NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB25-GUSO CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Get Up Speak Out alliance (GUSO): This alliance consists of Rutgers, dance4life, Simavi, International Planned Parenthood Federation,STOP AIDS NOW!, CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality, in a partnership with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The GUSO programme addresses the following problem; Young people do not claim their sexual rights and their right to participation because of restrictions at community, societal, institutional and political levels. This hinders their access to comprehensive SRHR education and services that match their needs, and ability to make their own informed SRHR decisions. To address this problem the GUSO programme uses a multicomponent approach in which it links (i) provision of sexuality education and information, (ii) provision of quality, youth-friendly SRH services and (iii) building support for youth SRHR, by addressing socio-cultural and political barriers in terms of practices, norms and policies. CHOICE aims to empower young people to increasingly voice their rights, meaningfully involve young people in all stages of organizations and program, strengthen the capacity of youth-led organizations to become sustainable, and encourage, capacitate and empower youth advocates to advocate for their sexual and reproductive rights at local, national and international level. The long-term objectice of GUSO is: All young people, especially girls and young women, are empowered to realise their SRHR in societies that are positive towards young people’s sexuality. The GUSO Theory of Change consists of 5 Interrelated outcomes ot reach the long-term objective: 1. Strengthened and sustainable alliances 2. Empowered young people voice their rights 3. Increased use of SRHR information and education 4. Increased use of youth-friendly SRHR services 5. Improved socio-cultural and legal environment Young people aged (10-24) are both the actors and beneficiaries of the GUSO programme Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality +31 (0)20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org/ 438390 448774 451517 452134 386493 23544.60 Naya Kenya Guso 2020 first 30 percent CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality NAYA Kenya 15627.90 Taya Ethiopia Guso 2020 first 30 percent CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality TaYA Ethiopia 78482 NAYA GUSO 2020 52093 TaYA GUSO 2020 61086 CYECE GUSO 2020 31902 Taya Ethiopia GuSo 2019 first 50% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Talent Youth Association 34686 YECE Malawi GuSo 2019 part 2 CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 42472 Naya Kenya Guso 2019 grant second 50 percent CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Network of Adolescents and Youth of Africa (NAYA) Kenya 127991 GUSO funds 2020 Rutgers CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 18320.40 Yece Malawi Guso 2020 first 30 percent CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality CYECE Malawi 35000 Rutgers GuSo extra toezegging 2019 Rutgers CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 13729 TaYA ETH extra budget Rutgers CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 185050 Second advance Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 10626 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 19349 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education 26212.87 First advance CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen (ARI) 13221.50 ARI Indonesia GUSO 2018 Second Tranche 25% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 22455 First advance CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 43267 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 36374.50 First advance CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 11227.5 Third tranche (25%) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 11227.5 second tranche (25%) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 78060 Letter of Agreement 2018 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescent and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 21633.50 CYECE GUSO 2017 second tranche Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 26433 ARI Indonesia GuSo 2018 first tranche 50% ARI 429305 GUSO fifth tranche Rutgers CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 33671.16 ARI Indonesia GuSo 2019 first 50 percent CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 63804 TaYA Ethiopia GUSO 2019 LoA CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Talent Youth Association 253340 Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 21633.50 First advance CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 419688 Fourth advance Rutgers CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 20837 TAYA 3rd tranche GUSO 2020 grant 40% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality TaYA Ethiopia 24434 CYECE 3rd tranche GUSO 2020 grant 40% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality CYECE Malawi 31393 NAYA 3rd tranche GUSO 2020 40% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality NAYA Kenya 15000 RAHU Uganda seed grant CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 13221.50 ARI Indonesia GuSo 2018 third tranche 25% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 20186 Implementation grant Alliansi Remaja Indenpenden (ARI) 5285 Inception phase GUSO CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 33919 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescence and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 11875 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TAYA) 39030 NAYA Kenya GuSo 2018 tranche 2 50% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality NAYA Kenya 24335.50 Yece Malawi GUSO 2018 second 50% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality CYECE 13680 Inception phase GUSO CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen (ARI) 72749 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 44910 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 52425.74 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 504688 Third advance Rutgers 36374.50 Second tranche (50%) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescence and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 39030 First tranche 2018 (50%) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolscents and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 26553.5 First tranche 2018 (50%) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 9525 Inception phase GUSO CHOICE for Youth and Sexualtiy Network for Adolescent and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 48671 Letter of Agreement GUSO 2018 Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 24335.50 CYECE Malawi GUSO 2018 first tranche 50% Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 26212.87 ARI Indonesia GUSO 2017 second tranche ARI 26553.50 TaYA Ethiopia GUSO tranche 2 50% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Talent Youth Association 34685 CYECE Malawi GuSo 2019 first 50% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality CYECE 42471.50 Naya Kenya GuSo 2019 first 50% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality NAYA 7500 ARI Indonesia seed grant 2019 GuSo CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 67343.32 ARI Indonesia GUSO 2019 LoA CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 69371 CYECE Malawi GUSO 2019 LoA CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 84943 NAYA Kenya GUSO 2019 LoA CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality NAYA 2500 Seed grant youth adult partnership CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality International Planned Parenthood Federation 31902 Taya Ethiopia GuSo 2019 part 2 CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Talent Youth Association 127991 Rutgers GuSo advance 2020 Rutgers CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 23544.60 Naya Kenya GuSo 2020 grant part 2 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality NAYA Kenya 18325.80 YECE Malawi Guso grant 2020 part 2 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CYECE Malawi 15627 Taya Ethiopia GuSo grant 2020 part 2 30 percent CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association 52886 Letter of Agreement 2018 GUSO ARI 53408 Letter of Agreement 2018 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) CHOICE Output Training for Talent Youth Asssociation and other GUSO partners CHOICE Output Training of trainers on youth-led advocacy and MYP for Aliansi Remaja Independen CHOICE Output Training of trainers on youth-led advocacy and MYP for Aliansi Remaja Independen CHOICE Output Training of trainers for Aliansi Remaja Independen. Joint activity with Yes I Do program. CHOICE Output Training of trainers for Talent Youth Association and NPC and YCC. Joint activity with Yes I Do program. CHOICE Output Training of trainers for NAYA and NPC and YCC. Joint activity with Yes I Do program. CHOICE Output Training of trainers for CYECE. Joint activity with Yes I Do program. CHOICE Output ToT on MYP and Youth Empowerment. ToT jointly provided by CHOICE and dance4life and NAYA under the GUSO Capacity Strengthening Trajectory. CHOICE Output Training of trainers for Talent Youth Association and NPC and YCC. Joint activity with Yes I Do program. CHOICE Output Training of trainers for NAYA and NPC and YCC. Joint activity with Yes I Do program. CHOICE Output ToT on MYP and Youth Empowerment. ToT jointly provided by CHOICE and dance4life and NAYA under the GUSO Capacity Strengthening Trajectory. CHOICE Output MYP Summer School CHOICE Output MYP Summer School CHOICE Output Training for Talent Youth Association and DEC (1 rep). Joint activity with the Yes I Do Program. CHOICE Output Training for CYECE. Joint activity with the Yes I Do program. CHOICE Output Training for ARI. Joint activity with the Yes I Do Program. NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB25-8832-ID CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Get Up Speak Out alliance (GUSO): This alliance consists of Rutgers, dance4life, Simavi, International Planned Parenthood Federation,STOP AIDS NOW!, and CHOICE. The goal of this alliance is that all young people, especially girls and young women, are empowered to realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights in societies that are positive towards young people’s sexuality. The GUSO programme links (i) provision of sexuality education and information, (ii) provision of quality, youth-friendly SRH services and (iii) building support for youth SRHR, by addressing socio-cultural and political barriers in terms of practices, norms and policies. CHOICE aims to empower young people to increasingly voice their rights, meaningfully involve young people in all stages of organizations and program, strengthen the capacity of youth-led organizations to become sustainable, and encourage, capacitate and empower youth advocates to advocate for their sexual and reproductive rights at local, national and international level. Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen (ARI) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality +31 (0)20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org/ 13680 20186 52426 52866 67343 13221.5 ARI 25% 2018 13680 Inception phase GUSO CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen (ARI) 20475.39 26212.87 26433 52866 20186.35 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen (ARI) 19210.74 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 13419 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 26212.87 GUSO first advance 2017 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 52425.74 GUSO year budget ARI CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 11365.87 13221.50 17125.21 31596.36 Aliansi Remaja Independen 33671.16 ARI Indonesia GuSo 2019 first 50 percent 7500 ARI Indonesia seed grant 2019 GuSo 19897 CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output # of participants # of participants % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes Country-specific indicator CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output # of participants % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations and networks that represent the youth constituency Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator This was a joint activity with the Yes I Do program Output 5.b. # of people structurally involved in the implementation of the program on the community level Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations and networks that represent the youth constituency Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations and networks that represent the youth constituency Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB25-8830-KE CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Get Up Speak Out alliance (GUSO): This alliance consists of Rutgers, dance4life, Simavi, International Planned Parenthood Federation,STOP AIDS NOW!, and CHOICE. The goal of this alliance is that all young people, especially girls and young women, are empowered to realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights in societies that are positive towards young people’s sexuality. The GUSO programme links (i) provision of sexuality education and information, (ii) provision of quality, youth-friendly SRH services and (iii) building support for youth SRHR, by addressing socio-cultural and political barriers in terms of practices, norms and policies. CHOICE aims to empower young people to increasingly voice their rights, meaningfully involve young people in all stages of organizations and program, strengthen the capacity of youth-led organizations to become sustainable, and encourage, capacitate and empower youth advocates to advocate for their sexual and reproductive rights at local, national and international level. Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network for Adolescent and Youth of Africa CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality T: +31 (0)20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org/ 9525 33919 78060 78060 84943 78482 18056 42471 23544.6 48512 9525 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network for Adolescent and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 9688 Expenditure development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescence and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 33919 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescence and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 25844.2 Expenditure implementation grant 39030 First tranche 2018 (50%) 35481 NAYA 27056.12 57363 39030 36374.50 First tranche YID 31392.8 31900 Expenditure first tranche 76537.20 This number is an estimation yet to be settle 36374.5 second tranche (50%) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 42471 17082 23544.6 % of young people (under 25) representation in organisations structures and decision making processes % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # of Young people reached # of people structurally involved in the program (young people + adults) # of young people trained on MYP # of trainings provided on MYP # of people trained Target for total # of people trained % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency Total amount of young people involved in collaborations # of Young people reached Target for total # of people reached Total # of people structurally involved (young people + adults) # of young people trained on SRHR # of trainings provided on SRHR to young people # of young people trained on MYP # of trainings provided on MYP to young people # of young people trained on youth-led advocacy # of people trained Target for total # of people trained % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency # of Young people reached Target for total # of people reached # of Young people reached Target for total # of people reached Total # of people structurally involved (young people + adults) # of people trained Target for total # of people trained % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes % of young people (25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency # of Young people reached Target for total # of people reached # of Young people reached Target for total # of people reached Total # of people structurally involved (young people + adults) # of people trained # of young people trained on youth-led advocacy # of trainings provided on youth-led advocacy # of trainings provided on youth-led advocacy # of young people trained on MYP # of trainings provided on MYP to young people NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB25-8833-MW CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Get Up Speak Out alliance (GUSO): This alliance consists of Rutgers, dance4life, Simavi, International Planned Parenthood Federation,STOP AIDS NOW!, and CHOICE. The goal of this alliance is that all young people, especially girls and young women, are empowered to realise their sexual and reproductive health and rights in societies that are positive towards young people’s sexuality. The GUSO programme links (i) provision of sexuality education and information, (ii) provision of quality, youth-friendly SRH services and (iii) building support for youth SRHR, by addressing socio-cultural and political barriers in terms of practices, norms and policies. CHOICE aims to empower young people to increasingly voice their rights, meaningfully involve young people in all stages of organizations and program, strengthen the capacity of youth-led organizations to become sustainable, and encourage, capacitate and empower youth advocates to advocate for their sexual and reproductive rights at local, national and international level. Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality +31 (0)20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org/ 5285 19384.51 43267 48671 69371 61086 34686 24434.4 18320.40 18457 13152 19348 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 16998 Expenditure implementation advance 17323 CYECE Malawi GuSo 2017 first 50% of EUR 43.267 21633.50 CYECE Malawi GuSo 2017 first 50% of EUR 43.267 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 24335.50 CYECE Malawi GUSO 2018 second tranche 50% CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 21633.50 CYECE GUSO 2017 second tranche CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 24335.50 CYECE Malawi GUSO 2018 first tranche 50% CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 22025 34685 28425 61916 31618 18325.8 5285 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education 5277 Expenditure development grant 24283 # of educators trained Target for total # of people trained % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes CHOICE Output % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency Total amount of young people involved in collaborations # of educators trained # of young people reached with CSE # of young people reached with targeted outreach # of young people reached with CSE Number of indirect SRH services provided to young people Number of indirect SRH services provided to young people Number of condoms provided indirectly to young people Target for total # of people reached Number of service providers who have been trained in YFS Number of condoms provided to young people Number of condoms provided indirectly to young people Target for total # of people reached CHOICE Output CHOICE Output CHOICE Output Total # of people structurally involved (young people + adults) CHOICE Output Target for total # of people trained % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency # of people from your organization that have received training from the country alliance Target for total # of people trained % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes Total # of people structurally involved (young people + adults) Target for total # of people reached CHOICE Output CHOICE Output CHOICE Output CHOICE Output CHOICE Output % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency # of young people reached with CSE # of young people reached with CSE Number of service providers who have been trained in YFS Number of indirect SRH services provided to young people Number of condomsSRH services provided to young people Young people reached by other means (please specify) Target for total # of people reached Total # of people structurally involved (young people + adults) Target for total # of people reached CHOICE Output CHOICE Output CHOICE Output # of people from your organization that have received training from the country alliance % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency # of young people reached with CSE # of young people reached with CSE Number of indirect SRH services provided to young people Young people reached by other means (please specify) Target for total # of people reached Total # of people structurally involved (young people + adults) Target for total # of people reached NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB25-8831-ET CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Get Up Speak Out alliance (GUSO): This alliance consists of Rutgers, dance4life, Simavi, International Planned Parenthood Federation,STOP AIDS NOW!, and CHOICE. The goal of this alliance is that all young people, especially girls and young women, are empowered to realise their sexual and reproductive health and entitlements in societies that are positive towards young people’s sexuality. The GUSO programme links (i) provision of sexuality education and information, (ii) provision of quality, youth-friendly SRH services and (iii) building support for youth SRH, by addressing socio-cultural and political barriers in terms of practices and CHOICE aims to empower young people to meaningful participate in all stages of organizations and program, strengthen the capacity of youth-led organizations to become sustainable, and encourage, capacitate and empower young for them being able to voice their SRH entitlements. Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 10626 11875 44910 53107 63804 52093 27997 13729 TaYA extra budget 2018 11714 Expenditure development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 10485.8 Expenditure implementation advance 11227 26553 11227 15759 24010 24593.11 31902 Taya Ethiopia GuSo 2019 first 50% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Talent Youth Association 12179 35820.08 15627.90 TaYA GuSO 2020 first 30% 31902 Second tranche GUSO 2019 CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Talent Youth Association 10626 Inception phase GUSO CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 11875 Implementation grant 22455 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 26553.50 38168 15627.90 Taya Ethiopia GuSo grant 2020 part 2 30 percent 12589.92 20837 TAYA 3rd tranche GUSO 2020 grant 40% 28295 CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output # of participants % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator CHOICE output CHOICE output # of participants % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output CHOICE output # of participants % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency CHOICE output CHOICE output # of participants % of young people (under 25) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes % of young adults (aged 25-30) representation in your organisations structures and decision making processes # Number of collaborations among young people from different alliance related organisations/ networks that represent the youth constituency Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator Country-specific indicator NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB26-YID CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Millions of adolescent girls all over the world are facing a limited future because of early marriage (EM), teenage pregnancies and female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). With this project, by changing the attitude of community members and other key persons and informing adolescent girls and boys, adolescents will be empowered to stand up for their sexual reproductive health and rights (SRHR). Through education, (economic) empowerment and meaningful youth participation, supported by the relevant legislation and policies, the project will give adolescents alternatives beyond EM, teenage pregnancies and FGM/C. Through this alliance CHOICE works in 6 countries: Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Indonesia. In the YID-alliance CHOICE is the lead organisation on meaningful engagement and empowerment of young people. adolescents and young people (10-24) Deep-rooted norms and expectations of girls and boys makes families and communities feel the need to control the sexuality of girls by marrying them off and forcing them to undergo FGM/C. Gender inequality is putting girls in a subordinate position with regard to boys and men in (sexual) relationships. For example, girls cannot refuse to have unprotected sex and this is resulting in a high level of teenage pregnancies. Girls and boys lack a voice, as well as the support to break through these norms and practices. The means and structures available for adolescents to organise themselves and claim their rights are limited and they have little access to adolescent-friendly and good quality SRHR information and services. There are close links between EM, FGM/C and teenage pregnancies and girls’ lack of education. Indeed, girls’ access to education is very restricted, which makes it difficult for them to find jobs later. It also hampers their economic independence. Legislation to outlaw FGM/C is either inadequate or is being poorly implemented. Plan Nederland CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality +31 (0) 20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org 316052 491043 571765 554590 432700 18858.5 20056 12000 NAYA 3rd tranche YID 2020 40% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Network for Adolescents and Youth of Africa 40100 9000 8700 9000 14500 12000 TAYA 3rd tranche YID 2020 grant 40% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Talent Youth Association 40100 Coalizao 2nd tranche YID 2020 grant 50% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Coalizao Mozambique 11600 CYECE 3rd tranche YID 2020 grant 40% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education 21373 14500 2nd tranche YID grant (50%) 29000 30000 30000 80200 Coalizao 29000 GAL 8775 21372.5 53500 5510 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 4799 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen (ARI) 4195 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Coalizao Mozambique 5150 Development grant 4822 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 269810 First advance Plan Nederland 27004 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Coalizao 20486 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Generation Alive (GAL) 6474 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 26429 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 30736 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen (ARI) 24967 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescent and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 22068 Implementation grant Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 22399.50 First advance CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 29866 First advance CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 25386 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 23893 First advance CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 22398.50 First advance CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 50772 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 59732 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 49900.49 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 47786 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 44797 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 475793 Plan Nederland advance 2017 180537 Second advance 44799 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 24950 Naya Kenya YID 2017 first 50% CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 27004 Aug-Dec 2016 funds Yes I Do COALIZAO CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Associacao Coalizao da Juventude Mocambicana (COALIZAO) 24967 Aug-Dec 2016 NAYA funds Yes I Do CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescent Youth of Africa (NAYA) 22068 Aug-Dec 2016 funds Yes I Do TaYA CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 6474 Development budget 2016 Yes I Do CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 20486 Aug-Dec 2016 Funds Yes I Do Generation Alive CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Generation Alive (GAL) 5510 Development Phase budget Yes I Do Fund Generation Alive CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Generation Alive (GAL) 26429 Aug-Dec 2016 Yes I Do funds CYECE CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education 30736 Aug-Dec 2016 Yes I Do funds ARI CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Ramaja Independen (ARI) Indonesia 4799 Development phase 2016 Yes I Do ARI CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen (ARI) Indonesia 53409 Letter of Agreement 2018 Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 53408 Letter of Agreement 2018 Network of Adolescent and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 26704.5 First tranche 2018 (50%) Network of Adolescent and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 24950 second tranche 2017 Network of Adolescents and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 25386 second tranche 2017 Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 26704.50 Naya Kenya YID 2018 second 50% Network of Adolescent and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 22398.50 Coalizao Mozambique YID 2017 tranche 2 50% COALIZAO 22399.50 GenerationAlive Zambia YID 2017 part 2 50% Generation Alive 23562 Generation Alive 23893 CYECE Malawi YID second tranche 2017 50% Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education 25133 CYECE Malawi YID 2018 first tranche 50% Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education 14933 ARI Indonesia YID 2017 tranche 3 25% ARI 32166 ARI Indonesia YID 2018 first 50% ARI 64332 Letter of Agreement YID 2018 ARI 26704 M17-585 Taya Ethiopia YID 2018 first 50% Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 26704 Taya Ethiopia YID 2018 tranche 2 50% Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 147567 Letter of Agreement YID 2018 COALIZAO 23562 Generation Alive Zambia grant YID 2018 part 2 73784 Coalizao YID 2018 Mozambique part 2 grant 25133 Yes I Do CYECE Malawi 2018 Second tranche 50% 25144.5 ARI Indonesia YID 2019 first 50% 38000 Coalizao Mozambique 40112 CYECE Malawi 410984 42746 NAYA Kenya 21372.5 TAYA Ethiopia YID 2019 first 50% 37717 GAL Zambia 2019 50289 ARI Indonesia 330240 4191 Development Phase 2016 COALIZAO CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Associacao Coalizao da Juventude Mocambicana (COALIZAO) 5151 Development Phase funds Yes I Do NAYA CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescent Youth of Africa (NAYA) 4822 Development Phase 2016 Yes I Do CYECE CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) Malawi 32166 ARI Indonesia YID 2018 tranche 2 50% ARI 50266 Letter of Agreement 2018 - YID Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 47124 Letter of Agreement 2018 YID Generation Alive 14933 ARI Indonesia 2017 YID second tranche 25% ARI 9000 9000 8700 42745 TAYA Ethiopia 554590 YES I DO Plan NL 2018 advance Plan Nederland 73783.50 Coalizao Mozambique YID 2018 term 1 50% 21373 NAYA Kenya YID 2019 first 50% 18858.5 GAL Zambia YID 2019 first 50% 19000 COALIZAO Mozambique YID 2019 first 50% 20056 CYECE Malawi YID 2019 first 50% 34500 Coalizao Mozambique pathway 3 2019 part 1 CHOICE Output # of young trainers trained by CHOICE on youth leadership No target set Training for GAL and other beneficiaries of YID. In the training were 4 boys - 12 girls CHOICE Output # of young trainers trained by CHOICE on youth leadership No target set Training for CYECE. Joint activity with the Get Up Speak Out program. CHOICE Output # of young trainers trained by CHOICE on youth leadership No target set Training for Talent Youth Association and DEC (1 rep). Joint activity with the Get Up Speak Out Program. CHOICE Output # of young trainers trained by CHOICE on youth leadership No target set Training for ARI. CHOICE Output # of young people trained by CHOICE on MYP No target set Training for COALIZAO. CHOICE Output # of young MYP trainers trained by CHOICE No target set Training of trainers for Aliansi Remaja Independen. Joint activity with Get Up Speak Out program. CHOICE Output # of young MYP trainers trained by CHOICE No target set Training of trainers for Talent Youth Association and NPC and YCC. Joint activity with Get Up Speak Out program. CHOICE Output # of young MYP trainers trained by CHOICE No target set Training of trainers for NAYA and NPC and YCC (GUSO). Joint activity with Get Up Speak Out program. CHOICE Output # of young MYP trainers trained by CHOICE No target set Training of trainers for CYECE and Generation Alive (Zambia). Joint activity with Get Up Speak Out program. CHOICE Output # of young MYP trainers trained by CHOICE No target set Training of trainers for CYECE and Generation Alive (Zambia). Joint activity with Get Up Speak Out program. CHOICE Output # of young MYP trainers trained by CHOICE PW2.C1 No target set Training of trainers for COALIZAO. CHOICE Output # of adults trained on MYP by CHOICE No target set Training of trainers for Talent Youth Association and NPC and YCC (GUSO). Joint activity with Get Up Speak Out program. CHOICE Output # of adults trained on MYP by CHOICE No target set Training of trainers for NAYA and NPC and YCC (GUSO). Joint activity with Get Up Speak Out program. CHOICE Output # of adults trained on MYP by CHOICE No target set Training of trainers for CYECE and Generation Alive. Joint activity with Get Up Speak Out program. NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB24-RHRN CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Right Here Right Now (RHRN) is a strategic partnership between Rutgers Netherlands, Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre of Women (ARROW), CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality, dance4life, Hivos, International Planned Parenthood Federation Africa Region (IPPF AR), Latin American and Caribbean Women’s Health Network (LACWHN) and the Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs. The partnership addresses the limited protection