XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-372 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Comision Nacional del Medio Ambiente CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 340000.00 340000.00 340000.00 340000.00 340000.00 0 UNDP Comision Nacional del Medio Ambiente 0 UNDP Comision Nacional del Medio Ambiente 0 UNDP Comision Nacional del Medio Ambiente 1700000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-843 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP National Energy Commision CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1196980.00 1196980.00 1196980.00 1196980.00 1196980.00 0 UNDP National Energy Commision 0 UNDP National Energy Commision 0 UNDP National Energy Commision 0 UNDP National Energy Commision 0 UNDP National Energy Commision 0 UNDP National Energy Commision 0 UNDP National Energy Commision 0 UNDP National Energy Commision 0 UNDP National Energy Commision 0 UNDP National Energy Commision 5984900 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-844 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank CIPMA (Centro de Investigacion y planificacion del Medio Ambiente) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 242223.33 242223.33 242223.33 0 World Bank CIPMA (Centro de Investigacion y planificacion del Medio Ambiente) 0 World Bank CIPMA (Centro de Investigacion y planificacion del Medio Ambiente) 0 World Bank CIPMA (Centro de Investigacion y planificacion del Medio Ambiente) 0 World Bank CIPMA (Centro de Investigacion y planificacion del Medio Ambiente) 726670 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1021 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Foundation for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 0 UNDP Foundation for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity 0 UNDP Foundation for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity 0 UNDP Foundation for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity 0 UNDP Foundation for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity 0 UNDP Foundation for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity 0 UNDP Foundation for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1207 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP The National Environment Commission (CONAMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 941400.00 941400.00 941400.00 941400.00 941400.00 0 UNDP The National Environment Commission (CONAMA) 0 UNDP The National Environment Commission (CONAMA) 0 UNDP The National Environment Commission (CONAMA) 0 UNDP The National Environment Commission (CONAMA) 0 UNDP The National Environment Commission (CONAMA) 0 UNDP The National Environment Commission (CONAMA) 4707000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1236 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP National Commission for the Environment (CONAMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 774486.20 774486.20 774486.20 774486.20 774486.20 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment (CONAMA) 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment (CONAMA) 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment (CONAMA) 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment (CONAMA) 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment (CONAMA) 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment (CONAMA) 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment (CONAMA) 3872431 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1300 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP CONAMA CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 278333.33 278333.33 278333.33 0 UNDP CONAMA 0 UNDP CONAMA 0 UNDP CONAMA 0 UNDP CONAMA 0 UNDP CONAMA 0 UNDP CONAMA 835000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1349 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Executive Commission for Transport in Santiago - CGTS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1396000.00 1396000.00 1396000.00 1396000.00 1396000.00 0 World Bank Executive Commission for Transport in Santiago - CGTS 0 World Bank Executive Commission for Transport in Santiago - CGTS 0 World Bank Executive Commission for Transport in Santiago - CGTS 0 World Bank Executive Commission for Transport in Santiago - CGTS 0 World Bank Executive Commission for Transport in Santiago - CGTS 0 World Bank Executive Commission for Transport in Santiago - CGTS 0 World Bank Executive Commission for Transport in Santiago - CGTS 6980000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1377 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank PROTEGE (Asociación de Municipalidades Parque Cordillera) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 241666.67 241666.67 241666.67 0 World Bank PROTEGE (Asociación de Municipalidades Parque Cordillera) 0 World Bank PROTEGE (Asociación de Municipalidades Parque Cordillera) 0 World Bank PROTEGE (Asociación de Municipalidades Parque Cordillera) 0 World Bank PROTEGE (Asociación de Municipalidades Parque Cordillera) 0 World Bank PROTEGE (Asociación de Municipalidades Parque Cordillera) 725000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1725 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP CONAMA RM CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 318828.33 318828.33 318828.33 0 UNDP CONAMA RM 0 UNDP CONAMA RM 0 UNDP CONAMA RM 0 UNDP CONAMA RM 0 UNDP CONAMA RM 0 UNDP CONAMA RM 0 UNDP CONAMA RM 956485 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2772 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP National Commission for the Environment CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment 0 UNDP National Commission for the Environment 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3599 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IADB Programa Pais Eficiencia Energetica (PPEE) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 527272.80 527272.80 527272.80 527272.80 527272.80 0 IADB Programa Pais Eficiencia Energetica (PPEE) 0 IADB Programa Pais Eficiencia Energetica (PPEE) 0 IADB Programa Pais Eficiencia Energetica (PPEE) 0 IADB Programa Pais Eficiencia Energetica (PPEE) 0 IADB Programa Pais Eficiencia Energetica (PPEE) 0 IADB Programa Pais Eficiencia Energetica (PPEE) 2636364 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5150 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Energy and Environment Ministries CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Energy policy and administrative management]]+ 497142.60 497142.60 497142.60 497142.60 497142.60 0 UNEP Energy and Environment Ministries 1986184 UNEP Energy and Environment Ministries 2468036 UNEP Energy and Environment Ministries -268726 UNEP Energy and Environment Ministries 2485713 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5335 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO Renewable Energy Centre of Chile (CER) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile Chile - Osorno -40.57395 -73.13348 +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 571717.00 571717.00 571717.00 0 UNIDO Renewable Energy Centre of Chile (CER) 0 UNIDO Renewable Energy Centre of Chile (CER) 1225220 UNIDO Renewable Energy Centre of Chile (CER) 1707854 UNIDO Renewable Energy Centre of Chile (CER) 476114 UNIDO Renewable Energy Centre of Chile (CER) 0 UNIDO Renewable Energy Centre of Chile (CER) 6520 UNIDO Renewable Energy Centre of Chile (CER) 1715151 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5429 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Agriculture (National Forest Corporation - CONAF - and Livestock and Agriculture Service - SAG) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile Vitor -18.724958 -70.312827 Hualpén -36.78691 -73.10517 Camarones -19.014234 -69.878233 San Miguel de Azapa -18.521114 -70.17617 Concepción -36.82 -73.04449 Talcahuano -36.74342 -73.09822 Cobquecura -36.18113 -72.72097 Tomé -36.61707 -72.85797 Curanilahue -37.48301 -73.23511 Nacimiento -37.48555 -72.82361 Carahue -38.61092 -73.26976 Lumaco -38.2871 -73.04591 Santa Juana -37.27638 -72.95977 Angol -37.76905 -72.79543 Los Alamos -37.67359 -73.35687 Penco -36.74842 -72.94369 Pelluhue -35.91154 -72.60758 Cañete -37.87412 -73.31773 Antuco -37.32769 -71.36663 Pinto -36.92137 -71.49935 Tucapel -37.22528 -71.7455 Yungay -37.10445 -71.93081 Pemuco -36.98295 -72.06754 El Carmen -36.92509 -71.8469 Contulmo -38.0527 -73.21238 San Fabián -36.550378 -71.549538 Coihueco -36.70214 -71.5811 Los Sauces -37.98315 -72.79682 Arica -18.5377 -69.97458 Renaico -37.71779 -72.5757 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 482283.20 482283.20 482283.20 482283.20 482283.20 859460 FAO Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Agriculture (National Forest Corporation - CONAF - and Livestock and Agriculture Service - SAG) 462582 FAO Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Agriculture (National Forest Corporation - CONAF - and Livestock and Agriculture Service - SAG) 595544 FAO Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Agriculture (National Forest Corporation - CONAF - and Livestock and Agriculture Service - SAG) 341698 FAO Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Agriculture (National Forest Corporation - CONAF - and Livestock and Agriculture Service - SAG) 150159 FAO Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Agriculture (National Forest Corporation - CONAF - and Livestock and Agriculture Service - SAG) 2409407 FAO Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Agriculture (National Forest Corporation - CONAF - and Livestock and Agriculture Service - SAG) 2411416 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5506 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA), Corporacion Nacional Forestal (CONAF), Wildlife Conservation Society Chile, Servicio Agricola y Ganadero (SAG) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile Ultima Esperanza -50.75 -74 Rio Marazzi -53.444601 -69.303453 Reserva Nacional Laguna Parrillar -53.431846 -71.284934 Punta Arenas -53.64148 -72.03848 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 430776.40 430776.40 430776.40 430776.40 430776.40 579586 FAO Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA), Corporacion Nacional Forestal (CONAF), Wildlife Conservation Society Chile, Servicio Agricola y Ganadero (SAG) 354240 FAO Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA), Corporacion