XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-6 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 2454800.00 2454800.00 2454800.00 2454800.00 2454800.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 0 UNDP Ministry of Mines and Energy 12274000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-58 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 2000000.00 2000000.00 2000000.00 2000000.00 2000000.00 0 World Bank Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) 0 World Bank Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) 0 World Bank Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) 0 World Bank Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) 0 World Bank Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) 0 World Bank Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) 0 World Bank Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) 0 World Bank Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) 0 World Bank Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) 10000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-63 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Min. of Science and Technology; Companhia Hydroelectrica do Sao Francisco CEO Endorsement Date ' Brazil 0 World Bank Min. of Science and Technology; Companhia Hydroelectrica do Sao Francisco 40000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-126 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Ministry of Environment and the Legal Amazon (MMA); Brazilian Institute for Environment and Renewable Resources (IBAMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment and the Legal Amazon (MMA); Brazilian Institute for Environment and Renewable Resources (IBAMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment and the Legal Amazon (MMA); Brazilian Institute for Environment and Renewable Resources (IBAMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment and the Legal Amazon (MMA); Brazilian Institute for Environment and Renewable Resources (IBAMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment and the Legal Amazon (MMA); Brazilian Institute for Environment and Renewable Resources (IBAMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment and the Legal Amazon (MMA); Brazilian Institute for Environment and Renewable Resources (IBAMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment and the Legal Amazon (MMA); Brazilian Institute for Environment and Renewable Resources (IBAMA) 20000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-128 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank ELETROBRAS-PROCEL CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 4000000.00 0 World Bank ELETROBRAS-PROCEL 0 World Bank ELETROBRAS-PROCEL 0 World Bank ELETROBRAS-PROCEL 0 World Bank ELETROBRAS-PROCEL 0 World Bank ELETROBRAS-PROCEL 0 World Bank ELETROBRAS-PROCEL 20000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-338 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 750000.00 750000.00 750000.00 750000.00 750000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 3750000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-381 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1623000.00 1623000.00 1623000.00 1623000.00 1623000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 8115000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-583 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Organization of American States (OAS) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 1265800.00 1265800.00 1265800.00 1265800.00 1265800.00 0 UNEP Organization of American States (OAS) 0 UNEP Organization of American States (OAS) 0 UNEP Organization of American States (OAS) 0 UNEP Organization of American States (OAS) 0 UNEP Organization of American States (OAS) 0 UNEP Organization of American States (OAS) 6329000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-586 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP OAS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 886000.00 886000.00 886000.00 886000.00 886000.00 0 UNEP OAS 0 UNEP OAS 0 UNEP OAS 0 UNEP OAS 0 UNEP OAS 0 UNEP OAS 4430000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-771 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 6000000.00 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA) 30000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-834 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 1340800.00 1340800.00 1340800.00 1340800.00 1340800.00 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 0 UNDP State Foundation for the Environment, Mato Grosso (FEMA) 6704000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-868 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Fundacao Pro-Natureza CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 250000.00 250000.00 250000.00 0 UNDP Fundacao Pro-Natureza 0 UNDP Fundacao Pro-Natureza 0 UNDP Fundacao Pro-Natureza 0 UNDP Fundacao Pro-Natureza 0 UNDP Fundacao Pro-Natureza 0 UNDP Fundacao Pro-Natureza 750000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1287 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Planning and General Coordination Secretary, State Government of Parana, Brazil CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1600000.00 1600000.00 1600000.00 1600000.00 1600000.00 0 World Bank Planning and General Coordination Secretary, State Government of Parana, Brazil 0 World Bank Planning and General Coordination Secretary, State Government of Parana, Brazil 0 World Bank Planning and General Coordination Secretary, State Government of Parana, Brazil 0 World Bank Planning and General Coordination Secretary, State Government of Parana, Brazil 0 World Bank Planning and General Coordination Secretary, State Government of Parana, Brazil 0 World Bank Planning and General Coordination Secretary, State Government of Parana, Brazil 0 World Bank Planning and General Coordination Secretary, State Government of Parana, Brazil 8000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1299 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Ministry of Environment; IBAMA; SDS; FEMA CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1436000.00 1436000.00 1436000.00 1436000.00 1436000.00 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment; IBAMA; SDS; FEMA 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment; IBAMA; SDS; FEMA 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment; IBAMA; SDS; FEMA 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment; IBAMA; SDS; FEMA 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment; IBAMA; SDS; FEMA 7180000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1343 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Environment CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 800000.00 800000.00 800000.00 800000.00 800000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 4000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1426 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP General Secretriat of the Organization of American States (OAS) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 324000.00 324000.00 324000.00 0 UNEP General Secretriat of the Organization of American States (OAS) 0 UNEP General Secretriat of the Organization of American States (OAS) 0 UNEP General Secretriat of the Organization of American States (OAS) 0 UNEP General Secretriat of the Organization of American States (OAS) 0 UNEP General Secretriat of the Organization of American States (OAS) 972000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1476 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Bahia: Companhia de Desenvolvimento e Ação Regional -CAR, and Centro de Recursos Ambientais - CRA; and Ceará: Secretariat of Environment - SOMA Financing Intermediary: Fundação Luiz Eduardo Magalhães - FLEM CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 2000000.00 2000000.00 2000000.00 2000000.00 2000000.00 0 World Bank Bahia: Companhia de Desenvolvimento e Ação Regional -CAR, and Centro de Recursos Ambientais - CRA; and Ceará: Secretariat of Environment - SOMA Financing Intermediary: Fundação Luiz Eduardo Magalhães - FLEM 0 World Bank Bahia: Companhia de Desenvolvimento e Ação Regional -CAR, and Centro de Recursos Ambientais - CRA; and Ceará: Secretariat of Environment - SOMA Financing Intermediary: Fundação Luiz Eduardo Magalhães - FLEM 0 World Bank Bahia: Companhia de Desenvolvimento e Ação Regional -CAR, and Centro de Recursos Ambientais - CRA; and Ceará: Secretariat of Environment - SOMA Financing Intermediary: Fundação Luiz Eduardo Magalhães - FLEM 0 World Bank Bahia: Companhia de Desenvolvimento e Ação Regional -CAR, and Centro de Recursos Ambientais - CRA; and Ceará: Secretariat of Environment - SOMA Financing Intermediary: Fundação Luiz Eduardo Magalhães - FLEM 0 World Bank Bahia: Companhia de Desenvolvimento e Ação Regional -CAR, and Centro de Recursos Ambientais - CRA; and Ceará: Secretariat of Environment - SOMA Financing Intermediary: Fundação Luiz Eduardo Magalhães - FLEM 0 World Bank Bahia: Companhia de Desenvolvimento e Ação Regional -CAR, and Centro de Recursos Ambientais - CRA; and Ceará: Secretariat of Environment - SOMA Financing Intermediary: Fundação Luiz Eduardo Magalhães - FLEM 0 World Bank Bahia: Companhia de Desenvolvimento e Ação Regional -CAR, and Centro de Recursos Ambientais - CRA; and Ceará: Secretariat of Environment - SOMA Financing Intermediary: Fundação Luiz Eduardo Magalhães - FLEM 10000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1544 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank State Secretariat of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development (SEAAPI) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1350000.00 1350000.00 1350000.00 1350000.00 1350000.00 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development (SEAAPI) 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development (SEAAPI) 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development (SEAAPI) 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development (SEAAPI) 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development (SEAAPI) 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development (SEAAPI) 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development (SEAAPI) 6750000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1612 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 680000.00 680000.00 680000.00 680000.00 680000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 3400000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-1642 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Embrapa Soils CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 324970.00 324970.00 324970.00 0 World Bank Embrapa Soils 0 World Bank Embrapa Soils 0 World Bank Embrapa Soils 0 World Bank Embrapa Soils 0 World Bank Embrapa Soils 0 World Bank Embrapa Soils 974910 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2096 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Secretariat of Environmental Quality in Human Settlements (SQA), Ministry of Environment in Brazil CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Brazil -10 -55 +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 252703.60 252703.60 252703.60 252703.60 252703.60 0 UNEP Secretariat of Environmental Quality in Human Settlements (SQA), Ministry of Environment in Brazil 0 UNEP Secretariat of Environmental Quality in Human Settlements (SQA), Ministry of Environment in Brazil 0 UNEP Secretariat of Environmental Quality in Human Settlements (SQA), Ministry of Environment in Brazil 0 UNEP Secretariat of Environmental Quality in Human Settlements (SQA), Ministry of Environment in Brazil 0 UNEP Secretariat of Environmental Quality in Human Settlements (SQA), Ministry of Environment in Brazil 1248396 UNEP Secretariat of Environmental Quality in Human Settlements (SQA), Ministry of Environment in Brazil 1263518 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2356 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank State Secretary of Environment (SMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 1550000.00 1550000.00 1550000.00 1550000.00 1550000.00 0 World Bank State Secretary of Environment (SMA) 0 World Bank State Secretary of Environment (SMA) 0 World Bank State Secretary of Environment (SMA) 0 World Bank State Secretary of Environment (SMA) 0 World Bank State Secretary of Environment (SMA) 0 World Bank State Secretary of Environment (SMA) 7750000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2373 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IFAD Ministry of Agrarian Development CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ 1188600.00 1188600.00 1188600.00 1188600.00 1188600.00 0 IFAD Ministry of Agrarian Development 0 IFAD Ministry of Agrarian Development 0 IFAD Ministry of Agrarian Development 0 IFAD Ministry of Agrarian Development 0 IFAD Ministry of Agrarian Development 0 IFAD Ministry of Agrarian Development 0 IFAD Ministry of Agrarian Development 0 IFAD Ministry of Agrarian Development 0 IFAD Ministry of Agrarian Development 5943000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2450 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank State Secretariat of Coordination and Planning, Special Projects Department CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Coordination and Planning, Special Projects Department 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Coordination and Planning, Special Projects Department 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Coordination and Planning, Special Projects Department 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Coordination and Planning, Special Projects Department 0 World Bank State Secretariat of Coordination and Planning, Special Projects Department 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2641 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank MMA/SBF, SEMARH/GO, SEPLAN/TO, COMPARQUES/DF. CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 2600000.00 2600000.00 2600000.00 2600000.00 2600000.00 0 World Bank MMA/SBF, SEMARH/GO, SEPLAN/TO, COMPARQUES/DF. 0 World Bank MMA/SBF, SEMARH/GO, SEPLAN/TO, COMPARQUES/DF. 0 World Bank MMA/SBF, SEMARH/GO, SEPLAN/TO, COMPARQUES/DF. 0 World Bank MMA/SBF, SEMARH/GO, SEPLAN/TO, COMPARQUES/DF. 0 World Bank MMA/SBF, SEMARH/GO, SEPLAN/TO, COMPARQUES/DF. 13000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2703 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 4985764 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2764 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 4400000.00 4400000.00 4400000.00 4400000.00 4400000.00 0 World Bank Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO) 0 World Bank Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO) 0 World Bank Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO) 0 World Bank Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO) 0 World Bank Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO) 0 World Bank Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO) 0 World Bank Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO) 0 World Bank Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO) 0 World Bank Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO) 22000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2765 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank State Government of Espirito Santo CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 800000.00 800000.00 800000.00 800000.00 800000.00 0 World Bank State Government of Espirito Santo 0 World Bank State Government of Espirito Santo 0 World Bank State Government of Espirito Santo 0 World Bank State Government of Espirito Santo 0 World Bank State Government of Espirito Santo 0 World Bank State Government of Espirito Santo 0 World Bank State Government of Espirito Santo 4000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2778 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 1560000.00 1560000.00 1560000.00 1560000.00 1560000.00 0 UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira 0 UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira 0 UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira 0 UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira 0 UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira 0 UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira 4108702 UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira 1345207 UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira 1542117 UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira 6996026 UNDP Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira 7800000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2817 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank FATMA (State Environmental Management Foundation - Fundação de Meio Ambiente de SC) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 324578.00 324578.00 324578.00 0 World Bank FATMA (State Environmental Management Foundation - Fundação de Meio Ambiente de SC) 0 World Bank FATMA (State Environmental Management Foundation - Fundação de Meio Ambiente de SC) 0 World Bank FATMA (State Environmental Management Foundation - Fundação de Meio Ambiente de SC) 0 World Bank FATMA (State Environmental Management Foundation - Fundação de Meio Ambiente de SC) 0 World Bank FATMA (State Environmental Management Foundation - Fundação de Meio Ambiente de SC) 973734 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2934 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Foundation for Indigenous Affairs (FUNAI), and Indigenous Organizations CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 1200000.00 1200000.00 1200000.00 1200000.00 1200000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Foundation for Indigenous Affairs (FUNAI), and Indigenous Organizations 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Foundation for Indigenous Affairs (FUNAI), and Indigenous Organizations 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Foundation for Indigenous Affairs (FUNAI), and Indigenous Organizations 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Foundation for Indigenous Affairs (FUNAI), and Indigenous Organizations 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Foundation for Indigenous Affairs (FUNAI), and Indigenous Organizations 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Foundation for Indigenous