrating innovative financing mechanisms. Activity 3.3.1: Develop training modules for capacity gaps in primary forests financing. Activity 3.3.2: Organize workshops for sharing information and validating training modules. Activity 3.3.3: Organize training workshops based on the modules. Activity 3.3.5: Organize regional dialogues and roundtable meetings for UN Major Groups and philanthropic organizations with interest in financing the conservation of primary forests. Proceedings of workshops on forest financing strategies organized by UNFF. Training modules developed by UNFF and Griffith University.30,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 40,000 20,000 20,000UNFFS UNFFS GRIFFITH UNIVERSITYUNFFS UNFFS UNFFS UNFFSYear 1-2 Year 1 Year 1-2 Year 1-2 Year 1-2 Year 1-2Activity 3.1.4: Organize side events at international forums to present success stories. Photos, news articles on events10,000UNFFSYear 1-2Activity 3.2.2: Develop, administer and launch on-line and in-person training courses and events to disseminate the toolkits and user guides to relevant stakeholders. Up and running on-line courses on forest financing40,000UNFFSYear 1-2Component Subtotal 200,000 Total 1,160,000Global Environment Facility IUCN FAO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11501 Global Environment Facility To develop capacities to strengthen responsible, inclusive, and gender-equitable tenure governance in LDN initiatives in Kyrgyzstan, Paraguay, South Sudan, and Sri Lanka Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.5.2.1 Socio-economic Benefits The project will initiate processes that will yield socioeconomic benefits and contribute to decent rural employment. While these results will not be direct outputs of the project, it is anticipated that by investing in improved land tenure, including land tenure for women, to achieve LDN, the project will strengthen the enabling environment for positive socioeconomic benefits, and will pilot the practices which will have long term positive social impacts. The socio-economic co-benefits of advancing LDN through the project include reducing rural poverty and promoting food and water security as well as gender equality and women’s empowerment, resulting in improved social welfare outcomes. Some of the anticipated benefits include: § Improved socioeconomic circumstances for women- Improving women’s economic status is essential for the overall improvement of their social status and well-being. Yet, for their economic status to improve, in general, women need secure land tenure rights[1], which the project will invest in. Further, improving women’s access to land could also generate cooperatives, community groups and promote the emergence of collaborative land management and development projects, which support community engagement and sharing of benefits. Enhancing women’s rights to own or have secure tenure over agricultural land has positive impacts on empowerment, investment, natural-resource management, access to services and institutions, resilience and food security, reducing gender-based violence and increasing women’s bargaining power.[2] § Less conflict and more clarity about land tenure rights- Clarifying land tenure can reduce conflicts over land use, fostering improved coexistence within communities. § Environmental benefits- With secure tenure, land users are more likely to invest in restoration techniques, such as reforestation and agroecological practices, contributing to the LDN objectives, and buffering communities from the vagaries of the climate. Strengthened ecosystems also mean greater ecosystem services (e.g. erosion control, flood management, carbon storage, cleaner air, polllination, disease and pest control) which can support healthier and safer lifestyles and contribute to food security. Further, women with land rights can cultivate diverse crops, ensuring nutrition and food availability for families and communities. § Skills development and training opportunities- The project will support capacity development, as needed, to improve tenure governance. This will involve specific trainings, development and use of selective tools, and promote greater skills development for stakeholders working on these issues. § Policy and institutional strengthening- Addressing LDN in a holistic way, such as including tenure and gender aspects, can strengthen the policy environment and foster improved alignment among multisectoral policies. The focus on multi-stakeholder work, and inclusion of gender, offers opportunities for mainstreaming gender and tenure beyond this project. 5.2.2 Global Environment Benefits The project is aligned with the GEF LD Focal Area strategy, and specifically Goal 1, aligning GEF support to promote UNCCD’s Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) concept through an appropriate mix of investments. This project will help to create an enabling environment to support LDN target implementation (Objective 2 of the GEF7 Land Focal Area) by strengthening the capacity of a wide range of stakeholders to implement LDN principles, established safeguards, and good practices and supporting policy decisions that enable countries to meet international commitments under the UNCCD. The project will allow stakeholders to promote LDN principles at multiple levels to address national obstacles to LDN attainment; to promote responsible governance and gender equality for land tenure. Progress towards LDN targets through enhanced gender-responsive tenure security will also make efforts at restoring and protecting soil biodiversity, habitat rehabilitation, and ecosystem health more sustainable. Land tenure security can also lead to improved adaptation outcomes in a range of areas. Secure tenure rights, including through customary systems, can incentivize farmers to adopt long-term agroecology and/or climate-smart practices, e.g., planting trees in mixed cropland/forest systems. Inclusive and responsible tenure policy for forests has the ability to reduce ecological vulnerability, as secure rights to land and forest resources can facilitate efforts towards more sustainable use if appropriate technical, policy or market support are available. Reforestation and agroecology efforts can also support carbon sequestration. 