US-EIN-521257057-CoalitionforUrbanTransitions World Resources Institute The Coalition for Urban Transitions seeks to build the global and national political commitment necessary to shift rapidly urbanizing countries towards a more compact, connected, coordinated model of urban development to support the SDGs and Paris Agenda. Launched in May 2016, the Coalition is a special initiative of the New Climate Economy (NCE) and is hosted by the World Resources Institute (WRI) Ross Center for Sustainable Cities and jointly managed by the C40 Climate Leadership Group. The Coalition is a partnership of 20+ leading urban focused institutions and leaders. Our mission is to support national governments - working together with city leaders - to unlock the power of cities to support enhanced national economic, social, and environmental prosperity, including reducing climate risks. It recognizes that successful cities are at the core of prosperous countries. The Coalition has two components – a Country Program and a Global Solutions Program – which will be complemented by flagship global synthesis reports, and active outreach and dissemination to decision - makers directly and at convening moments. UK - Department for International Development (DFID) Overseas Development Institute C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group Economic and Social Research Foundation (ESRF) University of Leeds World Resources Institute Larissa Da Silva Senior Manager, Global Projects & Initiatives +1 (202) 729-7930 ldasilva@wri.org 10 G Street NE, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20010 1701397 1669251 629017 128028.94 319082.94 53874.20 4537.73 ESRF 26402.64 London School of Economics 31463.22 IIED 15000 Arhdi University 38600 London School of Economics 10349.36 ESRF 5400 C40 4500 C40 35459.64 London School of Economics 45598.18 London School of Economics 32607 IIED 653.97 C40 33474.78 5419 C40 15112.91 ESRF 36480.75 ACC 10000 Mzumbe University 32800 LSE 13833 ACC 7512.17 C40 7512.17 C40 8100 C40 10000 ESRF 5893 University of Leeds 72981 ACC 39156 ACC 209130.84 17200 London School of Economics 27488 ACC 33575 IIED 26104 ESRF 30069 IIED 31033.5 ACC 31033.5 ACC 30124.00 Overseas Development Institute 450 C40 22895.72 C40 8100 C40 36480.75 African Centre for Cities 1500 ESRF 8918 ESRF 63077 ESRF 10000 Ardhi University 12500 Mzumbe University 81093.83 London School of Economics 38600 London School of Economics 32800 London School of Economics 23573.79 London School of Economics 123000 London School of Economics 10000 Leeds 69914.92 Leeds 51626.77 23573.79 20000 C40 50838 C40 8100 C40 4538.98 13758.30 C40 1794.33 IIED 41122.57 IIED 15000 ESRF 12500 Mzumbe University 23573.79 LSE 46772.46 IIED 556.53 World Resources Institute C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group 20233.07 World Resources Institute C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group 54519.25 African Center for Cities 71148 African Center for Cities 3000 African Center for Cities 12833 African Center for Cities 9910 Ardhi University 15000 Arhdi University 15000 Economic and Social Research Foundation 15000 Economic and Social Research Foundation 29800 London School of Economics 9480 Mzumbe University 23573.79 University of Leeds 23574 University of Leeds US-EIN-521257057-LowCarbonDevelopmentInitiativeForIndonesia World Resources Institute The Low Carbon Development in Indonesia is a program to implement new climate economy and new food and land use economy in Indonesia. It will undertake systematic economy-wide assessment and provide independent and authoritative evidence on the relationship between actions that strengthen economic performance and those that reduce the risk of climate change. In addition to examining economic sectors such as in forestry, agriculture, and peat, attention will be given to the overall performance of food and land-uses systems. The program intends to identify opportunities where policy reforms, investment and business solutions could yield large multiple benefits for the economy, society and the environment. It aims to contribute to building a low carbon development in Indonesia through new climate economy at a national level and sustainable food and land use economy in selected sub-national jurisdictions of East Kalimantan, South Sumatra, and Papua/West Papua. At a national level, it will develop an investment model to inform Indonesia’s Mid-term National Development Planning (RPJMN) strategic environmental assessment and to achieve Indonesia’s global commitment to emissions reduction. The investment model will be supported by background studies for several sectors, including forestry and agriculture, that document stakeholder’s knowledge in these sectors to inform the country’s development and investment options. Moreover, it will establish science-based targets and pathways at scale to include national and sub-national levels and agreed upon by multi-stakeholders in the public and private sectors; provide business solutions that raise ambition of the private sector; and present these in action roadmaps with innovations that can mobilize financing and investments. It will also identify key policies, investments and actions needed to establish a new food and land use economy, which enhances agricultural productivity and rural livelihoods, addresses food waste, improves diets while at the same time protecting forests and biodiversity and increasing Indonesia's resilience and adaptation to climate change. Combined these will aim at providing proof points for key sectors (such as in forestry and agriculture) in specified jurisdictions (such as in East Kalimantan) where opportunities and policy reforms are likely to yield the largest economic, social and environmental impacts and co-benefits. UK - Department for International Development (DFID) Overseas Development Institute Helen Mountford Global Director, Economics +1 (202) 729-7748 HMountford@WRI.org 252430 605135 742525 2184000 1016000 57500 WRI Indonesia 3420 Global Printing / More Vang 221434.38 WRI Indonesia 17544 The Nature Conservancy 20000 26844 The Nature Conservancy 230000 WRI Indonesia 250100 27266 Climate Policy Initiative 817.20 Consultant Eva Intan Nurwendah 798.95 Consultant Fauzan Ahmad 14400 Consultant Leonardo Garrido 517.12 Consultant Laura Villegas Ortiz 14400 Consultant Leonardo Garrido 14400 Consultant Leonardo Garrido 17187.60 Consultant Leonardo Garrido 15840 Consultant Leonardo Garrido 496.77 Consultant Medrilzam 847.85 Consultant Muhammad Tasrif 2192.70 Novotel Katowice Centrum 774.95 Consultant Praditia Rahadi 1687.50 Pt. Kharisma Persona Komun 8922.70 Sari Pacifit Jakarta 1381.28 The Grand Bali Nusa Dua 225169 260660 55238 182000 197776 48309 24049 133969 182278 171212 100000 WRI Indonesia 15000 Consultant Andrea Bassi 2500 Consultant David Brown 15000 Consultant Andrea Bassi 29086 Climate Policy Initiative 12740.81 Consultant Andrea Bassi 43648 Climate Policy Initiative 580.46 Consultant Dudi Chandra 4545 Epstein Creative LLC 11122.95 Consultant Andrea Bassi 4845 Epstein Creative LLC 22500 Consultant Andrea Bassi 442.50 Epstein Creative LLC 17000 Erwinsyah 581.83 Consultant Fauzan Ahmad 120.63 Consultant Praditia Rahadi 6851.50 Consultant Andrea Bassi 3824.48 Consultant Griselda Raisa Susanto 5062.50 Pt. Kharisma Persona Komun 383.29 Consultant Bagdus Indrawah Hardi 1512.64 Consultant Griselda Raisa Susanto 442.09 Consultant Rizka Nadia 32833.30 International Institute for Sustainable Development 1338.96 Systemiq 21757.19 20000 WRI Indonesia 17324.7 International Institute for Sustainable Development 26355 The Nature Conservancy 12918 WRI Indonesia 335.16 Consultant Ina Juniarti 17653 The Nature Conservancy 14400 Consultant Leonardo Garrido 14400 Consultant Leonardo Garrido 144000 Consultant Leonardo Garrido 17500 18637.5 801.7 Consultant Muhammad Anwari Leksono 466.27 785.52 Consultant Muhammad Faruk Rosyaridho 581.83 Consultant Muhammad Tasrif 44600 Overseas Development Institute 311.55 Overseas Development Institute US-EIN-521257057-StrategicPlan2018-2022 World Resources Institute See attached document. Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs World Resources Institute Starts beginning of FY18. Ends at end of FY22. World Resources Institute Managing for Results Aaron Holdway Manager for Global Results +1 (202) 729-7675 aholdway@wri.org http://www.wri.org/profile/aaron-holdway 10 G St NE, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20002 Location of WRI International Office. Location of WRI International Office. Location of WRI International Office. Location of WRI International Office. Location of WRI International Office. Location of WRI International Office. 4300000 4300000 4300000 4300000 4300000 4300000 4300000 4300000 4300000 4300000 4300000 Indicator: Percentage of the world’s food sold by these companies [target: 5%; FY18 baseline: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 16 organizations recruited that serve 150 million meals already recruited. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of countries with transparent geospatial information platforms frequently updated using information from Global Forest Watch and related data [target: 15+; FY18 baseline: 6]. Indicator: Number of new national or sub‐national governance reforms or new incentives [target: 20+ additional; FY18 baseline: a review of data is ongoing]. Indicator: Number of countries utilizing components of WRI’s Restoration Opportunity Assessment Methodology (or similar) method to inform strategies that will lead to improved enabling conditions [target: 5 additional; FY18 baseline: 25]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Tanzania and Mozambique — countries of vast mountain ranges and open stretches of plateaus — now face a growing land problem. As soil degradation, climate change and population growth place enormous strains on the natural resources that sustain millions of people, multinational companies are also gunning for large swaths of land across both countries. Caught between these pressures, many poor, rural communities get displaced or decide to sell their collectively held land. While they almost always get the short end of the stick in commercial land deals, women struggle more than men to rebuild their lives and livelihoods when villages resettle. A Fair Share for Women: Toward More Equitable Land Compensation and Resettlement in Tanzania and Mozambique finds that, despite constitutional commitments to gender equality, governments in Tanzania and Mozambique are not protecting poor, rural women from harmful commercial land deals. State officials’ failure to close gaps in land laws and overhaul ineffective regulations shortchanges women who receive little to no payment for their families’ land. Attempts to amplify women’s voices in community land decision-making are also falling short. But advancing women’s land rights, from equal treatment in commercial land deals to better representation in community decision-making, is critical to achieving gender equality not just in Tanzania and Mozambique, but also in countries across Africa. This working paper provides recommendations that government officials, private sector leads and civil society can adopt to improve gender equity in commercial land acquisitions. http://www.wri.org/publication/a-fair-share-for-women Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Forest Atlas dashboards present summary information, graphics, and statistics derived from national datasets and GFW. Dashboard content and proposed indicators to track have been developed for DRC, ROC, and Liberia, and are under development in Cameroon. Final content will be published on the Atlas country platforms in summer 2019. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 In DRC, WRI and partners drafted the official guidance from the government on what should be included in community forest management plans. Field missions carried out in 2 provinces, guidelines revised, and the validation workshop was held in early May. Final steps for the year will include distributing the finalized guide and developing simplified communications materials for a local audience. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 The Central Africa team has made significant progress on several new analyses including · The 2017 and 2018 reports on major deforestation events in DRC · The land use baseline analysis in Republic of Congo that will be developed into a briefing note for policy-makers · A blog series showcasing analysis of what is happening in DRC’s forests based on Forest Atlas and GFW data. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator:Number of cites committed to taking a GHG inventory and setting GHG reduction targets through the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy [target: 10,000+; FY18 baseline: 7,450]. Indicator:Number of companies that set ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets and report progress toward them [target: 500+; FY18 baseline: 300]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Completed technical assistance for 8 cities--Shanghai, Wuhan, Chengdu, Shenzhen, Nanjing, Guangzhou, Qingdao, and Hongkong. Waiting for C40 (funder) to confirm the ninth city, potentially Fuzhou. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Strengthen accountability for global commitments. Drive responsible supply chains for forest‐risk commodities. Empower forest defenders to expose and combat deforestation and illegal logging. Catalyze a broadbased restoration movement whereby communities and commercial enterprises gain access to the knowledge, expertise and finance they need to engage in successful restoration of degraded lands. Enable sound forest and land management in targeted countries and landscapes. Indicator: Number of new countries. Indicator: Organizations using WRI policy advice, analyses, data, and tools or interventions to proactively identify and mitigate deforestation and/or illegal logging in their supply chains, investment portfolios, or jurisdictions. Disaggregated for Global Forest Watch Pro. For each commodity, companies covering 40% of commodity trade Indicator: Organizations using WRI policy advice, analyses, data, and tools or interventions to proactively identify and mitigate deforestation and/or illegal logging in their supply chains, investment portfolios, or jurisdictions. Disaggregated for Open Timber Portal--Republic of Congo target. Indicator: Number of instances of the above. Data collection underway. Indicator: Number of countries in which the above takes place. Data collection underway. Indicator: Number of community‐based organizations, small-to‐ medium enterprises, corporations, financiers, subnational government agencies, national government agencies, members of regional initiatives, members of the Bonn Challenge, the Global Restoration Council, and the Global Partnership on Forest and Landscape Restoration (GPFLR) actively engaging on the restoration agenda. Data collection underway. Indicator: Number of countries in which the above takes place. Data collection underway. Indicator: Dollars invested in or donated to restoration activities or projects. Indicator: Number of countries with transparent geospatial information platforms frequently updated using information from Global Forest Watch and related data. Indicator: Number of new national or sub‐national governance reforms or new incentives. A review of data is ongoing. Indicator: Number of countries utilizing components of WRI’s Resotration Opportunity Assessment Methodology (or similar) method to inform strategies that will lead to improved enabling conditions. Indicator: Organizations using WRI policy advice, analyses, data, and tools or interventions to proactively identify and mitigate deforestation and/or illegal logging in their supply chains, investment portfolios, or jurisdictions. Disaggregated for Open Timber Portal--DRC target. TBD until current moratorium resolved. Indicator: Organizations using WRI policy advice, analyses, data, and tools or interventions to proactively identify and mitigate deforestation and/or illegal logging in their supply chains, investment portfolios, or jurisdictions. Disaggregated for Open Timber Portal--targets for other countries will be set as OTP expands. Targets will be set as OTP expands. Develop a common, evidence-based narrative and recommendations on how to create a transformational, sustainable new Ocean economy. Catalyze and accelerate Ocean action by building and supporting public-and private-sector coalitions and connecting existing efforts. Ensure accountability and coherence by monitoring progress against commitments, identifying gaps needing urgent attention, and helping create coalitions that can address these. Indicator: Number of media stories per year covering this message. Indicator: Number of heads of state making this argument. Indicator: Significant progress has been made at the World Trade Organization to end harmful fisheries subsidies. TBD TBD TBD Indicator: Pacific Rim countries ratify the Port State Measures Agreement to seek to end illegal fishing in the Pacific. TBD TBD Indicator: WRI helps catalyze on-the-ground and transformative action to address plastic pollution in multiple countries. TBD TBD Indicator: Countries reach their marine protected area commitments to designate 10% of national waters as protected by 2020 under SDG 14 and the Aichi target under the Convention on Biological Diversity. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Indicator: Organizations using WRI policy advice, analyses, data, and tools or interventions to proactively identify and mitigate deforestation and/or illegal logging in their supply chains, investment portfolios, or jurisdictions. Disaggregated for Global Forest Watch Pro [target: for each commodity, companies covering 40% of commodity trade; FY18 baseline for all: 0.] Disaggregated for Open Timber Portal [targets: Republic of Congo: 60% of active companies; DRC: TBD after the current moratorium is resolved; targets for other countries will be set as the Open Timber Portal expands; FY18 baseline for all: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 FLI has organized trainings with timber trade federations in key import markets (UK, Germany, France, EU-wide), and supported various trainings for IMs in the Congo Basin Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of cities [target: 40+ cities; FY18 baseline: 10]. Indicator: Dollars of public or private financing invested in projects as a result of the urban finance work [target: US$5 billion by 2022; FY18 baseline: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of cities [target: 50+ additional cities; FY18 baseline: 67]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of cities in which capacity‐building and short‐term assistance occurs [target: 50+; FY18 baseline: 31 cities in 18 countries]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator:Number of media stories per year covering this message [target: 20+]. Indicator:Number of heads of state making this argument [target: 10+] Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Mobilize large energy users’ demand for clean electricity. Build capacity for governments and cities to adopt energy efficiency and clean urban energy. Spotlight latent demand for clean energy services and connect financing and solution providers to extend energy access. Indicator: Number of states/regions in which utilities and suppliers offer new clean energy products as a result of buyer engagement. Indicator: Amount of additional capacity under contract globally. GW GW Indicator: Number of cities/districts successfully implementing renewable energy strategies. Pilot development underway. Pilot development underway. Indicator: Dollars of funding accessible to partner cities for efficiency improvements. Program development underway. Program development underway. Indicator: Number of entrepreneurs. Maps under development. Maps under development. Indicator: Dollars of investment secured by entrepreneurs. Maps under development. Maps under development. Indicator: Number of financial intermediaries. Maps under development. Maps under development. Indicator: Dollars of investment channeled by financial intermediaries. Maps under development. Maps under development. Get countries and companies to use WRI Food Loss & Waste Protocol and urge policy and practice changes through a high‐level group of champions. Encourage more sustainable diets. Restore yields on degraded lands through mapping restoration opportunities, helping put enabling conditions in place, and convening continent‐wide public-private partnerships on restoration. Indicator: Percentage of the world’s population covered by these countries. Indicator: Number of the 50 largest food companies with active food loss and water reduction programs. Indicator: Number of the above companies working with their supply chains. Indicator: Percentage of the world’s food sold by these companies. Indicator: Percentage of market share, within each target sector in each geography, in which the innovations are adopted. Indicator: Number of hectares. Methodology under development. Methodology under development. Indicator: Number of hectares of the above land having supporting policies, practices, and/or investments in place. Methodology under development. Methodology under development. Indicator: Number of additional public officials and stakeholders trained [target: 3200; FY18 baseline: 2086]. Indicator: Number of additional cities accounted for by the above officials and stakeholders [target: 228; FY18 baseline: 148]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of companies that align with targets and watershed stewardship practices to reduce local water stress and meet SDG 6 [target: 20+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of companies that use WRI Scope 2 methodology to reduce impacts on water stress embedded in consumed energy [target: 20+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 The four economic case studies are complete. We have released WRI Reports for two case studies (Rio and Sao Paulo), and have draft publications being finalized for Vitoria and Monterey. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of cities that implement master plans using WRI’s City Water Assessment framework and tools to build greater water security and resilience [target: 10+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of cities WRI assists to make low-carbon investments for water supply and sanitation, such as water reuse and sludge-to-energy wastewater treatment systems [target: 10+; FY18 baseline: 4, all in China]. Indicator: Dollars of innovative financing for specific source water protection or restoration activities issued by city water utilities working with WRI [target: US$50+ million; FY18 baseline: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Help countries – with active engagement from other stakeholders – understand where there is greatest potential for progressively increasing climate action in their NDCs, in ways that are aligned with development objectives. Help build up a dynamic and robust international regime that creates transparent rules of the game and fosters ever greater ambition from countries and non‐state actors. Indicator: Number of countries that have submitted enhanced NDCs. Indicator: Number of countries better equipped to mobilize finance to implement their NDCs. Indicator: Number of cites committed to taking a GHG inventory and setting GHG reduction targets through the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy. Indicator: Number of companies that set ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets and report progress toward them. Indicator: Number of countries that have integrated adaptation into development plans, policies, and actions. Indicator: Number of multilateral development banks that have integrated adaptation into development plans, policies, and actions. Indicator: Number of governments demonstrating a commitment to tranformative adaptation through plans, policies, strategies, or other formal mechanisms. Indicator: Extent to which effective rules and processes for transparency and accountability are adopted by UNFCCC (none (0)/weak (1)/moderate (2)/strong (3); provide justification). Indicator: Extent to which a clear process and pathway to assess and increase climate action and support are adopted by UNFCCC (none (0)/weak (1)/moderate (2)/strong (3); provide justification). Indicator: Extent to which rules and processes adopted by UNFCCC are in operation (none (0)/weak (1)/moderate (2)/strong (3); provide justification). Indicator: Number of countries that have put in place new measures, mechanisms, or institutions to implement their NDCs attributable at least in part to WRI’s support. Indicator: Number of countries that develop or improve long-term strategies informed by WRI analysis. Indicator:Number of countries that track and report progress toward their NDCs. Indicator: Extent to which effective rules and processes for transparency and accountability are adopted by UNFCCC (none (0)/weak (1)/moderate (2)/strong (3); provide justification). Extent to which a clear process and pathway to assess and increase climate action and support are adopted by UNFCCC (none (0)/weak (1)/moderate (2)/strong (3); provide justification). Extent to which rules and processes adopted by UNFCCC are in operation (none (0)/weak (1)/moderate (2)/strong (3); provide justification). Indicator: Number of media stories per year covering this message [target: 20+]. Indicator: Number of heads of state making this argument [target: 10+]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Significant progress has been made at the World Trade Organization to end harmful fisheries subsidies. Pacific Rim countries ratify the Port State Measures Agreement to seek to end illegal fishing in the Pacific [target: 11+ additional countries]. WRI helps catalyze on-the-ground and transformative action to address plastic pollution in multiple countries [target 6+]. Countries reach their marine protected area commitments to designate 10% of national waters as protected by 2020 under SDG 14 and the Aichi target under the Convention on Biological Diversity. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of instances of the above [100+; FY18 baseline: data collection under way]. Indicator: Number of countries in which the above takes place [target: 10+; FY18 baseline: data collection under way]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Missions are being conducted in the Congo Basin with IM organizations in the Citizen Voice for Change Project funded by the EU and led by CIDT, in coordination with Open Timber Portal team to insure well-documented quality reporting. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 In Cameroon, WRI has conducted GLAD alert trainings for national and regional forest law enforcement brigades. In DRC, WRI has trained civil society monitors at the provincial level in use of GLAD alerts and Forest Watcher. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of entrepreneurs [target: 15+; FY18 baseline: 0 – maps under development]. Indicator: Dollars of investment secured by entrepreneurs [target: US$15+ million; FY18 baseline: 0 – maps under development]. Indicator: Number of financial intermediaries [target: 4; FY18 baseline: 0 – maps under development]. Indicator: Dollars of investment channeled by financial intermediaries [target: US$100 million; FY18 baseline: 0 – maps under development]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Work with national planning agencies or ministries to co-create maps for Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda: Maps for all 3 countries are being co-created. There is a formal agreement with the MoE in Uganda, and we are seeking similar with REA in Tanzania and ERC in Kenya Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Percentage of partner cities that apply WRI tools [target: 30 percent; FY18 baseline: 0 – tools under development]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Leverage WRI online Aqueduct platform on global water risk to catalyze private sector action on watershed stewardship. Identify countries facing serious water risks and help government leaders understand and act to reduce these risks. Help cities shift toward resilient, low-carbon water infrastructure. Indicator: Number of companies that align with targets and watershed stewardship practices to reduce local water stress and meet SDG 6. Indicator: Number of companies that use WRI Scope 2 methodology to reduce impacts on water stress embedded in consumed energy. Indicator: Number of countries that use Aqueduct to pinpoint areas of high water stress and food security risk, identify mitigation steps, and make investments to reduce risks. Indicator: Number of cities that implement master plans using WRI’s City Water Assessment framework and tools to build greater water security and resilience. Indicator: Number of cities WRI assists to make low-carbon investments for water supply and sanitation, such as water reuse and sludge-to-energy wastewater treatment systems. All in China. Indicator: Dollars of innovative financing for specific source water protection or restoration activities issued by city water utilities working with WRI. Indicator: Portion of WRI data-oriented projects using Resource Watch team for strategic support, data access, and/or platform functionality. Indicator: Number of external projects powered by the Resource Watch open-source architecture and/or application programming interface (API). Indicator: Number of datasets downloaded per month, as an indicator of further in-depth use of Resource Watch data. Indicator: Number of hectares [target: 25+ million; FY18 baseline: methodology under development]. Indicator: Number of hectares of the above land having supporting policies, practices, and/or investments in place [target: 5+ million; FY18 baseline: methodology under development]. Indicator: Number of community-based organizations, small-to-medium enterprises, corporations, financiers, subnational government agencies, national government agencies, members of regional initiatives, members of the Bonn Challenge, the Global Restoration Council, and the Global Partnership on Forest and Landscape Restoration (GPFLR) actively engaging on the restoration agenda [target: 500+; FY18 baseline: data collection under way]. Indicator: Number of countries in which the above takes place [target: 30+ countries; FY18 baseline: data collection under way]. Indicator: Dollars invested in or donated to restoration activities or projects [target: US$3 billion; FY18 baseline: US$350 million]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 A 100 Landscapes prototype has been built and was socialized at the AFR100 annual meeting in Nairobi. It includes 4 case studies from Kenya, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Niger. This year we are working on ‘customer development’ to refine the platform, build out a mobile component, and take it live. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 The Restoration Monitoring Indicators Framework was launched and is being applied in multiple countries in Africa, including Malawi. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 We’ll work in 5 countries to develop landscape-level action plans. Kenya will likely be the first country to develop this. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of major companies that have adopted and are implementing circular economy business model approaches in their supply chains, production, in-life and end-of-life impact [target: 20; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of major companies that have adopted and are implementing business model approaches that substitute for high-consumption patterns [target: to be added; FY18 baseline: to be added]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of major companies that have adopted and are implementing circular economy business model approaches in their supply chains, production, in-life and end-of-life impact [target: 20; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of major companies that have adopted and are implementing business model approaches that substitute for high-consumption patterns [target: to be added; FY18 baseline: to be added]. Indicator: Number of companies and industry coalitions using WRI-WRAP method(s) and definitions to evaluate environmental and social impacts of reuse business models. Indicator: Number of companies setting ambitious targets for clothing reuse. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of countries that have submitted enhanced NDCs [target: 10+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of countries that have put in place new measures, mechanisms, or institutions to implement their NDCs attributable at least in part to WRI’s support [target: 10+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of countries better equipped to mobilize finance to implement their NDCs [target: 4+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Percentage of P4G scale-up partnerships that contribute to successful solutions/models ready for replication and scale. Indicator: Percentage of P4G scale-up partnerships where commercial partners have committed financial contribution (not in-kind). o Indicator: Percentage of P4G scale-up partnerships that contribute to successful solutions/models ready for replication and scale. o Indicator: Percentage of P4G scale-up partnerships where commercial partners have committed financial contribution (not in-kind). Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of countries that use Aqueduct to pinpoint areas of high water stress and food security risk, identify mitigation steps, and make investments to reduce risks [target: 5+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of major companies that have adopted and are implementing circular economy business model approaches in their supply chains, production, in-life and end-of-life impact. TBD Number of major companies that have adopted and are implementing business model approaches that substitute for high-consumption patterns. TBD TBD TBD Indicator: Number of companies and industry coalitions using WRI-WRAP method(s) and definitions to evaluate environmental and social impacts of reuse business models. TBD Indicator: Number of companies setting ambitious targets for clothing reuse. TBD Indicator: Percentage of P4G scale-up partnerships that contribute to successful solutions/models ready for replication and scale. TBD Indicator: Percentage of P4G scale-up partnerships where commercial partners have committed financial contribution (not in-kind). TBD Indicator: Portion of WRI data-oriented projects using Resource Watch team for strategic support, data access, and/or platform functionality [target: 75+%; FY18 baseline: 70%]. Indicator: Number of external projects powered by the Resource Watch open-source architecture and/or application programming interface (API) [target: 6; FY18 baseline: 3]. Indicator: Number of datasets downloaded, as an indicator of further in-depth use of Resource Watch data [target: 500 per month; FY18 baseline: 250 per month] Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Add at least 25 new datasets, and at least 12 new blogs, keeping its inventory of the best available global social and environmental data up-to-date. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of countries that develop or improve long-term strategies informed by WRI analysis [target: 10+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of countries that track and report progress toward their NDCs [target: 25+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 The GHG Platform India’s work was recognized in the Government of India’s Biennial Update Report to the UNFCCC. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of countries that have integrated adaptation into development plans, policies, and actions [target: 20; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of multilateral development banks that have integrated adaptation into development plans, policies, and actions [target: 5; FY18 baseline: 0] Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 PREPdata used in India and Costa Rica. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator:Extent to which effective rules and processes for transparency and accountability are adopted by UNFCCC (none/weak/moderate/strong; provide justification)[target: strong; FY18 baseline: none]. Indicator:Extent to which a clear process and pathway to assess and increase climate action and support are adopted by UNFCCC (none/weak/moderate/strong; provide justification) [target: strong; FY18 baseline: none]. Indicator:Extent to which rules and processes adopted by UNFCCC are in operation (none/weak/moderate/strong; provide justification) [target: strong; FY18 baseline: to be added] [target: strong; FY18 baseline: none]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of cities. Indicator: Dollars of public or private financing invested in projects as a result of the urban finance work. Indicator: Number of cities. Indicator: Number of cities in which capacity‐building and short‐term assistance occurs. In 18 countries. Indicator: Percentage of partner cities that apply WRI tools. Tools under development. Tools under development. Indicator: Number of additional public officials and stakeholders trained. Indicator: Number of additional cities accounted for by the above officials and stakeholders. Indicator: Number of the 50 largest food companies with active food loss and water reduction programs [target: 10+; FY18 baseline: 2]. Indicator: Number of the above companies working with their supply chains [target: 5+; FY18 baseline: 1]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Recruited Mayor of London, new CEO of Sodexo, VP of World Bank, and new CEO of Unilever. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Percentage of market share, within each target sector in each geography, in which the innovations are adopted [target: 20+ percent; FY18 baseline: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Highly successful. Research findings covered in over 260 media outlets. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Percentage of the world’s population covered by these countries. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 One notable area of progress is the agreement of methodology by the EU member countries (based on FLW Protocol recommendations) to ensure consistent measurement of food loss and waste by countries. In May, EU passed requirement for all member states to measure and report by 2022. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of new countries [target: 15+; FY18 baseline: 4]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 We released 2018 TCL data earlier than any previous year. We also released GFW’s new plantations dataset – based on a compilation of spatially explicit data on planted trees from 82 countries and a range of sources and the new pantropical primary forest data from UMD. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of states/regions in which utilities and suppliers offer new clean energy products as a result of buyer engagement [target: 20; FY18 baseline: 8]. Indicator: Amount of additional capacity under contract globally [target: 75 additional GW; FY18 baseline: 1.7]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Work with 3 municipalities in Mexico to assess new green power procurement options. Complete a technical, economic and policy analysis of grid impacts to support electrification of transport solutions in Mexico. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Operationalize a coalition of 18 cities in the Pennsylvania, Jersey, Maryland Power Pool wholesale market to support market rules that enable clean energy deployment. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of cities/districts successfully implementing renewable energy strategies [target: 15; FY18 baseline: 0 – pilot development underway]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Dollars of funding accessible to partner cities for efficiency improvements [target: US$500 million; FY18 baseline: 0 – program development underway]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of companies that have adopted science-based targets to reduce water use, land use, or other natural resources consumption [target: to be added; FY18 baseline: to be defined]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator:Number of governments demonstrating a commitment to transformative adaptation through plans, policies, strategies, or other formal mechanisms [target: 2-3; FY18 baseline: 0] Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 India and Costa Rica Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of countries that have submitted enhanced NDCs [target: 10+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of countries that have put in place additional measures, mechanisms, or institutions to implement their NDCs [target: 10+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of countries better equipped to mobilize finance to implement their NDCs [target: 4+; FY18 baseline: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Action Roadmap well advanced in Colombia, with high level of government and private sector buy-in for its recommendations, and strong country Ambassadors. Action roadmap well advanced for Indonesia, and widely shared with President, Government Ministers, and senior officials. Ideas baked into LCDI led by NCE/WRI. Country ambassador formed and active. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 WRI is posed to lead the enhancement analysis in Ethiopia, which is requested by the Govt. Sixteen countries requested some form of support for NDC enhancement analysis via NDC Partnership. WRI’s analysis and convening on NDC enhancement may have an influence on some of these countries. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 The report was launched in March – hugely successful, with true ownership by BAPPENAS, a major event with more than 200 people in attendance, and real uptake of the more ambitious scenario. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Action Roadmap well advanced in Ethiopia, with strong ownership from national government and local partners Close working partnership with ATA established, involving incorporating FOLU recommendations into the work of the ACCs Active set of FOLU country Ambassadors writing Op Eds and engaging with government and private sector Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Indicator: Number of countries with mechanisms in place to enhance policy coherence of sustainable development [target: 10; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of start-up partnerships funded [target: 25; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of scale-up partnerships funded[target: 15; FY18 baseline: 0]. Indicator: Number of systemic changes created via scale-up partnerships [target: 3; FY18 baseline: 0]. Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started - 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 Achieved – 5 On track – 4 Off track (behind schedule) – 3 Off track (serious setback) – 2 Changed - 1 Not started – 0 US-EIN-521257057-US-EIN-521257057-NDCPARTNERSHIP World Resources Institute The NDC Partnership (the Partnership) is a global coalition of countries and institutions collaborating to drive transformational climate action while enhancing sustainable development. The Partnership is working directly with developing country governments, mobilizing resources and expertise to support and accelerate their Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) implementation and increased ambition in updated NDC around the worlds. The Partnership is recognized as a neutral broker among stakeholders and a trusted partner, evidencing a strong governance structure, clear theory of change, and transparent strategy. Guided by a Steering Committee, the Partnership is comprised of developed and developing nations and international institutions and led by Co-Chairs from the Republic of Costa Rica and the Kingdom of the Netherlands. A Support Unit, which facilitates the work of the Partnership, has grown and consolidated to support its ambitious vision. As more governments seek support for turning NDCs into action, membership continues to grow considerably. The NDC Partnership’s Climate Action Enhancement Package (CAEP) is a new offering of the Partnership designed to be a targeted, demand-driven, and impact-focused fast-track initiative to deliver support for implementing and enhancing NDCs to set countries up for success in achieving raised ambition. It will allow countries to address the challenges of the first generation of NDCs by providing support for the development and implementation of evidence-based, high-quality NDCs with broad ownership from society and government. CAEP has two core elements: Leveraging new and existing support for NDC implementation and updating from member countries and institutions; Establishing a Technical Assistance Fund (TAF) for fast deployment of additional resources beyond those available through existing initiatives; and Partnership members able to quickly deploy technical and financial support will have the first option to respond to country requests under CAEP. Remaining gaps in support can then be covered by members of the Partnership with the required expertise but without available resources, by accessing the TAF. The TAF is a financial delivery instrument of CAEP. It is a pooled funding mechanism that will receive contributions from multiple development partners and allocate resources to multiple implementing partners in response to NDC enhancement requests under CAEP. Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs World Resources Institute Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre Rocky Mountain Institute World Wildlife Fund Conservation International COMESA SNV Netherlands Development Organisation Fundación Avina Greenhouse Gas Management Institute Gold Standard The Nature Conservancy World Resources Institute Climate Analytics Global Water Partnership ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability World Resources Institute NDC Partnership Whitney Pierson Deputy Director of Operations 2027297600 https://www.wri.org/ 10 G St NE #800, Washington, DC 20002 3000000 3440000 3440000 3000000 2103750.00 2103750.00 2103750.00 2103750.00 20 2332000 1400000 Initial disbursement from Grant 3065000 Disbursement from Grant 1759000 3679980 Prepared for the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs January - December 2019 Twitter: 5.97%Facebook: 3.39%Instagram: 40%LinkedIn: 40%(Revised targets per industry standards) The communications team has tested platform-specific engagement tools and will expand and make greater use of these tools to drive growth and engagement. Both Twitter and LinkedIn offer the greatest potential for growth and will be primarily targeted. This indicator reflects the aggregate number of KPIs being supported by members (rather than outputs) as implementing partners provide support and respond to country requests at this activity level. This indicator will need to be altered in the future to reflect this clarification. This indicator accounts for the percentage of Partnership Plans which include references to gender, sex, or male to female comparisons within output-level indicators. This indicator has been refined to show the extent to which Partnership Plans have included sex-disaggregated data and gender indicators across four levels. For better measurability, this indicator has been revised from: number of member countries with NDCs developed and/or implemented through regular (at least annually) multi-stakeholder engagement processes, disaggregated by engagement For this indicator, this percentage represents the share of countries that conducted two or more NDC consultations with gender stakeholders. This data comes from a member survey conducted in January-February 2020 as part of the Partnership’s Mid-Term Review. In response to the survey question asking respondents whether they felt there was improved coordination between government and sectors/country stakeholders over the last three years, 48 percent of respondents reported improved coordination. (Note: There was an18percentmember response rate to the overall survey.) The target for this KPI was 38 before the Work Program Addendum. Basic information: gender equality section of the RSA was filled out in a complete manner The target for this KPI was 23 before the Work Program Addendum. A virtual stop and reflect exercise is proposed towards the end of the year. •Tie Stop and Reflect exercises to other national events or planning exercises to reduce the administrative or time burden on the countries. 