Affairs (FUNAI), and Indigenous Organizations 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Foundation for Indigenous Affairs (FUNAI), and Indigenous Organizations 6000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-2941 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Global Environment Facility IADB Ministry of Environment CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biosphere protection]]+ 2700000.00 2700000.00 2700000.00 2700000.00 2700000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 IADB Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 IADB Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 IADB Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 IADB Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 IADB Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 IADB Ministry of Environment 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment 0 IADB Ministry of Environment 1484841 UNDP Ministry of Environment 1484841 IADB Ministry of Environment 13500000 GEF 13500000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3128 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP GS/OAS-ANA CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Water sector policy and administrative management]]+ 333333.33 333333.33 333333.33 1000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3282 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 940000.00 940000.00 940000.00 940000.00 940000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 0 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 3117200 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 4354817 UNDP Ministry of Environment (MMA) 4700000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3722 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1634545.60 1634545.60 1634545.60 1634545.60 1634545.60 0 UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology 7518991 UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology -339594 UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology 993331 UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology 8172728 UNEP Ministry of Science and Technology 8172728 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3767 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Brazilian Forest Service (BFS), under the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE); the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology/National Institute for Spatial Research (INPE) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 1770000.00 1770000.00 1770000.00 1770000.00 1770000.00 0 FAO Brazilian Forest Service (BFS), under the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE); the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology/National Institute for Spatial Research (INPE) 0 FAO Brazilian Forest Service (BFS), under the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE); the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology/National Institute for Spatial Research (INPE) 0 FAO Brazilian Forest Service (BFS), under the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE); the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology/National Institute for Spatial Research (INPE) 0 FAO Brazilian Forest Service (BFS), under the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE); the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology/National Institute for Spatial Research (INPE) 0 FAO Brazilian Forest Service (BFS), under the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE); the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology/National Institute for Spatial Research (INPE) 7972216 FAO Brazilian Forest Service (BFS), under the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE); the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology/National Institute for Spatial Research (INPE) 821804 FAO Brazilian Forest Service (BFS), under the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE); the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology/National Institute for Spatial Research (INPE) 8794021 FAO Brazilian Forest Service (BFS), under the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE); the Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology/National Institute for Spatial Research (INPE) 8850000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3848 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Management Agency (FEEMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 460000.00 460000.00 460000.00 460000.00 460000.00 0 FAO Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Management Agency (FEEMA) 0 FAO Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Management Agency (FEEMA) 0 FAO Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Management Agency (FEEMA) 0 FAO Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Management Agency (FEEMA) 0 FAO Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Management Agency (FEEMA) 2273324 FAO Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Management Agency (FEEMA) 2089314 FAO Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Management Agency (FEEMA) 184010 FAO Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Management Agency (FEEMA) 2300000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-3999 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1144000.00 1144000.00 1144000.00 1144000.00 1144000.00 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 0 UNDP Ministry of Science and Technology 5720000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4085 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank KfW Entwicklungsbank, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature – the WWF Global Network, through WWF-Brasil), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (Funbio), Government of Brazil, through the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Brazilian Amazon States (Acre, Amapá, Amazonas, Mato Grosso, Pará, Rondônia, Roraima and Tocantins) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 3178000.00 3178000.00 3178000.00 3178000.00 3178000.00 0 World Bank KfW Entwicklungsbank, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature – the WWF Global Network, through WWF-Brasil), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (Funbio), Government of Brazil, through the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Brazilian Amazon States (Acre, Amapá, Amazonas, Mato Grosso, Pará, Rondônia, Roraima and Tocantins) 0 World Bank KfW Entwicklungsbank, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature – the WWF Global Network, through WWF-Brasil), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (Funbio), Government of Brazil, through the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Brazilian Amazon States (Acre, Amapá, Amazonas, Mato Grosso, Pará, Rondônia, Roraima and Tocantins) 0 World Bank KfW Entwicklungsbank, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature – the WWF Global Network, through WWF-Brasil), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (Funbio), Government of Brazil, through the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Brazilian Amazon States (Acre, Amapá, Amazonas, Mato Grosso, Pará, Rondônia, Roraima and Tocantins) 0 World Bank KfW Entwicklungsbank, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature – the WWF Global Network, through WWF-Brasil), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (Funbio), Government of Brazil, through the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Brazilian Amazon States (Acre, Amapá, Amazonas, Mato Grosso, Pará, Rondônia, Roraima and Tocantins) 0 World Bank KfW Entwicklungsbank, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature – the WWF Global Network, through WWF-Brasil), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (Funbio), Government of Brazil, through the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Brazilian Amazon States (Acre, Amapá, Amazonas, Mato Grosso, Pará, Rondônia, Roraima and Tocantins) 0 World Bank KfW Entwicklungsbank, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature – the WWF Global Network, through WWF-Brasil), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (Funbio), Government of Brazil, through the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Brazilian Amazon States (Acre, Amapá, Amazonas, Mato Grosso, Pará, Rondônia, Roraima and Tocantins) 15890000 World Bank KfW Entwicklungsbank, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature – the WWF Global Network, through WWF-Brasil), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (Funbio), Government of Brazil, through the Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Brazilian Amazon States (Acre, Amapá, Amazonas, Mato Grosso, Pará, Rondônia, Roraima and Tocantins) 15890000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4560 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP UNOPS with Instituto Sociedade Populacao e Natureza (ISPN) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 1000000.00 0 UNDP UNOPS with Instituto Sociedade Populacao e Natureza (ISPN) 0 UNDP UNOPS with Instituto Sociedade Populacao e Natureza (ISPN) 0 UNDP UNOPS with Instituto Sociedade Populacao e Natureza (ISPN) 0 UNDP UNOPS with Instituto Sociedade Populacao e Natureza (ISPN) 4995573 UNDP UNOPS with Instituto Sociedade Populacao e Natureza (ISPN) 4995573 UNDP UNOPS with Instituto Sociedade Populacao e Natureza (ISPN) 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4637 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (FUNBIO), Petrobras CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 3640000.00 3640000.00 3640000.00 3640000.00 3640000.00 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (FUNBIO), Petrobras 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (FUNBIO), Petrobras 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (FUNBIO), Petrobras 5572325 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (FUNBIO), Petrobras 4022487 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (FUNBIO), Petrobras 18200000 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (FUNBIO), Petrobras 8605188 World Bank Ministry of Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade (FUNBIO), Petrobras 18200000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4718 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministerio do Meio Ambiente CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Minas Gerais -18 -44 +![cdata[Fuelwood/charcoal]]+ 1430000.00 1430000.00 1430000.00 1430000.00 1430000.00 0 UNDP Ministerio do Meio Ambiente 0 UNDP Ministerio do Meio Ambiente 1422006 UNDP Ministerio do Meio Ambiente 1123037 UNDP Ministerio do Meio Ambiente 1865141 UNDP Ministerio do Meio Ambiente 427001 UNDP Ministerio do Meio Ambiente 6755187 UNDP Ministerio do Meio Ambiente 7150000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4834 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IADB Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) Secretariat for Environment, State of Sao Paulo Secretariat for Environment of the State of Rio de Janeiro Secretariat for Science, Technology and Higher Education of the State of Minas Gerais CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Varre Sai region -20.93111 -41.86861 Valença region -22.2456 -43.70028 Porciúncula region -20.96278 -42.04083 Paraitinga river basin -23.36667 -45.66667 Paraiba do Sul river basin -21.60928 -41.01779 Italva region -21.42083 -41.69083 Cambuci region -21.57528 -41.91111 Barra do Piraí region -22.47 -43.82556 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 6301192.00 6301192.00 6301192.00 6301192.00 6301192.00 0 IADB Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) Secretariat for Environment, State of Sao Paulo Secretariat for Environment of the State of Rio de Janeiro Secretariat for Science, Technology and Higher Education of the State of Minas Gerais 3380137 IADB Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) Secretariat for Environment, State of Sao Paulo Secretariat for Environment of the State of Rio de Janeiro Secretariat for Science, Technology and Higher Education of the State of Minas Gerais 9518588 IADB Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) Secretariat for Environment, State of Sao Paulo Secretariat for Environment of the State of Rio de Janeiro Secretariat for Science, Technology and Higher Education of the State of Minas Gerais 5421097 IADB Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) Secretariat for Environment, State of Sao Paulo Secretariat for Environment of the State of Rio de Janeiro Secretariat for Science, Technology and Higher Education of the State of Minas Gerais 4680803 IADB Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) Secretariat for Environment, State of Sao Paulo Secretariat for Environment of the State of Rio de Janeiro Secretariat for Science, Technology and Higher Education of the State of Minas Gerais 6936375 IADB Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) Secretariat for Environment, State of Sao Paulo Secretariat for Environment of the State of Rio de Janeiro Secretariat for Science, Technology and Higher Education of the State of Minas Gerais 865062 IADB Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) Secretariat for Environment, State of Sao Paulo Secretariat for Environment of the State of Rio de Janeiro Secretariat for Science, Technology and Higher Education of the State of Minas Gerais 0 IADB Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) Secretariat for Environment, State of Sao Paulo Secretariat for Environment of the State of Rio de Janeiro Secretariat for Science, Technology and Higher Education of the State of Minas Gerais 31505960 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4859 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IADB Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade - FUNBIO; Ministry of Environment - MMA CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil APA do Ibirapuitã -30.42611512400 -55.64109240200 MONA do Rio São Francisco -9.510022 -37.992443 APA da Ararinha Azul -9.208371 -39.770192 RVS da Ararinha Azul -9.181867 -39.800987 FLONA do Araripe-Apodi -7.33545 -39.432781 PN da Furna Feia -5.054313 -37.511068 APA da Chapada do Araripe -7.39756 -40.014857 APA Baía Negra -19.045376 -57.521565 ESEC Raso da Catarina -9.721115 -38.601487 PE Caminho dos Gerais -15.010853 -43.017855 PE do Podocarpus Figueiras -30.81618167400 -52.92179241200 ESEC de Taiamã -16.859009 -57.510305 PE do Espinilho -30.187633 -57.503565 RPPN Estância Ecol. SESC Pantanal -16.280023 -56.007252 REBIO do Ibirapuitã -29.923748 -55.778263 PN da Chapada Diamantina -12.881223 -41.371264 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 6524364.00 6524364.00 6524364.00 6524364.00 6524364.00 246985 IADB Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade - FUNBIO; Ministry of Environment - MMA 1995061 IADB Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade - FUNBIO; Ministry of Environment - MMA 957423 IADB Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade - FUNBIO; Ministry of Environment - MMA 3266630 IADB Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade - FUNBIO; Ministry of Environment - MMA 3301063 IADB Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade - FUNBIO; Ministry of Environment - MMA 4586478 IADB Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade - FUNBIO; Ministry of Environment - MMA 5754361 IADB Fundo Brasileiro para a Biodiversidade - FUNBIO; Ministry of Environment - MMA 32621820 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-4949 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IADB Ministry of Cities, brazil CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Brasilia -15.77972 -47.92972 +![cdata[Social Protection]]+ 1200000.00 1200000.00 1200000.00 1200000.00 1200000.00 0 IADB Ministry of Cities, brazil 0 IADB Ministry of Cities, brazil 2427813 IADB Ministry of Cities, brazil 754743 IADB Ministry of Cities, brazil 1100536 IADB Ministry of Cities, brazil 769935 IADB Ministry of Cities, brazil 5053027 IADB Ministry of Cities, brazil 6000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5091 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Agency) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Federative Republic of Brazil -10 -55 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1095890.40 1095890.40 1095890.40 1095890.40 1095890.40 0 UNDP EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Agency) 0 UNDP EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Agency) 1815478 UNDP EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Agency) 1267990 UNDP EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Agency) 949995 UNDP EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Agency) 503373 UNDP EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Agency) 5343969 UNDP EMBRAPA (Brazilian Agricultural Research Agency) 5479452 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5276 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Secretary for Extraction and Sustainable Rural Development Ministry of Environment and State Secretary of Environment and Water Resources (SEMARH) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Sergipe -10.5 -37.33333 +![cdata[Rural land policy and management]]+ 763038.40 763038.40 763038.40 763038.40 763038.40 0 UNDP Secretary for Extraction and Sustainable Rural Development Ministry of Environment and State Secretary of Environment and Water Resources (SEMARH) 2297801 UNDP Secretary for Extraction and Sustainable Rural Development Ministry of Environment and State Secretary of Environment and Water Resources (SEMARH) 447845 UNDP Secretary for Extraction and Sustainable Rural Development Ministry of Environment and State Secretary of Environment and Water Resources (SEMARH) 77817 UNDP Secretary for Extraction and Sustainable Rural Development Ministry of Environment and State Secretary of Environment and Water Resources (SEMARH) 0 UNDP Secretary for Extraction and Sustainable Rural Development Ministry of Environment and State Secretary of Environment and Water Resources (SEMARH) 165624 UNDP Secretary for Extraction and Sustainable Rural Development Ministry of Environment and State Secretary of Environment and Water Resources (SEMARH) 3509010 UNDP Secretary for Extraction and Sustainable Rural Development Ministry of Environment