5.2.3 Decent Rural Employment Improved tenure security, and women’s access to tenure, for LDN will have considerable long-term effects. The project is piloting activities to strengthen tenure arrangements for LDN, and the following trickle-down benefits for decent rural employment can be foreseen (please note these are not direct outcomes of the project but strengthened LDN-gender-tenure nexus could yield the following positive benefits with the appropriate policy mix): § Greater sources for livelihoods- Empowering women to own land can lead to additional income streams from agroforestry, livestock, and other land-based enterprises, which diversifies sources for livelihoods § Agricultural productivity and resilient farming- Secure land tenure encourages long-term investments in sustainable practices, improving soil health and boosting crop yields. Women, as primary caregivers of land, can often adopt diverse crops and become part of new value chains, that contribute to food security and reduce land degradation. § Access to credit- with women having greater access to land, they could leverage this asset for credit for farming inputs, entrepreneurial activities, and small businesses. [1] IFAD. 2021. How To Do- Securing Women’s Tenure Rights: Land Tenure Toolkit. Available online at: https://www.ifad.org/documents/d/new-ifad.org/htdn_wlr-oct2021-pdf [2] FAO. The Status of Women in Agrifood Systems. Available online at: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/cf566816-e3c6-42a3-be37-77f86e4050cf/content Global Environment Facility FAO Landesa CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11516 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Bureau of Budget and Planning, Ministry of Finance (Palau) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11534 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP Chemicals and Health Branch PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11535 Global Environment Facility Coordinate and facilitate the strengthening of regional capacity for the sustainable monitoring of chemicals (POPs and mercury), to support the evaluation of the effectiveness of the Stockholm Convention and the implementation of the Minamata Convention mechanism. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.We confirm that the child project design has considered socio-economic benefits to be delivered by the project, and these have been clearly described in the Project Description and will be monitored and reported on during project implementation (at MTR and TER). Yes. It is described at the end of the project description.Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP Chemicals and Health Branch CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 5500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11553 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility AfDB Philippines: To be determined during the PPG PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11563 Global Environment Facility To facilitate coordination among GEM country child projects and other relevant stakeholders, and strengthen knowledge management and exchange in the electronics sector Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Socio-economic Benefits167. The socio-economic benefits of the GEM Global Child Project (GCP) are integral to its theory of change and are clearly articulated in both Section A (Project Rationale) and Section B (Child Project Description) of this document. These benefits are not incidental—they are core to the project’s ambition to drive a just and sustainable transition in the electronics sector, particularly across low- and middle-income countries facing compounded environmental and development challenges.168. The electronics value chain is currently characterized by persistent socio-economic imbalances: informal labor in e-waste processing with little protection or social security (the majority of which are female workers with less entitlements to welfare and social protection, as well as lower pay on average); the gender gaps in access to formal jobs, training, and decision-making; and limited access to affordable, durable technology for low-income consumers. The GCP responds directly to these realities by generating both direct and indirect benefits that support structural transformation, market formalization, social inclusion, and capacity building (both within the industries and among local communities).Direct Socio-Economic Contributions 169. The GCP delivers tangible value through its targeted technical assistance, training, knowledge generation, and communication activities. These interventions build national capacity in sustainable electronics governance while enabling inclusive access to opportunities along the value chain. Specifically:• Capacity-building and training programs empower government agencies, private sector actors, and civil society with the knowledge and tools needed to implement circular electronics strategies. These activities also help develop specialized skills in repair, refurbishment, material recovery, and sustainable design—laying the groundwork for green job creation. Moreover, by integrating the gender-responsive dimensions into the training programs, the GCP ensures the inclusiveness and fairness of the socio-economic benefits to be shared among different gender groups of the society. • Gender-responsive guidelines and policy tools support the development of fair, inclusive regulations. By promoting safer working conditions, equitable participation, and enhanced representation of women—especially in informal or hazardous roles—the project contributes to long-term social equity, empowerment, and occupational health and safety, helping to reduce the global gender gaps in these regards. • Technical guidance on reuse, repair, and right-to-repair frameworks offers immediate consumer and economic benefits by lowering barriers to maintenance and extending product lifespans, reducing the need for new purchases. The emphasis on supporting the training of women workers and female trainers also particularly contribute towards female leadership and knowledge building of women as professionals, consumers, and community members. • Gender-responsive knowledge management strategy and contents will be co-generated and circulated by the global child project (together with the inputs from the national child projects). They will include summary of best practices and lessons learnt about how to gender mainstream the management of global electronics, as well as stories that feature and promote female role models as agents for change towards sustainability and circular approaches. They have direct socio-economic benefits in terms of promoting and celebrating women’s roles in science