and respect and the hindered fulfillment of the Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) of young people in 10 countries and one sub-region, in low- and middle-income countries in Africa (Kenya, Senegal, Uganda, Zimbabwe), Asia (Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal, Pakistan), and Latin America (Bolivia, Honduras) and the Caribbean, with a focus on: freedom from stigma, discrimination and violence, access to comprehensive youth-friendly services and to comprehensive information regarding young people’s SRHR, and space for young people’s voices and meaningful participation. CHOICE aims to ensure the meaningful participation of young people throughout the RHRN programme at all levels and in all phases. In addition to doing our own advocacy, CHOICE will also encourage, capacitate and empower youth advocates at the national and international level, ensuring that they can create a critical mass to advocate for and voice their SRHR. The long-term objective of RHRN is that young people, in all their diversity, acquire full and uninterrupted access to comprehensive sexuality education, and youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services, including safe abortion. This objective will be achieved through the increased capacity of civil society, including young people and youth-led organizations, to conduct concerted advocacy for a progressive and inclusive SRHR agenda at the (sub)national, regional, and international level. In addition, RHRN will advocate for and hold governments accountable to their adoption of progressive and inclusive policies (and budgets thereof) for the implementation of comprehensive sexuality education and youth-friendly SRH services, including safe abortion. The target group is young people from age 10 - 24. Young people are both the actors and beneficiaries of the programme. Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org/ 199796 207345 213728 223728 341028 96864.00 113481.00 112827.00 20000.00 111864.00 11700 170514 170514 47074.00 Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 47074.00 Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 58574.00 Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 47074.00 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 116864.00 Rutgers CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 96864.00 Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 104044.00 CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 200744.00 CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 96864.00 111864.00 Transfer RHRN 2019 Part 1 CHOICE Output RHRN MYP CHOICE Output RHRN MYP CHOICE Output RHRN YLA training for youth advocates RHRN youth advocates from Nepal Bolivia Honduras Caribbean and Indonesia CHOICE Output RHRN YLA training for youth advocates RHRN youth advocates from Nepal Bolivia Honduras Caribbean and Indonesia CHOICE Output Training for RHRN YLO host YUWA in Nepal on Multiannual strategy (mission, vision, goals, objectives and action plan) CHOICE Output RHRN YLA training for youth advocates from Nepal Honduras Caribbean Indonesia Netherlands GUSO youth advocates Malawi (CYECE), Ethiopia (TaYA) CHOICE Output RHRN YLA training for youth advocates from Nepal Honduras Caribbean Indonesia Netherlands GUSO youth advocates Malawi (CYECE), Ethiopia (TaYA) CHOICE Output RHRN MYP CHOICE Output RHRN MYP NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB26-8841-ET CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality The goal of YID programme is for adolescent girls to decide if, when and whom to marry and if, when and with whom to have children with, and are protected from FGM/C. The alliance uses multiple strategies to reach this desired impact, namely: social mobilization, meaningful engagement and empowerment of young people; improved SRH information and services; improved access to education and economic opportunities and dialogues Plan Nederland CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality +31 (0) 20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org 6474 22068 50772 53408 51521 30000 9000 8775 6522 12000 TAYA 3rd tranche YID 2020 grant 40% 14614 21372.5 6474 Expenditure development grant 6474 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 26704 22068 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 14632.8 Expenditure implementation grant 25386 First tranche 2017 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) 26369 25386 second tranche 2017 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 26704 First tranche 2018 (50%) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 30454.14 Talent Youth Assiociation 22674 30013 18791.53 9000 Taya Ethiopia YID grant 2020 second 30 percent 8284 21372.50 Taya Ethiopia YID 2019 first 50% CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Talent Youth Association partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome A community-based cluster sample survey was administered at the household level among young girls and boys aged 15-24 in two intervention areas (Woredas: Bahirdar Zuirya and Qewete in Amhara Region). The survey included question about child marriage. We obtained a sample size of 1600 using a standard formula- taking into account possible ?design effects? because of the clustered sampling- we multiplied the required sample by 1.5 and had a ratio of 75% female respondents and 25% male respondents. A total of 1602 questionnaires were administered- which was the planned target. numerator=321 denominator=579 partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome A community-based cluster sample survey was administered at the household level among young girls and boys aged 15-24 in two intervention areas (Woredas: Bahirdar Zuirya and Qewete in Amhara Region). The survey included question about child marriage. We obtained a sample size of 1600 using a standard formula- taking into account possible ?design effects? because of the clustered sampling- we multiplied the required sample by 1.5 and had a ratio of 75% female respondents and 25% male respondents. A total of 1602 questionnaires were administered- which was the planned target. numerator=427 denominator=553 partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome A community-based cluster sample survey was administered at the household level among young girls and boys aged 15-24 in two intervention areas (Woredas: Bahirdar Zuirya and Qewete in Amhara Region). The survey included question about child marriage. We obtained a sample size of 1600 using a standard formula- taking into account possible ?design effects? because of the clustered sampling- we multiplied the required sample by 1.5 and had a ratio of 75% female respondents and 25% male respondents. A total of 1602 questionnaires were administered- which was the planned target. numerator=149 denominator=229 partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome A community-based cluster sample survey was administered at the household level among young girls and boys aged 15-24 in two intervention areas (Woredas: Bahirdar Zuirya and Qewete in Amhara Region). The survey included question about child marriage. We obtained a sample size of 1600 using a standard formula- taking into account possible ?design effects? because of the clustered sampling- we multiplied the required sample by 1.5 and had a ratio of 75% female respondents and 25% male respondents. A total of 1602 questionnaires were administered- which was the planned target. numerator=176 denominator=241 partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome Semi-structured in-depth interviews with girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years. And focus group discussions with groups of girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and groups of boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years Scale 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=all. Girls and boys seem to have little space to advocate for themselves. Especially those not living in larger towns and cities. Some girls have increasing access to income generating activities which enable them to postpone age at first marriage negotiate whom and when to marry. For most young people it is difficult to talk about sexuality themes with parents or elders. partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome Meaningful Youth Participation Tool conducted by all YID organizations for report please see https://aidstream.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documents/MOT-analysis-Ethiopia-20180831080821.pdf Present level of meaningful youth participation score 1-5 (1=not present 2=present to a low extent 3=somewhat present 4=present to a high extent 5=present to a high extent). partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome One survey conducted among young people in the Yes I Do Alliance please see document link https://aidstream.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documents/YES-I-Do_MYP-Survey-results-Ethiopia-20180319030341.pdf Perceived level of meaningful youth participation score 1-5 (1=not present 2=present to a low extent 3=somewhat present 4=present to a high extent 5=present to a high extent). No contributing partner In Ethiopia different means for building MYP capacity of partner organizations were used: trainings on youth-adult partnerships and MYP follow up trainings and youth-adult dialogues. No contributing partner Staff members from Plan AMREF joint training for ECHO Qewete No contributing partner Staff members from Plan AMREF joint training for ECHO Qewete No contributing partner Staff members from Plan AMREF joint training for ECHO Qewete No contributing partner Staff members from Plan AMREF joint training for ECHO Qewete No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome all partners contributed to the outcome The data was collected through Key informant interviews with NGO staff and policy makers. Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=all Comment on the target No evidence was found regarding new or adjusted national or local (including by-law) and policies prohibiting CM and FGM/C all partners contributed to the outcome The data was collected through Key informant interviews with NGO staff and policy makers. Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=all Comment on the target Althought there is some political will at national regional and local level to eliminate child marriage there implementation committment is low. all partners contributed to the outcome all partners contributed to the outcome all partners contributed to the outcome all partners contributed to the outcome all partners contributed to the outcome all partners contributed to the outcome partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome numerator = 320 denominator = 575 Comment on the target numerator = 310 denominator = 578 partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome numerator = 426 denominator = 552 Comment on the target numerator = 426 denominator = 559 partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome numerator = 149 denominator = 229 Comment on the target numerator = 158 denominator = 220 partners Amref- DEC- PLAN contributed to the outcome numerator = 175 denominator = 240 Comment on the target numerator = 211 denominator = 232 all partners contributed to the outcome The data was collected through Key informant interviews with NGO staff and policy makers. Comment on the target No evidence was found regarding new or adjusted national or local laws or policies. The efforts have been more focused on raising awareness about the existing law and on enforcing the law through financial punishments in case of child marriage. At the national level there is the new national roadmap on harmful traditional practices. all partners contributed to the outcome The data was collected through Key informant interviews with NGO staff and policy makers. Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=all Comment on the target Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allThere seems to be general support for gender equality. Policy makers at district level express their motivation to support gender equality. The specific perceptions around gender equality vary. The study has limited evidence on the exact actions and strategies to support gender equality and rights. NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB26-8842-ID CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality The goal of YID programme is for adolescent girls to decide if, when and whom to marry and if, when and with whom to have children with, and are protected from FGM/C. The alliance uses multiple strategies to reach this desired impact, namely: social mobilization, meaningful engagement and empowerment of young people; improved SRH information and services; improved access to education and economic opportunities and dialogues Plan Nederland CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen (ARI) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality +31 (0) 20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org 4799 20186.35 47786 64332 50289 19145.20 Aliansi Remaja Independen 17368 30736 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 4728 Expenditure development grant 4799 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen (ARI) 14933 14933 12616.29 32166 64332 32166 29066.80 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 29866 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 59732 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Aliansi Remaja Independen 26840 39696 25144.50 ARI Indonesia YID grant 2019 first 50 percent CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Aliansi Remaje Independen 21506.28 no contributing partner numerator=59 denominator=598 no contributing partner numerator=65denominator=559 no contributing partner numerator=17denominator=201 no contributing partner numerator=22denominator=176 no contributing partner Semi-structured in-depth interviews with girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years. And focus group discussions with groups of girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and groups of boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allGirls and boys seem to have little capacity and or knowledge to advocate for themselves. Girls and boys have increased their capacities to advocate for themselves in relation to the prevention of child marriage. Girls tend to be more active than boys. In Sukabumi and West Lombok girls and boys have aspirations for their future but in Rembang less young people have aspirations for the future. No contributing partner. Meaningful Youth Participation Tool conducted by organizations in the Yes I Do Alliance please see: https://aidstream.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documents/MOT-Analysis_Indonesia-20180831080816.pdf for report Present level of meaningful youth participation score 1-5 (1=not present 2=present to a low extent 3=somewhat present 4=present to a high extent 5=present to a high extent). No contributing partner. urvey conducted among young people in the Yes I Do Alliance please see document link: https://aidstream.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documents/Yes-I-Do-MYP-Survey-Results-Indonesia-20180126020108.pdf Perceived level of meaningful youth participation score 1-5 (1=not present 2=present to a low extent 3=somewhat present 4=present to a high extent 5=present to a high extent). No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner Capacity on MYP by ARI. SRHR by Rutgers. Child protection by Plan. No contributing partner Capacity on MYP by ARI. SRHR by Rutgers. Child protection by Plan. No contributing partner Capacity on MYP by ARI. SRHR by Rutgers. Child protection by Plan. No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner Indonesia includes young people who participated in dialogue sessions on MYP in this indicator which explains the high score. In addition unspent budget from 2017 was used to reach more young people. No contributing partner Indonesia includes young people who participated in dialogue sessions on MYP in this indicator which explains the high score. No contributing partner Youth networks established in 3 district and have network structures workplan action plans etc. (according to the youth network checklist - for FAD and PE) Action plans for youth networks including peer education and campaigns for raising awareness on sexual and reproductive health rights issue Activities carried out (including the network action plan and beyond) by youth networks that aim to educate and raising awareness on SRHR issue Youth network capacitated SRHR by Rutgers WPF Indonesia / partners. MYP YAP advocacy leadership and organizational management by ARI. CP by Plan / partners. Youth network capacitated SRHR by Rutgers WPF Indonesia / partners. MYP YAP advocacy leadership and organizational management by ARI. CP by Plan / partners. Youth network capacitated SRHR by Rutgers WPF Indonesia / partners. MYP YAP advocacy leadership and organizational management by ARI. CP by Plan / partners. This indicator reveals the number of women and men between the ages of 10-24 capacitated SRHR by Rutgers WPF Indonesia / partners. MYP YAP advocacy leadership by ARI. CP by Plan / partners. The hope is that participants will be more confident to voice their rights and join the youth network. This indicator reveals the number of women and men between the ages of 10-24 capacitated SRHR by Rutgers WPF Indonesia / partners. MYP YAP advocacy leadership by ARI. CP by Plan / partners. The hope is that participants will be more confident to voice their rights and join the youth network. This indicator reveals the number of women and men between the ages of 10-24 capacitated SRHR by Rutgers WPF Indonesia / partners. MYP YAP advocacy leadership by ARI. CP by Plan / partners. The hope is that participants will be more confident to voice their rights and join the youth network. no contributing partner numerator=59 denominator=598 Comment on the target numerator = 550 denominator = 584 no contributing partner numerator=65denominator=559 Comment on the target numerator = 467 denominator = 563 no contributing partner numerator=17denominator=201 Comment on the target numerator = 194 denominator = 196 no contributing partner numerator=22denominator=176 Comment on the target numerator = 171 denominator = 187 no contributing partner Semi-structured in-depth interviews with girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years. And focus group discussions with groups of girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and groups of boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allGirls and boys seem to have little capacity and or knowledge to advocate for themselves. Comment on the target Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allFADs are more active in campaign for the prevention of CM in the village involve in national advocacies and collaborate with other youth groups and between FADs from other villages for the SRHR and anti-CM campaign. FAD members feel that they are more confident in expressing their opinion in the village and the family and in initiating activities in the village. NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB26-8844-ZM CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality The goal of YID programme is for adolescent girls to decide if, when and whom to marry and if, when and with whom to have children with, and are protected from FGM/C. The alliance uses multiple strategies to reach this desired impact, namely: social mobilization, meaningful engagement and empowerment of young people; improved SRH information and services; improved access to education and economic opportunities and dialogues Plan Nederland CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Generation Alive (GaL) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality +31 (0) 20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org 5510.03 20486 44799 47124 37717 29000 24341 Generation Alive YID Zambia first 50% 2017 grant Generation Alive (GAL) 14500 20950 7702 this number is an estimation yet to be settled 5510 Inception Phase YID CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Generation Alive (GaL) 23562 Generation Alive Zambia grant YID 2018 part 2 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Generation Alive 20797 18858.5 18463 GAL expenditures second half 2018 18858.5 20486 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Generation Alive (GAL) 5482 Expenditure development grant 22399.50 Generation Alive Zambia YID 2017 second tranche 50% CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Generation Alive 23562 Generation Alive Zambia YID 2018 first tranche 50% CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Generation Alive 22399.50 Generation Alive YID Zambia first 50% 2017 grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Generation Alive (GAL) 17912 Expenditure implementation grant 46471 18817 14500 No contributing partners A community-based cluster sample survey was administered at the household level among young girls and boys aged 15-24 in the intervention areas (Chadiza&Petauke) and control area (Katete). The survey included question about child marriage. We obtained a sample size of 1434 using a standard formula- taking into account possible design effects because of the clustered sampling- we multiplied the required sample by 1.5 and had a ratio of 75% female respondents and 25% male respondents. A total of 1455 questionnaires were administered. numerator=461denominator=516 No contributing partners A community-based cluster sample survey was administered at the household level among young girls and boys aged 15-24 in the intervention areas (Chadiza&Petauke) and control area (Katete). The survey included question about child marriage. We obtained a sample size of 1434 using a standard formula- taking into account possible design effects because of the clustered sampling- we multiplied the required sample by 1.5 and had a ratio of 75% female respondents and 25% male respondents. A total of 1455 questionnaires were administered. numerator=167denominator=191 No contributing partner Semi-structured in-depth interviews with girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years. And focus group discussions with groups of girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and groups of boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allGirls and boys seem to have little capacity to advocate for themselves. Comment on the target Girls and boys seem to have some capacity to advocate for themselves especially the youth involved in the Champions of Change and other youth clubs. However the voice of youth in general community meetings is still limited. No contributing partner. Meaningful Youth Participation Tool conducted by YID organizations. For report see https://aidstream.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documents/MOT-analysis-Zambia-2017-20180831090827.pdf Present level of meaningful youth participation score 1-5 (1=not present 2=present to a low extent 3=somewhat present 4=present to a high extent 5=present to a high extent). No contributing partner. Survey conducted among young people about meaningful youth participation. For report see https://aidstream.