and State Secretary of Environment and Water Resources (SEMARH) 3815192 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5324 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of Environment - Extractivism and Sustainable Rural Development Secretary - Desertification Combat and Land Degradation Dept. (MMA/SEDR/DCD) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Varzea, Paraíba -6.785 -37.015 Uaua, Bahia -9.896 -39.444 Sao Mamede, Paraíba -6.929 -37.09 Santa Luzia, Paraíba -6.913 -36.9 Piranhas, Alagoas -9.525 -37.726 Parelhas, Rio Grande do Norte -6.712 -36.621 Olho D'agua Do Casado, Alagoas -9.436 -37.816 Jardim, Ceará -7.598 -39.216 Equador, Rio Grande do Norte -6.884 -36.659 Delmiro Gouveia, Alagoas -9.399 -38.05 Crato, Ceará -7.213 -39.48 Carnauba Dos Dantas; Rio Grande do Norte -6.553 -36.547 Barbalha, Ceará -7.376 -39.313 Serrinha, Bahia -11.619 -39.001 Jandaira, Bahia -11.598 -37.596 Araci, Bahia -11.222 -39.066 Coronel Joao Sa, Bahia -10.303 -37.945 Santana Do Serido, Rio Grande do Norte -6.726 -36.769 +![cdata[Forestry policy and administrative management]]+ 786031.00 786031.00 786031.00 786031.00 786031.00 57419 FAO Ministry of Environment - Extractivism and Sustainable Rural Development Secretary - Desertification Combat and Land Degradation Dept. (MMA/SEDR/DCD) 109557 FAO Ministry of Environment - Extractivism and Sustainable Rural Development Secretary - Desertification Combat and Land Degradation Dept. (MMA/SEDR/DCD) 106106 FAO Ministry of Environment - Extractivism and Sustainable Rural Development Secretary - Desertification Combat and Land Degradation Dept. (MMA/SEDR/DCD) 284041 FAO Ministry of Environment - Extractivism and Sustainable Rural Development Secretary - Desertification Combat and Land Degradation Dept. (MMA/SEDR/DCD) 595633 FAO Ministry of Environment - Extractivism and Sustainable Rural Development Secretary - Desertification Combat and Land Degradation Dept. (MMA/SEDR/DCD) 482305 FAO Ministry of Environment - Extractivism and Sustainable Rural Development Secretary - Desertification Combat and Land Degradation Dept. (MMA/SEDR/DCD) 1423937 FAO Ministry of Environment - Extractivism and Sustainable Rural Development Secretary - Desertification Combat and Land Degradation Dept. (MMA/SEDR/DCD) 3893478 FAO Ministry of Environment - Extractivism and Sustainable Rural Development Secretary - Desertification Combat and Land Degradation Dept. (MMA/SEDR/DCD) 3930155 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5378 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1505700.00 1505700.00 1505700.00 1505700.00 1505700.00 1161214 UNDP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation 1717389 UNDP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation 1537169 UNDP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation 572209 UNDP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation 6453094 UNDP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation 7528500 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-5760 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility IADB Ministry of Environment Ministry of Science and Technology Supervisory Committee of the National Genetic Heritage Council CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Federative Republic of Brazil -10 -55 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 880386.20 880386.20 880386.20 880386.20 880386.20 944186 IADB Ministry of Environment Ministry of Science and Technology Supervisory Committee of the National Genetic Heritage Council 0 IADB Ministry of Environment Ministry of Science and Technology Supervisory Committee of the National Genetic Heritage Council 396217 IADB Ministry of Environment Ministry of Science and Technology Supervisory Committee of the National Genetic Heritage Council 627211 IADB Ministry of Environment Ministry of Science and Technology Supervisory Committee of the National Genetic Heritage Council 1081864 IADB Ministry of Environment Ministry of Science and Technology Supervisory Committee of the National Genetic Heritage Council 1352453 IADB Ministry of Environment Ministry of Science and Technology Supervisory Committee of the National Genetic Heritage Council 0 IADB Ministry of Environment Ministry of Science and Technology Supervisory Committee of the National Genetic Heritage Council 4401931 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9057 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNIDO Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), Itaipu Binacional and CI Biogas- ER CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ 1400000.00 1400000.00 1400000.00 1400000.00 1400000.00 619 UNIDO Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), Itaipu Binacional and CI Biogas- ER 2103175 UNIDO Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), Itaipu Binacional and CI Biogas- ER 869539 UNIDO Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), Itaipu Binacional and CI Biogas- ER 674738 UNIDO Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), Itaipu Binacional and CI Biogas- ER 1311861 UNIDO Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), Itaipu Binacional and CI Biogas- ER 890820 UNIDO Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), Itaipu Binacional and CI Biogas- ER 600915 UNIDO Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), Itaipu Binacional and CI Biogas- ER 393455 UNIDO Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), Itaipu Binacional and CI Biogas- ER 7000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9142 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), UNOPS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Recife -8.05389 -34.88111 São Paulo -22 -49 Brasília -15.77972 -47.92972 +![cdata[Urban development and management]]+ 4527156.00 4527156.00 4527156.00 4527156.00 4527156.00 4770402 UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), UNOPS 2402109 UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), UNOPS 3205995 UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), UNOPS 5386836 UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), UNOPS 6501451 UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), UNOPS 236668 UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), UNOPS 22524846 UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communication (MCTIC), UNOPS 22635780 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9271 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility Funbio Environment Ministry, IBAMA, ICMBIO, JBRJ, OEMAS, IUCN Brazil CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 2687000.00 2687000.00 2687000.00 2687000.00 2687000.00 1500000 Funbio Environment Ministry, IBAMA, ICMBIO, JBRJ, OEMAS, IUCN Brazil 0 Funbio Environment Ministry, IBAMA, ICMBIO, JBRJ, OEMAS, IUCN Brazil 1500000 Funbio Environment Ministry, IBAMA, ICMBIO, JBRJ, OEMAS, IUCN Brazil 2000000 Funbio Environment Ministry, IBAMA, ICMBIO, JBRJ, OEMAS, IUCN Brazil 3000000 Funbio Environment Ministry, IBAMA, ICMBIO, JBRJ, OEMAS, IUCN Brazil 1212026 Funbio Environment Ministry, IBAMA, ICMBIO, JBRJ, OEMAS, IUCN Brazil 2931497 Funbio Environment Ministry, IBAMA, ICMBIO, JBRJ, OEMAS, IUCN Brazil 1291477 Funbio Environment Ministry, IBAMA, ICMBIO, JBRJ, OEMAS, IUCN Brazil 13435000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9413 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP MMA, PUC-Rio (CSRio and CPI), FBDS CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil APA São João -22.56772589 -42.41329186 APA Pouso Alto -14.18297311 -47.53514846 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1790685.00 1790685.00 1790685.00 1790685.00 1790685.00 2414518 UNEP MMA, PUC-Rio (CSRio and CPI), FBDS 1073549 UNEP MMA, PUC-Rio (CSRio and CPI), FBDS 531043 UNEP MMA, PUC-Rio (CSRio and CPI), FBDS 486222 UNEP MMA, PUC-Rio (CSRio and CPI), FBDS 0 UNEP MMA, PUC-Rio (CSRio and CPI), FBDS 1240696 UNEP MMA, PUC-Rio (CSRio and CPI), FBDS 8953425 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9449 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of Environment CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Brasília -15.77972 -47.92972 +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 1144554.00 1144554.00 1144554.00 1144554.00 1144554.00 44465 UNDP Ministry of Environment 95373 UNDP Ministry of Environment 271973 UNDP Ministry of Environment 871008 UNDP Ministry of Environment 1468360 UNDP Ministry of Environment 1007223 UNDP Ministry of Environment 5722770 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9617 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNDP Conservation International, WWF, IFC CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date Actual Completion Date ' Brazil Tocantins -10.5 -48 +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ 1320000.00 1320000.00 1320000.00 1320000.00 1320000.00 729906 UNDP Conservation International, WWF, IFC 1963643 UNDP Conservation International, WWF, IFC 1585638 UNDP Conservation International, WWF, IFC 581361 UNDP Conservation International, WWF, IFC 5850776 UNDP Conservation International, WWF, IFC 6600000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-9664 Global Environment Facility NA Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Ministry of Environment, Fundo Brasileiro de Biodiversidade - (FUNBIO), Conservacao Internacional (CI- Brazil) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Agricultural policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 12066000.00 12066000.00 12066000.00 12066000.00 12066000.00 22821556 World Bank Ministry of Environment, Fundo Brasileiro de Biodiversidade - (FUNBIO), Conservacao Internacional (CI- Brazil) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment, Fundo Brasileiro de Biodiversidade - (FUNBIO), Conservacao Internacional (CI- Brazil) 633240 World Bank Ministry of Environment, Fundo Brasileiro de Biodiversidade - (FUNBIO), Conservacao Internacional (CI- Brazil) 4098522 World Bank Ministry of Environment, Fundo Brasileiro de Biodiversidade - (FUNBIO), Conservacao Internacional (CI- Brazil) 3030917 World Bank Ministry of Environment, Fundo Brasileiro de Biodiversidade - (FUNBIO), Conservacao Internacional (CI- Brazil) 4008874 World Bank Ministry of Environment, Fundo Brasileiro de Biodiversidade - (FUNBIO), Conservacao Internacional (CI- Brazil) 6544893 World Bank Ministry of Environment, Fundo Brasileiro de Biodiversidade - (FUNBIO), Conservacao Internacional (CI- Brazil) 60330000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10122 Global Environment Facility To build social, economic, and ecological landscape resilience in the Cerrado and Caatinga biomes through community-based activities for global environmental benefits and sustainable rural development Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.SGP Brazil seeks to yield specific benefits in the Upper Pota River Basin (Piauí), Upper Jequitinhonha Valley (Minas Gerais), Arrojado River Basin and surroundings (Bahia) and Sertão do Pajeú (Pernambuco) landscapes. These benefits will also be upscaled, through policy tools, replication and through strategic projects, that are carried out beyond the landscapes. The key benefits foreseen in this project include: o Improved biodiversity values- Through biodiversity-friendly agriculture, conservation practices, restoration and improved use of biological resources, reforestation of native, climate-resilient species, there is the expectation that biodiversity values will improve. o Improved socioeconomic circumstances/strengthened livelihoods- Many small community groups do not often have the luxury of startup capital to put some of their sustainable enterprises into operation. The SGP approach will allow some of these groups to enhance their production, or distribution and improve their socioeconomic conditions. SGP funds will also strengthen civil society organizations that are working to enhance social conditions for the most poverty-stricken. The project will also test and pilot innovative technologies that could decrease labour, support more efficient production and improve peoples’ quality of life. o Resilient agriculture and food security- The focus on agroecology is to have food production that makes best use of natural resources without destroying said resources, so that there can be long-term supply and sustainable use. The idea is also to lower the cost of inputs, and create a farm ecosystem that is more resilient to climate change and vacillations in rainfall. Additional project interventions which serve to improve the collection and use of water resources, will also assist in ensuring successful production and a decrease in food insecurity. o Strengthening civic culture- The project’s landscape approach seeks to aggregate the actions of individual groups and communities, with the common objective of having a beneficial impact on the landscape as a whole. This will involve engagement, participation, the collaboration of many, and is anticipated—due to evidence through previous SGP Brazil experience-- to enhance civic culture. Groups that have not worked together yet will have the opportunity to work together; people will learn about successful initiatives carried out, and it is expected that the civil society community, as well as its collaborations with government, academia and the private sector will be improved. o Upscaling women’s achievements and creating opportunities for youth- This SGP project was designed to support women overcome the barriers that they face, and provide them opportunities of leadership. The project also will seek to increase youth participation and ownership in sustainability measures so as to make sure that knowledge is transmitted to the young, and that there are opportunities for youth to establish viable futures. Integrating environmental education into school and vocational programmes will be key to ensuring youth buy-in and support. o Benefits for Indigenous and Traditional Communities- The project seeks to support traditional communities and Indigenous communities that use a communal way of governing natural resources. Lessons learned from these communities will be upscaled, innovations that they wish to test will be supported. The project will also support advocacy and communications interventions to maintain the protection from these lands. o Learning from failures and successes- Many groups and communities do not have the finances available to test initiatives and learn from their failures—failures can lead to financial bankruptcy. SGP provides a unique opportunity to test initiatives, and to also learn if some of them do not perform as well as anticipated, and then share that learning with others. o Accompaniment- Many civil society groups and organizations have specialized talents and expertise, but may not have the organizational or administrative capacities. SGP Brazil will support these entities to strengthen their organizational capacities so that they may be more financially resilient, more adept administratively and can leverage funds from other donors in the future.Global Environment Facility UNDP Instituto Sociedade, População e Natureza (ISPN) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Federative Republic of Brazil -10 -55 +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 896242.00 896242.00 896242.00 896242.00 896242.00 510169 UNDP Instituto Sociedade, População e Natureza (ISPN) 1102557 UNDP Instituto Sociedade, População e Natureza (ISPN) 1186661 UNDP Instituto Sociedade, População e Natureza (ISPN) 4481210 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10190 Global Environment Facility To strengthen management of Brazil’s Marine and Coastal Protected Area (MCPA) system and the enabling conditions for a Blue Economy Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.16. Well-managed marine and coastal protected areas (MCPAs) can generate a suite of ecological benefits by reducing catch pressure on marine species and increasing habitat protection and ecosystem resilience. Similarly, ecological benefits within MCPAs can include increased diversity, abundance, size, and biomass of species, which can be 2–5 times higher in MCPAs compared to fished areas. MCPAs can also bring about improvements in ecosystem health. More generally, MCPAs may help marine ecosystems adapt to climate change impacts, including ocean acidification, sea-level rise, storm intensification, and shifts in species distributions that lead to “climate invaders.” Finally, another important benefit is the reduction of carbon emissions. 17. Ecological benefits translate into socio-economic benefits and resilience to shocks, including public health related shocks. Market benefits are the economic value of goods or services that are observed through market transactions. Marine protected area market benefits potentially include increased fisheries profitability, which can arise through increased recruitment of juveniles and the spillover of fish biomass from MCPAs into fished areas. Marine protected areas can also provide market benefits through increased tourism, or the provision of ecosystem services (e.g., conserved reef systems can protect coastlines from severe weather). Non-market benefits are the economic value of goods or services that cannot be observed through market transactions. These include the benefit to people from knowing that a threatened species is protected, or that an ecosystem is in good condition. Furthermore, the project supports substantial improvements in biodiversity and water quality. 18. Initiatives to develop a pathway to a Blue Economy create long-term benefits of the sustainable use of coastal and marine resources. If managed well, the goods and services produced from coastal and marine ecosystems could make a much greater contribution to reducing poverty, building resilient communities, fostering strong economies, and feeding a global population that is projected to grow to more than 9 billion by 2050. For example, the World Bank’s 2016 Sunken Billions Revisited report shows that properly managed fisheries, with a reduction in overcapacity and overfishing, could provide additional benefits to the global economy in excess of US$80 billion each year (World Bank, 2016). That is almost 30 times the annual net benefits currently accruing to the fisheries sector in spite of the currently prevalent overfishing. 