65 countries are committed to enhancing their NDCs with support from more than 35 partners through the Climate Action Enhancement Package (CAEP). More than 40 of the Partnership’s institutional and associate members have committed to deliver NDC enhancement support to 65 countries through the common framework of CAEP, with more than 20 of them accessing resources from TAF. Seven partners have contributed to TAF and CAEP. Developing country members also reported greater effectiveness both in the NDC updating process and in NDC implementation. According to the 2021 Member Survey, 93% of country respondents who had received CAEP support, stated that their country’s NDC updating process was more effective, and 86% indicated more effective NDC implementation overall. 65 countries are committed to enhancing their NDCs with support from more than 35 partners through the Climate Action Enhancement Package (CAEP). More than 40 of the Partnership’s institutional and associate members have committed to deliver NDC enhancement support to 65 countries through the common framework of CAEP, with more than 20 of them accessing resources from TAF. Seven partners have contributed to TAF and CAEP. A total of 67 countries are receiving CAEP support. Of the 18 countries that submitted an updated or new NDC by December 2020 with CAEP support, 100% increased their adaptation or mitigation ambition. Of the 49 remaining countries receiving CAEP support, 47 are on track to submit enhanced NDCs before COP26 . These are defined as investment plans or sectoral investment plans that have been finalized and approved by the government. US-EIN-521257057-StrengtheningForestLegalitythroughTransparencyandAccountability World Resources Institute The Strengthening Forest Legality through Transparency and Accountability Project builds on previous rounds of FGMC support. The first round supported WRI to launch Global Forest Watch (GFW), an online platform monitoring forests everywhere in near-real time. In the second round, WRI worked to demonstrate how transparency combined with customized information technology solutions could strengthen timber legality enforcement and private sector compliance, and drive greater accountability for tropical forest management. In the third FGMC round, WRI will deepen gains in forest and timber trade transparency while securing emerging processes and practices to hold governments and the private sector accountable for forest management and land use decisions. GFW remains central, and the Project will maintain and expand the global functions and reach of GFW. We will also expand ongoing engagement with actors and political processes globally and in key VPA and processing countries (Cameroon, Republic of Congo, China) to scale use of targeted information technology solutions. These include: Forest Watcher – a mobile app that brings near-real time deforestation alerts offline and into the field to assist law enforcement and civil society to identify and interdict forest crime. Forest Atlases – nationalized versions of the GFW platform owned and operated by forest ministries to enhance forest land use transparency and related policy enforcement. Open Timber Portal (OTP) – a web-based platform promoting trade in legal forest products by compiling information about forest sector compliance from government, companies and third-party forest monitors in producer countries. Uptake of these tools will support governments and private sector to implement their commitments to eliminate deforestation and illegal logging, and enable civil society to hold these actors accountable for their commitments. UK - Department for International Development (DFID) World Resources Institute World Resources Institute Global Forest Watch Crystal Davis Director of Global Forest Watch 2027297758 cdavis@wri.org 126104 1585682 2342666 743139 619397 29305 Field Legality Advisory Group 50456 Field Advisory Legality Group 14784 Field Legality Advisory Group 32955.96 Nanty Consulting 32754 Field Legality Advisory Group 21345 Field Legality Advisory Group 37428.61 Nanty Consulting 14901.23 Nanty Consulting 355245 60485 372429 41083.18 Nanty Consulting 13521 Field Legality Advisory Group 37363 Nanty Consulting 865222 736579 7149 8286 UK timber trade federation 25000 Observatoier de la Gouvernance Forestiere 41430 UK timber trade federation 5524 UK timber trade federation 7220 24957.81 Field Legality Advisory Group 30000 Field Legality Advisory Group 3564.18 Observatoier de la Gouvernance Forestiere 25000 Field Legality Advisory Group 38836 Field Legality Advisory Group 2427.19 Field Legality Advisory Group Continuous engagement with users Throughout the course of the grant, we engaged with OTP users, in particular importers, EU and UK competent authorities, Congo-Basin logging companies as well as Independent Forest Monitors. We also presented the OTP to government representatives at key events such as the ITTO Council Meeting in Togo and the EGILAT meeting “Advancing the trade and distribution of legally harvested forest products in the APEC Region” in Malaysia. Overall, we collected a total of 21 documented use cases for the OTP: 10 are about governments, 5 about the private sector, 3 about local CSOs and 3 about other FGMC or UKaid grantees. By the end of the grant, the number of new OTP users exceeded our expectations. Between the OTP release in 2018 and the end of the project in 2020, more than 6,500 new users located both in producer and consumer countries visited the OTP. We observed greater uptake from some major importing companies, who not only use the OTP regularly for their due diligence process but also started to actively reach out to their suppliers, asking them to make their compliance documents public on the OTP. This supported our outreach efforts towards Congo Basin logging companies, that shared an increased number of documents, significantly increasing the transparency of the forest sector in the region. In FY20-21, the OTP also started to gain traction with different government agencies in various producer and consumer countries. We received requests to further explore synergies with the VPA process and TLAS system deployment in Congo and Cameroon. We explored with customs officers how the OTP could better support law enforcement in Cameroon. Several U.S. government agencies contacted us, explaining how they use the OTP to guide importers who have to comply with the Lacey Act, to document cases, and to train law enforcement officials in Africa. The Korean Forest Service also requested the platform to be translated to Korean to support their efforts to lead Korean importers towards legal and more responsible sourcing. From a 2-country beta portal to an improved stable version covering 5-countries, available in 6 languages User feedback informed the OTP development, from the 2017 pilot version available for RoC and DRC to a successful, improved stable version covering the entire Congo-Basin. Several upgraded versions were released throughout the course of the grant. In addition to new designs, improved and new features, we added Cameroon on the portal in April 2019 and Gabon and Central African Republic in December 2020. We also translated the portal to Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese and Japanese to support outreach to importers operating in Asian markets. More data, higher quality data Throughout the course of the grant, we worked closely with Congo Basin logging companies and Independent Forest Monitors to train them on how to upload their data on the OTP. We also set-up, fine-tuned and implemented quality control processes to review company documents and IFM observations. The number of documents publicly accessible on the portal grew from less than 200 to almost 1,000 documents. Most of the 1,200 observations than had been initially uploaded to the beta version of the OTP were revised and more recent ones were uploaded. OTP official launch During Forest Legality Week in early October 2019, we officially launched the OTP, presenting it to a packed room of forest legality experts. We heard from Matthew Cassetta of the US Department of State, Patrick Duggan of the US Department of Justice, Jon Knut Berg of the Norwegian Embassy to the US, and Marieke Wit of the FGMC PMST. They showed how the information on the OTP can help better enforce forest laws. Development of resources for OTP users We developed several support tools to increase the OTP uptake by users. These documents include a joint brochure for wood importers that we developed together with ZSL and other organizations (ATIBT, ETTF, NEPCon and BVRio) to disambiguate between different tools. The OTP brochure was translated to French, Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese and Japanese. Coordination with other FGMC subgrantees We worked closely with FGMC grantee ZSL to incorporate OTP data and scores into their legality indicators for their SPOTT assessment. We also attended several coordination calls with FERN and coordinated with CIDT on the CV4C project. GFW has released our annual tree cover loss data update each year in conjunction with the University of Maryland (UMD), thus achieving all targets for this activity. The only change of plan was that we anticipated to use a 2.0 forest change algorithm for the 2020 data update. However, the research team at UMD, which is responsible for creating the data, was experiencing unforeseen challenges and decided it would be better to release the data using the original algorithm. Moving forward in 2021, we aim to determine a clearer timeline of when this 2.0 version of the global tree cover loss algorithm will be completed by UMD and can be visualized on GFW. The Global Forest Review (GFR), previously named the Global Forest Update, had its first release in January 2021 after the completion of the initial beta platform in January 2020. At the outset of the grant, we intended to have our first report published in 2019 with an update in 2020, but this timeline has shifted to 2021 as we faced unexpected delays. This first edition of the GFR will be relatively humble, and we plan to immediately continue building on this foundation with new data and analyses later in 2021. Our initial outreach efforts will focus on communicating the purpose and added value of the GFR vis-à-vis the FAO’s Global Forest Resources Assessment and other well-known global reports. We released a number of updates across the GFW suite of tools. On the Flagship site, we updated the dashboard and My GFW subscription services, which allow users to save and view more analyses for their areas of interest (AOI) and receive additional detail about change within their AOIs. My GFW is also now integrated across Flagship, the Forest Watcher (FW) mobile application, and MapBuilder. For MapBuilder specifically, we updated the backend infrastructure to use Vega to create, save, and share interactive visualization designs that will integrate MapBuilder with the GFW API. Lastly, we released FW 2.0, which has expanded offline capabilities, including the ability to share app data offline and between FW users, to upload data through an easy-to-use format, and to access all GFW data layers in the app. To support and optimize uptake of our data and tools, GFW released the new and improved Help Center, which serves as a hub for our global user base to access downloadable training materials, recordings of past webinars, and more resources. During the project period, the Forest Atlas database was continuously updated, and technical support given to the new team members from the cartographic service of MINFOF, as the former members were assigned elsewhere. We carried out an assessment to identify the needs of various stakeholders relating to the use of the tools included in the Forest Atlas and GFW for their duties on a daily basis. Following the assessment, we revised the structure of the database by including new data sets such as log yards, forest management indicators, and statistics displayed as dashboards on the platform online. New attributes were included in some layers, such as Annual Harvesting Areas to guide the analysis on the forest titles status. Trainings were carried out in the northern, southwest and central services of MINFOF to reinforce their capacity in forest monitoring and protected areas management using Atlas data, Forest Watcher, GLAD