and technology, business, as well as across the value chain of global electronics. These knowledge management contents will also directly contribute to the knowledge bases of similar future projects. • The GCP’s gender-inclusive communication strategy also ensures a fair and positive representation of women’s roles in global electronic management. This helps rectify gender stereotypes and encourages greater female presence in related fields. Even where national child projects may be at different stages of implementation, these global resources ensure that all countries benefit from shared knowledge, tools, and platforms.Indirect and Systemic Socio-Economic Benefits170. Beyond immediate technical assistance, the GCP plays a catalytic role in enabling the successful implementation of national child projects, amplifying their potential to deliver broader, lasting socio-economic impacts. These include:• Formalization of repair, refurbishment, and second-hand electronics markets, creating decent work opportunities, particularly for youth and women, and reducing the dominance of unsafe informal operations.• Reduced reliance on primary resource extraction, particularly conflict minerals and rare earth elements, through improved material recovery and reuse. This not only mitigates environmental damage but also addresses human rights and labor concerns in mining-intensive regions.• Enhanced consumer affordability and choice, through greater access to second-hand, repairable, and upgradable devices—helping reduce the digital divide.• Lower public health and environmental remediation costs, by reducing toxic exposure associated with informal recycling and unsafe e-waste disposal. This benefits governments, local communities, and health systems, particularly in vulnerable urban and peri-urban areas.• Reliable guidance, close alignment, and smooth coordination in gender mainstreaming practices throughout the program (especially from the program-level to the project-level). The GCP will offer training on gender mainstreaming, deliver internal communication and channel of gender mainstreaming knowledge base, toolkits, as well as expectations, which in turn contribute to the gender equality in different country contexts and in the global electronics value chain. 171. These benefits—both direct and indirect—will be tracked through a comprehensive set of objectively verifiable indicators outlined in the project’s results framework. The monitoring system is designed not only to assess technical outcomes but also to capture social inclusion, gender impact, and long-term economic value, ensuring a full picture of the program’s contribution to sustainable development.Global Environment Facility UNIDO UNIDO CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 8000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11667 Global Environment Facility Development of a global program to support the elimination of PCB from equipment in the electricity sector and other applications by leveraging transmission and distribution projects and other operations. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environmental BenefitsThe project supports the compliance of Parties to the Stockholm Convention with the established PCB elimination target date (2028). The elimination of PCB from equipment reduces the risk of toxic PCB leaking into the environment, global biota and the human food chain, which is a health and environmental risk and a recognized GEB.Environmental and Social SafeguardsGiven that the MSP will focus on analytics, knowledge, and stakeholder consultations, no specific ESF-relevant risks resulting directly from MSP activities have been identified. Risks associated with the implementation of child projects will be considered during child project preparation. For World Bank energy sector projects, these risks will be included in the ESF document of the underlaying operation, for which the MSP will develop a template, which will at least consider the following risks. ESF Risks Mitigation PCB spills to the environment during removal, transportation, and/or cleaning of PCB-containing equipment and containers. Child projects will use experienced contractors for this work. Personal protective equipment and other safety equipment to handle PCB and remove spills will be on hand and used. PCB in transit may be diverted or does not reach the destruction facility. PCB will be handled as hazardous waste. Child project plans and executing agencies will make sure that the necessary permits (as required by the Basel Convention and national regulations) and safety measures are in place. PCB will be transported by companies duly authorized and equipped to handle hazardous waste. PCB destruction in incinerators and other authorized facilities may lead to contamination of environmental media. The MSP will support the selection of final disposal and destruction facilities, which will have to be duly licensed and equipped to handle and destroy hazardous waste including PCB. There may be power outages during removal and replacement of transformers and other equipment. Child projects agencies will work with equipment owners (utilities) to minimize negative impacts on power supply, chiefly through technical means. Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 0 World Bank World Bank 2000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11681 Global Environment Facility To establish a dedicated finance facility to support investments in chemicals and wastes pollution (CWP) reduction / elimination and net-zero, nature positive development in key polluting sectors to foster zero-waste societies. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility ADB Vinachemia (Viet Nam) CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 29083000 GEF 29083000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11686 Global Environment Facility To facilitate coordination among FARM+ country child projects, strengthen knowledge exchange and support governments and agricultural stakeholders in transitioning to sustainable and climate resilient agricultural practices. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.YesGlobal Environment Facility UNDP UNDP CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Nepal 28 84 Ghana 8.1 -1.2 Nigeria 10 8 Benin 9.5 2.25 Gambia 13.5 -15.5 Costa Rica 10 -84 Mexico 23 -102 Egypt 27 30 8000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11698 Global Environment Facility Community-based and civil society organizations are technically and financially supported to design and deliver locally led initiatives that address complex socio-ecological challenges to foster resilience, enhance livelihoods and deliver global environmental benefits. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.1. The main outcome from SGP interventions is twofold: generate global environmental benefits and enhance local livelihoods within a framework of socio-ecological resilience. The programme will provide financial grants and technical assistance to civil society organization to implement community-led solutions. 2. Small scale farmers, livestock producers, fishermen and other smallholders will be supported to use improved agro-ecological practices and nature-based solutions and ecosystem-based approaches to enable sustainable agri-food systems across mosaics of natural and productive landscapes and seascapes in line with relevant national strategies and plans. Local communities in both rural and urban areas will be enabled to use sustainable urban solutions, access cost-effective renewable and clean energy solutions including in urban setups and remote rural sites and outer islands, explore alternatives to the use of harmful chemicals including through integrated pest management and biofertilizers, and champion efficient solutions for sustainable waste management. Financial grants, technical assistance and capacity building provided to SGP grantees and implementing partners will benefit an estimated 45,000 direct beneficiaries, including 22,500 women, 7,200 youth and 7,200 people with disabilities. 3. Based on the above, SGP interventions are expected to: create local jobs (through training and labor required to implement community-led initiatives), support rural residents diversify their income and strengthen livelihoods (income generating initiatives including ecotourism, beekeeping, and agroforestry), while building capacities and skills, empowering local communities and strengthening resilience.4. The specific focus on women, youth, IPLCS, people with disability will ensure that marginalized and under-represented social groups are empowered to benefit from SGP interventions. The Environmental and Social Management Framework developed will enable the SGP country teams to track relevant decent work standards such as safe working conditions and fair wages in line with the applicable regulations.Global Environment Facility FAO Yayasan Bina Usaha Lingkungan (YBUL) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Bosnia-Herzegovina Cook Islands Chile Cuba Guyana Indonesia Jamaica Kenya Marshall Islands South Sudan Syria Tajikistan Uganda Venezuela 17429002 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11719 Global Environment Facility Project Objective: To support and foster the active leadership of community-based organizations and other CSOs including those led by women, youth, Indigenous Peoples (where present) and Local Communities in delivering solutions to local environmental problems in ways that contribute to the achievement of national and Global Environmental Benefits and national poverty reduction Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The SGP 2.0, implemented by Conservation International through the CEPF mechanism, is designed to deliver both global environmental benefits and tangible improvements in local livelihoods by empowering civil society actors—particularly women, youth, Indigenous Peoples, and Local Communities—to lead community-based solutions. By providing targeted grants and tailored support, the project will enable these groups to address environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, and climate change impacts while promoting sustainable development. This will also strengthen resilience among beneficiary communities and generate income opportunities. Through capacity building, advocacy, and knowledge-sharing, the project will enhance the institutional and technical capabilities of CSOs, lower barriers to participation, and foster inclusive leadership. Ultimately, SGP 2.0 will contribute to poverty reduction and socio-ecological resilience by ensuring that marginalized and underrepresented groups are not only beneficiaries but active agents of change in shaping sustainable futures.Global Environment Facility CI Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) CEO Approval Date ' Equatorial Guinea Sri Lanka Libya Turkmenistan St. Vincent and Grenadines 4425950 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11723 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO TBD PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11726 Global Environment Facility Local CSOs and CBOs in landscapes-seascapes around the world access grant financing and technical assistance, including capacity development and knowledge sharing to maintain and enhance their socio-ecological resilience, well-being and socio-economic conditions for global environmental benefits. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.YesGlobal Environment Facility UNDP UNDP CEO Endorsement Date ' Afghanistan Antigua and Barbuda Albania Armenia Angola Argentina Barbados Bangladesh Burkina Faso Burundi Benin Bolivia Brazil Bahamas Bhutan Botswana Belize Congo DR Central African Republic Cote d'Ivoire Cameroon China Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Cabo Verde Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Algeria Ecuador Egypt Eritrea Ethiopia Fiji Micronesia Gabon Grenada Georgia Ghana Gambia Guinea Guatemala Guinea-Bissau Honduras Haiti India Jordan Kyrgyz Republic Cambodia Kiribati Comoros St. Kitts and Nevis Kazakhstan Lao PDR Lebanon St. Lucia Sri Lanka Liberia Lesotho Morocco Moldova Montenegro Madagascar North Macedonia Mali Mongolia Mauritania Mauritius Maldives Malawi Mexico Malaysia Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Nepal Naoero Niue Panama Peru Papua New Guinea Philippines Pakistan Palestinian Authority Palau Paraguay Rwanda Solomon Islands Seychelles Sierra Leone Senegal Somalia Suriname Sao Tome and Principe El Salvador Eswatini Chad Togo Thailand Timor Leste Tunisia Tonga Türkiye Trinidad and Tobago Tuvalu Tanzania Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Viet Nam Vanuatu Samoa Yemen Yemen South Africa Zambia Zimbabwe Developing countries, unspecified 73997710 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11729 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility UNIDO Global Environment Facility FAO Global Environment Facility WWF-US Global Environment Facility EBRD Global Environment Facility IADB Ministry of Tourism and Diaspora Relations (Belize) Ministry of Tourism and Diaspora Relations (Belize) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11730 Global Environment Facility To enable the successful implementation of a coherent global programme that accelerates the tourism sector's transformation to one characterised by significantly reduced carbon emissions and the complete elimination of toxic chemicals, waste and pollution. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNDP CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 8000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11749 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility World Bank Global Environment Facility AfDB Nigeria: Federal Ministry of Environment PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11755 Global Environment Facility To increase national and regional capacity and coordination among Global Elimination Program for PCB (GEP-PCB) implementation partners and stakeholders and facilitate the treatment and elimination of PCB from contaminated transformers and other electric equipment across GEP-PCB Program participating countries. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank World Bank CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 4000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11757 Global Environment Facility To identify, reward and support high impact innovative environmental approaches and solutions spearheaded by civil society organizations and actors. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.IUCN confirms that the project design considers socio-economic benefits to be delivered by the project and these are clearly described in the Results Framework.Global Environment Facility IUCN RTI International CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 9075229 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11761 Global Environment Facility Increase Indigenous Peoples’ and local communities’ organizational capacities and ability to access sustainable finance at scale for territorial stewardship to deliver social, economic, cultural, and Global Environmental Benefits. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility WWF-US WWF-US CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Amparibe -18.41667 47 22535780 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11831 Global Environment Facility To foster international cooperation towards the swift entry into force of the BBNJ Agreement and to promote implementation readiness at the global and the regional level. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.88. Through its support to the entry into force process of the BBNJ Agreement and to the implementation readiness at global and regional levels – in particular of countries that are eligible for GEF support, including least developed countries (LDCs), landlocked least developed countries (LLDCs) and SIDS – the MSP will create benefits in terms of knowledge and capacity. Contributing in this way to an early as possible initial implementation of the BBNJ Agreement, important benefits will be created through the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity and ecosystems, as indicated in previous sections. 89. The BBNJ Agreement will enhance efforts to tackle environmental challenges and promote the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in ABNJ. Several provisions of the BBNJ Agreement will support inclusive ocean management, including those related to the traditional knowledge and participation of IP&LC, on gender responsiveness of capacity-building and on gender balance and equitable geographic representation in the composition of the bodies established under the BBNJ Agreement. It will also promote marine scientific research and facilitate the generation and dissemination of data and information to help improve our knowledge of marine biodiversity in the ABNJ.90. Most importantly, the BBNJ Agreement will bring socio-economic benefits by: a) build countries capacity to carry out and benefit from activities with respect to MGRs of ABNJ and digital sequence information on such resources, ensuring that such activities are in the interests of all States and for the benefit of all humanity; b) to enable ABMTs, including MPAs, to be established in ABNJ, which will contribute to protecting and restoring ecosystems and strengthening resilience to stressors, including climate change, ocean acidification and marine pollution; c) to assist in preventing and minimizing impacts on the marine environment, including through its provisions on EIAs; and d) to assist States in strengthening cooperation and coordination and in undertaking activities in ABNJ through the steady provision of CB&TMT.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP Global Environment Facility FAO FAO CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 4566210 GEF 4566210 GEF 4566210 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11833 Global Environment Facility Support country-led target setting and prioritization of specific freshwater ecosystems in policies and plans, learning, and communications that strengthen country-level freshwater ecosystem restoration and conservation interventions and accelerate progress of the Freshwater Challenge Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Socioeconomic benefits will be delivered at local, national and transboundary levels through sustained and improved delivery of freshwater wetland ecosystem services including water supply, water purification, flood mitigation, fisheries, other wetland produce including fodder and thatching materials, tourism and recreation opportunities, buffering of local communities against extreme weather events, etc. While certain demonstration activities (e.g. in Cambodia) will result in direct immediate benefits to local populations, the local benefits of such activities in the other three countries will focus on leveraging longer term benefits through transformative changes in subnational and national stakeholder engagement mechanisms, programmes, policies and communications. In Brazil, the demonstration activities will assist the development of a National Program on the Conservation and Restoration of Freshwater Ecosystems that will result in multiple benefits for water security, biodiversity conservation, productive inclusion — especially in artisanal fishing, nature-based tourism, and sustainable agriculture — public health, and climate change adaptation. In Cambodia, the demonstration activities will contribute to improved flooded forest management, enhanced fish habitat and promoted community-led monitoring and resource planning in Tonle Sap, as well as support for sustainable living through access to clean and safe drinking water and responsible fishing and production that can attract ecotourism income protecting the unique ecosystem and biodiversity of the lake. CI will build on the previous work with women's self-help groups, such as savings and fish producing groups in Tonle Sap Lake, who will be trained to apply the required standardised fish processing in compliance with the contract they signed. Savings are treated as revolving funds to support and scale their enterprise activities when needed and to repay their high-interest loans. In Tanzania, the demonstration activities will support strengthened catchment management for the Malagarasi - Muyovozi Ramsar Site, the largest wetland complex in Tanzania, located within the Lake Tanganyika Basin. A key geographic focus is the Malagarasi River, which flows through the Ramsar site before emptying into Lake Tanganyika. Improved catchment management through Water User Associations is expected to result in improved water quality, flow regime, wetland resources and wetland-dependent livelihoods for communities in this region.Global Environment Facility WWF-US IUCN CEO Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 4400000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11834 Global Environment Facility To provide improved spatial datasets for Parties, particularly small island developing states, and build an effective capacity development environment for national reporting using Trends.Earth. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.1. This project has a global impact on the technical data aspects of UNCCD reporting by the Parties. This includes the socioeconomic benefits incurred by 150 participants of the five workshops delivered through this project, 2000 beneficiaries of the upgraded tool, as well as the 197 country Parties (Please see more details under the Section ‘Core Indicators’ and under the M&E indicators). Consequently, the benefits that this project will generate will be manifested over the medium – to – long term due to Trends.Earth and PRAIS 4 interoperability and the broader capacity for monitoring and reporting that the project will realize (with benefits both directly to governments as well as to civil society groups and others involved in planning and implementation of measures to achieve LDN). 2. The project will generate economic benefits for governments obliged to report to the UNCCD on its core indicator on land cover, as the methods developed to assess land cover using freely available datasets will provide governments with a cost-effective way of meeting convention obligations. This could in future also be extended to reporting to other conventions that use land cover as a proxy for other indicators, e.g., Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry (LULUCF), Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) and habitat connectivity. 3. In addition, the use of improved information on changes in land cover and areas at risk of land degradation and desertification will enable governments to improve the targeting of interventions that address these problems through sustainable land management (SLM). SLM interventions are designed to generate multiple environmental and socio-economic benefits and poor communities in affected arid, semi-arid and sub-humid areas that are the focus on the UNCCD will thus benefit from improved land productivity, incomes and livelihoods.Global Environment Facility CI Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science (MCS), Conservation International CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Maldives 4.1755 73.5093 Palau 7.5 134.62 Singapore 1.3521 103.8198 Cook Islands -21.213 -159.782 Timor‑Leste -8.5569 125.5603 Marshall Islands 7.0897 171.3803 Micronesia (Federated States of) 6.9248 158.1611 Papua New Guinea -9.4438 147.1803 Suriname 5.852 -55.2038 Tuvalu -8.5167 179.2167 Nauru -0.5477 166.9209 Vanuatu -17.733 168.3273 Fiji -18.125 178.4501 Guinea-Bissau 11.8817 -15.6178 São Tomé and Príncipe 0.3365 6.7273 Seychelles -4.6191 55.4513 Solomon Islands -4.6191 55.45 Barbados 13.1132 -59.5988 Cabo Verde 14.9331 -23.5133 Guyana 6.8013 -58.1553 Jamaica 17.997 -76.7936 Dominican Republic 18.4861 -69.9312 Cuba 23.1136 -82.3666 Bahamas 25.048 -77.3554 Trinidad and Tobago 10.6667 -61.5189 St. Kitts and Nevis 17.2955 -62.725 Dominica 15.3017 -61.3881 Antigua and Barbuda 17.121 -61.8433 St. Lucia 13.995 -61.0061 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 13.1553 -61.2274 Grenada 12.0561 -61.7488 Belize 17.251 -88.759 Haiti 18.5944 -72.3074 Kiribati 1.3382 173.0176 Tonga -21.139 -175.205 Samoa -13.85 -171.75 Niue -19.055 -169.918 Comoros -11.717 43.2473 Mauritius -20.161 57.5012 1625000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11835 Global Environment Facility To develop a digital tool that supports smallholder farmers in complying with the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) by integrating satellite monitoring and blockchain technology for land tenure verification, product provenance, and sustainable agricultural practices Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.? The AgroWeb3 : Market Access Window Project will deliver significant socioeconomic benefits at both national and local levels, particularly for smallholder farmers and rural communities in the target regions. These benefits are intertwined with the project's environmental goals, as the economic empowerment of smallholder farmers is directly linked to the promotion of sustainable agricultural practices and the achievement of Global Environmental Benefits (GEBs). Economic Empowerment and Market Access. Smallholder farmers, the primary beneficiaries of the project, will be empowered with the tools and knowledge needed to meet the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) requirements. By providing farmers with satellite-based monitoring and blockchain technology to certify land tenure and demonstrate deforestation-free practices, the project will enhance their ability to access international markets, particularly in the European Union. This access to global markets is critical for improving the livelihoods of smallholder farmers, as it allows them to secure higher