Nacional Forestal (CONAF), Wildlife Conservation Society Chile, Servicio Agricola y Ganadero (SAG) 173227 FAO Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA), Corporacion Nacional Forestal (CONAF), Wildlife Conservation Society Chile, Servicio Agricola y Ganadero (SAG) 531591 FAO Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA), Corporacion Nacional Forestal (CONAF), Wildlife Conservation Society Chile, Servicio Agricola y Ganadero (SAG) 416116 FAO Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA), Corporacion Nacional Forestal (CONAF), Wildlife Conservation Society Chile, Servicio Agricola y Ganadero (SAG) 96899 FAO Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA), Corporacion Nacional Forestal (CONAF), Wildlife Conservation Society Chile, Servicio Agricola y Ganadero (SAG) 2151728 FAO Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA), Corporacion Nacional Forestal (CONAF), Wildlife Conservation Society Chile, Servicio Agricola y Ganadero (SAG) 2153882 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9068 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of Agriculture (ODEPA-INDAP) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile Pica -20.47958 -68.91191 Lonquimay -38.47467 -71.23925 Curarrehue -39.33581 -71.53926 Huara -19.53591 -69.98482 San Pedro de Atacama -23.40111 -67.91113 Colchane -19.35311 -68.84698 Camiña -19.37371 -69.5056 Alto Biobío -37.86539 -71.34738 Melipeuco -38.82478 -71.61102 General Lagos -17.653611 -69.634722 Putre -18.42869 -69.31158 Calama -22.16394 -68.62954 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 609269.40 609269.40 609269.40 609269.40 609269.40 0 FAO Ministry of Agriculture (ODEPA-INDAP) 554960 FAO Ministry of Agriculture (ODEPA-INDAP) 817313 FAO Ministry of Agriculture (ODEPA-INDAP) 534116 FAO Ministry of Agriculture (ODEPA-INDAP) 639086 FAO Ministry of Agriculture (ODEPA-INDAP) 495218 FAO Ministry of Agriculture (ODEPA-INDAP) 3040693 FAO Ministry of Agriculture (ODEPA-INDAP) 3046347 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9496 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Fundación Chile, Ministry of Energy CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile Santiago -33.45694 -70.64827 +![cdata[Energy generation, renewable sources - multiple technologies]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 491254.00 491254.00 491254.00 842493 UNEP Fundación Chile, Ministry of Energy 193161 UNEP Fundación Chile, Ministry of Energy 338452 UNEP Fundación Chile, Ministry of Energy 1421027 UNEP Fundación Chile, Ministry of Energy 1473762 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9742 Global Environment Facility Demonstrating systemic impacts of integrated low-emission urban mobility systems to support Chile in a transformational shift towards low-emission urban mobility systems. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility CAF Ministry of Environment (MMA), Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications (MTT), Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (MINVU) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Chile Valdivia -39.8142 -73.2459 Santiago -33.45694 -70.64827 Lebu -37.60825 -73.65356 Antofagasta -23.646374 -70.398003 Concepción -36.82699 -73.04977 +![cdata[Transport policy and administrative management]]+ 580000.00 580000.00 580000.00 580000.00 580000.00 0 CAF Ministry of Environment (MMA), Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications (MTT), Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (MINVU) 0 CAF Ministry of Environment (MMA), Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications (MTT), Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (MINVU) 2900000 CAF Ministry of Environment (MMA), Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications (MTT), Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (MINVU) 0 CAF Ministry of Environment (MMA), Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications (MTT), Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (MINVU) 0 CAF Ministry of Environment (MMA), Ministry of Transport and Telecommunications (MTT), Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (MINVU) 2900000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9766 Global Environment Facility Chile is one of only five places in the world with a Mediterranean climate, where the Project area is located, recognized as one of the 35 biodiversity Hotspots, not only for their high levels of wealth and endemism in plant and animal species, but also for being regions with high risk of species extinction. This is especially relevant regarding coastal landscapes and ecosystems, having in this area several types of coastal wetlands, such as salt marshes, brackish and salty coastal lagoons, tidal plains and estuaries and with the presence of different gradients, making for a high level of time-space heterogeneity and therefore the availability of habitats for a wide range of aquatic and shoreline species, in particular migratory birds. The threats and environmental degradation factors in the Chilean Mediterranean Eco-Region, are for the most part the result of human activities, which play a key role in the advancing deterioration of the coastal ecosystem functions and habitats. The main factors are habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation caused by agricultural activities, urban expansion and infrastructure, and the scarce legal protection given to these ecosystems. The objective of the Project is to improve the ecological condition and degree of conservation of ecologically valuable coastal ecosystems in South-Central Chile, including the wetlands and associated watersheds, incorporating them into local development efforts through sustainable management, improving coastal landscape management, reducing pressures on these habitats occupied by diverse migratory species with different conservation problems, and reducing threats to and pressures on the supporting watersheds that contribute to locally significant human activities. This Project contributes to fulfilling the GEF VI objectives BD-4 Program 9 and LD-3 Program 4, which will be undertaken through three components. The first seeks to mainstream the importance of BD conservation and LD problems in coastal landscapes to decision-makers and relevant stakeholders, the second to strengthen political and regulatory frameworks regarding coastal conservation among the diverse institutions with mandates in coastal and watershed areas, and the third, to implement and systematize an array of initiatives in five pilot landscapes to be replicated at the national level by the main institutions involved. The pilot ecosystems are located between Coquimbo and Araucania, representing different socio-environmental conditions, and these will play a relevant role in generating the data and evidence necessary for demonstrating the need to apply a focus that considers the whole watershed, with strengthened inter-institutional coordination and with productive sectors applying environmentally sustainable practices for conserving and sustainably managing coastal landscapes when these are not protected areas. Each one of the pilots will contribute concrete evidence according to their individual realities regarding threats and present circumstances and will make it possible to have a wide range of options that can be replicated in similar situations. This project will bring together stakeholders from various national, regional and local institutions, committed for the duration of Project implementation, and led by a Steering Committee, which will be in charge of monitoring fulfilment of objectives, a process that will be supervised by the implementing agency, UN Environment. The Project includes a gender focus, where equal opportunity and development actions are proposed for both men and women, and also as a contribution to women’s empowerment, for the purpose of increasing their participation and decision-making, as well as their access to the Project’s socio-economic services and benefits. The aims and objectives of this project are consistent with the commitments made by Chile as signatory of the Ramsar Convention, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), and the Convention on the Conservation of Wild Migratory Species (CMS). Chile has been making efforts to comply with these commitments, approving in the year 2003 its National Biodiversity Strategy (ENB), which led in 2005 to the National Strategy for the Conservation and Rational Use of Chile’s Wetlands (ENH), with its respective Action Plan. Later, the National Wetlands Committee was created, formally in 2013, as well as the National Committee for Ecological Recovery (2017) by means of a framework document, for the purpose of achieving effective ecological recovery in degraded areas. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of the Environment EM CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Agricultural development]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1029360.80 1029360.80 1029360.80 1029360.80 1029360.80 1549794 UNEP Ministry of the Environment EM 777490 UNEP Ministry of the Environment EM 922884 UNEP Ministry of the Environment EM 683640 UNEP Ministry of the Environment EM 1167997 UNEP Ministry of the Environment EM 5101804 UNEP Ministry of the Environment EM 5146804 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10075 Global Environment Facility Develop and implement a governance system that integrates, coordinates and articulates public, private and civil society institutions for the conservation and sustainable use of coastal marine ecosystems. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.308. The direct beneficiaries of the whole Project are 3,352 people, of whom 1,209 are women, living in the pilot communes of La Higuera and Freirina in the northern zone and Puerto Cisnes in the southern zone. 309. The project support will develop the capacities of the beneficiaries to: 1) participate actively in establishing and operating governance and decision-making mechanisms, and be empowered in the sustainable management of the coastal marine ecosystems where they are settled and which depend on for their livelihoods; 2) use approaches that contribute to ensuring the sustainability of coastal marine ecosystems (EA, EAF, MSP); 3) participate in the development and implementation of management plans for coastal marine ecosystems and their resources based on proposed and learned approaches; 4) contribute to the improvement of MPA management; 5) apply good biodiversity-friendly practices for the sustainable use of resources and ecosystems; and 6) develop business initiatives that help diversify production. 