19. Management for conservation and sustainable use in MCPAs is expected to improve and enhance understanding in local communities of the importance of MCPAs and the Blue Economy. Additional benefits will arise in the form of better public service delivery resulting from capacity building in coastal and marine ecosystem administration and specialized training of beneficiaries. Specifically, the project will create direct socio-economic benefits for an estimated 3,000 beneficiaries, including women (50% of beneficiaries), indigenous peoples and vulnerable groups. By doing this, the project also promotes full and productive employment and decent work in rural areas, aiming at the progressive realization of their right to Decent Rural Employment. More indirectly, the project is expected to generate socio-economic benefits for Brazil’s coastal and marine communities more widely by securing the conservation and sustainable use of their resources.Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of the Environment (MMA), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ 2895779.80 2895779.80 2895779.80 2895779.80 2895779.80 14478899 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10368 Global Environment Facility To minimize risk to Persistent Organic Pollutants (PCBs) exposure of human beings and environment in compliance of Stockholm Convention, in an environmentally sustainable market approach, in Brazil. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.206. The project's goal is to strengthen the national capacity to implement sustainable management plans and elimination goal of large PCB holders, particularly in the power generating and distribution sectors; large industrial facilities and sensitive sites, within the framework of national and international guidelines on chemical substances and hazardous waste management. 207. At the national and state levels, the implementation of coordinated demonstration actions with the private sector in the field will show the opportunities of institutional integration and coordination, private-driven investments, will demonstrate that the positive results of these demo interventions would serve to improve and enforce current regulation for environmentally sound management of PCBs. Innovative market interventions offer alternative solutions to other LAC parties of the Stockholm Convention and will follow and integrate these strategies in their efforts to phase out chemical hazardous substances. For this, a public awareness and communication strategy for the elimination of PCBs, related wastes and safer alternatives should result in direct gains for the citizens and the environment.208. Additional economic and social benefits that will be brought on by the project:- Reduced health impact from the exposure to hazardous chemicals, particularly PCBs as well as gender dimensions related to chemicals. The project estimates to increase awareness of 36,000 people, of which 18,000 females and 18,000 males.- Considered newly identified risks related to the global pandemic amid the COVID-19 virus that may affect the implementation of the project. - Job creation through opportunities enhanced in the waste treatment and metal-scrapping recycling industry.- Improved policy, regulatory, monitoring and analysis frameworks, to safeguard human health and the environment.209. In the BAU national context of a BRICS economy, limiting the country´s capacity on elimination and destruction of remaining volumens of PCBs will put a heavy burden in the compliance of international regulations committed by Brazil with the Stockholm Convention. The Global Environmental Benefits (GEB) of the project at the CEO endorsement stage, are the same as presented at the PIF stage. The positive impacts of the project will include the following reduction: 15,000 tons of PCB contaminated wastesGlobal Environment Facility UNDP Ministry of the Environment (MMA) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Brasília -15.77972 -47.92972 +![cdata[Chemicals]]+ 1932000.00 1932000.00 1932000.00 1932000.00 1932000.00 179839 UNDP Ministry of the Environment (MMA) 357793 UNDP Ministry of the Environment (MMA) 508737 UNDP Ministry of the Environment (MMA) 9660000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10465 Global Environment Facility Brazilian metropolitan regions reduce greenhouse gas emissions, conserve biodiversity and achieve economic, social and environmental co-benefits through an integrated urban planning approach. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The GEF-7 project aims to generate social, economic and environmental benefits for Brazil and its citizens. The project objective makes reference to co-benefits that will be generated in addition to mitigation and biodiversity benefits. 1) Social Benefits The project aims to create significant social benefits for local city populations by applying an integrated approach which facilitates collaborative and participatory urban development, leading to more inclusive cities. For instance, the development of project plans and pilot investments will be designed through participatory processes in each city. This will ensure that the concerns, needs and priorities of residents, local communities and civil society organizations will be considered and incorporated in such interventions, leading to outcomes that respond to social needs. Project activities will improve the management of important urban issues such as transportation, sanitation and urban sprawl, leading to an improvement in people’s quality of life in the pilot metropolitan regions. This will include as with regards to health (low-emission transport, improved sanitation management), safety (reduced urban sprawl leading to more compact cities, with better provision of urban services including lighting and policing), and productivity (reduced travel times, greater safety). The development of platforms for the integration of municipal plans and data, and the strengthening of capacities for better metropolitan governance, are some examples of activities that can increase the population’s access to important public services. Furthermore, the developed climate mitigation plan will promote a low-emission development pathway, leading to reduced air contamination and consequently reduced negative health impacts upon the local community. Plans to promote the scale-up of low-emission zones focus on developing spaces that promote a more livable and people-focused space. These will be designed as places for people, rather than for transport thorough-fares. A second category of benefits, which in some cases can be translated, or converted, into economic terms (in others not), consists of the social benefits derived from increased access to green space, both within urban centers and in urban and nearby protected areas. The project’s support for green space establishment and conservation has the potential to make a significant contribution to the wellbeing of urban residents in each of the pilot cities. Benefits are associated with recreational opportunities that encourage residents to spend increased amount of time outdoors in natural surroundings. In addition to physical and health benefits associated with enhanced opportunities for exercise (walking, biking, etc.), a range of additional health and wellness benefits, including enhanced cognition, arise from the restorative benefits of nature exposure. As noted, such benefits have an economic component as well, via improved health and wellbeing and enhanced productivity. Another important benefit correlates specifically with the theme of gender – and inclusivity more broadly. Mapping opportunities, training on issues and addressing gender, in addition to fostering a governance structure that strengthens women’s action, give voice to vulnerably etc., can be a gateway to empowerment of women and other marginalized groups within the project’s sites (see also the gender analysis and action plan for details). One example is the support for sustainable value chains on the Combú Island Environmental Protection Area (Belém), which has a strong potential to contribute to the strengthening of female leadership, in addition to rescuing culture and traditions of riverine traditional populations in the region. 2) Economic Benefits Through its component 3, the project aims to directly lead to economic benefits for Brazilian municipalities by enhancing the availability of financial offer for investing in sustainable urban development. By having enhanced access to such public financing, municipalities will be able to increase investment, and attract greater private investment, for promoting the development of sustainable cities. Increased investment in urban infrastructure is a significant job-creator and stimulus for responding from economic downturns, which many Brazilian cities currently find themselves within. The project also focuses on creating economic benefits for civil society and the private sector. On the former, through the development of integrated plans in component 1, the project aims to lead to reduced travel times (through prioritization of public and non-motorized transport) and reduced energy usage costs (through uptake of efficiency measures) for communities, resulting in increased productivity and household savings. The project also aims to directly kick-start new economic opportunities for the private sector. Building on the component 2 investments, national financing institutions will strengthen and create financial instruments for catalyzing new opportunities for private sector investment in areas such as transport, energy services and waste management. For instance, the project will support FINEP to strengthen financial instruments for incentivizing micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises to innovate solutions for responding to local sustainable urban development challenges. This may build upon existing innovation calls it has in the areas of Technology 4.0, Innovative Women, and Investment in Innovative Startups, as related to the urban context. Improving metropolitan governance is also expected to promote better management of public resources and investments, potentially increasing the availability of resources to address other urban issues. If executed effectively, the project has the potential to change realities and leverage economic development where it intervenes locally. An example is the coordinated action between municipalities for basic sanitation solutions, which can potentially optimize public and private investments in each municipality through economies of scale, thus potentially generating a surplus for investment in other projects. Within the scope of pilot interventions to be carried out by the project, activities that revive the local trade and services through urban upgrading projects may generate economic gains and potentially also employment opportunities. Another example relates to fostering sustainable tourism and the sustainable production of local produce from certain protected areas. They represent an important source of income to local people and an incentive to protect nature and support these areas. Taking a longer-term view, it is also possible to consider reductions in public health costs as a result of stimulating low-emission zones and transport modes. Likewise, better structuring of the urban environment through requalification can also have climate change adaptation benefits and result in potential savings for addressing the consequences of climate change, for example, in connection with the recovery of urban infrastructure affected by natural disasters. 3) Environmental Benefits Beyond mitigation and biodiversity benefits to be generated by the project, described in section 6, there are many other environmental benefits that result from its interventions. These include: (i) reduced pollution in the form of noise, water, air and soil pollution; (ii) reduced heat island effect associated with excess traffic and the burning of fossil fuel; (iii) the spontaneous creation of urban gardens by surrounding communities as a result of the enhancement of green areas and their inclusion into the overall management of the wider landscapes, fighting thereby land degradation and food security locally. Concretely, in Belem, Teresina and Florianopolis the climate mitigation and low-emission technology action plans, the low-emission zone pilots, and the low-emission zone plans will lead to reduced air contamination and heat island effect. Furthermore, in Belem, the integrated solid waste plan will lead to less solid waste disposal, more solid waste recycling and re-use, and consequential reduced land and ground water contamination.Furthermore, the GEF project, through its interventions in component 1 and 2, will contribute directly to increasing the resilience and supporting the adaptation of the metropolitan regions of Belem, Florianopolis and Teresina. On the one hand, the integrated planning platforms will support metropolitan actors to visualize key geospatial data, including layers related to geographical and physical attributes of the city’s environment. Through these platforms and such visualization, the cities will be able to plan more effectively for building resilience, for instance with regards to managing coastline development to avoid erosion and increased possibility of flooding in Belem and Florianopolis. Furthermore, the integrated plans that the cities develop in component 1 will take into account risk matrices, ensuring that new developments incorporate considerations of urban resilience. For instance, in Teresina, the climate mitigation and low-emission technology plan may also focus on nature based solutions and other interventions to reduce the urban heat island (UHI) effect, one of the key challenges in the city. In this way, through natural and low-emission cooling measures, the plan will support the city to reduce GHG emissions generated through air conditioning, as well as increase the city’s resilience to temperature rise.Component 2 also contributes directly to climate adaptation and resilience benefits. While the exact solutions will be determined during project execution, the integrated low emission street, block and district in Belem, Teresina and Florianópolis (Ouputs 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4) may include nature-based solutions that reduce UHI effect, but also serve to support storm-water runoff management and reduce flood impacts. This may also include solutions related to green infrastructure (such as green façades and roofs). The low-emission zones may also pilot solutions such as the retrofitting of public buildings and the use of sustainable materials with high thermal inertia to address UHI effects, increasing local resilience to increased temperatures in all three cities. Furthermore, the agroforestry production chain in Combu Island (Output 2.2) aims to provide benefits for climate resilience by reducing the vulnerability to extreme events both with regards to agriculture productivity and for the families that rely on the income from such agriculture. In synthesis, project interventions aim to reduce the vulnerability of communities directly involved in the areas of intervention by the implementation of integrated and climate-resilient solutions.Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovations (lead), with co-executing partners: the Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO), the Centre for Management and Strategic Studies (CGEE), UNEP CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Teresina -5.08921 -42.8016 Belém -1.45502 -48.5024 Florianópolis -27.5969 -48.5495 +![cdata[Urban development and management]]+ +![cdata[Urban land policy and management]]+ +![cdata[Urban development]]+ 2510488.00 2510488.00 2510488.00 2510488.00 2510488.00 770053 UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovations (lead), with co-executing partners: the Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO), the Centre for Management and Strategic Studies (CGEE), UNEP 303976 UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovations (lead), with co-executing partners: the Brazilian Biodiversity Fund (FUNBIO), the Centre for Management and Strategic Studies (CGEE), UNEP 12552440 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10468 Global Environment Facility Project Objective: To increase the area under sustainable land management in selected beef cattle and soybean landscapes in Brazil and promote the integration of food systems and sustainable landscapes, conservation of biodiversity and recovery of degraded areas. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Inter-American Institute for Cooperation in Agriculture – IICA CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil +![cdata[Agricultural development]]+ +![cdata[Agricultural land resources]]+ +![cdata[Food crop production]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Food security policy and administrative management]]+ 0 World Bank Inter-American Institute for Cooperation in Agriculture – IICA 0 World Bank Inter-American Institute for Cooperation in Agriculture – IICA 0 World Bank Inter-American Institute for Cooperation in Agriculture – IICA 24577982 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10706 Global Environment Facility Strengthening participatory natural resource management processes for sustainable economic development, conservation of biodiversity and maintenance of carbon stocks in Amazon Wetlands Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. 1. The project will directly benefit approximately 6,000 rural producers and strive for 50/50 engagement of men and women. The livelihoods of these producers are currently challenged due in large part to the inability to address degradation challenges and the loss of critical ecosystem services leading to deteriorating living conditions and well-being of local communities. The project will reverse this trend by providing rural interests with the opportunities to access knowledge, information, capacity and experience to adopt improved practices. This will be comprehensively applying best practices to the entire value chain, starting from resource management to market. This will include providing residents to access to greater profitability through sustained production methods and ability to better realize gains from existing and new markets. These practices will result in GEBs along with increased standards of living, food security, and climate change resiliency. 