incomes by meeting sustainability requirements demanded by buyers. Additionally, the project will help reduce the costs associated with compliance certification. Traditionally, smallholder farmers face significant financial barriers to verifying land tenure and product provenance. By automating these processes through blockchain technology and remote sensing, the project will lower transaction costs and make compliance affordable. This will enhance farmers’ competitiveness in international markets, leading to improved income security and economic resilience. Sustainable Livelihoods and Poverty Reduction. At the local level, the project will promote sustainable land management practices that improve the long-term viability of smallholder farms. By avoiding unsustainable land expansion into forested areas and adopting climate-resilient agricultural practices, farmers will improve the productivity of their land. This will lead to more stable crop yields, enhanced food security, and a reduction in poverty among rural populations. Sustainable agricultural practices will also lead to healthier ecosystems, which support the livelihoods of rural communities by providing critical ecosystem services, such as water regulation and soil fertility. Job Creation and Capacity Building. The project will create new job opportunities through capacity-building initiatives and the establishment of a robust ecosystem for EUDR compliance. Local farmers, agricultural extension officers, and community organizations will receive training in the use of satellite monitoring tools and blockchain technology. This capacity building will equip communities with the skills needed to monitor and verify sustainable practices, manage compliance processes, and support future agricultural innovations. Additionally, the introduction of new technologies will generate jobs related to data management, compliance reporting, and technical support at both the local and national levels. Gender Equality and Social Inclusion. The project will actively promote gender equality by ensuring that women farmers and marginalized groups have equitable access to the tools and resources provided. Women often face additional barriers in accessing land tenure rights and financial resources. By incorporating gender-sensitive approaches in capacity-building programs and ensuring women are prioritized in the training and use of the technology, the project will enhance their role in decision-making processes and increase their economic participation. This will contribute to poverty reduction and create more resilient rural communities by empowering a broader range of stakeholders. Link to Global Environmental and Adaptation Benefits. The socioeconomic benefits delivered by this project directly contribute to Global Environmental Benefits (GEBs) and adaptation outcomes by ensuring that sustainable agricultural practices are both economically viable and environmentally sustainable. By linking market access to the adoption of deforestation-free and climate-resilient practices, the project incentivizes smallholder farmers to actively contribute to environmental goals, such as reducing deforestation, protecting biodiversity, and mitigating climate change. Furthermore, the project’s focus on sustainable livelihoods will enhance the adaptive capacity of rural communities, making them more resilient to climate shocks and environmental degradation. This is especially important in regions prone to climate variability, where food security and economic stability depend on the health of ecosystems and the sustainability of agricultural practices. In summary, the AgroWeb3 : Market Access Window Project will deliver significant socioeconomic benefits that support both local development and global environmental goals. By empowering smallholder farmers, promoting sustainable practices, and fostering inclusive economic growth, the project ensures that the direct beneficiaries contribute meaningfully to broader global efforts to protect ecosystems and mitigate climate change.Global Environment Facility IFAD European Institute of Innovation for Sustainability (EIIS) CEO Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 1660311 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11840 Global Environment Facility To test and validate a scalable Fellowship Program and Collaboration Lab methodology that can strengthen collaborative capacity, catalyze increased collaboration, and accelerate institutional reform to support more collaborative and systemic development practices. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The C3 Labs project seeks to redefine how socioeconomic benefits can be achieved by placing inclusivity at the core of its methodology. In contrast to many traditional GEF projects that prioritize solution development before fully engaging communities, this initiative integrates local voices and expertise at every stage—from identifying challenges to co-creating and implementing solutions. This approach ensures that inclusivity is not a secondary consideration but the foundation upon which the project is built. The active involvement of Indigenous peoples, women, and marginalized communities is not merely encouraged—it is essential to the project's success, driving the design, execution, and outcomes of the Collaboration Labs. By embedding this process-first approach, the C3 Labs methodology aims to generate deeper socioeconomic benefits. Locally co-designed solutions are more likely to be relevant, embraced, and sustained by the communities they aim to serve, ensuring long-term impact. The focus on cross-sector collaboration and capacity building aims to equip the Lab Fellows with skills in systems thinking and adaptive management, empowering them to address future challenges with confidence and resilience. In alignment with GEF Core Indicator 11, the project will directly benefit at least 120 participants, ensuring equitable representation and meaningful engagement. Gender equity is also central to the project’s design, with a 50/50 split between men and women anticipated in participant selection. This balance reflects the project’s commitment to diverse and inclusive participation, aligning with GEF’s strategic emphasis on gender equity. The project expects to directly engage 120 high-intensity participants, including 60 Fellows (30 each in Kenya and Thailand) and 60 participants in the Global Learning Lab. However, the potential socioeconomic benefits extend far beyond this number. Each