310. Capacities built on sustainable use and development of business initiatives will contribute to productive diversification and improvement of income and livelihoods. Hence, it is expected that 382 men and 13 women engaged in fishing activities in pilot communities and coves will increase their income from the sustainable use of coastal marine biodiversity by 10% (with a 10% reduction in the income gap between women and men), as well as the financing of at least nine business initiatives that add value to products or services from the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity. 311. Project interventions and enhanced beneficiary capacities result in local and regional benefits in terms of better livelihoods, cultural reassertion and environmental sustainability that contribute to supporting long-term global environmental benefits (previously described in section 1.a Project Description - 6) Global Environmental Benefits). In particular, the benefits are: Conserving and maintaining ecosystem services provided by coastal marine ecosystems (artisanal and industrial fisheries); Maintaining cultural, aesthetic and spiritual benefits, scenic beauty, preserving places of cultural significance, territorial identity, and valuing coastal marine natural heritage; Benefits to the local economy through business initiatives that value products or services from the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity and that contribute to creating new sources of diversification, income, better livelihoods and social benefits stemming from partnership and empowerment of local communities and stakeholders. Social benefits in terms of alliances and empowerment of local communities and stakeholders (including women and indigenous peoples); Improving food security and quality of life and wellbeing of the population through long-term sustainability of fisheries and aquaculture resources used to feed coastal populations, marine species providing healthier and less polluted food, and possibilities of frequent consumption with adequate management. Promotion of Decent Rural Employment[1] through project actions that are embedded in the four pillars of decent employment, namely: Table 16 Project contribution to the pillars of Decent Rural Employment Pillar Themes under the Pillars related to project intervention Specific project actions Pillar 1 Job creation and enterprise development · Support to small producers, women and men, to access markets and value chains · Job creation in rural areas, particularly for youth and women · Vocational and educational programmes to develop technical and entrepreneurial skills in rural people · Training (Output 2.1.2) · Business initiatives for productive diversification and enhanced local products marketing (Output 2.1.4) Pillar 2 Social Protection · Improving working conditions in rural areas, including effective maternity protection and income · Training (Output 2.1.3) · Good practices for the sustainable use of resources (Output 2.1.1) · Improve beneficiary’s income and reduce the income gap between men and women (Outputs 2.1.1 and 2.14) Pillar 3 Work standards and rights · Socially responsible production, specifically to reduce gender and age discrimination · MPA and biodiversity resource management plans (Outputs 1.1.2 and 1.2.1) · Good practices for the sustainable use of resources (Output 2.1.1) · Business initiatives for productive diversification and enhanced local products marketing (Output 2.1.4) Pillar 4 Governance and social dialogue · Participation of the rural poor in decision-making and governance mechanisms · Rural women and youth empowered to participate in these processes from the outset · Participatory governance and decision-making mechanisms, including women and youth (Output 1.1.1) · Ecosystem and resource management plans developed and implemented in a participatory manner (Outputs 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.2.1) [1] According to FAO’s definition, decent rural employment refers to any activity, occupation, work, business or service performed by women and men, adults and youth, in exchange for remueration or benefits, in rural areas, which: 1) respects core labour standards as defined in ILO Conventions; 2) provides an adequate living income; 3) entails an adequate degree of employment security and stability; 4) Adopts sector-speci­c minimum occupational safety and health measures; 5) avoids excessive working hours and allows sufficient time for rest; 6) promotes access to adapted technical and vocational training. Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of the Environment (MMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 700593.60 700593.60 700593.60 700593.60 700593.60 1067582 FAO Ministry of the Environment (MMA) 671374 FAO Ministry of the Environment (MMA) 756463 FAO Ministry of the Environment (MMA) 3502968 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10087 Global Environment Facility Accelerate the decarbonisation of the heating sector in Chile by fostering the deployment of district energy systems Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The Project aims to achieve the following socioeconomic benefits: Table  SEQ Table \* ARABIC 8: Sustainable development benefits of the project SDG / Category SDG target Project impact Project indicator Environment SDG 11 11.6: By 2030, reduce the adverse per capita environmental impact of cities, including by paying special attention to air quality and municipal and other waste management · There is a huge potential to improve city-wide air quality in Chile through reduced burning of fossil fuels that produce sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) and associated heat benefits · Increased visibility due to lower pollution · Mean urban air pollution of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in Chilean (pilot) cities · Mean concentration of CO, SOx, NOx in Chilean (pilot) cities · Share of households and commercial users connected to DES in Chilean (pilot) cities Socio-Economic SDG 3 3.9: By 2030, substantially reduce the number of deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and air, water and soil pollution and contamination · Health benefits from greater utilization of the heating system by fuel-poor populations, due to more affordable provision of heat · Improvements in air quality that could reduce spending on health costs or environmental penalties · Reduced household and ambient air pollution (in particular through replaced wood stoves, such as in Temuco) · Improved livelihoods /urban quality of life: Improved safety as individual boilers and stoves are removed from buildings, reduced fire risk as fuels (in particular wood in Chile, such as Temuco) are centrally managed, reduced legionella disease risk through central operation · Mean urban air pollution of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in Chilean (pilot) cities · Mean concentration of CO, SOx, NOx in Chilean (pilot) cities · Number of premature mortality and morbidity cases attributed to indoor air pollution SDG 7 7.1: By 2030 ensure universal access to affordable, reliable, and modern energy services 7.2: Increase substantially the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix by 2030 7.3: Double the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency by 2030 · Local wealth retention from greater use of local resources, reduced fossil fuel imports, reduced electricity consumption and more-efficient primary energy consumption as well as improved resilience and energy security at the city level and national level · Increased proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels and technology · Increased renewable energy share in the total final energy consumption · Improved consideration of gender in the development of city energy strategy · Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels and technology in Chilean (pilot) cities · Renewable energy share in the total final heat energy consumption in Chilean (pilot) cities · Primary energy by type in Chilean (pilot) cities SDG 8 8.3: Promote development-oriented policies that support productive activities, decent job creation, entrepreneurship, creativity and innovation, and encourage formalization and growth of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises including through access to financial services 8.4: Improve progressively, through 2030, global resource efficiency in consumption and production and endeavour to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation · Local job creation related to setting up of new district energy projects and increased use of local resources (local forest residues, renewables) · Increase access to affordable and efficient energy for industries and businesses · Enhances productivity for industries and businesses · Number of employments by DES in Chilean (pilot) cities · Energy intensity measured in terms of primary energy and GDP SDG 13 13.2: Integrate climate change measures into national policies, strategies and planning · Substantial contribution to meeting city-wide greenhouse gas reduction targets though the development of District Energy Master Plans. · Master Plans being part of an integrated city policy and strategy, which foster climate resilience and lower greenhouse gas emissions · Number of municipalities in Chile with newly adopted District energy Master Plan and investment roadmap to develop district energy systems Technological SDG 9 9.1: Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and trans-border infrastructure, to support economic development and human well-being, with a focus on affordable and equitable access for all 9.4: By 2030 upgrade infrastructure and retrofit industries to make them sustainable, with increased resource use efficiency and greater adoption of clean and environmentally sound technologies and industrial processes, all countries taking action in accordance with their respective capabilities · Decreased heat loss into the atmosphere, minimizing the heat-island effect in cities · Private sector incorporated with new business opportunities · New employment opportunities · New skills acquired · Share of households and commercial users connected to DES in Chilean (pilot) cities · The pilot cities supported under project will develop an MRV Plan including the sustainable development benefits (incl. socio-economic benefits and global environment benefits). See the section on Monitoring & Evaluation above.Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of Energy of Chile; Ministry of Environment of Chile CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Chile Santiago -33.45694 -70.64827 +![cdata[Energy generation, renewable sources - multiple technologies]]+ 428356.20 428356.20 428356.20 428356.20 428356.20 270000 UNEP Ministry of Energy of Chile; Ministry of Environment of Chile 118177 UNEP Ministry of Energy of Chile; Ministry of Environment of Chile 208293 UNEP Ministry of Energy of Chile; Ministry of Environment of Chile 1136879 UNEP Ministry of Energy of Chile; Ministry of Environment of Chile 123909 UNEP Ministry of Energy of Chile; Ministry of Environment of Chile 2141781 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10213 Global Environment Facility Improve national financing of biodiversity through the design, implementation and optimization of market-based economic instruments (IECB), that reinforce public financing and facilitate the economic contribution of the private sector to maintaining Chile’s natural capital. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Regarding socioeconomic benefits, by the end of the project there will be a direct positive influence on 1,334 people (401 women and 933 men) who will benefit from the mechanisms put in place to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem services that they depend on (mostly marine resources and fresh water supply). These direct beneficiaries are the members of each of the organizations that will co-execute the project IECB demonstration experiences: the Rural Drinking Water Committees of Mashue and Liquiñe, the Fishermen Association of AMERBs Chepu, Ventanas and Maitencillo, and the indigeneous communities of ECMPO Caulín. As a result of Project implementation, this initiative will deliver various global environment benefits (GEB’s) in sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity, as described in the GEF-7 Programme Directives. The demonstration experiences in land ecosystems will contribute to the protection of ecosystems of high global significance, making available around 100,000 ha of high value (HCV) native forests for conservation and sustainably managed biodiversity in the Los Ríos Region. Furthermore, carbon emissions will be mitigated, measured as carbon sequester, as a result of the application of sustainable management measures, amounting to 89,890 metric tons of CO2. Having available IECB mechanisms and guidelines as well as other institutionalized outputs (green project models; intervention models based on sustainable practices; information and monitoring and evaluation systems and an internet platform; studies on biometrics and return on investment in ecosystem services, etc.) generates benefits on the national level, strengthens institutions’ management capabilities, as well as public policies, strategies, plans and instruments. At the same time, access by the private sector and their participation is ensured, thereby improving the development of conservation projects and appropriate offsets through IECB application, increasing both public and private financing and favorably impacting biodiversity and ecosystem services conservation. Furthermore, it will contribute to the implementation and up-dating of the NDC’s and Chile’s other international commitments such as the CDB and Climate Change. It contributes directly to EM and SEIA capabilities; to the Environmental Superintendency’s information system; as well as to the component of the National System of Public Investment consistent with the objectives of IECB implementation under the Social Development Ministry’s responsibility. Development of the land and marine demonstration experiences (DE’s) will make it possible to validate the methodological guidelines for the instruments and generate knowledge for strengthening local and national capabilities. The land ESR experience will reinforce the management capabilities of the Rural Potable Water Committees impacting other CAPR’s, through replication and up-scaling; as well as directly to their beneficiary members. This experience will benefit the Public Works Ministry’s Water Works Department regarding improving management of the CAPR’s under their responsibility as well as achieving more sustainable management of water resources for human consumption. This initiative will contribute to DE sustainability, replicability and scalability in other CAPR’s. Studies on biometrics and return on investment will contribute to Sanitary Services Superintendency management and its inclusion of biodiversity and ecosystem services in determining tarrifs for potable water services. Development of NbS project models contributes to the Finance Ministry’s Green Bonds initiative regarding climate change. The IECB mechanisms with green project models and sustainable management measures, together with the territorial governance framework, contribute to improving management in the Agriculture Ministry’s institutions (INDAP, CONAF, INFOR, SAG and ODEPA). As for the results of IECB application regarding the ecosystem services of scenic beauty, human well-being and tourism, this will contribute to the targets of the National Tourism Service. Implementation of sustainable management measures in native forests will make it possible to improve in the middle and long term the ecosystem services of water for rural human consumption and productive systems, carbon sinking, and other ecosystem services, such as: scenic beauty, tourism, cultural objectives, medicinal applications and social well-being. If it should be feasible to develop the ESR DE’s in the Alto Maipo Wetlands, this will be an example of supporting the ecosystem service of water for human consumption in an urban area. If it should be feasible to develop CE experiences in coastal wetlands, the surface area under conservation measures will be increased as well as financing for biodiversity and ecosystem services conservation in this type of ecosystem. The outputs and outcomes will foster transfer of capabilities and financing through IECB application; the outputs taken together will be an incentive for project development; the ESR demonstration experiences could also serve as offset sites, attracting financing to the territory; this same benefit will generate the development of the certification system. The land and marine ESR demonstration experiences will contribute to regional and local governance and to territorial planning within the IECB framework as well as planning of sustainable measures founded in NbS’s. The implementation of demonstration experiences in marine and coastal ecosystems will help strengthen capabilities of Fishermen’s Union members in the AMERB’s and the ECMPO. In this last case, indigenous issues will be safeguarded. Developing this IECB experience will lead directly to an increase in biodiversity, in quantity, size and number of species; will transfer methodologies for natural resources conservation and management, demonstrating an increase in bentonic resources and seaweed, that can be incorporated as a model in the management plans of these marine management systems (replication, sustainability and up-scaling). Furthermore, the Unions will be strengthened in their organizational capabilities, in reaching agreements through the development of activities for the application of surveillance system models and biodiversity management models. As in the case of the land experiences, this will attract financing for the management and conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services, and through the system for managing and increasing natural resources, we will even be contributing to incomes, the feasibility of project development and broadening out to include other ecosystem services such as tourism. The IECB demonstration experiences in the AMERB and ECMPO will generate, like in the land experiences, an ESR mechanism (green project model, sustainable management measures, information system and financing strategy); these will become offset sites and will have a Biodiversity Conservation Certification System. The tools generated will contribuite to strengthening the sectorial institutions: SERNAPESCA, SUBPESCA, INDESPA and DIRECTEMAR. Furthermore, the results of the demonstration experience in the ECMPO where indigenous issues are addressed, will contribute to the CONADI targets and to strengthening ECMPO management plans through IECB application. Safeguarding application of the gender focus throughout the IECB DE’s, in all capacity building actions, including indigenous issues and cultural pertinence, will provide lessons that will reveal the role of women in biodiversity and ecosystem conservation; it will foster IECB application and provide knowledge for replicability and up-scaling actions. Implementation of the ESR IECB and other instruments will provide social benefits recognized on the local, regional and national levels; as well as the contribution of models on the international level.Global Environment Facility UNDP Chile Ministry of Environment CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 460000.00 460000.00 460000.00 460000.00 460000.00 211306 UNDP Chile Ministry of Environment 609348 UNDP Chile Ministry of Environment 2300000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10277 Global Environment Facility Accelerate and scale-up the adoption of low-carbon electric vehicles in Chilean regions. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.In terms of direct benefits for the local population, incorporating electric vehicles into the public transport fleet, in particular fixed route taxis, will help reduce local pollution through a reduction of NOx, carbon monoxide and particulate matter emission, improving quality of air in regional urban areas and thus reducing the impact on human health. This is a significant benefit as some of the Chilean regions have some of the lowest air qualities in Latin America. This will further have a positive benefit on human health given that preliminary studies suggest that the COVID pandemic has a more significant impact on regions of poor air quality. Thus, by improving air quality the project may contribute indirectly to reducing the impact of the COVID pandemic. Estimates of the reduction in air pollution will be calculated based on data obtained through output 2.2. By tracking vehicle odometers and other performance indicators, the emissions of the electric vehicle pilots will be compared with a calculation of those of existing old fixed-route taxis. The potential for a positive through-out the regions will then by extrapolated based on a controlled scale-up of fixed-route taxis. Furthermore, introducing electric vehicles into the public transport system will improve the quality of the service in terms of comfort by reducing noise and vibrations. Furthermore, the use of connectivity apps to connect operators with passengers will promote a modal shift from the use of private transport to the public transport system, as it will facilitate the development of a more enhanced service, which could in turn result in an improvement of traffic conditions in the different cities. As is expected when incorporating a new technology into a given system, this will result in a new ecosystem for business which enables opportunities but could also affect current employment areas. The project will put in place activities to ensure that the work force transition (Output 1.2, and 3.3), and does not result in the loss of employment of current workers of transport sector. Also, given the strong gender focus of the project and the experience of the Ministry of Energy personnel in the area, the project aims to result in new employment opportunities for women. This will be done by ensuring that companies involved in the procurement, installation or sale of systems, infrastructure and equipment related to low carbon electric mobility include gender diverse initiatives into their operating structure, in-accordance with the gender action plan. In terms of economic benefits, the project will help promote investment in the Chilean regions, where market pull, and push have not been strong enough to consolidate business opportunities related to electric mobility. Although the incorporation of electric mobility will also require importation, thus capital expenditures, the transition will make the country less dependent of global oil prices. This should reduce investment uncertainties, which should in turn result in a more favorable investment environment reducing interest rates and short term expected returns, making long term investments more attractive. Furthermore, the transition to electric mobility will create a new market for the power generation and electricity distribution sectors making such investments more attractive, thus, improving the reliability and reliance of the Chilean regional power systems.Global Environment Facility UNEP Agency of Sustainability Energy (ASE), on behalf of the Ministry of Energy, CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Chile Osorno -40.57395 -73.13348 Linares -35.8454 -71.5979 Curicó -34.9854 -71.2394 Castro -42.4721 -73.77319 Calama -22.45667 -68.92371 Antofagasta -23.65236 -70.3954 Talca -35.42804 -71.60282 Puerto Montt -41.48917 -72.79531 +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 594954.00 594954.00 594954.00 303182 UNEP Agency of Sustainability Energy (ASE), on behalf of the Ministry of Energy, 533489 UNEP Agency of Sustainability Energy (ASE), on behalf of the Ministry of Energy, 53638 UNEP Agency of Sustainability Energy (ASE), on behalf of the Ministry of Energy, 1784862 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10718 Global Environment Facility Restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services at the landscape scale on productive agroforestry areas and their natural environment improving the livelihoods of local communities Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.10. Benefits 294. The estimated number of direct beneficiaries of the project is 9,630 people, of which 3,817 (40 percent) are women and 5,813 (60 percent) are men. Most of them (9,150 people,[1] or 95 percent of the total) correspond to inhabitants of rural localities in the seven pilot landscapes who will benefit from the actions of the project as a whole, mainly in the establishment of local committees, the landscape-level planning, design and implementation of demonstration activities for restoration and best production practices, development of business models, investment plans and project portfolios, and technical assistance programmes. The remaining 5 percent (480 people) correspond to officials from public institutions at the national and regional level, and from other public and private organizations, who will benefit from the training programme for monitoring landscape restoration. In addition, of the total direct beneficiaries, it is estimated that 6 percent (578 people) belong to indigenous Mapuche communities within the framework of the Lanalhue-Nahuelbuta indigenous pilot landscape. 295. The project will support the beneficiaries to develop their capacities in order to: 1) actively participate in the establishment and operation of governance and decision-making mechanisms (at the local, regional and national levels), and strengthen their role in the sustainable management of the landscapes and ecosystems on which they depend for their livelihoods; 2) make use of approaches that contribute to greater sustainability in the use of biodiversity, soil and water resources; 3) participate in the development and implementation of landscape restoration plans and demonstration actions for restoration and best agricultural, livestock and forestry practices based on the approaches proposed and learned; and 4) develop business models and investment plans, as well as projects that help diversify the production of goods and services based on restoration. 296. The capacities acquired in the area of restoration actions and better productive practices that benefit biodiversity and the recovery of degraded soils should allow the development of business models that will contribute to productive diversification and the improvement of income and livelihoods. In this regard, it is expected that 245 men and 105 women, who participate in agricultural, livestock and/or forestry activities in the pilot landscapes, will increase their income associated with local economies based on restoration by 10 percent, as well as the financing of at least seven demonstration projects. In addition, the project will contribute to the promotion of Decent Rural Employment[2] considering the following aspects: Training, technical assistance and business model initiatives, investment plans and value chains for the diversification of products based on restorative economies (Outputs 2.2.1, 2.2.2 and 2.2.3). Improvement of the beneficiaries´ income, including the reduction of the income gap between men and women (Outputs 2.2.1, 2.2.2 and 2.2.3). Participatory governance and decision-making mechanisms, including women and youth (Outputs 1.1.1, 2.1.1 and 2.1.3). Good practices for the sustainable use of biodiversity, water and soil resources (Outputs 2.1.2 and 2.1.3). Landscape restoration plans developed and implemented in a participatory manner (Outputs 2.1.1 and 2.1.3). The restoration business models and the capacity transfer programs to be developed by the Project (Outputs 2.2.1 and 2.2.2) will support the creation of decent employment opportunities based on farming and rural non-farm activities in the pilot landscapes, especially for women and youth. Project support includes promoting the application of international labour standards and partnering with local, regional and national stakeholders to build human capital by improving access to vocational and entrepreneurial training and strengthening the capacity of rural organizations. [1] On average, 261 people are expected to participate per pilot landscape per year, considering a total of seven pilot landscapes and five years of implementation. It is likely that during the first two years of implementation the number of beneficiaries will be lower than average and more related to participatory planning processes, while in the following three years of implementation the number of beneficiaries will be higher and more related to the demonstration actions for restoration, best production practices and business models. [2] In the definition used by FAO, decent rural employment refers to any activity, occupation, job, business or service performed by women and men, adults and youth, in exchange for remuneration or benefits, in rural areas, which: 1) respects the fundamental labour standards as defined in the ILO Conventions; 2) provides an adequate living income; 3) implies an adequate degree of security and stability in employment; 4) adopts basic occupational health and safety measures; 5) avoids excessive working hours and allows enough time for rest; and 6) promotes access to technical and professional training. Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of Environment (MMA) and National Forestry Corporation (CONAF) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Forestry development]]+ +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Site preservation]]+ 769549 FAO Ministry of Environment (MMA) and National Forestry Corporation (CONAF) 867929 FAO Ministry of Environment (MMA) and National Forestry Corporation (CONAF) 5674032 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11071 Global Environment Facility Accelerate the implementation of the Chilean Long-Term Climate Strategy in the construction and demolition sector through the promotion of low-carbon and circular economy principles. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Circular economy offers ways to overcome the trade-off between economic development and environmental protection, creating synergies between both objectives, as it emphasizes the importance of material productivity, i.e. how much value the economy generates per unit of mass of input material. Currently, Chile has the lowest material productivity of all OECD countries, generating US$ 0.56 for each kilogram of material used by the economy, while the OECD average was US$ 2.88, and a leading country like the Netherlands generated US$ 5.75 per kilogram.