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documents/YID-MYP-SURVEY-REPORT-ZAMBIA-2017-20180831090803.pdf Perceived level of meaningful youth participation score 1-5 (1=not present 2=present to a low extent 3=somewhat present 4=present to a high extent 5=present to a high extent). No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner In Zambia besides training the partner organisations MYP capacity building focused on local organizations and community members of which 91 participated in an MYP training (not included in this number but in indicator PW2.CZ4). No contributing partner In Zambia besides training the partner organisations MYP capacity building focused on local organizations and community members of which 91 participated in an MYP training (not included in this number but in indicator PW2.CZ4). No contributing partner In Zambia besides training the partner organisations MYP capacity building focused on local organizations and community members of which 91 participated in an MYP training (not included in this number but in indicator PW2.CZ4). No contributing partner In Zambia besides training the partner organisations MYP capacity building focused on local organizations and community members of which 91 participated in an MYP training (not included in this number but in indicator PW2.CZ4). No contributing partner First time measured in 2019 No contributing partner First time measured in 2019 No contributing partner Policies are analysed and communication materials developed No contributing partners numerator=461denominator=516 Comment on the target numerator = 440 denominator = 613 No contributing partners numerator=167denominator=191 Comment on the target numerator = 162 denominator = 196 No contributing partner Semi-structured in-depth interviews with girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years. And focus group discussions with groups of girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and groups of boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allGirls and boys seem to have little capacity to advocate for themselves. Comment on the target Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allThere are some observed changes to young people's agency and capacity to speak out. Some participants spoke about improvements in intergenerational communication. Others said it was still difficult to discuss issues with adults. A conservative culture remains and young peoples' self-expression is mostly shaped by their outward appearance and hardly by contributing in for example community meetings which seems to limit self-expresions and agency. NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB26-8845-MZ CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality The goal of YID programme is for adolescent girls to decide if, when and whom to marry and if, when and with whom to have children with, and are protected from FGM/C. The alliance uses multiple strategies to reach this desired impact, namely: social mobilization, meaningful engagement and empowerment of young people; improved SRH information and services; improved access to education and economic opportunities and dialogues Plan Nederland CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Coalizão CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality +31 (0) 20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org 4190.50 27004 44797 147567 37717 80200 40100 40100 22691 COALIZAO Malawi YID 2017 first 50 percent 53500 4190 Expenditure development grant 26993 Expenditure implementation grant 22398.5 Coalizao Mozambique YID 2017 part 1 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality COALIZAO 22398.5 Coalizao Mozambique YID 2017 part 2 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 73783 Coalizao YID 2018 Mozambique part 2 grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality COALIZAO 22607 77713 19000 67157 COALIZAO expenditures second half of 2018 15305 34500 35368 50508 38007 27004 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 4195 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Coalizão 73783.50 Coalizao Mozambique YID 2018 term 1 50% CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality No contributing partners Due to COVID-19 and the related school closure in September 2020. it was not possible to use the same sampling framework for the end-line survey as for 2016 baseline study in Mogovolas (household sample n=715) and the 2017 Nampula and Rapale study (school-based sample n=943). The end-line survey therefore targeted young people (15-24 years. both female and male) involved in the Champions of Change activities in all three districts: Mogovolas (n=55). Nampula (n=35) and Rapale (n=74). The different sampling frame used for the end-line as result of COVID-19. makes comparison with the previous studies not possible and therefore. only the qualitative indicators have received a value in the IATI reporting. The qualitative component of the endline consists of interviews and focus group discussions with 41 young women and 21 young men (15-24 years). numerator=390denominator=596 Comment on the target no data available. Endline survey cancelled due to COVID No contributing partners Due to COVID-19 and the related school closure in September 2020. it was not possible to use the same sampling framework for the end-line survey as for 2016 baseline study in Mogovolas (household sample n=715) and the 2017 Nampula and Rapale study (school-based sample n=943). The end-line survey therefore targeted young people (15-24 years. both female and male) involved in the Champions of Change activities in all three districts: Mogovolas (n=55). Nampula (n=35) and Rapale (n=74). The different sampling frame used for the end-line as result of COVID-19. makes comparison with the previous studies not possible and therefore. only the qualitative indicators have received a value in the IATI reporting. The qualitative component of the endline consists of interviews and focus group discussions with 41 young women and 21 young men (15-24 years). numerator=75denominator=119 Comment on the target no data available. Endline survey cancelled due to COVID no contributing partner Due to COVID-19 and the related school closure in September 2020. it was not possible to use the same sampling framework for the end-line survey as for 2016 baseline study in Mogovolas (household sample n=715) and the 2017 Nampula and Rapale study (school-based sample n=943). The end-line survey therefore targeted young people (15-24 years. both female and male) involved in the Champions of Change activities in all three districts: Mogovolas (n=55). Nampula (n=35) and Rapale (n=74). The different sampling frame used for the end-line as result of COVID-19. makes comparison with the previous studies not possible and therefore. only the qualitative indicators have received a value in the IATI reporting. The qualitative component of the endline consists of interviews and focus group discussions with 41 young women and 21 young men (15-24 years). Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allGirls and boys seem to have little capacity to advocate for themselves. Comment on the target Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allSome youth indicated to have the capacity to advocate for themselves. However very few youth participate in decision-making in their communities. Several youth groups and or clubs exist. Youth in these groups advocate against child marriage and teenage pregnancies through lectures in the communities and schools. Peer to peer groups formed under projects such Yes I Do and geração Bizz were said to play an important role in facilitating the discussing about such topics. This shows some improvement as compared to the baseline. No contributing partners numerator=390denominator=596 Comment on the target No contributing partners numerator=75denominator=119 Comment on the target no contributing partner Semi-structured- in-depth interviews with girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years. And focus group discussions with groups of girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years- groups of boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allGirls and boys seem to have little capacity to advocate for themselves. Comment on the target Girls and boys seem to have little capacity to advocate for themselves in Nametil. Youth engagement in general is limited as young people are rarely invited in community activities organized by adults and intergenerational communication is generally poor. However there are a number of active youth activists who conduct awareness raising activities such as lectures in the SAAJ and school or theater activies. There were more of these activist in the past in Nametil but under the YIDA programme a small number have continued. Most young people address their concerns and SRHR issues between peers and some refer to the youth activists and youth/school clubs as a space to participate and communicate. No contributing partner. Present level of meaningful youth participation score 1-5 (1=not present 2=present to a low extent 3=somewhat present 4=present to a high extent 5=present to a high extent). No contributing partner. Survey conducted among young people in the Yes I Do Alliance please see document link https://aidstream.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documents/Yes-I-Do-MYP-Survey-Analysis-Mozambique-2018-20180426080452.pdf Perceived level of meaningful youth participation score 1-5 (1=not present 2=present to a low extent 3=somewhat present 4=present to a high extent 5=present to a high extent). No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner In Mozambique young people participated in the multisectoral committees which are community structures representing various community members to end child marriage. No contributing partner In Mozambique young people participated in the multisectoral committees which are community structures representing various community members to end child marriage. No contributing partner In Mozambique young people participated in the multisectoral committees which are community structures representing various community members to end child marriage. No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB26-8830-KE CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality The goal of YID programme is for adolescent girls to decide if, when and whom to marry and if, when and with whom to have children with, and are protected from FGM/C. The alliance uses multiple strategies to reach this desired impact, namely: social mobilization, meaningful engagement and empowerment of young people; improved SRH information and services; improved access to education and economic opportunities and dialogues Plan Nederland CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescents and Youth of Africa (NAYA) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality +31 (0) 20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org 5151 24967 49900.49 53409 42746 30000 21373 24967 Implementation grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescent and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 22825 Expenditure first tranche 26704.5 First tranche 2018 (50%) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 21373 9000 8858.23 9000 12000 29025.77 5151 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Network of Adolescent and Youth of Africa (NAYA) 5085 26705 16041.9 Expenditure implementation grant 24950 First tranche YID 2017 24950 second tranche 2017 (50%) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 22255.54 NAYA 32985.20 37102 5982.01 17991 No contributing partners numerator=375denominator=506 No contributing partners numerator=150denominator=175 no contributing partner Semi-structured in-depth interviews with girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years. And focus group discussions with groups of girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and groups of boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allMainly girls seem to have little capacity and space to advocate for themselves. Boys are more accepted to advocate for themselves. Most girls and boys admit that they have very little space to advocate for their issues especially issues that go against the culture or are sensitive. Within the household boys are capable to talk directly with their father but girls mainly have to communicate via their mother with the father who is the main decision maker in the household. Boys and girls feel more safe to discuss sensitive issues with their teachers or at church fora. young people are not very much organised to join forces to advocate for their issues. However girls or boys with higher education are more respected and can provide a bit more input. No contributing partner. Meaningful Youth Participation Tool conducted by YID organizations. For report see https://aidstream.