2. Rural communities will be engaged equitably with clear consideration given to cultural norms and practices. The project will work collaboratively with these stakeholders to assist them with the design and implementation of management regimes that build knowledge for informed decision-making and provide opportunities to regulate resource use through planning, by-laws, and improved practices. 3. The project will closely monitor and track benefit delivery. This will be done to make certain that target beneficiaries are meaningfully increasing livelihood security, reducing climate risk exposure through the adoption of pro- BD conservation approaches. 4. Employment is an on-going challenge. By improving these practices, increased livelihoods, and income the project is expected to have knock-on impacts in terms of economic development and associated increases in employment opportunity. 5. At the governance level, national benefits will accrue to a variety of agencies particularly at the local level where resource concerns are greatest and management capacity most needed. This will include the ability to more efficiently and effectively address conservation issues. The results of more strategic and collaborative approaches will also increase cost-effectiveness. 6. As noted, the project will pay special attention to these issues with regards to women empowerment and gender equity. These concepts are woven throughout the project framework and reflected in the results framework. The project will assist women to engage meaningfully in decision-making and capacity building. The project will help build skills and empower women to realize more equity and greater economic security. Global Environment Facility FAO Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovations; Mamiraua Sustainable Development Institute CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Amapa National Forest 1.397872 -51.632996 Soure Marine Extractivist Reserve -0.50519 -48.4759 Piagaçu-Purus Sustainable Development Reserve -4.562736 -62.141418 +![cdata[Environmental policy and administrative management]]+ +![cdata[Biodiversity]]+ +![cdata[Site preservation]]+ 1215828 FAO Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovations; Mamiraua Sustainable Development Institute 3411644 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10749 Global Environment Facility To expand the area under legal protection and improve management of Protected Areas, and increase the area under restoration and sustainable management in the Brazilian Amazon. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility World Bank Ministry of Environment(MMA), Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Amazon Basin -2.5 -60 Brazil -10 -55 3856880.80 3856880.80 3856880.80 3856880.80 3856880.80 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment(MMA), Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) 1695956 World Bank Ministry of Environment(MMA), Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) 0 World Bank Ministry of Environment(MMA), Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) 909653 World Bank Ministry of Environment(MMA), Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) 19284404 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10911 Global Environment Facility Conserve the Cerrado biome by sustainably generating income to local communities Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project's socio-economic benefits are to increase income and community organization in the project area, with particular attention to the role and participation of women and youth. This economic and social strengthening of communities directly contributes to the sustainable and long-term management of the area, increasing the value perceived by communities for the native vegetation and their traditional production methods. This preservation of traditional income-generating methods maintains biodiversity, including indigenous seeds, water recharge, and carbon stored in the soil.Global Environment Facility Funbio Instituto Internacional de Educação do Brasil - IEB CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil 611021.67 611021.67 611021.67 400000 Funbio Instituto Internacional de Educação do Brasil - IEB 826767 Funbio Instituto Internacional de Educação do Brasil - IEB 1833065 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-10932 Global Environment Facility Strengthen the national transparency system in Brazil (DataClima+) for informing national policymaking and meeting the requirements of the enhanced transparency framework (ETF) under the Paris Agreement. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.This CBIT project is addressing GEF Focal Area Climate Mitigation 3-8 “Foster enabling conditions for mainstreaming mitigation concerns into sustainable development strategies through capacity building initiative for transparency”.The project will contribute to the improvement of local and global environmental conditions through enhancing the transparency related to GHG emissions, mitigation, adaptation, and means of implementation in Brazil. It will strengthen the institutional and technical capacities in the country for national reporting requirements under the commitment of the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement, such as the elaboration of Biennial Transparency Reports and National Communications, and the tracking and updating of its NDC. More specifically, it will improve the national capacities of Brazil to fulfil the MPGs of the Enhanced Transparency Framework of the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, the project will improve gender mainstreaming activities in fundamental elements of Brazil’s climate change related policies and reports, such as the country’s NCs, NDC updates, adaptation plans and mitigation actions. It will define, design, and propose the necessary institutional arrangements for all the reporting processes to ensure that the capturing and reporting of essential climate transparency information and data is efficient and science based. The design and establishment of a functional transparency system with tools, guides, and protocols to monitor and evaluate (M&E) adaptation measures and monitor, report, and verify (MRV) mitigation actions, and support needed and received will additionally be supported.This CBIT project will therefore strengthen Brazil’s enabling environment and capacity to implement the MPGs of the Enhanced Transparency Framework of the Paris Agreement by establishing the necessary institutional arrangements and by improving the national planning processes and instruments.The project will additionally ensure active engagement with national academia, research institutions, and public and private universities throughout the country to ensure the sustainability of the entire system and project outputs. Throughout the project, active engagement will be ensured through capacity building activities to ensure improved knowledge of relevant stakeholders and the sustainability of the project. The communication campaign in output 1.6 will create public awareness and will establish a channel for continuous stakeholder consultation, interaction, and engagement.DataClima+ will provide a better access to climate change information and allow monitoring for decision making. It will also allow to develop well informed viable strategies to increase resilience in marginalized communities of Brazil, which are particularly prone to climate hazards. Frequently affected by floods and landslides, these events have widespread implications for the economic, social, and psychological welfare of vulnerable communities. Responding effectively and timely to these risks requires the strategic combination of updated information and decision-making, thereby creatively linking the expertise, efforts and actions of diverse stakeholders, including local government, scientists, industry experts, and the communities themselves. To achieve this, DataClima+ represents an integrated tool of interconnectivity between the sectors and disciplines to manage climate change commitments and impacts.Finally, the CBIT project will assist Brazil in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), and more specifically, SDG 13, by supporting the integration of climate change measures into national policies, strategies and planning; building knowledge and improving education, awareness-raising and human and institutional capacity on climate change issues, and promotion of mechanisms for raising capacity for effective climate change-related planning and management in the country.Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovations (MCTI), and FUNBIO (executing partner) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Brazil -10.000000 -55.000000 3835616 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11052 Global Environment Facility To reduce and reverse the trends of degradation and biodiversity loss in Southern Bahia State by strengthening the cabruca cocoa production systems Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. E.1 Knowledge management and Communication 131. Knowledge management approach and Communication strategy comprises component 4 of this project and are structured under two outputs: 4.1.1. Communication strategy developed and under implementation; 4.2.2. Knowledge management plan developed and implemented, including south-south cooperation activities. Knowledge Management Plan 132. The Knowledge management plan will be transversal to all three main components of this project and will be implemented in two main approaches: An internal approach, referring to the knowledge generated by the project activities and results; and an external approach, building on the knowledge already developed by local organizations, seeking to improve projects and synergistic actions impacts. 133. In the internal approach, the project team will document, store, analyze and publicize project results and the knowledge generated during activities implementation. In this sense, activities planned in the Knowledge management plan include publication of online and printed documents for publicizing and spreading project results and Knowledge generated and realization of seminars and workshops to share and discuss project findings with main partners and beneficiaries. These events include south-south cooperation activities with other projects supported by GEF targeting cocoa under the FOLUR programme (i.e., Nicaragua and Ivory Coast) and GEF-7 project in Venezuela. The team project will also seek to participate in events organized by partners to share results and findings, positioning the project as an important initiative in innovation and knowledge generation fields. Also, the project will support innovation initiatives in agroforest management and cocoa value chain in partnership with local universities and promote environmental education weeks in schools, highlighting the importance of cabruca and producer's role for biodiversity conservation. 134. In the external approach, the project will work together with local stakeholders to overcome major barriers regarding knowledge management. The region has a rich set of organizations involved with research, development and innovation activities, such as universities, private companies and NGOs, as well as CEPLAC. Despite that, there’s a lack of knowledge integration and diffusion in a way that facilitates decision-making process by public authorities and private actors, supporting the territorial development planning based on actual data and information. The project will support the development of tools and platforms, in partnership with Social Observatory and Scientific and Technological Park to integrate, organize and share in accessible ways relevant data and information with main public and private stakeholders and with the society in general. 135. In Component 1, the knowledge management plan, including internal and external approach will support the decision-making process and regional planning in the scope of the governance system with actual and precise data and information. In component 2, the project will support tools and platforms for knowledge generation and sharing, will promote workshops for discussion and knowledge integration with main stakeholders regarding Biodiversity Conservation, Landscape Planning, Environmental Restoration and Payment for Environmental Services. Will also develop a landscape and biodiversity monitoring systems that will help the design of public policies and strategic actions. Also, the project will support the capacitation and training of young people in actions such as “Biodiversity monitoring System implementation” and “Community environmental agents’’. In component 3, the project will work with partners to build on and improve the knowledge related to agroforestry management practices, training technicians and producers, and improving cabruca management systems. One of the strategies that will be implemented to raise technical knowledge available in the project region will be the “Cocoa School''. It's a hub of knowledge development that will offer continuous training programs to rural technicians and producer’s, that includes exchanges between producers to raise the knowledge related to better management practices. 136. The knowledge management plan will adopt gender sensitive actions, promoting workshops with women leadership to foster and improve women role in knowledge management and diffusion and women role in biodiversity and agrobiodiversity conservation and in cocoa value chain. The project will also adopt strategies to valorise and fully integrate local and traditional knowledge in the decision-making process, guaranteeing its participation in the governance system and other discussion forums implemented by the project. Also, the project will be implementing activities to document and safeguard local and traditional knowledge, in activities such as “Support and valorisation of traditional management practices through GIAHS patrimonialization and cabruca dynamic conservation plan elaboration” and as one of the main functions of the community environmental agents. The following table details the budget and implementation timeline of the KM plan: Activities Budget Timeline 4.1.2.1. Development of a platform for data aggregation and dissemination $15,000 First Year of the project 4.1.2.2. Holding seminars to exchange experiences between beneficiaries and project partners $15,000 3 seminars - 1 at final of first project year 1 at final of second project year 1 at final of third projet year 4.1.2.3. Seminar on conservation of the Atlantic Forest with a focus on sustainable cocoa production $18,000 Last year of the project 4.1.2.4. Participation in regional and national events, fairs and forums $8,000 4 events supported; 1 at each project year 4.1.2.5. Meeting of female leaders $10,000 2 meetings supported, 1 at first project year 1 at third project year 4.1.2.6. Producers meeting $ 10,000 2 meetings supported 1 at second project years 1 at third project year 2.1.2.7. Hackathon – innovative ideas for the cabruca cocoa chain $6,000 Second project year 2.1.2.8. Advocacy and incidence actions (coordinator for component 4) $44,000 Throughout the entire project implementation phase 2.1.2.9. Virtual seminars to exchange south-south experience $3,000 2 seminars supported 1 at second project year 1 at third project year 2.1.2.10. Cross-site Visit For GEF Project in Venezuela $17,000 At third project year 2.1.2.11. Tradicional population consultation process (to be evaluated during the project period) $6,000 Throughout the entire project implementation phase Communication Strategy 137. The communication strategy will focus on sharing and publicizing project results to partners, stakeholders and general society. The objective is to enlarge project visibility, results and new initiatives implemented on the territory, seeking to promote project credibility, transparency and legitimacy. The project communication strategy will work an in and out approach (internal and external communication strategy) 138. The internal communication strategy will be focused on project implementation itself, by fostering communication within the project team and with project main partners. This strategy has the following objectives: To Engage stakeholders and beneficiaries in project activities, updating about activities implementation, facilitating participation and collaboration opportunities; To build a project common narrative, alignment and belonging between partners and beneficiaries; publicizing about project results and advancements. The internal communication strategy will be directed to the project team and main partners. It will contribute directly to the effectiveness of project implementation and reaching its goals. It also contributes to a better communication between project team and main partners, through coherent and homogenous discourses about project strategies and institutional approach, promoting better alignment between organizations involved (executors and partners). 139. The activities that will be carried on the internal communication strategy includes: publication of online and printed materials about project activities, opportunities for collaboration and project results and advancements; realization of forums and workshops between project teams and main partners to enhance the alignment during project implementation; Elaboration of short audiovisual materials to spread project activities among main partners and beneficiaries; Elaboration of project visual identity. 140. The external communication strategy will be focused on publicizing project actions and results to society in general and its contributions and advancements in sustainable development, biodiversity conservation and improvement of smallholders livelihoods agendas. This external communication strategy will also promote strategic communication actions regarding unique characteristics of the cabruca system to society, including its importance for Atlantic Forest Conservation and the Higher quality of its cocoa and the project’s contribution to its maintenance and improvements. Its intention is to raise the project visibility, as well as its results, advancements, and new initiatives implemented and developed on the territory, promoting project credibility, legitimacy and transparency. 