[1] Improving material productivity will be one of the key benefits from this project. While no specific figures exist for the specific case of Chile, the potential benefit of a transition to a circular construction has been supported by various studies. Together with mobility and food, it is estimated that the shift to a circular built environment would enable Europe to increase resource productivity by 3% per year, and other estimates report positive impacts on GDP growth (0.8 to 7.0%) and employment, adding 0.2 to 3.0% of jobs while reducing sectoral carbon emissions by 8 to 70%.[2] While the key benefit of this project arises from emission reductions linked to zero-emitting buildings, through the introduction of lifecycle and circular economy approaches the project will generate other environmental benefits, e.g. related to eliminating the use of materials containing harmful chemicals in buildings and reducing the impact of buildings and construction on land and associated biodiversity. Thus, promoting technological advances and decarbonization considering the entire life cycle of buildings represents an opportunity to (i) reduce household, business and government spending on energy and waste management, (ii) optimize the use of natural resources, reducing impact on health, land and biodiversity; and (iii) enhance the productivity of the workforce involved in the construction industry through capacity building measures, contributing towards a just transition to a net-zero, circular economy in Chile.[1] MMA Hoja de ruta para un Chile circular al 2040 (Santiago, Chile, 2021)[2] Construye2025 (2020), p. 37.Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of Environment CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Chile Santiago -33.45694 -70.64827 2963699 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11088 Global Environment Facility Strengthen Chilean institutions to accelerate nature positive, net-zero development pathways Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. Through the new public and private climate change instruments and their measurement, biodiversity integration into the financing strategy, energy demand decarbonization policies, and capacity and awareness-raising activities, the project will deliver several socioeconomic benefits: In economic Growth and Job Creation: · Stimulates investment in green technologies and sustainable practices.· Boosts innovation, productivity, and competitiveness.· Creates jobs in renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable agriculture, and ecosystem restoration. In enhanced Ecosystem Services and Resilience: · Helps safeguard critical ecosystem services like clean water, fertile soil, and pollination.· Helps protecting and restoring natural ecosystems, supporting economic activities such as agriculture, tourism, and fisheries. In energy Security and Affordability: · Reduces dependence on fossil fuels.· Lowers energy costs for households and businesses.· Creates jobs in renewable energy infrastructure.· Improved Public Health:· Reduces air pollution and its associated health risks.· Lowers healthcare costs. Social Inclusion and Empowerment: · Fosters broader social acceptance and support for climate action.· Enhances employability through green skills training.· Improves livelihoods, particularly for women.Global Environment Facility UNEP Fundación Chile (FCh) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Chile Chile -30 -71 4822966 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11208 Global Environment Facility Strengthen inter-institutional coordination for the mainstreaming of biodiversity conservation in national, regional and local public policies Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.E.2 Socio-economic Benefits and Decent Rural Employment[1] At the socioeconomic level, 13% of the Chilean population identifies as indigenous peoples (INE, n.d.) and the country has varying levels of extreme poverty and multidimensional poverty, as well as several gender gaps linked to economic inequality. In the North Pilot, in the Atacama Region, this figure reaches 20% of the total inhabitants of the region, of which 47.7% belong to the Diaguita People, followed by the Colla People with 25.3% and the Mapuche People with 16.4% (INE, n/d). The Atacama Region presents levels of extreme poverty and multidimensional poverty higher than the national average and several gender gaps linked to economic inequality are evident in the Atacama Region, where women's participation in the labor market is slightly lower than the national average. The Central Pilot covers the Valparaíso and Metropolitan Regions, which concentrate more than half of Chile's population, the former with 10.3% (1,815,902 people) and the latter with 40.4% (7,112,808 people) of the total population (INE, n.d.). The South Pilot covers the Magallanes Region, which has a population of approximately 150,675 people, equivalent to 0.9% of the national population, of which 17.5% identify as indigenous people[2]. Magallanes has the lowest income poverty rate in the country, with 3.4%, while multidimensional poverty also reveals the lowest percentage of the regions, with 6.9%.[3] These characteristics provide an important opportunity to implement SBAP instruments such as regional-scale ecological planning, management plans associated with threatened ecosystems and degraded areas, best practices in key productive sectors, and harmonizing instruments such as monitoring, homologation of protected areas, and updating management plans to the standards of the new SBAP. Component 3 provides replicable interventions to improve the socioeconomic conditions of local communities and producers in each of the pilot areas through the implementation of instruments in three priority productive sectors (tourism, wine and fishing-aquaculture): a. The project’s engagement with the tourism sector includes support for the creation or improvement of enterprises, especially associative and/or community enterprises, to improve access to livelihoods for local and indigenous communities in the Atacama Region. This proposal arises from the needs assessment carried out during project design, in which the communities reported the development of local heritage crafts and requested support for their enhancement. The project will support the articulation between public and private actors and local and indigenous Diaguita communities around sustainable tourism, which would improve the scope and impact of the value chain associated with the different tourism products and services in the region. This would favor the creation of decent rural employment through the creation of collective and associative strategies that allow for sustainability. b. With regards to the wine sector, the project will work with partners to incorporate good practices and environmental criteria in current practices in order to support the product or landscape certification process brought about by the new environmental institutional framework through the SBAP. This will add value to the product, improving the value chain for small and medium-sized producers. In turn, some of these good practices are related to the improved management of certified pesticides and fertilizers with consideration of the potential impacts on water quality and human health, water resource regulations, and waste management, among others, all of which will improve conditions for workers and surrounding communities. c. In the case of the fishing and aquaculture industry, the incorporation of good practices and environmental criteria will be promoted in order to support the product or landscape certification process brought about by the new environmental institutional framework through the SBAP. This will add value to the product, improving the value chain for small and medium-sized producers. In turn, for the fishing sector, some of these good practices are related to improved waste management, which will improve working conditions for fishermen. [1] Specific guidance on how FAO can promote the Four Pillars of Decent Work in rural areas is provided in the Quick reference for addressing decent rural employment (as well as in the full corresponding Guidance document). For more information on FAO's work on decent rural employment and related guidance materials please consult the FAO thematic website at: http://www.fao.org/rural-employment/en/. [2] https://observatorio.ministeriodesarrollosocial.gob.cl/storage/docs/fichas-regionales/2015/Magallanes.pdf [3] https://www.desarrollosocialyfamilia.gob.cl/noticias/casen-2022-magallanes-se-mantiene-como-la-region-con-menor-tasa-de-pobreza-por-ingresos-y-multidimen Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of Environment (MMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Chile El Tabo -33.45861 -71.66194 Huasco -28.25833 -71.01778 Timaukel -54.19500 -69.53222 Punta Arenas -53.64139 -72.03833 San José de Maipo -33.70472 -70.09694 Melipilla -33.74389 -71.19389 Copiapó -27.32000 -69.82750 Tierra Amarilla -27.86556 -69.67194 Freirina -28.50917 -71.08111 Boiler -27.14222 -70.68361 El Quisco -33.41611 -71.64111 San Antonio -33.57083 -71.60944 Santo Domingo -33.80917 -71.67639 Buin -33.74806 -70.73917 Talagante -33.68222 -70.89500 El Monte -33.6694 -71.03222 Maipo Island -33.74833 -71.94556 Paine -33.86361 -70.75806 Pirque -33.71861 -70.50639 Cartagena -33.53361 -71.44222 3776941 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11220 Global Environment Facility Catalyze the transition toward a regenerative and circular model in Chile's food systems to recover and improve soils, biodiversity, and associated ecosystem services, thereby contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation in the national agricultural sector Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.With respect to the socioeconomic benefits that the project will bring, farmers, technicians, extensionists, advisors and public officials at the national and regional levels will be benefitting from the National Regenerative Training Program, totaling to at least 1,105 people (442 women and 663 men), who will strengthen their knowledge and capacities on the regenerative approach integrating a gender approach and cultural relevance in all training activities. Among the people trained, pilots producers including Peasant and Indigenous