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documents/MOT-analysis-Kenya-2017--20180831100825.pdf Present level of meaningful youth participation score 1-5 (1=not present 2=present to a low extent 3=somewhat present 4=present to a high extent 5=present to a high extent). No contributing partner. ne survey conducted among young people in the Yes I Do alliance please see document link https://aidstream.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/documents/YES-I-Do_MYP-Survey-results-Kenya-20180319020331.pdf Perceived level of meaningful youth participation score 1-5 (1=not present 2=present to a low extent 3=somewhat present 4=present to a high extent 5=present to a high extent). No contributing partner NAYA started to train people outside of the partner organizations which explains the low result compared to target. No contributing partner NAYA started to train people outside of the partner organizations which explains the low result compared to target. No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner No contributing partner New indicator hence no target available for 2018. In Kenya 14 young people were involved in a local gender responsive budgetting proces and 100 young people form part of community structures. No contributing partner New indicator hence no target available for 2018. In Kenya 14 young people were involved in a local gender responsive budgetting proces and 100 young people form part of community structures. No contributing partner New indicator hence no target available for 2018. In Kenya 14 young people were involved in a local gender responsive budgetting proces and 100 young people form part of community structures. No contributing partners numerator=375denominator=506 numerator = 444 denominator = 553 No contributing partners numerator=150denominator=175 numerator = 139 denominator = 170 no contributing partner Semi-structured in-depth interviews with girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years. And focus group discussions with groups of girls aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years and groups of boys aged between 15-19 and 20-24 years Scale: 0=no 1=few 2=some 3=most 4=allMainly girls seem to have little capacity and space to advocate for themselves. Boys are more accepted to advocate for themselves. no contributing partner The data was collected through Key informant interviews with NGO staff and policy makers. NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB26-8843-MW CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality The goal of YID programme is for adolescent girls to decide if, when and whom to marry and if, when and with whom to have children with, and are protected from FGM/C. The alliance uses multiple strategies to reach this desired impact, namely: social mobilization, meaningful engagement and empowerment of young people; improved SRH information and services; improved access to education and economic opportunities and dialogues Adolescents and youth (10-24) Plan Nederland CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality +31 (0) 20 737 0179 info@choiceforyouth.org http://www.choiceforyouth.org 4821.90 26429 47786 50226 40231 29000 5693.61 20056 4822 Development grant CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education 4767 18942 Expenditure implementation grant 24084 CYECE Malawi YID 2017 first 50 percent 26429 Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 23893 CYECE Malawi YID second tranche 2017 50% CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 25133 CYECE Malawi YID 2018 first tranche 50% CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education (CYECE) 25133 CYECE Malawi YID 2018 grant part 2 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education 21394 20056 28582 10789.73 8700 27677 CYECE Malawi YID 2017 second 50 percent 20046 8700 11600 29963 23893 CYECE Malawi YID 2017 first 50 percent CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Centre for Youth Empowerment and Civic Education NL-KVK-32108345-NL-KVK-32108345-XM-DAC-7-PPR-4000 002659 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality The themes are:1) Meaningful youth participation (MYP) within the policies of the Ministry.2) Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV), including in conflict, humanitarian and refugee settings, and SRH services for survivors.Sub-themes:a. Recognition, accountability and prevention.b. Access to youth friendly SRH services for survivors of SGBV.c. Celebration of and commitment to UNSCR 1325, with its 20-year anniversary in 2020. Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs In a time where global public health is the world’s main concern, it is even more evident that SRHR, gender equality and bodily autonomy are essential human rights and need to be treated as such. Youth, minorities and displaced persons most often have the least access to fulfilling their SRH, through inaccessible services, education, or lack of decent work. In response to the visibleregressive trend, MoFA and YASRHR emphasize the necessity of continued promotion of SRHR, gender equality and bodily autonomy. 112530 88111 88111 88111 88111 80768 Ministry Buza voorschot 400002659 termijn 2 The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 80768 BuZa Youth ambassador 19-23 part 1 The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 72104 Actual Sept 2020 - Sept 2021 70800 Actual July 2019 - August 2020 80768 121911 123682 141344 128920 112700 NL-KVK-32108345-YASRHR-240000137 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality The role of Youth Ambassador SRHR, Gender Equality and Bodily Autonomy was set up by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) and CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality in 2015. Through this program, the MoFA and CHOICE, work together to give young people a voice and a platform to advocate for their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and their meaningful and inclusive participation in all areas of decision-making; at the national, regional and international level. This partnership contributes to the development of progressive and inclusive policies for young people and emphasizes the importance of meaningful and inclusive youth participation in the design, development and implementation of sexual health policies. The YASRHR represents a crucial link between young people and the departments that focus on international cooperation of the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) to ensure that their work is in line with the realities of young people. By creating effective channels of collaboration and information exchange, the YASRHR enables policies to be more reflective of the realities of young people so that the solutions brought by these policies adequately represent their needs. The YASRHR program provides a safe and structured space for young people to be meaningfully and inclusively included when it comes to policies on SRHR. The intended end result of the program is as follows:  “Through the work of the YASRHR, young people are given an official voice in promoting SRHR policy in the Netherlands and globally through empowering young people to become leaders and advocates of SRHR around the world”. Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality info@choiceforyouth.org http://choiceforyouth.org +31 (0)20 737 0179 In a time where global public health is a major concern, it is even more evident that SRHR, gender equality and bodily autonomy are essential human rights and need to be treated as such. Youth, minorities and displaced persons most often have the least access to fulfilling their SRH, through inaccessible services, education, or lack of decent work. In response to the visible regressive trend and shrinking civic space, MoFA and YASRHR emphasize the necessity of continued promotion of SRHR, gender equality and bodily autonomy. 127436 124967 121976 NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB36 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Right Here Right Now 2 (RHRN2) builds on the successes of its predecessor Right Here Right Now (2016-2020) funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The new partnership, RHRN2 (2021-2025) consists of consortium partners Rutgers (lead), AMPF, ARROW, CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality, RHU, and RNW Media, and technical partners Dance4Life and IPPF AR.The strategic objective of RHRN2 is for young people in all their diversity to enjoy their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in gender-just societies. By placing young people at the forefront of the partnership, RHRN2 seeks:• to increase public support for SRHR;• to improve policies and laws; and• to strengthen civil society.CHOICE is the youth-led partner in the consortium of the RHRN2 partnership and focuses on meaningful youth participation in decision-making and youth-led advocacy on youth's SRHR and bodily autonomy. Rutgers CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Starting date of the program. Planned end of the program. CHOICE is based in the Netherlands. Human rights. Reproductive health care. Health education. Family planning. 518107 491531 491531 LoA RHRN 2022 Rutgers CHOICE 245766 Second advance received from lead agent. Rutgers is the lead agent in RHRN2 CHOICE is a consortium partner in the RHRN2 program. 518106 LoA RHRN 2021 Rutgers CHOICE 536010 LoA RHRN 2024 Rutgers CHOICE 268005 Advance RHRN 2024 (1) Rutgers CHOICE 268005 Advance RHRN 2024 (2) Rugers CHOICE 578103 2024 Expenditure CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE 435687 2021 Expenditure CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE 542180 LoA RHRN 2023 Rutgers CHOICE 271090 Advance RHRN 2023 (1) Rutgers CHOICE 594683 2023 Expenditure CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE 271090 Advance RHRN 2023 (2) Rugers CHOICE 573475 2025 Expenditure CHOICE CHOICE CHOICE 582718 LoA RHRN 2025 Rutgers CHOICE 299181 Advance RHRN 2025 CHOICE (2) Rutgers CHOICE 291359 Advance RHRN 2025 CHOICE (1) Rutgers CHOICE 245765 Advances received from lead agent. Rutgers is the lead agent in RHRN2 CHOICE is a consortium partner in the RHRN2 program. -16310 Return advances to Rutgers 2025 CHOICE Rutgers 477172 Total expenditure 2022 Rutgers is the lead agent in RHRN2 CHOICE is a consortium partner in the RHRN2 program. 