and fire alerts. Two training sessions using the same framework were delivered to Civil Society Organizations and the private sector to reinforce their capacity in forest and natural resources monitoring, and to enable them to play their role in sustainable agriculture commodity production. The team also supported the Ministry of Economy, Planning and Regional Development (MINEPAT) to design and develop a Land Use Portal, another channel where the forest data can be visualized and be used in decision-making processes. We also contributed to the publication of the annual report on landmark deforestation events (LDEs), drafted as part of Cameroon's Forest Cover Monitoring activities by the Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife (MINFOF) and the Ministry of Environment, Protection of Nature and Sustainable Development (MINEPDED), through the Operational Unit for Forest Cover Monitoring (UOSCF). This report will be released in February 2021. It aims to present trends in forest cover changes in Cameroon in 2019, using Global Land Analysis and Discovery (GLAD) alerts technology. More specifically, this report describes serial evolution of alerts by Region according to land use types and drivers of forest cover change. The report will facilitate proper planning of missions to implement the National Forestry and Wildlife Control Strategy as a decision-making tool, and will help provide guidelines for improved forest management policies. We also participated in many other processes at the government level including the elaboration of the Framework for the National Restoration strategy. Throughout the project lifetime, we maintained the Forest Atlas fully functional and up-to-date. Overall, we updated over a hundred new datasets on various forest titles including Annual Cutting Areas (AACs), development series, and five-year production units. Aiming at improving the uptake of the Forest Atlas by forest agents, our approach consisted of gradually transferring responsibilities to those agents in the update of the Atlas database. Further, in year 2, we conducted two training sessions in the Lekoumou and Niari departments respectively. The training which was followed-up by a field mission in the Lekoumou department to test various scenarios aimed at strengthening the capacities of forest stakeholders on the use of the Forest Atlas and Forest Watcher for enforcing and monitoring the enforcement of the law. Subsequently, a data sharing protocol was developed to fluidify information flow between local and central levels. On the policy engagement front, the project team has been a key player in the VPA-FLEGT implementation process. We supported the preparation of and took part in all major events of the VPA-FLEGT convenings. In the final year of the project and based on the demand from the CLFT staff aware of the Atlas (the legality team in charge of the computerized timber legality assurance system – SIVL), we conducted a field mission in order to identify possible synergies between the Forest Atlas and SIVL. This mission has helped identifying strong options for linking both platforms in order to improve the legality of the forest sector. We completed the Chinese translation of the OTP website and the OTP brochure. We presented the OTP to more than 30 people from government agencies, research institutes, industry associations, and civil society organizations in China and summarized and analysed their feedback. Our outreach activities in China were limited by the COVID-19 pandemic in year 3. Some resources have been reallocated to Output 2 to translate the OTP to Korean, Vietnamese, and Japanese. By December 2020, Google Analytics indicated that 98 new users based in China had visited the OTP website. In year 2, we hired a consultant with a private sector background to reach out to RoC logging companies. In year 2 and year 3, the consultant reached out to logging companies based in RoC to train them on how to upload their compliance documents to the OTP and to encourage them to do so. We carried out quality control on the documents that were uploaded and followed up with the companies to discuss any issue that arose during quality control. We also coordinated with other key stakeholders to mutualize outreach efforts. We participated in particular in an FAO-funded workshop organized by ATIBT for logging companies from South Congo to collect their feedback on the revision to the Forest Code and in a BVRio workshop organized in Brazzaville for key actors involved in timber legality verification in Congo. More than 58% of the logging companies based in RoC now share documents on the OTP, some of them sharing more than 90% of their compliance documents. In addition, a joint mission between the WRI team, key staff from the Ministry of Forest Economy and a representative of the Ministry of Finance in charge of information systems, showed how the OTP has prepared the ground for the deployment of the TLAS system in RoC and identified options to strengthen synergies between the SIVL and the OTP. The WRI team worked with the Guyana Forestry Commission and other partners on the intended deliverables including: a learning exchange between a delegation of Guyanese stakeholders and the Ghana Forestry Commission and the Liberian Forest Development Authority, a scoping mission to conduct to understand the needs of various government agencies in relation to FLEGT licensing, the development of a training program for small forest operators, and a virtual learning event focusing on key topics related to the implementation of the VPA. Through all of these activities the WRI team has built strong relationships with in-country actors that prepare the ground for the next phase of the project. In particular, the shift from a planned in-person conference to a virtual learning event was greatly facilitated by our existing relationships with the GFC, EFITAP, FAO-FLEGT, and other partners in Guyana. We also worked with the United Kingdom Timber Trade Federation (UKTTF) as a subgrantee to develop draft modules for a business management training program aimed at small and medium-sized enterprises. After consultations with other groups experienced in providing support to SMEs on business management and more specifically on forest management, UKTTF developed draft modules for initial review. Towards the end of 2020 the materials were validated by in-country actors who form part of the target audience as well as other stakeholders who understand the business management capacity of these enterprises. While we were not able to implement an in-person pilot training due to COVID-19, UKTTF and WRI plan to work on implementation of this program going forward. The engagement in Latin America on NDC enhancement of the forest and land use sector was carried out successfully during FY 2020-21 despite the COVID-19 crisis. Seven countries (Colombia, Costa Rica, Chile, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Peru)1 were engaged directly, leveraging their active participation in Initiative 20x20, the regional restoration movement in Latin America. Additionally, we were able to reach many other countries including Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, El Salvador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, through Initiative 20x20’s webinar series. Some country specific achievements for FY 2020-21 include: •Chile included the restoration of 1 million hectares of degraded landscapes in its updated NDC submitted to the UNFCCC in April. The inclusion is based on the National Restoration Plan draft whose development is being supported by WRI and other Initiative 20x20 partners. The Plan is currently under internal review and it is expected to be launched in early 2021. The roadmap towards its launch was updated in April with the support if WRI and partners. The project team developed an in-depth country profile for Chile and engaged country officials in high-level webinars as well as technical workshops. •Colombia’s NDC update included a target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 51 percent by 2030, a scenario that includes land use-based interventions and was proposed and analyzed in the work supported by the project team. A technical note on the analysis is available here; and a presentation summarizing the results, here. The project team also developed an in-depth country profile for Colombia •Nicaragua’s 2020 NDC update explicitly mentions the country’s goal to restore 2.8 million hectares in its efforts to better manage watersheds, improve the resilience of rural livelihoods to the effects of climate change, and conserve biodiversity. The project team engaged country officials in high-level webinars as well as technical workshops on the links between restoration and climate change mitigation and adaptation, and landscape restoration monitoring and its connections to NDC progress. Detailed information on regional and country-specific activities can be found in the synthesis report from country engagement available here. A 10-meter global land cover map was started with a very innovative way of machine learning and artificial intelligence. We developed more than 1 million training pixels and trained the algorithm. To date 10% of the globe has been mapped in 10-meter detail. The full global map is expected to be completed in 2021 without need for additional resources. WRI completed a CCICED Special Policy Study on Greening China’s Soft Commodity Value Chains in collaboration with the Foreign Environmental Cooperation Office (FECO) of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment in China in 2020. The study identified actions China could take to improve the environmental and economic sustainability of soft commodities including “establishing a national green value chains strategy, adopting mandatory and voluntary measures to green soft commodity value chains, and building on existing Chinese policy levers and initiatives”. A summary of these recommendations along with those from other CCICED special policy studies have been submitted to the State Council in China for consideration. The recommendations in the SPS were favorably received both within China and by international experts and stakeholders, including the recommendation for WRI and its partners to develop a second phase of work on the topic within the framework of the SPS recommendations. US-EIN-521257057-GB-1-205053 World Resources Institute This study thus aims to develop roadmaps and identify milestones for the Power, Transport and Industry sectors, such that their growth till 2100 is compatible with the global target on limiting anthropogenic global warming to 1.5C and 2C. This compatibility is assured by limiting their total cumulative emissions till 2100 (along with other sectors like Buildings) to India’s share of the global carbon budget, calculated based on a variety of principles. UK - Department for International Development (DFID) World Resources Institute World Resources Institute KPMG Council on Energy, Environment and Water Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP) 165355 330708 551181 165355 Incoming funds from FCDO (2019/20) UK Department for International Development World Resources Institute 330708 Incoming funds from FCDO (2020/21) UK Department for International Development World Resources Institute 55118 Incoming funds from FCDO (2021/22) UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office World Resources Institute 53730 World Resources Institute CEEW 5969 World Resources Institute CEEW 30777 KPMG PHASE 1 World Resources Institute KPMG 30777 KPMG PHASE 1 World Resources Institute KPMG 21759 KPMG PHASE 2 World Resources Institute KPMG 21759 KPMG PHASE 2 World Resources Institute KPMG 10879 KPMG PHASE 2 World Resources Institute KPMG 8296 KPMG PHASE 3 World Resources Institute KPMG 19360 KPMG PHASE 3 World Resources Institute KPMG US-EIN-521257057-FoodandLandUseCoalition World Resources Institute 1. Advance international policy to deliver FOLU transformation 2. Raise ambition, create accountability and improve knowledge of best practice targets and policies to deliver FOLU transformation through a FOLU Action Tracker 3. To share lessons and build partnerships for FOLU transformation in sub-Saharan Africa. This grant