141. In this sense, the external communication Strategy has the following objectives: To update and inform project progress and activities and publicize its results, lessons learned and good practices for replication and scaling up; ; Raise awareness about Atlantic Forest and its biodiversity conservation, as well as the importance of cabruca systems; Raise awareness about cabruca cocoa and its unique characteristics, such as higher quality and socioenvironmental values associated. Publicize projects contributions to sustainable development, biodiversity conservation and improvement of smallholders livelihoods; 142. The actions to be implemented in the scope of the communication plan includes: Press releases and social network publications;; Elaboration of online and printed materials; Elaboration of audiovisual materials, such as short videos for social networks, a project video case, a promotional video focusing on marketing and a short documentary about cabruca system; Realization of a award for higher quality chocolate from cabruca agroforestry systems; and frequent encounters with public managers and other relevant stakeholders. The following table details the budget and implementation timeline of the communication strategy: Activities Budget Timeline 4.1.1.1. Project Communication Consultancy $35,000 Throughout the entire project implementation phase 4.1.1.2. Audiovisual pieces elaboration $18,000 3 audiovisual pieces elaborated 1 at second project year 1 at third project year 1 at final project year 4.1.1.3. Communication pieces publication (printed and online) $21,000 Bimonthly, throughout the entire project implementation phase 4.1.1.4. Case studies/lessons learned publications $16,000 4 publications supported, 2 at third project year 2 at final project year 4.1.1.5. Cocoa Cabruca Quality award $9,000 At third project year 4.1.1.6. Inception workshop $5,000 First 3 months of the project implementation phase 4.1.1.7. Final workshop $5,000 Last 3 months of project implementation phase E.2 Socio-economic Benefits and Decent Rural Employment 143. The project will directly benefit cocoa producers with a series of activities such as technical assistance, training and capacitation program, access to market, economic valorization of products and byproducts of cabruca systems through incentives to better production and processing practices and labeling and marketing strategies. Through this set of actions, the project seeks to revitalize cabruca systems and the cocoa value chain in the impacted region, contributing to regional sustainable economic development and positioning 141. Bahia State and Brazil as one of the biggest producers of sustainable cocoa in the world. To achieve this the project will support small and medium farmers, seeking to increase technical capacities, yields, product quality and access to better markets, fostering increase in income generation by rural activities in smallholders’ families, improving their livelihoods. 144. As mentioned in the sections above, the cabruca system contributes immensely to biodiversity conservation, climatic regulation, landscape connectivity and promotes ecosystem services such as water and soil protection and renovation in addition to its social, cultural and economic importance to the region, as will be more explored in “Annex B – Baseline Scenario and problem to be addressed” (please refer to the Annex B in the ProDoc word document). Nevertheless, the current state of cabruca economic unviability and producers’ vulnerability is one of the major drivers of productive areas transformation that leads to forest degradation and biodiversity loss. In this sense, strengthening and valorizing farmers’ role in biodiversity conservation by promoting the sustainable cocoa value chain is a key strategy to achieve global benefits linked to Tropical Forests and its biodiversity management and conservation, as well as promotion of ecosystem services. Yet, the revitalization of cocoa culture in the region is fundamental for rural succession and maintenance of families in rural areas, ensuring employment and income generation that attends to families demands and needs and fosters better life quality. The revitalization and valorization of the cocoa value chain promotes employment and decent work for rural people, especially for young people. The project will work closely with small and medium producers guaranteeing good work conditions in all activities related to the project. In this sense the project will contributes to Decent Rural Employment (DRE) in four pillars of DRE supported by FAO, as follows: Pillar 1 – employment creation and enterprise development: Women and men small-scale producers supported in accessing markets and modern value chains.; agribusiness and marketing micro, small and medium enterprises supported in accessing markets, training, financial services and other productive assets; vocational and educational training programmes on technical and business skills for rural people supported; Capacities of national partners supported to collect and analyze age and disaggregated data on rural labor markets. Pillar 2 – Social protection: occupational safety and health measures for the rural workforce adopted by promoting safer technology for small scale and commercial agriculture in extension programmes; working conditions improved in rural areas, including effective maternity protection and living wages in agriculture. Pillar 3 – Standards and rights at work: Socially responsible agricultural production supported, specifically to reduce gender and age based discrimination; Child labour prevention and reduction in rural areas supported by tackling its root causes (poverty, lack of education) and providing livelihood alternatives to poor households; Compliance with national labour legislation promoted in rural areas. Pillar 4 – Governance and Social Dialogue: Countries supported in strengthening democratic organizations and networks of producers and workers, particularly in the informal rural food economy; Representation of the rural poor in social dialogue and policy dialogue through their organizations supported; Participation of rural poor in local decision-making and governance mechanisms supported; Rural women and youth groups empowered to be involved in these process from the initial steps; Synergies built between organizations, programmes, countries and producer-to-producer learning opportunities created. Global Environment Facility FAO CEPLAC (Ministry of Agriculture) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Brazil State of Bahia -12.000000 -42.000000 Ituberá Municipality -13.4458 -39.913 Nilo Peçanha Municipality -13.3853 -39.1419 Presidente Tancredo Neves Municipality -13.2741 -39.2516 Una Municipality -15.952 -39.1220 Almadina Municipality -14.4033 -39.4126 Arataca Municipality -15.1445 -39.2529 Aratuipe Municipality -13.537 -39.457 Aurelino Leal Municipality -14.2147 -39.2846 Barro Preto Municipality -14.4528 -39.2425 Buerarema Municipality -14.5926 -39.1821 Cairu Municipality -13.526667 -38.948056 Camacan Municipality -15.2539 -39.3029 Camamu Municipality -13.5626 -39.720 Canavieiras Municipality -15.3853 -39.1015 Coaraci Municipality -14.3841 -39.3537 Floresta Azul Municipality -14.5040 -39.4518 Gandu Municipality -13.4856 -39.2650 Ibicaraí Municipality -14.5227 -39.3335 Ibirapitanga Municipality -14.332 -39.2429 Igrapiúna Municipalit -13.5121 -39.1137 Ilhéus Municipality -14.4534 -39.134 Itabuna Municipality -14.5058 -39.1932 Itacaré Municipality -14.2210 -39.730 Itaju do Colônia Municipality -15.918 -39.4257 Itajuípe Municipality -14.4131 -39.2545 Itapé Municipality -14.556 -39.2910 Itapebi Municipality -15.5315 -39.4116 Itapitanga Municipality -14.2749 -39.3732 Jaguaripe Municipality -13.742 -39.048 Jussari Municipality -15.916 -39.3056 Maraú Municipality -14.914 -39.850 Mascote Municipality -15.3825 -39.2540 Pau Brasil Municipality -15.2635 -39.4123 Piraí do Norte Municipality -13.849444 -39.391944 Santa Luzia Municipality -15.2749 -39.1636 São José da Vitória Municipality -15.418 -39.210 Taperoá Municipality -13.3410 -39.1312 Teolândia Municipality -13.3413 -39.2753 Ubaitaba Municipality -14.1613 -39.2250 Uruçuca Municipality -14.293 -39.106 Valença Municipality -13.2219 -39.1424 Wenceslau Guimarães -13.375 -39.3451 4700001 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11072 Global Environment Facility Promote the decarbonization of the Brazilian building and construction sector through the adoption of innovative technologies and public policies Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Yes.Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Brazil 9167443 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11124 Global Environment Facility Promote structuring conditions for large-scale restoration in Brazil Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.1. It is envisioned that this will create increased employment and income-generating opportunities for 150,000 beneficiaries in all biomes of Brazil, thus improving their socio-economic wellbeing and resilience. Restaura Biomas will create socio-economic benefits through the following components: Component 1 - Public Policies2. This component will strengthen national and subnational frameworks to promote cross-sector coordination and enable policy implementation. With the enabling conditions in place, ecosystem restoration at scale can be achieved through public policies and instruments, such as programs, plans, incentives, and others, thus generating climate, biodiversity and social benefits. There will be public consultations and planning efforts that use community input to determine the best approaches for restoration in the project areas while supporting community needs. Component 1 also plans to support research and development initiatives, expanding the socio-economic benefits for communities in project sites. Component 2 - Networks3. Under Component 2, subnational and local interventions will help to build capacity and strengthen restoration coalitions. Capacity building and technical assistance will be used to support compliance with the Forest Code. Restaura Biomas will also support innovations in ecosystem restoration which can result in transformation impacts that generate global environmental benefits and livelihoods at the scale needed. Capacity building through technical assistance and innovation can generate increased socio-economic wellbeing for communities that depend on healthy, restored ecosystems for their livelihoods. Component 3 - Finance and Models4. Restaura Biomas plans to unlock financial flows and bridge different types of capital to support forest landscape restoration interventions led by local organizations from civil society, companies from the private sector, and governmental agencies. By creating demand for forest products and unlocking financial flows, Restaura Biomas will directly increase the economic wellbeing of communities, farmers, and businesses that depend on ecosystems for their livelihoods. 5. The 150,000 beneficiaries of the project will experience the environmental, social, and economic benefits from restoration. In particular, climate change mitigation and adaptation will support food, water, and financial security, especially for vulnerable populations. Component 4 - Monitoring & Evaluation and Knowledge Management6. The knowledge management and monitoring & evaluation products (e.g. the project website, annual progress reports, evaluations, participation in webinars and forums) can create socioeconomic benefits by sharing lessons learned and best practices for other projects that are similar in theme, scope, and/or region. By supporting best practices and learning for other projects, Restaura Biomas can indirectly improve the design and implementation of future GEF programming and other restoration projects in the region, creating environmental and social benefits for people in project areas.Global Environment Facility CI WRI Brazil CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Caatinga Priority Landscape -7.82 -37.843 Atlantic Forest Priority Landscape -21.8621 -44.6169 13397248 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11167 Global Environment Facility To restore wetland and lowland forest ecosystems and biodiversity in the Amazon mainland and coast through strengthening people and Local Communities capacity for ecosystem restoration, improving the enabling environment, and initiating restoration in overlooked areas of the Amazon. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The project seeks to integrate forest restoration with the livelihoods strategies of local communities and farmers and make the sustainable exploitation of forest resources economically viable through support for the strengthening of the restoration and of non-wood forest products value chains. The theory of change of this project but also of bioeconomy policy and models under development is that this creates significant incentives for the restoration of degraded lands, the implementation of agroforestry models and the sustainable use of natural resources provided by the standing forest and, hence, becomes an important ingredient in strategies to combat the conversion of forests into arable land or pastures, often with much lower economic returns per hectare. Although the project is expected to deliver these benefits at the local level in the conservation units included in its activities, the assumptions on which the project is based have application at the national level and certainly also at the level of the entire Amazon basin. Colombia, for example included bioeconomy, natural ecosystems, sustainable territory in its national development plan as one of five development strategies, with the objective “to promote sustainable territorial development through knowledge, conservation and use of biodiversity and its goods and ecosystem services, considering research and innovation ecosystems as instruments and as an institutional strategic program, innovation and transparency for institutional transformation focused on social and regional convergence”77. Ecuador prepared a white book on bioeconomy78 which defines bioeconomy as “the production of goods and services based on the sustainable use of biological resources and their derivates, including ecosystem services”79 while Brazil launched in 2024 its national bioeconomy strategy with the objective to coordinate and implement public policies with respect to the development of bioeconomy, defined as productive and economic development model based on values of justice, ethics and inclusion, able to generate products, processes and services through the sustainable use, regeneration and conservation of biodiversity, guided by scientific and traditional knowledge and with a view to add value, the generation of jobs and income, sustainability and climate stability80 81. Project activities are aligned with FAO policies on decent employment in forestry, in particular with the goals of “increasing opportunities for entrepreneurship and employment in forestry while avoiding deforestation and forest degradation” and “increasing social dialogue and representation through effective and strong cooperatives, producers’ organizations and forestry workers’ unions82. The strengthening of restoration value chain has the potential to promote employment and decent work for rural people, especially for young people and women. The project will work closely local communities and MSMEs to guarantee good work conditions in all activities related to the project.?In this sense the project will contributes to Decent Rural Employment (DRE) as supported by FAO, as follows: Employment creation and enterprise development Local communities trained in restoration value chain activities, such as seed and seedling production, biodiversity assessment and monitoring. The project will also support the development of seed collection networks and seedling nurseries, articulating with partners to support access to new market. The project will also support local MSMEs in accessing innovative markets in NWFP value chains, increasing income generation, and decent rural employment. Social protection: occupational safety and health measures for the rural workforce adopted by promoting safer technology for restoration and NWFP production; working conditions improved in rural areas, including effective maternity protection and living wages in agriculture. Standards and rights at work: Socially responsible value chains supported, specifically to reduce gender and age based discrimination; Child labor prevention and reduction in rural areas supported by tackling its root causes (poverty, lack of education) and providing livelihood alternatives to poor households; The project will guarantee compliance with national labor legislation promoted in rural areas.??? Governance and Social Dialogue: Countries supported in strengthening democratic organizations and networks of producers and workers, particularly in the in the restoration and NWFP value chains; Representation of the rural poor in social dialogue and policy dialogue through their organizations supported; Participation of rural poor in local decision-making and governance mechanisms supported; Rural women and youth groups empowered to be involved in these process from the initial steps; Synergies built between organizations, projects, and producer-to-producer learning opportunities created.Global Environment Facility FAO Mamiraua Institute for Sustainable Development (IDSM) CEO Endorsement Date ' Brazil Mestre Lucindo Marine Extractive Reserve -0.7222 -47.724 Mãe Grande de Curuçá Extractive Reserve -0.6474 -47.8369 Manaus Municipality -3.101194 -60.025 Manacapuru Municipality -3.29972 -60.62056 Amanã Sustainable Development Reserve -2.6368 -64.6957 Tefé National Forest -4.05389 -65.53639 Careiro da Várzea Municipality -3.78706 -60.3479 Careiro Municipality -3.78706 -60.3479 Novo Airão Municipality -1.98386 -61.78513 Tefé Municipality -4.52227 -65.60446 Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve -2.1921 -65.71379 5000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11182 Global Environment Facility To advance plastic circularity in the Food and Beverage sector working with the HORECA sector (hospitality, restaurant and catering) creating a conducive policy and regulatory environment piloted in coastal cities in Brazil. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency. The project aims to benefit millions of people in Brazil by promoting circularity and fostering an enabling regulatory environment. This will drive innovation and investment in sustainable packaging solutions, creating new market opportunities and jobs in the green economy, including for women. The project targets less developed cities such as Salvador and Belém, fostering regional development and economic growth. Municipal governments in these cities support the project through co-financing, recognizing its potential to boost the local economy. Key socio-economic benefits include: 1. Job Creation and Economic Growth: Promoting circularity will drive innovation, create jobs, and foster regional development, especially in less developed cities like Salvador and Belém. 2. Cost Reduction for Local Businesses: Implementing circular solutions will help local businesses reduce costs associated with plastic waste management and regulatory compliance, enhancing their competitiveness. 3. Enhanced Gender Equality: The project will improve gender equality by providing opportunities for women in the green economy, fostering a more inclusive HORECA sector. 4. Regional Development: By targeting less developed cities and fostering local initiatives, the project will drive regional development and economic growth. 5. Documentation and Reporting: Progress, including cost-benefit analyses and socio-economic impacts, will be documented and shared with stakeholders to ensure transparency and knowledge transfer. Additionally, by Y5 Q4, at least 40% of pilots will demonstrate positive socio-economic effects, such as increased income, job creation, and cost savings for HORECA establishments. This target underscores the project's commitment to delivering tangible socio-economic benefits, contributing to a more sustainable and inclusive economy. Global Environment Facility UNEP Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation (Brasil) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Belém (PA) -1.45583 -48.50444 São Paulo (SP) -23.5475 -46.63611 São Vicente -23.9631 -46.3919 Santos -23.9608 -46.3336 Salvador (BA) -12.97563 -38.49096 Rio de Janeiro (RJ) -22.90642 -43.18223 Peruíbe -24.3200 -46.9980 Praia Grande -24.0058 -46.4028 Mongaguá -24.0948 -46.6208 Itanhaém -24.1836 -46.7886 Guarujá -23.9931 -46.2564 Cubatão -23.8950 -46.4253 Bertioga -23.8545 -46.1388 Baixada Santista (SP) -23.85663 -46.27055 Florianópolis (SC) -27.61455 -48.50116 8056881 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11200 Global Environment Facility Enhance conservation and sustainable management in selected areas in the Lower Xingu region in the Brazilian Amazon. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Yes, an economic and financial analysis was performed and a summary is presented below. Additional information on Gender, Stakeholder Engagement, and risks are also outlined following the Socio-economic benefit section.The economic and financial analysis presents an incremental analysis of the economic (welfare) benefits generated by the project. It includes two main benefit streams: (a) the first is related to ecosystem goods and services provided by biodiversity conservation, avoided deforestation, and freshwater preservation by better managing protected areas (Component 1), and (b) the second is linked with carbon storage and a reduction of carbon emissions (all components). Results show a positive economic impact (between 1 to 6 of benefit-cost ratio) for Pará region and for the Brazilian society. The results of the quantitative simulations are mostly robust across sensitivity analyses, assuming different discount rates and carbon price parameters. Key parameters such as the avoided deforestation attributed to the project, or the value of ecosystem services are very conservative. The estimates shown correspond to a lower bound as they represent the benefit streams derived from Component 1 mostly, which is a very conservative approach. It is expected that the other components will have additional benefits but are difficult to measure due to data constraints. For instance, the project is expected to improve sustainable value chains by enhancing bioeconomy sustainable production, which will clearly improve livelihoods, create sustainable jobs, and reduce poverty for local inhabitants. Additional benefits can be associated with economic benefits arising from better public service delivery resulting from capacity building of the protected areas administration, territorial governance and specialized training to beneficiaries. While this approach is likely to systematically undervalue the project impacts, it provides a high degree of robustness. If additional project benefits are considered, results are expected to be even stronger. The estimates shown correspond to a lower bound as they represent the benefit streams derived from Component 1 mostly, which is a very conservative approach. It is expected that the other components will have additional benefits but are difficult to measure due to data constraints. For instance, the project is expected to improve sustainable value chains by enhancing bioeconomy sustainable production, which will clearly improve livelihoods, create sustainable jobs, and reduce poverty for local inhabitants. Additional benefits can be associated with economic benefits arising from better public service delivery resulting from capacity building of the protected areas administration, territorial governance and specialized training to beneficiaries. While this approach is likely to systematically undervalue the project impacts, it provides a high degree of robustness. If additional project benefits are considered, results are expected to be even stronger.Based on literature, it is estimated for Component 2 that this project can generate higher agricultural and non-agricultural profit through incentivizing socio-bioeconomy production. It will support substantial improvement in both biodiversity and adding value to natural resources while preserving the forest, compared to the current land use in Brazil in Pará. For instance, acai and cocoa are part of the top biodiversity products in Pará. The training support of small businesses that use the previous-discarded acai seeds as an input to produce acai soaps, or that enhance the vertical integration of cocoa production, would bring marginal revenues to the families involved and overall wellbeing to the country. A recent analysis on the GDP of the socio-bioeconomy production chain in the state of Pará estimates that socio-bioeconomy has the potential to generate 30 billion USD in income by 2040. Similarly, the support of municipal plans for restoration of Native Vegetation and other similar measures may promote soil and watershed protection, biodiversity conservation, and even agricultural productivity, with obvious benefits for the whole population of Pará State.Additional details on Gender, Stakeholder Engagement, and safeguards presented below: The Project seeks gender equality and adopts a gender transformative approach. The project conducted a gender assessment and prepared a Gender Action Plan (GAP) to encourage equitable gender participation in all activities. The GAP has been prepared considering gender gaps that can be addressed by the Project and defining monitoring indicators and goals. This assessment reveals significant gender gaps in decision-making instances and in access to financing for collective actions on conservation, sustainable use, or restoration of biodiversity. Hence, the GAP gives emphasis to strengthening the role of women in project activities and the goal is that 50 percent of its beneficiaries are women. The Project aims to enhance participation of women in the community-based governance and sustainable production activities by incorporating actions to (a) strengthen women’s participation and leadership within community decision-making processes, and (b) ensure women get an equitable share of the economic benefits resulting from the sustainable use of the natural resources. Gender-focused activities will include gender assessments, the facilitation of women’s participation in formal and informal decision-making structures and governance processes, and training for capacity strengthening to ensure effective nature-based economic development. Project outcomes will be measured based on three indicators of women’s agency: (a) the number of women participating in decision-making processes regarding Project-supported activities; (b) proportion of women among participants in decision-making processes regarding activities supported by the Project; (c) proportion of women among female participants in decision-making processes regarding activities supported by the Project who believe that these activities take into consideration their views and meet their needs; (d) proportion of women-led organizations and organizations where at least half of the members are women among the beneficiary organizations of the Project; (e) proportion of local content on conservation and sustainable production prepared for various media that incorporate gender aspects and women’s perspective; and (f) proportion of women among the members of the Management Councils of the Conservation Units supported by the Project. The Monitoring and Evaluation process of gender actions and indicators will be based on the record of the activities conducted and on primary and secondary data collected during their implementation. The Project’s GAP includes the following pillars: (a) enhance women’s participation in local conservation, community forest management and sustainable production activities; (b) boost the participation of women in decision-making processes related to the management of protected areas supported by the Project; (c) boost the participation of women in decision-making processes at the municipal level; and (d) tackle sexual harassment, abuse, and exploitation and gender-based violence. The Monitoring and Evaluation process of gender actions and indicators will be based on the record of the activities conducted and on primary and secondary data collected during their implementation. There will be three rounds of data collection and analysis throughout the life of the project: (i) in the first year of implementation; (ii) at the midpoint of the implementation period; and (iii) upon conclusion of the Project. The Gender Action Plan also includes specific indicators to be monitored during project implementation : (a) Number of women who benefit from conservation, sustainable use or biodiversity restoration activities supported by the Project- target 1500; (b) Proportion of women among participants in decision-making processes regarding activities supported by the Project – target 40%; (c) Proportion of women among female participants in decision-making processes regarding activities supported by the Project who believe that these activities take into consideration their views and meet their needs – target 80%; (d) Proportion of women-led organizations and organizations where at least half of the members are women among the beneficiary organizations of the Project – target 40%; (e) Proportion of local content on conservation and sustainable production prepared for various media that incorporate gender aspects and women’s perspectives - target 80%; (f) Proportion of women among the members of the Management Councils of the Conservation Units supported by the Project – target 30%The following indicators will be monitored during project implementation, as defined in the GAP: Intermediate indicators monitored in the Brazil ASL Xingu project. Indicators Target and Time for Completion Gender Issues Assessment Assessment completed by the end of the first year of Project implementation Basic training sessions on gender issues held in protected areas 17 training sessions held by the end of the second year of Project implementation Basic training sessions on gender issues held with members from the Municipal Environmental Councils Five training sessions held by the end of the second year of Project implementation Evaluations of Gender Activities conducted by female beneficiaries Two evaluations completed (mid-term and end of the Project) Sexual harassment, abuse and exploitation cases adequately addressed through the Project Relationship Channel 100% Outcomes of the GAP will be evaluated according to the indicators and targets shown in Table below. Indicators and targets for evaluating the outcomes of the Brazil ASL Xingu Project. IndicatorsTargetsNumber of women who benefit from conservation, sustainable use or biodiversity restoration activities supported by the Project1500Proportion of women among participants in decision-making processes regarding activities supported by the Project40%Proportion of women among female participants in decision-making processes regarding activities supported by the Project who believe that these activities take into consideration their views and meet their needs.80%Proportion of women-led organizations and organizations where at least half of the members are women among the beneficiary organizations of the Project40%Proportion of local content on conservation and sustainable production prepared for various media that incorporate gender aspects and women’s perspectives.80%Proportion of women among the members of the Management Councils of the Conservation Units supported by the Project.30%Communities and general public engagement in public policy decision-making, planning and implementation will be explicitly supported under the project.The Project Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) comprises the following four fundamental pillars, each aimed at ensuring effective and inclusive stakeholder engagement:Pillar 1 – Identification of stakeholders: Ongoing and evolving stakeholder mapping to ensure all relevant voices are considered.Pillar 2 – Transparency and information disclosure: Sharing relevant information in a clear and accessible manner in order to keep all stakeholders well-informed about project progress and activities.Pillar 3 – Engagement with Stakeholders: Establishment of accessible channels to support dialogue with stakeholders and the public in general while ensuring active and collaborative participation. This pillar includes aspects related to:Critical integration of feedback: Consideration and integration of feedback from stakeholders in the implementation of project activities, in an ongoing adjustment and improvement process.Attention to vulnerable individuals and groups: A special focus on ensuring that the needs and concerns of vulnerable individuals and groups are addressed.Gender issues: Consideration of a gender perspective in all project activities and decisions by promoting equity between men and women. Pillar 4 – Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM): Implementation of effective mechanisms to respond to and redress grievances in a timely manner in order to ensure satisfaction and trust among stakeholders.These enabling pillars ensure that the SEP is an effective tool for the engagement and participation of all stakeholders by promoting a collaborative and transparent environment throughout the project life cycle. Each of these pillars is further detailed in subsequent chapters.In addition, citizen engagement and participation (through civil society and CBOs) are at the core of the project’s design. Consultations have been held with organizations representing the potential beneficiaries of the Project to define the scope of activities, areas of intervention, and targets of the Project. Furthermore, the SEP sets a robust strategy for continuous and meaningful consultation with Project beneficiaries (and particularly those who belong to disadvantaged and vulnerable social groups), including the creation of spaces for dialogue where members of local communities can express their opinions. Citizen engagement will be monitored and evaluated through two intermediary indicators: (a) number of beneficiaries from local communities who participate in decision-making processes regarding Project-supported activities and consider that they embody their visions and needs, and (b) grievances raised regarding the Project whose resolution was facilitated in an effective and prompt manner.The overall Risk Classification for the project is Moderate The Project environmental and social risk is rated as Moderate. The project will generate considerable environmental and social (E&S) benefits through due diligence for strengthening PA management, coordination and implementation of environmental protection policies, and strengthening sustainable natural resource-based production. Key E&S direct/indirect risks/impacts are expected to be moderate, predictable and reversible. They may include: increased natural resource use or risks to forest integrity due to inadequate implementation and/or monitoring of sustainable community forestry or natural resource management plans; temporary site-specific impacts of residue, pollution or resource use from small construction or remodeling works for Protected Areas management and vigilance infrastructure, or natural resource processing units; the minor generation of residues/leftovers by raw materials’ small processing units; water and natural resource use; contamination or erosion from inadequate pest and soil management; restrictions on land/natural resource use; inequitable access to project information/benefits; exposure of highly sensitive vulnerable communities and workers to communicable diseases and SEA/SH incidents. These risks can be prevented or mitigated with the adoption of best practices and adequate measures to be defined in the environmental and social risk management instruments. The Project design already incorporates some measures to prevent and mitigate impacts from timber and non-timber management, such as the provision of technical assistance and support to reviewing and updating Community-based Forest Management Plans, and to meet Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) standards that are environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable. Such measures will be complemented in the environmental and social risk management instruments for the Project, which will be prepared based on the existing ESMF, IPPF and PF of the previous Brazil ASL project (phases 1 and 2), which will be reviewed and updated to assess risks/impacts consistent with the ESSs, define mitigation measures, and screen out activities leading to significant negative impacts on natural/critical habitats, biodiversity, and remote communities no later than 30 days after Effectiveness. . The existing instruments are publicly available at the following dedicated web pages: a) ESMF - https://www.fgveurope.