259053 Consortium budget CHOICE. Rutgers is lead organization in RHRN2. CHOICE is part of the consortium in RHRN2. 259053 Consortium budget CHOICE. Rutgers is the lead organization in RHRN2. CHOICE is part of the consortium in RHRN2. A critical mass reinforces positive norms and values regarding young people's SRHR and gender # of young people (female) reached by campaigns and dialogues Target setting will be conducted in 2022. No gender disaggregated data for online reach No gender disaggregated data for online reach No gender disaggregated data for online reach No gender disaggregated data for online reach # of young people (male) reached by campaigns and dialogues Target setting will be conducted in 2022. No gender disaggregated data for online reach No gender disaggregated data for online reach No gender disaggregated data for online reach No gender disaggregated data for online reach # of young people (other) reached by campaigns and dialogues Target setting will be conducted in 2022. No gender disaggregated data for online reach No gender disaggregated data for online reach No gender disaggregated data for online reach No gender disaggregated data for online reach # of young people (gender non-specified) reached by campaigns and dialogues Target setting will be conducted in 2022. Online reach of CHOICE website, YouthDoIt website and social media campaigns/posts on GEF and International Safe Abortion Day and an online survey (Sekswijzer). Online reach of CHOICE website and social media campaigns and posts on Intersecting Movements, Demystifying UN, and SRHR Recommendations, amongst others. This includes De-mystify the UN articles on the CHOICE website and social media campaigns such as Mythbusting SRHR and International Youth Day. This includes partners who attended CHOICE Connector Week, the MIYP CoP sessions, trainings, CHOICE Townhalls, advocacy strategy sessions and Extravaganzas. This total also captures young people reached via our website and social media, and those who engaged with our social media. Strengthened civil society for young people's SRHR and gender justice # of CS and L&L events Target setting will be conducted in 2022. This includes the CHOICE Connector Week, GYQN Youth funding session, MIYP Community of Practice, MIYP VCAT training, PMEL training for youth-led organisation, GEF Unconference and HRC side event This included Community of Practice on MIYP, Youth Leadership training for Bangladesh, Fundraising training for Ethiopia, amongst others. This included Community of Practice on MIYP, Connector Week, HRC training, MIYP and Advocacy workshop with the Ethiopia coalition, amongst others. This included HRC Learning Extravaganza, ICPD Knowledge Sharing Sessions, Post-UPR training for Benin partners, MIYP training in Nepal, Youth Engage MIYP CoP sessions, MIYP ToT training for Ethiopia. This includes CHOICE Connector Week, 2 x online MIYP CoP sessions, Advocacy strategy sessions and learning Extravaganza's ahead of the CPD and HRC, Townhall session on innovative Youth Led projects and 3 x capacity strengthening workshops (in Bangaldesh on MIYP and YLO Sustainability, in Nepal on Advocacy Skills, and in Benin on Strategic Planning) # of people Target setting will be conducted in 2022. 50 female, 45 male, 4 other, and 96 not specified 8 female; we adapted how we calculate this number to avoid double-counting. # of organisations Target setting will be conducted in 2022. 7 LGBTI-led organisations 1 youth-led organisation NL-KVK-32108345-NLBB35 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality The Power to You(th) partnership is a Dutch ministry funded programme, that unites Amref Flying Doctors, Rutgers and Sonke Gender Justice, along with technical partners Royal Tropical Institute and CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality. Its overall objective is to contribute to adolescent girls and young women from underserved communities being meaningfully included in all decision-making, particularly focusing on harmful practices, sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) and unintended pregnancies. The programme is implemented in seven countries: Ethiopia, Ghana, Indonesia, Kenya, Malawi, Senegal and Uganda, with coordination support and advocacy activities conducted in the Netherlands and globally. As a technical partner, CHOICE’s mandate is to support youth-led organisations (YLOs) and ensure meaningful youth participation (MYP) throughout the programme. Amref Flying Doctors CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality Start date End date Netherlands Human Rights Reproductive health Health education 222414 220414 219014 224364 217864 166536 Expenditures made by CHOICE in 2024 from PtY budget CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 220414 Advances received from lead agent Amref Flying Doctors CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 217864 CHOICE Global Youth Group Budget Amref Flying Doctors CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 221148 Expenditures made by CHOICE in 2025 from PtY budget CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 205928 Expenditures made by CHOICE in 2022 from PtY budget CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 18212 CHOICE expenditure from Global Youth Group Budget CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 4691 CHOICE expenditure on advocacy processes CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 175680 CHOICE LOE and overhead expenditure 2021 CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 8000 CHOICE Advocacy Budget Amref Flying Doctors CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 174914 CHOICE Consortium budget 2021 Amref Flying Doctors CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 39500 CHOICE Global Youth Group Budget Amref Flying Doctors CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 229353 Expenditures made by CHOICE in 2023 from PtY budget CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality 224364 CHOICE Global Youth Group Budget Amref Flying Doctors CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality 219014 CHOICE Global Youth Group Budget Amref Flying Doctors CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality NL-KVK-32108345-WYL_CHOICE CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality When You(th) Lead is a fully youth-led programme funded by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and implemented in Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda. The programme seeks to improve young peoples’ access to youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) services and knowledge so that all young people can fully realise and enjoy their SRHR and bodily autonomy. When You(th) Lead focuses on these three countries as young people in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda face many barriers to accessing their SRHR and right to participation in SRHR decision-making. These young people continue to face limited access to services, stigma, high unintended pregnancy rates, gaps in sexuality education, and restricted freedom in terms of sexuality. Despite their demographic strength, young people are systematically excluded from influencing SRHR decisions that impact their own bodies and futures. Over four years, this programme will provide multi-year funding to three youth-led organisations in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda. Together, we will tackle challenges in youth SRHR through a multi-level approach that drives structural and lasting transformation. When You(th) Lead empowers young people with knowledge, ensures services are youth-responsive, and mobilises communities and institutions to support SRHR. Through these interconnected pathways When You(th) Lead builds a resilient and lasting ecosystem in which all young people can fully realise their SRHR and bodily autonomy. Talent Youth Association Ethiopia (TaYA) SRHR Alliance Kenya Uganda Network of Young People Living with HIV/AIDS Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Chloe Fafard PMEL Coordinator info@choiceforyouth.org https://www.choiceforyouth.org/ Keizersgracht 177, 1016 DR Amsterdam CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Sophia Balsamo Youth Leadership & Programme Lead sophia@choiceforyouth.org CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Carla Cecconi Financial Controller carla@choiceforyouth.org UNYPA TaYA SRHR Alliance Kenya Activities implemented under When You(th) Lead primarily support access and information to sensitive, youth-friendly SRHR, as well as developing support for youth voices in SRHR policy decision-making. 1161091.56 1023088.33 1034277.14 1073288.97 300000 982395 982395 993583 809939 Proposal for When You(th) Lead Programme submitted to and accepted by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands Inception report detailing set-up and framework of WYL programme, including final revised budget, theory of action, and governance framework. Submitted alongside 2027 annual work plan, revised multi-year budget Conducted in August 2026, this report looks at 5 key indicators of the When You(th) Lead programme to establish a baseline for impact evaluation. Evaluation was conducted in Kenya, Uganda, and Ethiopia and supported by young peer researchers. Narrative work plan for When You(th) Lead 2027 planned activities and expenditures. Consolidation of work plans from 3 implementing partner countries, as well as thematic coordination efforts, annual budget, and risk mitigation. NL-KVK-32108345-WYL_ETHIOPIA CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality TaYA is the Ethiopian organisation conducting activities through the When You(th) Lead programme. CHOICE disburses funds to TaYA through the programme. CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Carys Stirling Youth Leadership & Programme Advisor carys@choiceforyouth.org 143000 143000 143000 143000 135850 78650 57200 78650 57200 78650 57200 Description of activities conducted by TaYA as an in-country implementing partner of When You(th) Lead Budget for implementation of When You(th) Lead in 2026 by in-country partner, TaYA NL-KVK-32108345-WYL_UGANDA CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality UNYPA is the Ugandan organisation conducting activities through the When You(th) Lead programme. CHOICE disburses funds to UNYPA through the programme. CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Jessica Steffens Resource Mobilisation Coordinatior jessica@choiceforyouth.org 143000 143000 143000 143000 135850 78650 57200 78650 57200 78650 57200 Description of planned actitivies for 2026 implementation period of WYL, conducted by in-country implementation partner UNYPA Budget for 2026 implementation period of WYL by in-country implementing partner UNYPA NL-KVK-32108345-WYL_KENYA CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality SRHR Alliance Kenya is the Kenyan organisation conducting activities through the When You(th) Lead programme. CHOICE disburses funds to SRHR Alliance Kenya through the programme. CHOICE for Youth and Sexuality CHOICE for Youth & Sexuality Chloe Farfard PMEL & Programmes Advisor chloe@choiceforyouth.org 143000 143000 143000 143000 135850 78650 57200 78650 57200 78650 57200 Description of activities to be conducted in 2026 implementation period for WYL, by in-country implementing partner SRHR Alliance Kenya Budget provided for activities conducted in 2026 implementation period for WYL, by in-country implementing partner SRHR Alliance Kenya