Fellow represents key institutions or communities and is positioned to influence colleagues, stakeholders, and community members through the co-creation and implementation of systemic solutions. By conservative estimates, each Fellow’s engagement could benefit at least 10 additional individuals within their professional networks, while community-driven interventions stemming from the Labs are likely to indirectly impact hundreds more. By funding C3 Labs through the Innovations Window, the GEF supports a pioneering approach to achieving socioeconomic benefits that are equitable, inclusive, and scalable. The project bridges gaps between theory and practice, demonstrating how inclusivity not only strengthens social resilience but also ensures that solutions are tailored to local realities and needs. By integrating local voices into decision-making from the outset, the C3 Labs methodology aims to empower communities to take ownership of solutions, driving long-term, systemic improvements in livelihoods and well-being. If the methodology’s effectiveness is demonstrated in this project, this would position C3 Labs as a model for transformative development, showcasing how systems thinking and collaboration can enhance socioeconomic benefits across diverse contexts.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNDP CEO Approval Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 1735160 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11854 Global Environment Facility To create and provide standardized online monitoring frameworks and indicators for wildlife use and trade to enable near real-time tracking and analysis of wildlife trade patterns and empower policymakers and stakeholders to make informed and sustainable wildlife management decisions. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project highlights the essential role wildlife use and trade play in sustaining millions of livelihoods by providing food, income, and cultural value. Ultimately, the development of wildlife use and trade indicators seeks to inform sustainable practices and monitoring frameworks that preserve resources vital to local and Indigenous communities while protecting cultural heritage linked to traditional wildlife use. The project encourages legal wildlife markets by combating illegal trafficking, preventing economic losses, and supporting sustainable development. It also protects legitimate business opportunities in sustainable wildlife trade. Food security is enhanced by preserving wildlife resources communities rely on for subsistence. Through the uptake by governments and institutions of indicators of harvesting practices, the project seeks to ensure long-term food availability and mitigates threats caused by unsustainable exploitation of wildlife. Capacity building and knowledge transfer are key aspects, as the project provides training and workshops for policymakers and conservation practitioners through MEA platforms. It develops tools (indicators) and frameworks to help governments monitor and manage wildlife trade effectively. The project drives policy and governance improvements by helping governments make informed decisions about wildlife management. It strengthens compliance with international agreements, enhances monitoring frameworks, and promotes evidence-based conservation strategies. The socioeconomic benefits directly contribute to broader environmental goals by reducing overexploitation of species through improved monitoring and management, protecting biodiversity via sustainable use practices, and maintaining ecosystem functions. These efforts align with global conservation targets like the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF), enhancing coordination between national and international conservation efforts. Key beneficiaries include local communities, particularly Indigenous peoples and traditional wildlife users, as well as government stakeholders like policymakers, conservation practitioners, and wildlife management authorities. Conservation organizations such as NGOs, research institutions, and advisory groups also benefit, alongside private sector actors involved in legal wildlife trade. The project creates a positive feedback loop where better monitoring and management of wildlife trade supports local livelihoods and global conservation goals. This synergy ensures that both socioeconomic and environmental benefits are maintained over the long term.Global Environment Facility IUCN IUCN CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 1743120 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11855 Global Environment Facility To design and pilot the Accelerating Rapid Transition of Subsidies and Incentives (ARTSI) grants mechanism to support subsidy reform and enhance policy coherence with respect to impact on biodiversity and climate change in the agriculture, forestry and fisheries sectors. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. The project will contribute distinct human wellbeing benefits by providing direct incentives to adopt improved practices in agroforestry (Colombia), agriculture (Fiji) and salt production (the Philippines). This will enhance the sustainability of livelihoods and protect ecosystem services, including mitigation of GHG emissions. Adoption of organic cultivation practices in Colombia and Fiji will enhance health as well as water security, and protection of mangroves in the Philippines will help sustain a wide range of ecosystem services that underpin human wellbeing in local communities, including food security.Global Environment Facility CI CI-Center for Policy and Incentives CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Developing countries, unspecified 1693119 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11857 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Vice President's Office (VPO) PIF Approval Date ' XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11880 Global Environment Facility To strengthen developing countries' capacity to implement the ETF by enhancing access to and use of global and regional climate transparency knowledge, tools, and networks; building inclusive and gender-responsive capacity to apply this knowledge; and improving the quality, consistency, and usability of climate reports and transparency frameworks. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility UNEP UNEP - CCC CEO Endorsement Date ' Developing countries, unspecified Copenhagen, Denmark 55.67594 12.56553 9000000 GEF 9000000 GEF