delivers three outputs to shift to more sustainable patterns of land use, which produce sufficient food for a growing population, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect the ecosystems and natural resources at the global, regional and national levels. UK - Department for International Development (DFID) SDSN Association, Inc. Systemiq Limited Alliance for a Green Revolution for Africa World Resources Institute Food and Land Use Coalition Morgan Gillespy Programme Director +442039481359 info@foodandlandusecoalition.org http://www.foodandlandusecoalition.org 1000000 106487 93343.32 246007.30 192429.14 43465.04 106487 67492.98 SYSTEMIQ LTD. 88912.41 SDSN ASSOCIATION INC. 104650.00 SDSN ASSOCIATION INC. 50692.81 SYSTEMIQ Limited 46912 SYSTEMIQ Limited 71368.97 SYSTEMIQ LTD. 21435.09 SYSTEMIQ LTD. 132381.00 ALLIANCE FOR GREEN -AGRA 28927.33 SYSTEMIQ LTD. 3001.32 ALLIANCE FOR GREEN -AGRA 206327.28 64077.59 SDSN ASSOCIATION INC. 69511.10 SYSTEMIQ LTD. 50000.00 ALLIANCE FOR GREEN -AGRA 246007 192429.14 93343 43465.04 US-EIN-521257057-NDC Partnership Support Unit and CAEP/TAF World Resources Institute The NDC Partnership (the Partnership) is a global coalition of countries and institutions collaborating to drive transformational climate action while enhancing sustainable development. The Partnership is working directly with developing country governments, mobilizing resources and expertise to support and accelerate their Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) implementation and increased ambition in updated NDC around the worlds. The Partnership is recognized as a neutral broker among stakeholders and a trusted partner, evidencing a strong governance structure, clear theory of change, and transparent strategy. Guided by a Steering Committee, the Partnership is comprised of developed and developing nations and international institutions and led by Co-Chairs from the Republic of Costa Rica and the Kingdom of the Netherlands. A Support Unit, which facilitates the work of the Partnership, has grown and consolidated to support its ambitious vision. As more governments seek support for turning NDCs into action, membership continues to grow considerably. The NDC Partnership’s Climate Action Enhancement Package (CAEP) is a new offering of the Partnership designed to be a targeted, demand-driven, and impact-focused fast-track initiative to deliver support for implementing and enhancing NDCs to set countries up for success in achieving raised ambition. It will allow countries to address the challenges of the first generation of NDCs by providing support for the development and implementation of evidence-based, high-quality NDCs with broad ownership from society and government. CAEP has two core elements: Leveraging new and existing support for NDC implementation and updating from member countries and institutions; Establishing a Technical Assistance Fund (TAF) for fast deployment of additional resources beyond those available through existing initiatives; and Partnership members able to quickly deploy technical and financial support will have the first option to respond to country requests under CAEP. Remaining gaps in support can then be covered by members of the Partnership with the required expertise but without available resources, by accessing the TAF. The TAF is a financial delivery instrument of CAEP. It is a pooled funding mechanism that will receive contributions from multiple development partners and allocate resources to multiple implementing partners in response to NDC enhancement requests under CAEP. UK - Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) World Resources Institute Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) SNV Netherlands Development Organisation SouthSouthNorth World Resources Institute Global Water Partnership CAEP/TAF CAEP/TAF World Resources Institute NDC Partnership 2027297600 supportunit@ndcpartnership.org https://www.wri.org/ 10 G St NE #800, Washington, DC 20002 3000000 5000000 5000000 4000000 500000 4000000 750000 1750000 3776171.85 149930 346.91 2755936.87 43489.78 963166.38 54808 2274468.53 5241200 553107.56 72605.87 2898369.04 2545792.12 28273.29 43370.68 4835.52 361000.00 48083.93 3114101.48 265025.58 10135.07 65 countries are committed to enhancing their NDCs with support from more than 35 partners through the Climate Action Enhancement Package (CAEP). More than 40 of the Partnership’s institutional and associate members have committed to deliver NDC enhancement support to 65 countries through the common framework of CAEP, with more than 20 of them accessing resources from TAF. Seven partners have contributed to TAF and CAEP. Developing country members also reported greater effectiveness both in the NDC updating process and in NDC implementation. According to the 2021 Member Survey, 93% of country respondents who had received CAEP support, stated that their country’s NDC updating process was more effective, and 86% indicated more effective NDC implementation overall. 65 countries are committed to enhancing their NDCs with support from more than 35 partners through the Climate Action Enhancement Package (CAEP). More than 40 of the Partnership’s institutional and associate members have committed to deliver NDC enhancement support to 65 countries through the common framework of CAEP, with more than 20 of them accessing resources from TAF. Seven partners have contributed to TAF and CAEP. A total of 67 countries are receiving CAEP support. Of the 18 countries that submitted an updated or new NDC by December 2020 with CAEP support, 100% increased their adaptation or mitigation ambition. Of the 49 remaining countries receiving CAEP support, 47 are on track to submit enhanced NDCs before COP26 . This indicator accounts for the percentage of Partnership Plans which include references to gender, sex, or male to female comparisons within output-level indicators. This indicator has been refined to show the extent to which Partnership Plans have included sex-disaggregated data and gender indicators across four levels: Level 1 (L1): Absence of gender indicators; Level 2 (L2):includes indicators for participation at events or a gender-specific indicator; Level 3(L3):includes indicators related to beneficiaries and social changes; and Level 4(L4): includes indicators which are paired with M&E systems. For this indicator, we have aggregated levels 2 through 4, which means that at least one sex-disaggregated indicator or a call for sex-disaggregated data was included in the Partnership Plan. For better measurability, this indicator has been revised from: number of member countries with NDCs developed and/or implemented through regular (at least annually) multi-stakeholder engagement processes, disaggregated by engagement with: a) multiple ministries, including planning, finance, and relevant sectoral ministries; b)government agencies responsible for different underrepresented groups, including on gender equality, indigenous peoples, and others, and respective focal points within sectors/ministries; and c) non-state actors, private sector, civil society (including women’s organizations and other underrepresented groups). The target for this KPI was 38 before the Work Program Addendum. For this indicator, this percentage represents the share of countries that conducted two or more NDC consultations with gender stakeholders. This data comes from a member survey conducted in January-February 2020 as part of the Partnership’s Mid-Term Review. In response to the survey question asking respondents whether they felt there was improved coordination between government and sectors/country stakeholders over the last three years, 48 percent of respondents reported improved coordination. (Note: There was an18percentmember response rate to the overall survey.) The target for this KPI was 38 before the Work Program Addendum. Basic information: gender equality section of the RSA was filled out in a complete manner; In-depth information: analysis done with the support from a member The target for this KPI was 23 before the Work Program Addendum. A virtual stop and reflect exercise is proposed towards the end of the year. •Tie Stop and Reflect exercises to other national events or planning exercises to reduce the administrative or time burden on the countries. This indicator reflects the aggregate number of KPIs being supported by members (rather than outputs) as implementing partners provide support and respond to country requests at this activity level. This indicator will need to be altered in the future to reflect this clarification. Twitter: 5.97%Facebook: 3.39%Instagram: 40%LinkedIn: 40%(Revised targets per industry standards) The communications team has tested platform-specific engagement tools and will expand and make greater use of these tools to drive growth and engagement. Both Twitter and LinkedIn offer the greatest potential for growth and will be primarily targeted. These are defined as investment plans or sectoral investment plans that have been finalized and approved by the government. National Subnational Twitter: 11,388Facebook: 23,779LinkedIn: 14719Instagram: 1,691YouTube: 791 50:50 71% M; 29% F 14 PINS in 8 countries 115 (of which 55 Economic, 25 Finance; and 35 Sectoral) US-EIN-521257057-US-EIN-521257057 World Resources Institute The NDC Partnership is a global coalition, bringing together more than 200 members, including more than 120 countries, developed and developing, and nearly 100 institutions to deliver on ambitious climate action that helps achieve the Paris Agreement and drive sustainable development. Governments identify their NDC implementation priorities and the type of support that is needed to translate them into actionable policies and programs. Based on these requests, the membership offers a tailored package of expertise, technical assistance, and funding. This collaborative response provides developing countries with efficient access to a wide range of resources to adapt to and mitigate climate change and foster more equitable and sustainable development. To improve the speed and scale at which climate vulnerable developing countries can access finance to deliver high-quality national climate and nature plans, the Taskforce on Access to Climate Finance (the Taskforce) was convened by the UK COP26 Presidency. The Center for Access to Climate Finance, which is an initiative of the Taskforce, funded by the UK Government, will collect and disseminate evidence from the Pioneer Country trials and gather and share lessons learned between climate vulnerable countries to help develop new solutions, scale-up successes, and advance global agenda on improved access to climate finance. The Center will scale up and amplify the learning from the Pioneer Country pilots to enable systemic opportunities to improve climate finance. This will be done by disseminating evidence from Pioneer Countries, communicating, and amplifying best practices and lessons through the NDC Partnership and its broader network to shape improvements in policies and procedures of the international climate finance system. The Center will deliver global thought-leadership, policy analysis, evidence generation, lesson learning and knowledge sharing. Specifically, activities will be delivered across four main areas: Knowledge sharing and dissemination, System thinking and policy analysis, Governance and Outreach The primary test group of the Center activities are the Pioneer Countries (Rwanda, Uganda, Mauritius, Somalia, Bangladesh, Jamaica, Fiji), but leveraging the NDC Partnership's Work Program, the Center will deploy knowledge sharing activities hand in hand with the Partnership's country engagement strategy, and consider requests from non-Pioneer countries interested in replicating the Taskforce approach in the context of the Support Unit and Partnership's broader work. Climate Finance providers already engaged in the Taskforce, will also contribute to the Center's outputs through implementing the Taskforce Principles and Recommendation, including adopting harmonized processes to access, manage, and report on climate finance, aligning climate finance with national priorities and adopting innovative and agile approaches to deliver climate finance considering countries' contexts and capacities. UK - Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office World Resources Institute Climate Analytics World Resources Institute NDC Partnership supportunit@ndcpartnership.org https://www.wri.org 10 G. Street NE #800Washington, D.C. 20002United States of America 1235472.00 1225097 1267364 1272067 1250000.00 1250000.00 1250000.00 1250000.00 494768.00 2024 Installment of Funds FCDO World Resources Institute 310908.99 1st Installment of 2025 Funds FCDO World Resources Institute 356161.00 2nd Installment of 2025 Funds FCDO World Resources Institute Opportunities for system-wide reform of climate finance access arrangements have been identified through thought-leadership, knowledge sharing and lesson learning All outputs and activities are cleared outlined in the NDCP Climate Task Force website - see attached. Activity 1: Prepare bi-annual summaries of Taskforce progress. and findings to share and discuss with the NDC Partnership's Steering Committee. (Target: 2 annually). Target achieved. Activity 2: Regular check-ins between the Support Unit, the Taskforce Co-Leaders, and FCDO. Organize regular check-ins between the Support Unit, the Taskforce Co-Leaders, and the FCDO program team. (Target 6 annually). Exceeded target. Activity 3: Prepare bi-annual virtual Taskforce Steering Committee meetings with all Taskforce members, in close coordination with the Co-Leaders. (Target: 2 annually). Target achieved. Activity 1: Develop a monitoring framework to measure progress. Develop a monitoring framework and a data collection tool to measure progress made against the Principles and Recommendations for both climate finance providers and recipients. This will include annual surveys among Taskforce members and targeted interviews to collect deeper insights. Target achieved. Activity 2: Develop an Annual Report to summarize progress made against the Principles and Recommendations, highlighting success cases, areas where further progress is needed, and suggested actions for major climate finance providers. Target achieved. Activity 1: Peer exchanges among Pioneer Countries. "Peer exchanges among Pioneer Countries and other relevant countries, and experts on progress, common challenges, and solutions on climate finance. Topics will be prioritized by theCenter in collaboration with Taskforce members. These peer exchanges will be held virtually unless there are opportunities to easily convene members on the margins of existing events." Target exceeded. Activity 1: Develop policy briefs - Working through the expertise and skills within the NDC Partnership members and beyond, develop a series of policy briefs, with targeted actions, to help climate finance providers (and where appropriate, recipients) implement the Taskforce Principles and Recommendations. Policy briefs could focus on joint planning and financing frameworks, public expenditure, international aid architecture, blended finance instruments, global trends in climate finance, institutional strengthening, etc. The process for developing each policy brief will start with the mapping of a clear objective and audience. The NDC Partnership partners (including both members and non-members) tasked with the development of the brief will be chosen based on their understanding and engagement in the space, ensuring the brief is adding to the discourse and not repeating what has already been written. Where relevant, briefs will reference existing products, including NDC Partnership Plans and the World Bank's CCDRs, for example. Topics will be chosen based on progress made against the Principles and Recommendations as well needs identified across the Taskforce countries and more broadly, the Partnership. Target achieved. Activity 2: Virtual and in-person regional and global knowledge exchange among NDC Partnership members and beyond to discuss best practices. Virtual and in-person regional and global knowledge exchange among NDC Partnership members and beyond to discuss best practices, amplify learning and insights from the Taskforce's in-country work. This will include webinars as well as opportunities to engage with existing platforms like the Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action (CFMCA) and to leverage existing forums like the COPs, Regional Climate Weeks, the SBs, the Global NDC Conference, the World Bank/IMF Annual and Spring Meetings, I4C, etc. Events will target key stakeholders, including private sector, MDBs, developed countries, as well as recipient countries. Target exceeded. Activity 1: Host high-level event. Host at least one high-level event per year to spotlight and disseminate the key insights from the Taskforce work. The event will happen as part of an existing international event (e.g., COP). Target achieved. Activity 1: Publish key insights (blogs). Publish key insights and best practices from the Taskforce to inspire broader action. Blogs will be published on the NDC Partnership website, with dedicated Taskforce branding. Target achieved. Activity 2: Define the Center’s visual identity within the Partnership. The Center will have its own visual identify that will reference the role the NDC Partnership plays as host. Target achieved. Activity 3: Share regular updates (website and social media). Share information and regular updates on the Taskforce's work through a dedicated area on the NDC Partnership's website and social media. Website and social media updates are ongoing. Climate finance providers and recipients have increased knowledge on steps to implement the relevant elements of the Taskforce Principles and Recommendations to improve climate finance access. All outputs and activities are cleared outlined in the NDCP Climate Task Force website - see attached. US-EIN-521257057-US-EIN-521257057-NDCPxDESNZ World Resources Institute The NDC Partnership is a global coalition, bringing together more than 200 members, including more than 120 countries, developed and developing, and nearly 100 institutions to deliver on ambitious climate action that helps achieve the Paris Agreement and drive sustainable development. Governments identify their NDC implementation priorities and the type of support that is needed to translate them into actionable policies and programs. Based on these requests, the membership offers a tailored package of expertise, technical assistance, and funding. This collaborative response provides developing countries with efficient access to a wide range of resources to adapt to and mitigate climate change and foster more equitable and sustainable development. Department for Energy, Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) World Resources Institute World Resources Institute NDC Partnership supportunit@ndcpartnership.org https://www.ndcpartnership.org 10 G Street NE #800Washington, D.C. 20002United States of America 2400000 4075000 3053537 3000000 3000000 2400000.00 4075000 3053537 3000000 3000000 2400000.00 Disbursement #1 UK DESNZ World Resources Institute 50:50 67% M; 33% F Members: 84 Non-members: 237 US-EIN-521257057-NDCPxSIDA2026-2029 World Resources Institute The NDC Partnership is a global coalition bringing together more than 260 members, including more than 140 countries, developed and developing, and more than 120 institutions to deliver on ambitious climate action that helps achieve the Paris Agreement and drive sustainable development. Governments identify their NDC implementation priorities and the type of support that is needed to translate them into actionable policies and programs. Based on these requests, the membership as a collective offers a tailored package of expertise, technical assistance, and funding. This collaborative response provides developing countries with efficient access to a wide range of resources to adapt to and mitigate climate change and foster more equitable and sustainable development. The NDC Partnership is built on the premise of collective action: by acting together, we achieve more. The Partnership is co-chaired by two countries (currently Brazil and Australia) and guided by an active Steering Committee comprised of developed and developing nations and international institutions.The NDC Partnership’s work is facilitated by a Support Unit (the NDC Partnership’s secretariat) hosted by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) in Bonn, and World Resources Institute (WRI) in Washington, DC. The Support Unit (SU) convenes all members and other partners to facilitate the implementation of the NDC Partnership’s work program. The Support Unit’s position as a neutral broker enables it to effectively coordinate the deployment of resources to meet countries’ needs and best practices around the world. The team does this by enabling coordinated support, intelligence and exchange, and evidence-based outreach. The model of the Partnership is country-driven, ensuring that the support provided aligns with and responds to developing countries’ priorities and requirements. Over the course of the previous 2021-2025 Work Program, the membership increased from 186 to 265, which includes an increase from 112 countries to 144 countries. The NDC Partnership's member countries now represent 54% of the world's population and 41% of global emissions, making it a powerful force to tackle global climate challenges. Overall: • 40% of country members reduced their greenhouse gas emissions.• 61% of country members strengthened their resilience.Through its previous work program, the NDC Partnership has successfully mobilized more than USD 1.92 billion in capacity building and technical assistance from 321 partners (members and non-members)4 in response to requests from more than 100 countries and has deployed more than 100 facilitators and embedded advisors in over 80 countries. It has also aligned USD 20.4 billion of project financing5 with NDC Implementation Plans. The NDC Partnership 2021–2025 Work Program ended in December 2025. A complete summary of the NDC Partnership’s achievements against the targets set in the monitoring and evaluation framework is found in annex of the First 2026 Progress Report. An independent final evaluation of the 2021–2025 Work Program is currently underway, and the full results will be presented to the Steering Committee at the second Steering Committee meeting of 2026. The evaluation will present further details and examples of progress, challenges, and lessons learned. The new 2026-2030 Work Program is informed by achievements and lessons learned in implementing previous work programs and past external evaluations, including most recently, the Midterm Review of the 2021–2025 Work Program. Applying these lessons learned into the current work program will result in increased efficiency in the delivery of the NDC Partnership’s impact. The overall objective (s) of the Project are: 1). Accelerated NDC Implementation: supporting the accelerated implementation of mitigation and adaptation actions outlined in countries’ NDCs (Impact Pathway 1); 2). Access to Finance: supporting countries’ capacity to access the finance needed to implement these actions (Impact Pathway 2); and 3). Ambitious NDCs: seeking opportunities to continuously increase climate ambition (Impact Pathway 3). Sida will channel funding to the NDC Partnership Support Unit to facilitate the implementation of the work plan and to support activities in priority countries, as identified by Sida and requested by NDC Partnership members. Sida has identified the following priority countries for support under this contribution. The list below is meant to be a gross list of country possibilities, while also recognizing the selected countries to receive support will be determined based on priorities and budget availability to do so. In Europe: Albania and Serbia; in Asia: Bangladesh, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam; in Africa: Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Rwanda, Somalia, South Africa, Uganda; and in Latin America: Colombia. Sweden, through Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) World Resources Institute World Resources Institute NDC Partnership supportunit@ndcpartnership.org https://www.ndcpartnership.org 10 G Street NE #800Washington, D.C. 20002United States of America 18000000 18000000 18000000 15000000 18000000 9000000 9000000 9000000 9000000 7500000 7500000