Family Farming , are considered beneficiaries of the training program whose exact number will be defined at the beginning of the project's implementation stage. It should be noted that the scope of the training will be expanded through continuous training and formal education actions, reaching a larger number of people who will benefit locally and nationally with improved knowledge and more information on regenerative systems. At pilot level, it is expected that all families of the pilot farms, including those belonging to Peasant and Indigenous Family Farming will benefit directly from the improvement of their production systems through implementation of regenerative practices (with specific investments contributed by the project), technical assistence and development of practical tools to support implementation and monitoring of results which will be defined in the Regenerative Action Plan (farm intervention work plans). In this regard, the expected beneficiaries in the pilots to reach at least 400 people (160 women and 240 men), including people from the family group linked to the producers of Peasant and Indigenous Family Farming identified during the formulation stage of the Prodoc. In particular, in the pilot project developed in the property that is part of the Senda Chacao community, actions will be carried out to provide permanent information and training to interested community members, in order to improve their knowledge, as well as to highlight cultural knowledge and the role of women in the community (for more information, see Annex F2). As part of the activities of each pilot, demonstrative activities and exchange of experiences will be developed, which will benefit various local stakeholders strengthen their knowledge and skills in regenerative systems. At the company level, it is expected that workers will benefit from the training and transfer of knowledge, which will contribute to improving their labor skills and future oportunities. The scaling-up strategy for each pilot (Component 3) is intended as a means to extend the benefits to the entire industry or sector, installing good production practices, with positive environmental impacts, such as reduction of soil and water pollution due to a reduction in the use of agrochemicals and waste management, efficient use of water resources, improvement in biodiversity conditions and in the provision of ecosystem services, increasing the adaptive capacity and climate resilience of the systems. Additionally, it is expected, to reduce occupational risks due to exposure to agrochemicals, improve food safety, strengthen food security and conservation of the agri-food heritage, promoting improved conditions for workers and local communities. This sectoral transformation will contribute to the long-term sustainability of production systems while generating tangible benefits for rural communities.Component 3 will also strengthen the value chains of regenerative products, by improving marketing conditions and strategic positioning of regenerative products through the valorization of regenerative attributes demanded by processors and consumers. In general, it is expected that income will be increased for producers through better prices and added value, generation of qualified rural employment, improvement in the livelihoods of small and medium producers, including Peasant and Indigenous Family Farming, and woman entrepreneurs. Specifically, consumers will gain access to evidence-based information on regenerative product attributes through reliable and accessible channels. Value chain participants will benefit from streamlined verification and certification systems for regenerative products, enabling access to higher-value markets. Small producers involved in the business model pilot will receive targeted training strengthening of local business capacities and guidance to overcome market access challenges, such as formalization, permit acquisition, and marketing strategies. Additionally, partnerships with public and private sectors will facilitate commercialization strategies, including direct sales, public procurement, and digital platforms. By updating public policy instruments (Component 1), technical assistance and investment will be strengthened through the integration of regenerative criteria with a gender and intercultural approach, which will have a positive impact on production systems and production chains. Considering the national scope of the public policy, it is expected that regenerative and sustainable agricultural producers will be benefited from the modified instruments through investment subsidies, technical assistance and capacity building. With respect to financial mechanisms (Component 2), these will expand access to financing traditionally underserved farmers, taking into account gender and intercultural conditions considering Peasant and Indigenous Family Farming. Agricultural producers and regenerative value chain actors are expected to benefit from the new portfolio of public and private financing available. With respect to the establishment of public-private linkages (Regenerative Hub), investments will be catalyzed, innovation will be promoted and workshops and trainings opportunities will be strengthened, actions that will benefits to agricultural producers and regenerative value chain actors at both the national and regional levels. These structural changes will lay the groundwork for a sustainable transformation of the sector, leading to measurable improvements in the quality of life and well-being of rural communities.  FORMTEXT FFFFFFFF0000000014000800450041005F0047006F0061006C0073000000000000000D004600490052005300540020004300410050004900540041004C00000000000000000000000000000000000000 Employment and decent work in rural areasRegarding decent rural employment[1], the project will contribute to improving the employment opportunities of people participating in the national training program specialized in regenerative agriculture and livestock (Output 4.1.1), aimed at producers, technicians, extensionists, advisors and public officials. In addition, all the activities developed within the framework of the toolkit for the dissemination and exchange of best practices will contribute to strengthening the capacities of different stakeholders in a cross-cutting manner in the project (Output 4.1.2).On the other hand, the knowledge and skills in regenerative production systems, good practices, sustainable management, biodiversity, soil and water management, and waste management of the people directly related to the pilots (at least 40 farms) will be strengthened, with a scope of at least 400 people, as well as all those who participate in the demonstration activities that will be developed over the 5 years of the project (Output 3.1.1). It should be noted that part of the indicators that are expected to be monitored in the pilots are related to decent employment and gender equity; therefore, feedback will be provided to the farms and companies participating in the topic, as well as in the public policy instruments that apply (Output 1.1.2).Actions focused on the development of marketing strategies (Output 3.2.2) will improve the income of producers and value chain actors, prioritizing Peasant and Indigenous Family Farming, and support the creation of decent employment opportunities and help reduce the income gap between men and women. It should be noted that the activities implemented by the project integrate the application of international labor standards and will support partnerships with local, regional and national stakeholders to build human capital by improving access to vocational and business training and strengthening stakeholder capacities. [1] In the definition applied by FAO decent rural employment refers to any activity, occupation, work, business or service performed by women and men, adults and youth, for remuneration or profit, in rural areas, that: 1) respects core labor standards as defined in ILO Conventions; 2) provides an adequate living income; 3) involves an adequate degree of job security and stability; 4) adopts basic occupational safety and health measures; 5) avoids excessive working hours and allows sufficient time for rest; 6) promotes access to technical and vocational training. Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of Agriculture, Chile CEO Endorsement Date ' Chile Vegetable farms (TAS Program) -37,76905 -72,79543 Vegetable farms (TAS Program) -38,42834 -72,43653 Vegetable farms (TAS Program) -37,98315 -72,79682 Vegetable farms (TAS Program) -38,54317 -72,28936 Vegetable farms (TAS Program) -39,10496 -72,90194 Vegetable farms (TAS Program) -38,94959 -72,57581 Eliana Schmidt farm -41,08716 -73.09563 Vegetable farms (TAS Program) -38,7047 -72,1136 Vegetable farms (TAS Program) -37,71779 -72,5757 Vegetable farms (TAS Program) -38,01213 -73,05044 Vegetable farms (TAS Program) -39,17173 -72,66922 Alex Wulf farm -41.39804 -73.58258 5966207 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11339 Global Environment Facility To expand and integrate nature-based solutions (NbS) and green infrastructure (GI) in cities and peri-urban areas in Chile to promote the conservation and restoration of biodiversity, mitigate climate change, and promote the health and wellbeing of people in urban areas Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.NbS and GI offer multiple environmental, social, and economic benefits. They are an approach that seeks to solve urban problems by leveraging the advantages and conditions that nature uses to solve them, addressing territorial, social, economic, and environmental challenges. The main social benefits of NbS and GI are directly related to people's health and well-being, improving the sense of community and social integration, contributing to gender equity and quality of life, providing recreational opportunities for communities, and promoting the reduction of vulnerability to climate change. At the national and local levels, the Project's social and economic benefits will contribute to promoting and strengthening the implementation of these solutions, improving living conditions in urban areas by generating access to green spaces, clean and conserved urban ecosystems, awareness-raising and education activities, and social integration. Furthermore, these benefits will provide opportunities for urban