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/gestao-socioambiental_esmf_asl2_final_fgv_v18nov2020.pdf; b) IPPF - https://www.fgveurope.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/povos-indigenas_ippf_asl2_final_fgv_v18nov2020.pdf; and c) PF - https://www.fgveurope.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/process_framework_asl2_final_fgv_v18nov2020.pdf. The FGV, MMA, ICMBio, SFB, SEMAS and IDEFLOR-Bio have been demonstrating moderately satisfactory or better performance with the Bank’s safeguards through the implementation of the previous operation P158000 Brazil ASL project (phases 1 and 2), which triggered OP 4.01, OP 4.04, OP 4.36, OP 4.09, OP 4.11, OP 4.10 and OP 4.12. Although the Additional Financing (ASL Phase 2) was prepared after 2018, this is the first time the project will be fully implemented under the ESF. Capacity building needs of the executing agency will be addressed in the ESCP, which will also define the number and qualification of Environmental and Social specialists to be assigned to PEU-FGV.Global Environment Facility World Bank Ministry for Environment and Climate Change (MMA) CEO Endorsement Date ' Brazil 8562691 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11268 Global Environment Facility to reduce habitat loss and fragmentation, which are the main threats to Brazilian biodiversity, by enhancing the management of critical terrestrial and marine territories for large-scale conservation. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Socio-economic benefits in this project will be achieved in subcomponent 2.4 for Promotion of Sociobiodiversity Value Chains This subcomponent will focus on the development of biodiversity-based economies in support of local communities by fostering sustainable development and enhancing local livelihoods. The project will promote structural actions to support sustainable use practices developed by local communities in critical PAs for conservation, involving approximately 1,500 people. With a focus on promoting gender equity, the project aims to ensure that half of this target audience consists of women, either as direct or indirect beneficiaries. The project will support capacity-building for colective enterprises that empower local residents with new skills and knowledge. Training in sustainable practices and business management enables community members to diversify their income sources and improve their economic stability. This empowerment can lead to greater community resilience, as individuals and families become less reliant on potentially harmful practices like illegal logging or poaching. In turn, this reduces environmental degradation and supports the long-term health of the protected area, contributing to a more balanced and sustainable relationship between people and nature. Global Environment Facility Funbio IPE CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Brazil 16872477 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11269 Global Environment Facility To strengthen the capacity of indigenous peoples and local communities (IPs and LCs) in the Amazon and Cerrado biomes to produce and manage sociobiodiversity data and information as a strategy to effectively protect their territories, safeguard traditional knowledge and promote integrated biodiversity management. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.107. At the local level, socio-economic benefits will accrue to IPs and LCs, having a special focus on women, youth and elders, primarily through empowering them to strengthen claims for the protection of their territories and the promotion of traditional knowledge of sustainable development and management of local biodiversity. At the global level, benefits will be derived from promoting increases in scientific knowledge on the origin of species of interest and the different centers of plant domestication. Establishing clear ownership of biological resources and associated traditional knowledge will help prevent their unauthorized use, ensuring recognition and fair compensation for indigenous or local communities when their assets are exploited. 108. Similarly, organizing traditional knowledge on natural resource use, from hunting, food gathering, and nutrition to medicinal practices and cultural activities, is crucial for its protection and recognition. This will also enable the integration of conservation and sustainability measures from the perspectives of IPs and LCs. Encouraging meaningful discussions among IPs and LCs, having a special focus on women, youth and elders, about how to safeguard knowledge and practices concerning biodiversity management can contribute to both developmental objectives and global conservation efforts. 109. The application of CARE and FAIR principles will ensure the equitable distribution of these benefits among IPs and LCs beneficiaries, having a special focus on women, youth and elders. 110. We confirm that the Project design has considered socio-economic benefits to be delivered by the project and these have been clearly described in the Project Description and will be monitored and reported on during project implementation (at MTR and TE).Global Environment Facility UNEP International Institut of Education of Brazil (Instituto Internacional de Educação do Brasil – IEB) CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date Expected Completion Date ' Brazil Juminã Indigenous Land 4.07883 -51.58466 Mato Verdinho Retireiro Traditional Territory -10.9625 -50.7500 Extractive Reserve Cazumbá-Iracema -9.51426 -69.47317 Indigenous Land Alto Rio Negro 0.54000 -67.52528 Arara da Volta Grande do Xingu Indigenous Land -3.22014 -51.75833 Galibi Indigenous Land 3.95390 -51.72396 Uaçá Indigenous Land 3.48603 -51.48368 Morrinhos Quilombola Community -16.77154 -42.48310 Cuba Quilombola Community -17.08809 -42.53636 Bem Posta Quilombola Community -17.47988 -42.51961 Gentio Quilombola Community -17.45979 -42.58103 Macaúbas Quilombola Community -17.50978 -42.64738 Aldeia Ipatse, Kuikuro People, Xingu Indigenous Park -12.35231 -53.20908 Historical Site and Cultural Heritage Quilombo Kalunga -13.58328 -47.47148 Paquiçamba Indigenous Land -3.51759 -51.81099 6192695 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11327 Global Environment Facility The overarching goal of the project is to protect the Amazon rainforest by strengthening Amazon socio-biodiversity organizations, businesses, and supply chains, promoting a development model in the Brazilian Protected Areas System in the Amazon that empowers conservation stewards (ILPCs) by combining conservation with income generation. The estimated improvement of the effectiveness of protected areas (Resex, RDS, Flotas and APAs – IUCN categories IV and VI) reaches 11.9M hectares and provides global environmental benefits. The project strategy to achieve this goal is to use a non-grant instrument to support a common financial instrument in Brazil (CRA - agribusiness receivables certificate) innovatively, for the first time for sustainable production in the Amazon and leveraging Natura (Brazilian major cosmetic industry) strong and trusting relationship of 20 years built with local cooperatives. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Sustainable production in the Brazilian Amazon offers significant socio-economic benefits for local communities, fostering both environmental conservation and improved livelihoods. By promoting non-timber forest product harvesting practices, communities can generate diversified income streams while preserving the region's rich biodiversity. These activities reduce dependence on environmentally destructive practices like illegal logging and slash-and-burn agriculture, contributing to long-term ecological stability. Economically, sustainable production enhances food security and creates jobs. This, in turn, empowers local producers, strengthens value chains, and encourages entrepreneurship. Ultimately, sustainable production fosters resilient communities capable of thriving economically while safeguarding the Amazon's vital ecosystems. The project will increase the livelihoods of 20,000 people (number of family members of the direct beneficiaries). Economic Benefits Increased Income and Financial Inclusion: the project provide the necessary capital for cooperatives to invest in equipment, improve processing, or expand their operations. This directly leads to higher productivity and better quality products, which in turn results in higher sales and increased income for community members. Financial inclusion will be significantly enhanced, which is often a challenge in remote areas. Strengthened Value Chains: Technical assistance helps cooperatives professionalize their management, improve product quality, and meet market standards. This allows them to move beyond subsistence practices and reach new buyers/markets, reducing their dependence on intermediaries who often capture most of the profit. Job Creation and Local Economic Growth: As cooperatives grow and become more profitable, they create more jobs for community members, including women and youth, fostering a stronger local economy. This stimulates local commerce and reduces the pressure for residents to seek income in unsustainable industries like illegal logging or mining. Social and Governance Benefits Community Empowerment and Leadership: The technical assistance component focuses on building skills in business management, women and youth inclusion, governance, and financial literacy. This empowers community members—particularly women and young people—to take on leadership roles within the cooperative, strengthening local decision-making processes and organizational resilience. Preservation of Culture and Land: By providing a viable economic alternative, the project incentivizes communities to protect the standing forest and their traditional territories. This validates and strengthens traditional knowledge of natural resource management, connecting economic success to cultural and environmental preservation. Improved Quality of Life: Increased and stable income allows communities to invest in better education, health, and infrastructure, leading to a direct improvement in their overall quality of life. The success of the cooperatives also builds community cohesion and a shared sense of purpose. In essence, the Amazonia Viva project provides the tools for communities to be the primary beneficiaries of their own natural resources. It creates a self-reinforcing cycle where economic growth is directly linked to social development and environmental conservation. During project implementation the numbers of loans, value, number of families will be monitored.Global Environment Facility Funbio Vert CEO Endorsement Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Brazil RESEX MÉDIO JURUÁ -5.26617382181 -67.4665033354 6200000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11484 Global Environment Facility Expand the sustainable tourism business chain around and within protected areas of high value for biodiversity conservation in the Atlantic Forest Great Reserve Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.The Atlantic Forest Great Reserve project aims to foster sustainable economic development in communities located in key areas for biodiversity conservation. By advancing sustainable tourism and responsible production chains within and around Protected Areas (PAs), the initiative seeks to create stable income opportunities, enhance social inclusion, and strengthen local enterprises. Communities in the surrounding regions will benefit directly through job creation and training, skills development, and expanded economic opportunities tied to environmental stewardship. The project also emphasizes the valorization of traditional knowledge and the strengthening of local governance systems, with a focus on gender equity and the inclusion of youth. By positioning biodiversity as a core economic asset, the project supports the diversification of local economies, the growth of sustainable businesses, and the reduction of reliance on environmentally harmful practices. Its close collaboration with Protected Areas helps to safeguard endangered species and highlights natural capital as a driver of regional development. In addition, the initiative promotes ecotourism as a catalyst for income generation, building partnerships among local communities, the private sector, and public authorities. This integrated strategy combines environmental conservation with improved quality of life, fostering social inclusion, economic resilience, and sustainable development in one of Brazil’s most valuable biomes.Global Environment Facility Funbio Instituto de Pesquisa em Vida Selvagem e Educação Ambiental (SPVS) CEO Approval Date Actual Implementation Start Date ' Brazil 1784000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11565 Global Environment Facility To improve biodiversity conservation, diminish GHG emissions and improve climate change adaptation through sustainable management of areas outside PAs in the Caatinga (drylands) biome, connecting well conserved areas. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility Funbio FADURPE CEO Endorsement Date ' Brazil 5504588 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11574 Global Environment Facility To support national commitment towards the Minamata Convention through monitoring, control and reduction of mercury emissions from the cement industry in Brazil and synergies with innovative approaches planned under the Cement Technology Roadmap Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Health improvements and reduced exposure to hazardous substancesBy reducing mercury emissions from cement kilns and promoting the safe management of input materials and alternative fuels, the project will contribute to improved occupational and public health. Workers in cement plants, waste co-processing facilities, will benefit from lower exposure to mercury and associated health risks, including reproductive, neurological, and respiratory disorders. These improvements are particularly relevant for vulnerable populations such as women of reproductive age, children, and informal sector workers.Creation of sustainable livelihoods and green job opportunitiesThe project will support the growth of sustainable practices in the cement value chain, such as the expanded use of SCMs, improved waste co-processing, and environmental monitoring. These activities will generate demand for new technical roles and services, particularly in environmental analysis, logistics, and sustainable materials sourcing. Targeted capacity building and technical assistance will open up employment opportunities for youth, women, and local service providers, supporting more inclusive green job creation.Strengthening regulatory capacity and institutional resilienceBy improving the regulatory framework for mercury inventory, control and emissions monitoring, the project will enhance Brazil’s institutional capacity to enforce environmental standards and fulfill its Minamata Convention commitments. These institutional improvements will support broader efforts to modernize industrial oversight, increasing transparency and long-term governance resilience across the sector.Market transformation through innovation and competitivenessThrough its focus on clinker substitution, circular material flows, and alternative fuels, the project aligns with global trends in sustainable construction. By helping the industry meet environmental standards, it enhances competitiveness in both domestic and international markets. This transformation will also encourage investment in cleaner technologies and resource-efficient processes, improving the overall productivity and environmental performance of the sector.Improved resource efficiency and circular economy integrationThe project promotes the increased use of industrial by-products (e.g., fly ash, slag, phosphogypsum) as SCMs, diverting waste from landfills and reducing the demand for virgin raw materials. By embedding circular economy principles into cement production, the project contributes to more efficient resource use and reduced environmental degradation.Advancement of gender equity and inclusive participationBy integrating gender-responsive approaches into mercury risk reduction and environmental governance, the project will help address structural inequalities in the cement sector. Women, especially those in administrative, community-facing, or informal roles, will benefit from increased awareness, capacity-building, and representation in decision-making processes. This inclusive approach ensures that environmental benefits are equitably shared and socially sustainable.Support for national environmental and economic prioritiesThe project supports Brazil’s national development goals by aligning industrial decarbonization with chemical safety, circular economy, and inclusive growth. It contributes to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3 (Good Health and Well-being), 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 13 (Climate Action), reinforcing Brazil’s transition to a more sustainable and resilient industrial future.Global Environment Facility UNIDO University of São Paulo CEO Endorsement Date ' Brazil 12000000 GEF XI-BRIDGE-6385676864-11697 Global Environment Facility To reduce negative environmental and social impacts caused by mercury and mercury wastes from the chlor-alkali sector and other stocks of obsolete metallic mercury in Brazil. Note: Disbursement data provided is cumulative and covers disbursement made by the project Agency.Global Environment Facility UNEP Fundação Educacional Ciência e Desenvolvimento (FECD) CEO Endorsement Date ' Brazil 12000000 GEF