neighborhoods and communities to strengthen community NbS and GI networks and ensure their sustainability over time. The economic benefits generated by NbS and GI networks include a contribution to cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions in selected urban areas, cost-reductions due to the reduction of flooding and other climate-related threats, and employment opportunities. In this last aspect, they promote green jobs associated with activities and businesses involved sustainable urban development, environmental preservation, ecosystem restoration, tree planting, and generating business opportunities and local partnerships around circular economy and urban agri-food systems for food security and nutrition, contributing to the project’s objective of promoting the health and well being of people. According to the ILO definition, green jobs are "decent jobs that contribute to preserving and restoring the environment, whether in traditional sectors such as manufacturing and construction, or in emerging sectors such as renewable energy and energy efficiency." On the other hand, the ILO definition of decent work "means the opportunity to access productive employment generating a fair income, workplace security and social protection for all, improved prospects for personal development and social integration, freedom for individuals to express their opinions, organize and participate in decisions that affect their lives, and equality of opportunity and treatment for all, women and men." On the other hand, the SDG 8 on Decent employment and Economic Growth recommends integrating policies on decent urban employment, referring to productive work, offers a fair income, provides security, social protection, and opportunities for development within urban areas. It also includes freedom of expression, organization, and participation in decisions affecting workers. This approach is also applicable to rural areas, as recommended by FAO, and can contribute to strengthening urban-rural linkages.Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of Housing and Urbanism (MINVU) CEO Endorsement Date ' Chile 4742965 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11660 Global Environment Facility Chile enhances its capabilities to meet the reporting obligations under the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF) in line with the Climate Change Framework Law (LMCC), positioning itself as a regional reference in sustainable climate change systems. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Through improved and more transparent data, the project will also support increased local, regional, and national investments and improved decision-making. Timely, accessible, high-quality information will enable better decision-making and planning and increase transparency to improve governance and accountability. An appropriate transparency framework will generate multiple social, economic, and environmental co-benefits, including human capacity, local and national institutional strengthening, cost-effective national budgeting and planning, reduced vulnerability, and resilient natural resources and ecosystems. This project will provide access to data and information used for multi-sector GHG inventories that contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation. GHG data archiving and sharing with other national platforms will enhance the consistency of the data used for national climate change mitigation and adaptation and contribute to integrated approaches and solutions. Apart from the NDC, the project will also advance the goals and targets of the national plans and policies. Therefore, the major goals and activities of the GEF-funded CBIT-2 project are highly aligned with national environment and climate change-related national action plans.It is anticipated the CBIT-2 project will benefit the country’s social and environmental sectors by building the capacity of government officials and tracking progress against NDC priority mitigations, adaptation, and monitoring the climate finance in the country. As a signatory to the Paris Agreement, the country is committed to carrying out both adaptation and mitigation activities by maintaining ETF. The CBIT-2 project will advance efficient tracking, monitoring, and reporting of climate change adaptation and mitigation covering the sectors mentioned in the NDC of Chile with durable and robust interventions on coordination, and technical capacity building in adaptation and mitigation. Finally, the project will comply with national employment and labor laws and international commitments upon hiring project staff.Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of Environment of Chile CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Chile 1998630 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3998 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Ministry of Public Works CEO Approval Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 303030.00 303030.00 303030.00 909090 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4104 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Office of Agrarian Studies and Policy (Ministry of Agriculture) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Rural development]]+ 1172727.20 1172727.20 1172727.20 1172727.20 1172727.20 0 World Bank Office of Agrarian Studies and Policy (Ministry of Agriculture) 2691921 World Bank Office of Agrarian Studies and Policy (Ministry of Agriculture) 2361772 World Bank Office of Agrarian Studies and Policy (Ministry of Agriculture) 522252 World Bank Office of Agrarian Studies and Policy (Ministry of Agriculture) 0 World Bank Office of Agrarian Studies and Policy (Ministry of Agriculture) 287691 World Bank Office of Agrarian Studies and Policy (Ministry of Agriculture) 5863636 World Bank Office of Agrarian Studies and Policy (Ministry of Agriculture) 5863636 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4136 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IADB National Energy Commission (CNE) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Solar energy for centralised grids]]+ 545454.60 545454.60 545454.60 545454.60 545454.60 0 IADB National Energy Commission (CNE) 0 IADB National Energy Commission (CNE) 0 IADB National Energy Commission (CNE) 0 IADB National Energy Commission (CNE) 1372504 IADB National Energy Commission (CNE) 1314817 IADB National Energy Commission (CNE) 0 IADB National Energy Commission (CNE) 2244892 IADB National Energy Commission (CNE) 2727273 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4176 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IADB Chilean Agency for Energy Efficency (ACHEE) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Energy policy and administrative management]]+ 472800.00 472800.00 472800.00 472800.00 472800.00 0 IADB Chilean Agency for Energy Efficency (ACHEE) 0 IADB Chilean Agency for Energy Efficency (ACHEE) 0 IADB Chilean Agency for Energy Efficency (ACHEE) 0 IADB Chilean Agency for Energy Efficency (ACHEE) 0 IADB Chilean Agency for Energy Efficency (ACHEE) 2363360 IADB Chilean Agency for Energy Efficency (ACHEE) 2363360 IADB Chilean Agency for Energy Efficency (ACHEE) 2364000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4330 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP National Environment Commission (CONAMA) with support from SAG, CONAF and NGOs CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 800000.00 800000.00 800000.00 800000.00 800000.00 0 UNDP National Environment Commission (CONAMA) with support from SAG, CONAF and NGOs 0 UNDP National Environment Commission (CONAMA) with support from SAG, CONAF and NGOs 0 UNDP National Environment Commission (CONAMA) with support from SAG, CONAF and NGOs 0 UNDP National Environment Commission (CONAMA) with support from SAG, CONAF and NGOs 0 UNDP National Environment Commission (CONAMA) with support from SAG, CONAF and NGOs 4000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4939 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Environment CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 662322.80 662322.80 662322.80 662322.80 662322.80 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 1438187 UNDP Ministry of Environment 734542 UNDP Ministry of Environment 553900 UNDP Ministry of Environment 3304601 UNDP Ministry of Environment 3311614 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4968 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Centro de Información de los Recursos Naturales (CIREN) Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF); Instituto Nacional Forestal (INFOR) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 1258736.80 1258736.80 1258736.80 1258736.80 1258736.80 0 FAO Centro de Información de los Recursos Naturales (CIREN) Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF); Instituto Nacional Forestal (INFOR) 4280859 FAO Centro de Información de los Recursos Naturales (CIREN) Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF); Instituto Nacional Forestal (INFOR) 849227 FAO Centro de Información de los Recursos Naturales (CIREN) Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF); Instituto Nacional Forestal (INFOR) 6268564 FAO Centro de Información de los Recursos Naturales (CIREN) Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF); Instituto Nacional Forestal (INFOR) 1138478 FAO Centro de Información de los Recursos Naturales (CIREN) Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF); Instituto Nacional Forestal (INFOR) 6293684 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5135 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Environment Ministry Chile Sendero de Chile Foundation CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Chile +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1131440.20 1131440.20 1131440.20 1131440.20 1131440.20 0 UNEP Environment Ministry Chile Sendero de Chile Foundation 1856206 UNEP Environment Ministry Chile Sendero de Chile Foundation 538784 UNEP Environment Ministry Chile Sendero de Chile Foundation 1431303 UNEP Environment Ministry Chile Sendero de Chile Foundation 1069384 UNEP Environment Ministry Chile Sendero de Chile Foundation 557826 UNEP Environment Ministry Chile Sendero de Chile Foundation 203698 UNEP Environment Ministry Chile Sendero de Chile Foundation 5657201 UNEP Environment Ministry Chile Sendero de Chile Foundation 5657201 GEF